Out of the Pravda
Warning: Do not take these articles to serious as it is not, many of the so-called facts are in fact incorrect, hear saying's and maybe's. The fact that we publish it is because a time of a half year(near) in jail for an offense like this and although Erwin was wrong and acted in an extremely violent way which could have been a danger for many, is indeed wrong and against the law International and of the Dutch. Even if it could have been a serious terrorist attack, many people could have died. That it was a near innocent wax candle could not have been known by the security and the police they have to take direct action to avoid casualties. However it also shows that some people are able to make a story out of nothing and present it as actual.
-----------------------------------------------------
01-03-2011
The Queen's Bastille
So you thought the Netherlands was a democratic country? You thought human rights were being respected in that little Kingdom by the North Sea? You got it all wrong there. Don't you believe the Netherlands is a friendly constitutional monarchy with happy, loyal subjects tending their tulip fields and polishing their wooden shoes! Beatrix von Amsberg, the present queen, rules her realm like a medieval fiefdom, with an iron fist. Of course, there is a constitution, but in actual practice its lofty principles are not enforced.
Abroad, Beatrix von Amsberg is best known as the president of the Bilderberg group, one of the secret organizations trying to change the world by imposing a New World Order. Actually, Mrs. Von Amsberg is the only Bilderberg member who is at the same time the leader of a sovereign nation. She has been in office ('on the throne') since 1980.
Today, government-sponsored polls report a mere 50% approval rate, indicating that most Dutch nationals nowadays would like to see the monarchy abolished. If at the moment of her accession, Beatrix may have enjoyed a modicum of popularity, in the course of her 40-year reign she has thus lost the support of the majority of her subjects. Like all autocrats and dictators, Beatrix's reaction to the dwindling support has been vindictive and vicious.
On September 21, 2010, as she was riding in her gold-plated state coach on her way to the opening of the parliamentary year Mr. Erwin Lensink (29) threw a small crystal candle-holder, hitting the coach. The object was too small to do any damage, since under its shining golden surface the coach is heavily armoured. Mr. Lensink was immediately worked to the ground by a dozen police officers, handcuffed and thrown in jail.
This is the way both democracies and dictatorships deal with those who vent their anger at the system. But from there on, democracies usually treat their prisoners with some human dignity. Dictatorships subject them to unusual and cruel punishment, even torture. You might therefore have expected the Dutch to give Mr. Lensink a decent treatment. Unfortunately, this is not the case.
Charged with assault and attempted assassination, Mr. Lensink has been waiting more than five months in the country's top maximum security prison for his trial to begin. The date has now been set for March 15. Meanwhile, anytime Mr. Lensink has complained about the treatment he was receiving, he was put in isolated confinement. Under both Dutch law and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it is prohibited to keep defendants locked up for an unreasonably long period of time while they are awaiting trial.
The charges are outrageous and preposterous. There is no way Mr. Lensink could have posed a danger to the lives of either Beatrix or her son and daughter-in-law who were with her in the gold-plated coach. Even so, Mr. Lensink is facing a multi-year jail sentence. The trial will decidedly NOT be a fair one: both judges (appointed by the queen) and lawyers are required to swear an oath of allegiance to the queen. You can imagine the defendant's chances in a legal system that is so heavily weighted against him.
Moreover, Mr. Lensink constitutes a special case. The nature of his grudges against the so-called royal family must be extremely worrisome to the queen, since he claims she is a usurper. In fact, he contends that Beatrix holds no legal claim to the throne because she does not descend from the last king of the House of Orange, William III, who died in 1890. Suffering from a serious case of syphilis, it is extremely unlikely King William could have fathered a daughter (Wilhelmina, Beatrix's grandmother) in the same year he died. Nor is Beatrix the first daughter of her Mother, Queen Juliana. Wilhelmina allowed her own husband, German Prince Heinrich of Mecklenburg, to systematically rape their daughter. Thus at 18 years of age, Juliana gave birth to a daughter, who was discreetly whisked off to the confines of a monastery far removed from the royal palace. (There exists a wealth of evidence on this sad episode).
Actually, it is this first-born illegitimate daughter, born of an incestuous relationship, and not Beatrix that should have become queen after Juliana stepped back in 1980. Mr. Lensink has repeatedly requested Queen Beatrix undergo a DNA-test. You may guess what has been the answer.
As if the charges of illegitimacy weren't enough, Mr. Lensink also contends his grandfather was sacrificed in order to help Queen Wilhelmina escape to England when the Nazis attacked the Netherlands in 1940. At the very same time the Dutch army was putting up a fierce and desperate resistance against the vastly superior German army, Beatrix's grandmother Wilhelmina fled to England on a warship, taking with her all the gold from the National Bank. Meanwhile hundreds of valiant Dutch soldiers, having been led to believe they were fighting for queen and country, were giving their lives for a lost cause.
In conclusion, Beatrix the Bilderberger has sound reasons to regard Mr. Lensink as a very dangerous man. His actions and contentions are a threat to the survival of the monarchy. Therefore, she had him locked up in her own version of the Bastille, the Vught Maximum Security Prison.
Would you consider Mr. Lensink a political prisoner? I certainly would.
Hans Vogel
---------------------------------------------
NOTE: Mr. Vogel clearly did not check the facts. First there are severe doubts that before Erwin Lensinks absurd action the Queen would have known of Mr. Lensink, and we may doubt of she sees him as a dangerous man. A sad man with mental delusions maybe, dangerous NO. The actions of Mr. Lensink are certainly no treat to the Queen or the House of Orange. There is absolute no proof of that illegitimate daughter, other then maybe, possible, fabrications. Mr. Lensink is not in a Bastille and not in the maximum security section of the prison. Hans Vogel could have that checked easy and rather simple. The prison is part of the department of Justice in the Netherlands. Although the Queen is head of State she has no control or ownership possibilities. Above all the Queen in 1940 did not take all the Dutch gold with her. The Dutch government in charge of the gold, not the Queen had already shipped this before the Queen left. That also could have been easy checked by Mr. Vogel. Mr. Vogel always has articles with critic on others for their failings and that is just what he is doing.
Even if you go through the ramblings of the very person's that in their grudge against the Dutch Royal family are willing to fabricate anything they see as a change to spread their lack of mental stability. However in the case of Erwin Lensink they did not contact the prison authorities although not before we contacted them to verify. Nor did they inquire the reason as why no bail was given to Lensink, in which case he was shown and told the instability of the mind of Lensink. Mr. Erwin Lensink is certainly not a political prisoner but a person who on a day that is enjoyed by most Dutch attempted to create a act of violence out frustration that he did not received the report of conclusion about the suspected suicide of his mother in 2008, and that is the reason of his locking up.
Chancer's then changed this into his grudge against the Royal family. However if this was done in the US Erwin would possible face the death penalty. This time as it turned out it was an waxine candle, at that time the security not the police knew that they took the right decision as this, which way you want to look at it at that time an terrorist attack. What if the waxine candle was in reality not a candle but a hand granate would if that had caused an explosion the people still say poor Erwin? The reason of no bail is that regarding previous actions of Mr. Lensink it was seen that it was more save to hold him.
He was not tortured although he was held for 4 days in solitaire confinement due to his aggressive behaviour. His own phone calls (regular) show that he is everything but in an isolation cell.(prison authorities). His own reactions and writings are giving that conclusion. Mr. Lensink seems to be suffering of delusions and therefore is a grateful subject of the mischief makers. He has the illusion that the Queen of the Netherlands has no right to be Queen, and all the negative points in his live and there are many are the fault of the State or the Queen herself, it is sad but this are the facts. His case if any is taken up by the Klokkenluideronline side and is based on a rambling collections of suggestions half truth fabrications and lies plus an hate against everything that has authority, by people who have no direction in life and only want to see the negative in anything that does happen. Therefore read the article with a humour rich mind, and feel sorry for the writers and pursuers of his case.
Gideon Cohen.
===============================================================
03-03-2011
Some times we want to have a good laugh and what better place to find some good laughs then at the many so-called religion sides. They are the masters who take a story make up two thousands years ago and set it then in a present situation. Sad but it is good for a laugh. Look at the story they have made active now to collect the funds they need.
They are now expecting two upcoming wars which are indicated in Isaiah 17 and Ezekiel 38/39 and Psalm 83. However nor in Isaiah 17, Ezekiel 38/39 and Psalm 83 is there any indication that even in the slightest of way's point to any war today or in the future. We are watching for two upcoming wars which are described in Psalms 83, Isaiah 17 and Ezekiel 38. By Christian fanatics and money makers this is shown as the situation is to day. However the writers of that story Ezekiel by his own admission was a captive in Babylon when he wrote this. He had no knowledge of any of political situation of today nor did he have any knowledge that there were more countries and land in the world then the lands he knew of.
When Christian fanatics and money makers are saying: When both wars are analysed to exact detail, it points toward the Psalms 83 war preceding the Ezekiel 38 war.They mean actual, that they are talking rubbish but hope that you will buy their literature so that they make some money. Their view of the timing of the wars is marked by hints in scripture, they say although what ever version of the Bible you read there are no hints. The Psalms 83 group of nations that have made a confederacy against Israel are missing in the group of nation listed in Ezekiel 38. The scripture also says that the weapons of war will be burned for 7 years in Ezekiel 39 which seems to align with the last week of Daniel.
Naturally the group of Countries against Israel are missing from Ezekiel and Psalm of Asaph, as most of the countries now did not exist in Ezekiel times. In fact Ezekiel mentioned only one Country Magog or Magoch which ever version you read the leader or king is Gog all versions are clear about that. However there are many stories in the Middle East history that are mention Gog and Magog. It is from there that Ezekiel said that Gog made a pact with other kings to wipe the Israeli out as they were interfering and aggressive. Some stories say the others were the Persian, who were much nearer to Israel then they are now, others say they were the Moors, but also Ethiopia and Libya are mentioned. In the centuries following upon today the area of enemies as was intended by Ezekiel is enlarged almost daily.
Here we going in the old habit of having one occurrence and then try to make it to fit of into any situation you want. What the real word for this is Fraud, Lying and confidence tricks. After all those Christian side's knowing very well what the story is and what it did mean. In Ezekiel's case it was meaning that one day Israel could start the fight back and be one strong country again. The Christian side's will point to this and say you see we were right, Ezekiel was right, Israel is strong again. Wrong, Ezekiel was talking about all the tribes of Israel. The present situation is only Judah. Judaism is present in Israel the other tribes for more then 2000 years were not to be seen or heard from. Again was this the fantasy of the writers of the Bible 2500 years ago as twelve tribes sound better and more stabilising then just one tribe. However telling their readers this would not bring in the money, so that part is simple ignored.
Other Christian side are saying that Psalm 83 want to wipe Israel of the map, it does not say that, they simple having enough of the always quarrelling and conniving argument al Israelis. It that context it should be known that the bible clearly shows that from the time Abram returned from Egypt his group attacked almost every other tribe around them in their expansion drive. Thereby as the bible clearly indicates and on which the Israeli are very proud, they were lying and cheated with fraudulent actions not only the Egyptians out of a fortune but did the same with the Ammonites and the Philistines, not exactly a way to make friends. However it was more then enough to annoy other tribes and states, to make them to wanting revenge. Some Christian sides put it that the root of the hate against Israel has it roots in the Islamic countries. This is absolute rubbish and they know it but it can attract money which is the reason for mention it. However the Islam was only created more then thousand years after Ezekiel statement and even longer after Asaph's Psalm.
Even more so the early Islam and the Jewish community outside Medina in what is now Saudi Arabia were living peaceful together, till the time that they started to create the as usual trouble as which result they were driven out. This is simple hate creation by those Christian website who with that violating their own learning and principles in the hope that they can earn a couple of bucks.
Take this statement found on one of the much money making Christian website. The language is out of today's headlines and the countries lined up against Israel in this Psalm match the neighbours who are in this revolution. The Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, said that Israel must be wiped off the map. Besides the fact that the Iran President did not say this, as is highlighted many of times but is just a racist invention by Zionist to score point, the countries against Israel and that are 98 out of the 142 countries of the world or to put it more clearly one billion people living in those Israel supporting countries, which leaves five and a half billion of people in the countries against Israel. Most of the countries now against Israel did not exist in the time of Asaph Psalm. Most of those countries were tribes with no exact place of living and moved around till they settled on the places they are now.
Look at some of the fantasies that have to bring the money out of the pockets by the readers of those sites.
Hagrites (Hagarenes are Egyptians)
Arau (Mid and N. Sinai they are Bedouins)
Gebal (Hezbollah & N. Lebanese)
Amman (Palestinians and N. Jordanians)
Moab (E. Dead Sea S. Jordan)
Amalek (Arabs of the S. Sinai area)
Philistia (Hamas of the Gaza Strip)
Tyre (Hezbollah and S. Lebanese)
Assyria (Syria and N. Iraqis)
Persian (Iran and turkey)
Gomer (N. Lebanon)
Aram (S. Syria)
Aramean (N. E. Jordan)
Nabatu (N. Saudi)
Edom (Negev)
Magog (Russia)
Meshech and Tubal (S. Russia, the Scythians)
Another statement that always is used to create hate is Isaiah 17.1 The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap.
That is then followed by, this is the trigger for Russia to step in. The logic is not to be found but money is there to be made so who cares. That actual the Bible speaks over about a time period of 3 years after the Moab situation of Isaiah 16.14. However Ezekiel said that the war against Magog was to take wealth and riches from Israel. Wars are always made to gains however; in that time Israel was nearly stripped of all they had so that it was obvious that Magog wanted the land. Ezekiel 38:1 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying, Son of man, set thy face against Gog, the land of Magog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal, and prophesy against him.
Ezekiel 38-39 has to occur before Daniels 70th week can begin because it's the Battle of Ezekiel 38 that brings Israel back to the Lord and makes the Temple mentioned in Daniel 9:27 necessary. Therefore all that talk that Ezekiel was talking about the end battle is utterly rubbish. The battle against the Van Kingdom was done before Daniel 70th week as Israel was restored to the Lord. It is not known what is the obsession to see all what is written in the bible as an event somewhere in the future, it is not. It is a story, sometimes rambling of the Hebrews in their early years when they needed to put the people together and stay one people. That event failed, Israel and Judah where fighting each other. The Northern part of Israel fell in foreign hands and further wars instigated by Judea made sure that a 400 years later not much was left of the state of Judea. Then Rome made sure that indeed the state of Israel was wiped of the map.
The battle of Israel can be seen in another version of a good book. Take the battle of Gondor out of the Lords of the Rings by JRR Tolkien. After all the traditional
How should followers of Christianity react to 'The Lord of the Rings'? These films and books take us into a world of unseen powers and predictions. That is just as the bible shows us power and predictions, however does that mean that we should take the Lord of the rings serious just as the Lord of Christianity. After all both stories following the same line of powers and predictions. The same lost and won battles, the same battle for legal and illegal kingdoms, the same treachery, cheating and lies. The question is it right for people to belief a book with many stories, a quest to be for filled, above all is it right that people actual turn those stories into a religion belief?
Is the world into which those stories take us if we start to belief them if we take them as serious would that not be dangerous? And if that believing is OK, what is the real difference between 'The Lord of the Rings and the Bible. Can we see those stories as dark materials and continue story a fact of life and religion? And how many people think Lord of the Rings has to do with the Bible? There is Good vs. Evil, like Sauron as is the Devil and Sarumon as the Anti-Christ, Man and Hobbits against all evil, Like Israel against the world. The death of Suramon is the survival of the Good. Just as the Death of Christ is the survival of the good.
Could it be that Middle-Earth created by Tolkien was a kind of Earth beginning with the Elves or Hobbits as the earlier inhabitants? Like the story in the Bible it is certainly a mythical world where as by the mythical story of the bible is taken serious, but the world of the Hobbits is an world genuine good versus evil, with deep personal decisions, the sin of one Gollum as a sin which could destroy the Hobbits world, just as in the Bible the sin of man could destroy the world. In both books the power is carried by angels or elves, both mystic and mysterious.
However do us really belief that what was written into the bible is a prediction for the future, are we so gullible that we need to hold on that kind of stories to get a stable life, (or make a lot of money in the process). We do not stop people believing, they have their free choice to do so, and people can believe whatever they want to believe. Having said that it goes too far to create and re-create the stories to suit an occasion because there is money to be made. After all just as the Greece mythology, the Bible story is a mythology and can only be looked at via a mythographical perspective.
What does happen today in the world has no relationship with what did happen in the stories of the Bible, many occurrences in there cannot be verified or located names like Magog, and although that land could be with near certainty be the Kingdom of Van with the Meshech being the Scythians.
There are further stories from the Jewish being a Roman Josephus but we really would not put much confidence in his writings. After all it is proven that he wrote what his master wanted to hear. Annex to that the persons character has to be seen dubious, special his survival of the Roman onslaught in which he, while all others died managed to survive, and as an enemy not only was warmly welcomed but appointed to the emperor almost instantly. As the Americans would say, we have a traitor in our mid.
Believe what you want, that is our right, but do not be taken in by stories which by closer looking turning out to be good stories to listen to, but not to spent any money on.
================================================================
05-03-2011
Hiding from reality.
Where ever in the Western world you see the salon Buddhists and hear them talking, they will tell you that the faith of the future is Buddhism as Buddhism never go to war kill or fight. Special the political linked SGI an NGO which pride themselves that they are that Buddhist organisation that works and act in peace only. Maybe that is so in the mind of the easy indoctrinated followers, or actual brainwashed followers, and it is now doubt the intention that the organisers have in mind that the SGI should look like. However there can not be any doubt that the organisers only want to have a army of brainwashed followers, followers who abandoning friends and family, ignore in many cases their parents, (unless they need money or an other form of help) They follow the learning’s of Nicheren a Japanese creator of his own form of Buddhism which brought him in conflict with almost every group of Buddhist in his time, with every ruler of his time and even with the people who followed him in that time. It brought him many times in conflict with the authorities and even a death penalty avoided by his death. The SG without the now I for International was banned in Japan for being a linked political organisation. Noticing this the question does arise is Buddhism pacifist? One would think so, if you hear the Declarations of the Dalai Lama and those who claim there has never been "Buddhist war.
We may expect that the Zen Buddhism's force to militarism been only an aberration, after the timeless message of Gautama, the warrior-prince who, once he became the Buddha, preached non-violence. Here we are confronted with the reality and the story of a peaceful form of faith called Buddhism. However, Buddhism has no concept of a fighting they say. This however, does not mean that they did not do so. Nor does it means that its doctrine not at times legitimises the recourse to violence killing and war.
Look at the situation of the Buddhists of Sri Lanka, this as an example, they have openly taken up the struggle against the Tamil freedom fighters. The problem with the Western salon Buddhist is that they will find any excuse to exclude the Buddhist from violence and wars. However, the quantity of Buddhist who has been fighting wars since the early beginnings is considerable larger then the Christians or the Muslims war s and over a considerable longer period. So what is the lyrical excuse of those Buddhist? To keep it simple all the wars of Buddhist countries were not wars by Buddhists but by Buddhist governments, they had nothing to do with the Buddhists population. That was the government of the country against an other government of another country.
Christians were involved in many wars as they were Christian Countries. Muslim countries went to many wars because they were Muslim countries. But as the Buddhist did not have a Buddhist country collective in faith but just had a Buddhist population with an Buddhist faith and an Buddhist government, therefore that fact did not make the country an Buddhist country as Buddhism is an personal, self centred undertaking, while Christians and Muslims are together in a collective religion and therefore their wars are in the eyes and convictions Christian and Muslim wars. At such that band of religion does not exist between the Buddhists and for that reason the wars by Buddhists governments were not Buddhist wars. For that reason Buddhist have never fought a war.
However, what is true of Japanese Zen holds equally for other sections of Buddhism. Long before the lyrical metaphysical learning’s exerted their charm upon the unexpected population, Buddhism took hold first and foremost as a tool for protecting States and their governments. That those actions were wars was an excuse to protect the land that could not be helped, murder, on the other hand, murder and killings was and is still clearly condemned. As the Buddha states in the Brahma Net Sutra: "If a child of Buddha himself kills, or goads someone else to kill, or provides with or suggests means for killing, or praises the act of killing or, on seeing someone commit the act, expresses approval for what that person has done, or kills by way of incantations, or is the cause, occasion, means, or instrument of the act of inducing a death, he will be shut out of the Buddhist community. Added should be here unless it was to protect the Buddhist laws.
However the Brahma Net Sutra provides in many instances an ideal ideology for counter forces, inspiring peasant revolts cantered on the coming of the future Maitreya Buddha. In one of these movements, in China, arising at the start of the sixth century rebels, using the Buddhist title of "Grand Vehicle" (Mahayana), undertook to rid the world of its "demons" starting with the Buddhist clergy. Going on from there Buddhism managed to pave the way for feudal struggles, creating a new type of religious figure, the "warrior monk. It is only at the end of the sixteenth century, after centuries of many struggles, that the great monasteries were controlled by the military government. The ensuing subordination explains in part why, after the Meiji Restoration, the Japanese Buddhism proved no force anymore against militarism, and fell into line with the states principles.
However for practical reasons the golden rule was still, "when Buddhist Law is threatened, it is necessary to ruthlessly fight the forces of evil". The kill and kill them all does not differ from what the USA, Israel and the UK practising at the moment The rule and law that by their religion they should not kill is buried in the freezer for the time being. The never kill of the Buddhist is when it comes to defend the Buddhist law turned into "Kill them all, and the Buddha will recognize his own". The killings in such an occurrence qualified as "liberation," since the demon, duly killed out of compassion, will be released from its ignorance and can then be reborn under better auspices. (Karma)The crucial moment in Tibetan ritual dances comes when the priests stab an effigy personifying the demon forces. Basically it is right to kill out of charity or compassion, to prevent another person from committing evil.
There is historic documentation that in 621 monks from the Shaolin Temple of China fought in a battle that helped establish the Tang Dynasty. In centuries past, the heads of Tibetan Buddhist schools formed strategic alliances with Mongol warlords and reaped benefits from the warlords' victories. The Tibetan Buddhist were standing at the front in their actions against the Chinese, including killing not so long ago. But then again the links between Zen Buddhism and samurai warrior culture were partly responsible for the shocking collusion of Zen and Japanese militarism in the 1930s and 1940s. Zen institutions not only supported Japanese military aggression but raised money to manufacture war planes and weapons.
In recent years Buddhist monks have been leaders of political and social activism in Asia. The Saffron Revolution in Burma and the March 2008 demonstrations in Tibet are the most prominent examples. Most of these monks say they are committed to non-violence, and then presented the always there being exceptions. Look at the monks of Sri Lanka who lead the Jathika Hela Urumaya, a strongly nationalist group that advocates a military solution to Sri Lanka's civil war. The excuse here is that sometimes Buddhists have to fight to defend the Buddhist laws, their nation, their home and family. This is not seen as a wrong. It hides however that any act of war that sows the seeds of future harmful karma is still akusala. "The Buddha did not teach His followers to surrender to any form of evil power be it a human or supernatural being."
Sometimes Buddhist using the excuse that they are forced to go to war by others who do not respect the concept of the brotherhood of humans as taught by the Buddha. They may be called upon to defend their country from external aggression, and as long as they have not renounced the worldly life, they are duty-bound to join in the struggle for peace and freedom. Under these circumstances, they cannot be blamed for becoming soldiers or being involved in defence. It does not mean that they as Buddhist are going to war doing the killings but those they defending duty-bound the laws of Buddha however, if everyone were to follow the advice of the Buddha, there would be no reason for war to take place at all. It is the duty of every cultured person to find all possible ways and means to settle disputes in a peaceful manner, without declaring war to kill his or her fellow human beings, but if they do not want to listen then again duty-bound they would have to defend themselves against the invaders of the laws of Buddha.
Today there are more than 5,000 Buddhists serving in the USA armed forces, including some Buddhist monks. Today's Buddhist soldiers and sailors are not the first. During World War II, approximately half of the troops in Japanese-American units were Buddhists. In most army units in the world are Buddhist soldiers fighting for them the Buddhist laws are covered as they do not violate the laws they are duty-bound. That was always the case special in Asian Countries. One of them that come to mind was the Ikko Ikki revolts. They were a religious/political movement in the 1400s-1500s Japan that basically seized various important parts of Japan in revolt against the samurai, and even managed to overthrow one daimyo. At the end they lost and were put down by warlords in the name of Buddha. After that most Buddhist sects and temples in Japan had warrior monks attached to them to defend and to attack and they were almost constant fighting each other over matters of doctrine, power and territory.
Was Japan almost constantly at war civil and otherwise but look at Burma and Thailand/Siam they were almost constant fighting each other, Siam fought a few wars with Vietnam, and so on. There's been a lot of war in Southeast Asia, regardless of the Buddhist population. Historically, Buddhist countries have not been on average any more peaceful than non-Buddhist countries. South-eastern Asia is overwhelmingly Buddhist and the various nations of that region have been happily butchering each other both before and after the advent of Buddhism in the region.
Wasn't the Empire of Tibet brought down (or at least weakened) by sectarian violence between the Bon religion and the Buddhist converts? This was without a doubt a religion war in which Buddhist monks happily assassinated the Bon emperor and his family. Look at Pol Pot whose atrocities were supported by the Cambodia's traditional Buddhism which may have actually increased the atrocities that happened there. Basically it says Buddhism's ideas about suffering allowed people to distance themselves enough to commit and accept really horrific acts. After all, if all life is suffering, what does it matter if you are making people suffer a bit more? Another one is Sri Lanka. A Buddhism-Hinduism divide has played out as a minor theme in the greater overarching Singhalese-Tamil divide. Not to forget there was also the warlike period that ended in the Tang dynasty.
The reality is that the Buddhist you shall not kill is an image to attract the easy led the "I want something else" younger population who is fed up with the constant wars between the religions led by the USA, Israel and the UK. The brand Buddhism stands for no wars, no killings an ideal that find an easy ground for the disillusion mind of the younger generation in which they do not have to think. However it is a Brands Advertising, the reality is that Buddhism is just as violent, warlike and killing as any other faith or religion they just have learned to pack it in a more peaceful packing.
=================================================================
07-03-2011
Wiesi woosi Warsi!
The Leader of that little island called Britain seems to think that without his opinion the world would come to a stand still. Fact is that by lack of action that Britain is almost already at a stand still with Banks and the IMF warning for dire consequences if he not start to do something for the people is supposedly to lead. And here is where the leader comes unstuck. It is one thing of making all kind of fantastic statements, one thing of presenting ideological plans with no link to reality, it is a complete other thing to actual take actions.
Take some of his statements before and after his self appointed election as he did not win the countries majority but has to work with an ego tripper who has only one thing in mind on how to become a permanent Euro commissioner and be settled for life, Britain or his party they do not come in to it. We will reduce the many guango’s he said, they are still there some in altered form some linked together so that it looks like they are gone, but are still existing into another name or quango. After all he has to keep his friends in cosy jobs. We do not say that this is a typical English occurrence we see it here in France happening as well although there are better controls. Some rules need to be relaxed he said red tape need to be cut. By hearing this we were thinking on making business easier and straight forward, however, apparently that red tape is the tape used to cut by opening something official.
We will make Britain stand on the forefront of the carbon emission fight, now that sounds something worth looking at, what kind of measures would he take if he would take any. For starters people will get government money to insulate their homes, however only if you own it privately, the renters can still freeze to death under the British government rules to save money quickly, after all every death is one benefit less. The sea the biggest treat to Britain will not be restricted anymore; no money will be available to strengthening sea walls or river dyke's. From the British government point of view again it is a waste of money. After all most people living on low land are the poor people and if those perish again the government principle of saving money, indeed saves money as every death is a benefit saved.
Improve a home that was his slogan, so now if someone needs to improve their home they need so many planning permits that the cost of doing the improvement is as such that people cannot afford it. Take the double glazing it can only be done by special appointed firms with a permit from the government quango the Fensa, Fensa is a quango part of a quango as an extension of yet another quango that is part of the main quango. Difficult to understand but then again the government ministers have many friend who need to be rewarded in a cosy job with an impressed title in which they have to do nothing then once in a while to show their faces. The prototype of a British quango, the one who he said would be abolished.
We need to take sharp action against those in society who do not want to live peaceful annex others. We will not allow that Muslim extremist are terrorising the communities and we will take sharp action he said. It sound fantastic and so it is. Just now a man who violated the remembrance of the fallen soldiers is fines 50 pounds, the perpetrator being a Muslim. On the other hand a man who accidental damaged a car belonging to a Muslim was fined 150 pound plus 600 damages. One law for the Muslims and one very unfair law for the rest. That is Cameron's idea of living peaceful, he is living peaceful alright while the population is suffering, and he is living in riches while the population is poor but that is just the value of being a Conservative leader everything for one nothing for the rest. However where is his contempt for the English coming from, his contempt, obvious contempt of Christians on the British isle of which he is supposedly the leader?
A leader who has more interest to serve his American masters and clean up in Libya so that the American can control yet another country. That the British people have to pay for it with money they do not have, but will be borrowed to them by the US bankers who have their own source of obtaining money they do not have. When Assange exposed the dealings of the US the British were double quick to make him ready for extradition to Sweden who had made a trap in order of the US to get hold on Assange, normal for an Swedish government who has shown over the last 100 years that they as an government have the mentality of a sewer, smelling so bad that most Swedish now have left the country. It is question of "He who pays the piper" so they did the German bidding in WW2 and now do the USA bidding till someone else comes around who pays more.
In the time between most Sweden are so disgusted with their governments that the majority lives now in the rest of the world and Sweden is almost empty, besides of African and Asian immigrants. As an matter of curios coincidence the same judge who in fact said well done to the Muslim who damaged the remembrance of the fallen soldiers by given a token fine is the same judge who decided on feeble grounds and an offence that is not proven, of which there is no proof then heresy decided that a criminal like Assange should be extradited for a crime that is not a crime in any western country then Sweden, and even there it is not accepted as such. A clear sign that this judge seems to go to the side that is most important on that moment in time. In the case of the criminal act of the Muslim who deliberate damaged the remembrance of the fallen soldiers he followed the Conservative line of praise the Muslims.
Now here is coincidence, maybe the British people noticed the deafening silence when a Christian member of parliament in Pakistan was murdered, mentioned in all papers but not a word from the government. A government who screams murder when an Israeli citizen is killed, any American is killed, citizen in Libya are killed but not a word, not a sound not even a beep when that MP was killed. Worst of all the Muslim chairperson of the Conservative party a party who's commands Cameron has to obey, Baroness Warsi daughter of a Pakistani immigrant who called all English muslim phobic, kept stumm, not a word not a sound not a whisper not a beep by the killing of a Christian MP. Not a word not a sound not whisper not a beep by the killing of Christians in Egypt, in Nigeria, Ivory coast, Iraq, Iran, Israel to go on with the list would create a list too long for this article. She stayed silence, she is normally the first to jump on the band wagon of minorities special Muslim minorities in which she tries to speculate in dividing the moderates and extremist by suggesting that it are the British people who are Muslim Phobic. We have no doubt that in her capacity as the Conservative Chair person she will do all she can to protect those poor misunderstood Muslims who committed the 7/7 atrocities.
For the Conservative party, seen in Britain as the party for the rich and wealthy only and a party that after 13 years in opposition could not even manage during a sharp recession to win outright even not with the total out support of the American newspapers in Britain, it is now obvious who is paying the piper, the Muslim conservatives. How an obvious religion deluded self-centred ignorant person can become an Chair of one of the two biggest parties in Britain is for an average person not to understand, however money talks and were the money is coming from that section delivers the Chair. Even if Britain is a 70% Christian Country, Muslim rules and the leader of the country, although leader is an to big word it is more the self appointed unselected man who tries to run Britain into the ground, has to make his daily bows for the Muslim chair and obey her regardless of he likes it or not. Then again he likes money; therefore he likes the persons were the money is coming from. Point here is that if anyone would come near a Muslim person and makes a move that could be seen as an treat even if it is not, the police will down as a ton of bricks and arrest that person, that person will get a kicking from them his home will be wrecked in the search for something they know is not there and then will be charged with threatening behaviour against a Muslim and resisting arrest by the police, worst if they by coincidence find an photo of a child then the person is also accused of being a paedophile.
Baroness Warsi will be on TV telling the Christian British people how evil they are by attacking the Muslims and that paedophiles are now targeting Muslims children. That neither a Muslim was threatened not the person was a paedophile but an happy married person does not the matter, the press will take over the story and when a week is passed the person who done actual nothing is accused of being a member of the BNP (British National Party) a leading member of a paedophile group and was intending to bomb a nearby mosque. The man in question in the mean time is holding on terrorist charges intended but not made yet. Weird new papers such as the Telegraph are supporting Baroness Warsi, as they say the British hate Muslims. The telegraph was never a newspaper that got his comments right but as a newspaper that has more Muslims readers then English they have to. However there is not hate against Muslims that is just in the mind of the extremists such as Warsi and her supporting newspaper the Telegraph. English look how someone behaves themselves not how they look. Peter Osborne who is the staunch supporter or Warsi need to get a slice of reality of life. It is the Muslims who are not adapting to the English way of life and demand that the English should adapt to their way of life. It is not the English who are blowing up the Muslims, but Muslims blowing up the English. Peter Osborne can find that amusing, Warsi can see that as Muslim phobic, the facts are that so far the Muslim organisations have not spoken out against the killing of Christians.
The old saying that he who is not for me is against my, is doing very well in the Muslim world they have made under the inspired lead of the Conservative chair perfectly clear that they see Christians as against them. Under the Islamic laws that mean that those are now enemies and need to be destroyed. It is therefore that Baroness Warsi can be seen as the fifth column working against the English. By not condemning the murders on Christians the Muslim community under the leadership of Warsi and the support by Cameron have made it clear that the only good Christian is a death one.
It would be a step forwards if deluded persons like Warsi realise that being a Muslim believes in the Islam as a religion, not as a life style. There are many religions in the UK they all are living peacefully next to each other the Muslims are the odd one out as they see their religion as a life style to whom all have to obey. It is this what set of the mode against Muslims it is their behaviour, their ignorance, their basic violence.
Here in France we have recognised that Muslims are not united by nations by love for a country but only by the rules of the Islam. Unfortunately the Islam demands that unbelievers are turned around to be Muslim or to be killed. Only under that notification there is a possibility to control their absurdities or otherwise like the Netherlands to submit yourself to it. The actions and the lack of actions by a party under Muslim control such as the Conservatives need to make it clear that Muslims are a part of the British communities and as such have to behave themselves. Only if the Muslims accept that living annex other believes is the way of progress the antipathy created by them will be eradicated.
Like in any religion or believe there will be always fanatics, extremist and basically violent people is for those religions their duty to the country they are living in to report those fanatics and extremists. As so long as people like Warsi stir the controversy in fact support the killing of Christians by not condemning it life will be difficult in Britain and the stream of British who are leaving the country will be growing faster and faster.
===============================================================
09-03-2011
The presumption is being a Christian is the result of an up-bringing and what the parents told them not because of a conviction. The children are fed the Christian principles and later take that to a Christian school in effect they are Christians as a kind of inheriting from the parents. The bible and the learning’s of the educated Christian teachers can strengthen the faith, but the basics are there from birth. Then there are people who due to an occurrence in life decided to put there faith in the Christian believe. Others are simple carolled into it by the need for food or work.
Some people say that Christianity comes to you as a conviction; however it is proven that this is not the case. However it is said because the simple fact that people are indoctrinated by their parents and peers does not look that good if you want to proof that Christianity is the ultimate saviour for the soul. Therefore a person typically becomes a Christian not because of evidence but because of conviction. Conviction that is made up of 99% faith. Faith in something that we really haven't even asked for evidence beyond our Bible for. The Christians but also for any other religion don't really view belief as an evidential outcome, we view it as a cloud of the feeling of sensation that has overcome us as we hear study and read about our Christianity.
They the Christians as also for other religions do not care about the way of evidence other than they have found satisfaction in the belief in Christianity. They only need the bible as evidence as all what is in the bible is the word of God and nothing else is needed. Therefore they do not ask for credible, substantial or irrefutable evidence as such really that doesn't mean anything. In reality they do not and never had to rely on that type of evidence from the beginning. And be honest why would they go searching for it now? Especially when they already are happy and convinced with the provided belief the "non-evidential" belief.
So many people however have still many questions demanding proof from Christians that God indeed exist. Who would not like to see the proof that God is real? Mind you even so many people like to see evidence that God is not real. But what is proof and if it is proof from which way you have to look at it to see of the proof is the proof you want to see and to belief. Proof? Ask the way to New York and they point to the right, they do not try to proof that it is that way as it can also be to the left; they just try to say that they know the way. Proof? A fat person is not trying to proof that he is fat he just is trying to say that he is not skinny. Proof? A Christian is not trying to proof that God does exist, he knows, he just trying to say proof that God does not exist.
Meaning of gullibility; Tendency to believe too readily and therefore to be easily deceived. Believe me; Christian people are not easily and readily convinced. It takes something’s years, many years, study and listening to finally to accept it as a fact. Some people need an almost life time to come to the stage that they accept the Christian belief.
It clearly indicates that Christians belief that the universe is forever under the control of a God a supreme being- its Creator and Sovereign.
Then of course there are people who by conviction need proof as without proof nothing can exist in their opinion. "If there is a God, why is He not visible to us?" This is the basic question often put to Christians and other regions by atheists and nihilists, because they feel that there is no possible answer to this question within the framework of the physical sciences. This they feel is in itself a kind of proof that there is no God. However, they forget that we are living in a world where we have no choice but to believe in many things which are quite beyond observation. The Big Bang, the neutrino is a case in this point. This particle, which is one of the groups of particles making up an atom, is believed to have no electric charge in it, and to have no mass. As a scientist would put it, ‘The neutrino is a tiny bundle of nothing.
The Neutrino, why do we feel compelled to accept the existence of a particle that is a ‘bundle of nothing? It does not proof anything concerning the universe, it proofs that the atom has certain properties which cannot be accounted for in any other way except by that of presuming that a non-particle is contained in the fabric of each atom. One of the amazing properties of the supposed neutrino is its capacity to penetrate any body of mass unhindered. It is claimed that it can pass through the whole of the globe in its progress. In the United States, experiments are underway to harness this property of the neutrino for the benefit of mankind. Scientists believe that if this property of the neutrino can be used, the world of communications will be revolutionized.
Seeing things in the universe, in a purely optical sense, is so impossible scientifically that scientific philosophers are divided in their opinion as to whether the universe should be regarded as an objective reality or just a subjective phenomenon. Mostly it still does not proof the non-existence of God. It does not even proof the possibility of the reality of the occurrence of the big bang. As no proof exist of either side of the coin then it is save to presume that the possibility of God being the creator is indeed the main option unless proven otherwise. The scientists of today are eliminating all models of God; however they are not able to eliminate God.
Even so if they want to eliminate God they will have to eliminate the bible as well as the God of the bible id the God of the Christian belief. Although the belief is centre point God and the bible cannot be separated they claim nothing in the way of evidence other than that they have found satisfaction in their belief. They do not need any more evidence other than the Bible. However the bible has some very primitive statements such as; 1Cor.14:34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also said the law. 1Cor.14-35 and if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.
That is not to be seen as a negative point more important is that the Christians are the ones who are making extraordinary claims so in principle are they the ones required to provide extraordinary evidence if the rest of us are to take their claims serious. On the other hand if we asking that of the Christians than we also should be asking this at the ones who do not belief to supply us with the proof that God does not exist. The simple saying that God exist or does not exist does not deliver any proof for either side. Saying that it does exist does not make it true, saying that it does not exist also does not make it true.
If someone or something makes a claim such as having created the world, then the burden of proof is for them to provide evidence to support their claim. It is not down to the non-believer to prove God does not exist; it is for God or the believer in God to prove He does. Putting a book put together by man with selected texts chosen to suit their needs is absolutely not any kind of proof at all. Therefore officially God does not exist until proven otherwise. If you don't plan to prove to others, then you're right, you don't need to provide evidence. It's those who expect us to adopt their beliefs that should be providing evidence. There is no evidence, yet many of these people will profess to have this evidence... only to spew out a mind-numbing litany of logical fallacies, ignorance and indeed downright stupidity at times, based on writings in a book that cannot be proven as an fact.
As for evidence in favour of atheism? It is simple nothing that is 100% conclusive. Just see the hypothesis of a deity as completely unnecessary, and that they were only invented by humanity originally as primitive explanations for concepts that were far outside of their grasp at the time. Just notice that all the traditional 'proofs' of a deity have been explained far more rigorously by modern science. And as for Christianity in particular, I can't see how an all-loving deity would consign people to eternal torture for the simple crime of not believing in him. A deity that apparently was willing to destroy all live on earth because of the alleged crime of one group of life. Was it absolute needed to destroy next to the humans also all animals, all insects, all plants and trees, just because what one group did. If we have to believe the bible those actions of the humans were activated by the Sons of God who game to earth and "used" the female humans for their pleasure.
Would that kind of God set up religion upon religion country against country and made the by Him chosen people one of the most war some ones on earth. A God who actual, if we have to believe the bible gave the order to maim and kill in the most gruesome way that was possible. God is not proven nor is the big bang, as it is at the moment there is more change on a big bang then the proof of God being the creator. No creator would make the mistakes as they are to see on earth and universe, you want a save bet, don't bet!
===================================================================
11-03-2011
Divide to control.
We have to put a stop to bullying, the US president Obama said, after bullying the European states in taken actions against Libya, after which he will take over and use the oil for himself. The Libyan people will of course receive their part just as in the other countries under US control, in fact just a hand out. No objection is possible as the US force will be standing after them. That way the Europeans will get the blame and the US is seen as the power that liberated them. If we listening to the stooge now at the head of NATO then NATO should attack Libya. This on itself is a typical US ploy. The NATO rules make it clear that they can only act when they are under treat, which they are not. By not taken any action they could come under treat, this also not possible seeing the Libyan army size, or if they are under attack, see previous comment.
So what is the scenario to get the NATO involved, simple you place your war ships, the NATO warships under reach of Libyan fire? Then launch an attack, the French are cowards enough to do that accidental, and NATO will have his excuse to launch a full scale war against Libya. That is if the Libyan army retaliate, if they do not then legally NATO does not have a leg to stand on. Not that this will stop them from attacking anyway, they simple create a fantasy attack by Libya to create the onslaught on Libya just as the Americans did in Vietnam to start the war. In Iraq the US and UK did it under the non-existing excuse of weapons of mass destruction. While the only once who were using weapons of mass destruction was the US. In Afghanistan they used the excuse of the Taliban, those nasty people who did not finished the pipelines as promised. In Libya they will use either the WMD again or the excuse will be those nasty men from Gadaffi.
There is no doubt that Gadaffi had his time and should be gone, and this for a while. But interfering once again in an internal problem of a country just because it has oil is an absurdity. It is a question of elimination something that should have been done a long time ago. The excuse that Gadaffi is firing on his people is a dead excuse as those people are firing on him if not at his person then on his system. In Saudi the Saudi's are doing exactly the same they shooting at the demonstrators and have already arrested hundreds. In fact the same situation as in Libya with the same dictatorial system, worst then in Libya. At least the people in Libya had some rights, in the Saudi's they have none. Nor have the western visitors. However, Saudi is a friend and therefore they cannot do any wrong. They, the US, controls the press and therefore all what is bad in Libya is exploited inch by inch, while the same situation in Saudi and Oman are ignored. We leave Bahrain out as there the US marines are controlling the situation.
Russia is not much better as they do everything the US wants in desperation to come into the World trade organisation. The WTO is not needed in Russia and they will do very well as they have done till now without it. Any country in the world that wants to be a member of the WTO just has to obey the US and they are in. However, Russia after Putin is a different Russia, a Russia that is willing to do anything the US wants and what the US wants they get from Russia.
Leaves the state of Israel, who has now taken their chance too and transported large troops to the Syria/Lebanon border. They do this under cover of that Syria should have the aim of nuclear weapons in sight. Again this is an Israeli fantasy, just as the WMD of Iraq and the nuclear weapons of Iran. Those kinds of claims are coming straight out of the fantasy creating departments of the Israeli Mossad. Divide and rule is their motto, next to kill and kill again.
So told the outgoing Major-General Amos Yadlin of the IDF's Intelligence Branch, "that Iran is the major threat against Israel and not only with regard to its nuclear ambition". That Iran's nuclear ambition is to have enough electricity for all their people is for Yadlin not a point. Nuclear sounds good and the western people who do not look further then their nose is long and in the by their governments controlled press simple make the association of nuclear to a nuclear bomb. "However Iran is reaching out with octopus-arms to anyone who acts against Israel”, he said. Now we were thinking that it was Israel who with octopus-arms was strangling everyone in the world who did not obey them, strangling financial via their US Jewish banks.
"In the next confrontation, there is a chance that war will break out on more than one front, and that Tel Aviv will become a front, Yadlin warned, as he has before. There is also a struggle against the very legitimacy of Israel's existence, he added, and to face it we need intelligence and to mobilize the nation. "Israel's deterrent power is very strong, Yadlin told the ministers in his final briefing as Military Intelligence Head, but the quiet should not deceive us to the contrary. Our enemies are getting stronger and arming themselves.
The way Israel is reacting on his neighbours is like an asocial neighbour reacting on the turbulence of the action by that neighbour Israel. Always accusing others for all what is wrong, always being paranoid on every move the neighbours are making and every action in the neighbours own environment is seen as suspicious, in short an aggressive asocial behaviour pattern is displayed by Israel regarding his neighbours. Attacking them and killing them is also not a good way of being good neighbours. The Benjamin of the Israeli government Netanyahu in absence of the more aggressive Lieberman said: "I met with him every week, sometimes several times a week. We discussed the difficult problems and new challenges that face us, from the Iranian nuclear threat through the threat of missiles and rockets against the State of Israel, the development of Hizbullah and Hamas, as well as various developments in the countries of the region. I believe that Amos succeeded in giving us the tools with which to assess these dangers and to prepare to meet them." Brigadier-General Aviv Kochavi will take over and we may expect more of the same concerning the opinions of their neighbours.
In the mean time it did not stop the Jewish press to launch more fantasies against there self created enemy Iran. The Iranian parliament planned to impeach President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the US press said but refrained from doing so following the intervention of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. That is was not true is of course not an objection for the US government/Jewish controlled press, four members of Tehran's parliament launched a petition to hold a debate on Ahmadinejad's impeachment, the problem here is that Tehran does not have a parliament. They do have a mayor but only Iran as a state has a parliament. The whole story was a no-goer and the information was spread by the opposition of the government to enable them to be in the news for once.
The problem here is that it seems now that some of the by the USA controlled opposition are now to have opened a new possibility, their protest actions against the government are to go nowhere. Their story that 40 members of the parliament already had signed the petition turned out to be an complete fantasy which had found his original storyline in Tel Aviv and was launched in Wall Street under Jewish control. True is that some members of the parliament did have indeed critic on the fact that subsidies for essential daily need would be withdrawn gradually. However it is needed because the US is deliberate acting against Iran with the help of the by them controlled UNSC, whereas by the European states following as slaves of an empire building country that is going nowhere. Here is the problem that the arrogance of the US and the EU stops them from seeing the obvious.
In a report discussed in parliament Monday, four lawmakers voiced unprecedented harsh criticism of Ahmadinejad, accusing him of breaking the law and acting without the approval of the legislature. The Iranian president was charged with illegally importing gasoline and oil, failing to provide budgetary transparency and withdrawing millions of dollars from Iran's foreign reserve fund without getting parliament's approval, said the Wall Street Journal. An typical US/Jewish fabrication none such accusation was made nor was the President charged with the Jewish fantasies, fantasies they already had launched during the presidential elections it did not work then it does not work now.
U.S. officials Monday said they are following the political struggle in Tehran and believe that they are caused, in part, by the sanctions imposed on the Iranians by the US, the United Nations and the European Union. Beside that there is no struggle other then in the US/Jewish mind the subsidies reduction is indeed due to the US/UN imposed sanctions. Sanctions who are based on the Israeli paranoia and based on nothing else than the US supported paranoia of the Jews. There is no nuclear weapons program, the nuclear program is for electric power, however in the deluded minds of the US who always sees ghost where they are not it is simple so that every country that does not obeys the US and their slave states in Europe create evil in what ever form. The fact that Israel create nuclear weapons on a daily base, refuses any form of control, throws the Bedouin out of their home to create new nuclear factories is simple seen by the US as normal as Israel is an supporting country of the USA.
It will be obvious that Barrack Obama will go on founding the opposition in Iran with enormous amounts weapons and technical help as the US has done for some time now. They failed during the presidential election; it does not mean that they will not go on to interfere in Iran. As the Director of the Global Governance Initiative at the New America Foundation, said, he predicts that the next Iranian revolution is very close, if they can get enough money to the people. The sanctions will bite food and other daily necessities will be become more expensive, people will be getting restless as in most Arab countries now and already in many European countries. However Iran is not an Arab country, that throwing money to the protesters as the US and the UK have done and still do in the Arab countries will not work that well in Iran. In a couple of years there are elections again in Iran the present President cannot stand again so another needs to be elected. It was therefore very dumb of the opposition after losing the election to follow the US advice and protest. They should have known that this does not work that way in Iran. Iran may have Islamic laws which are not liked in the West but so has Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states and some are more severe and also directed against westerners but Saudi Arabia is a friend of the USA so they can do what they like. However, Iran that does the same is bad, well maybe so but it is a democracy even more so then Israel or the US/UK for that matter.
Look at Israel where combinations of parties who hate each other and try to cut throat each other at every opportunity. Look at the USA where daddy’s friends had to appoint the president who had lost the election, where they are still trying to solve the problem in states where more votes were counted then there were people living. Look at the UK where they have for the second time running an unselected self appointed first minister. Then look at Iran where the international inspectors not under control of the USA said that in general the election was free and fair. The only what the opposition in Iran had to do is work a couple of years with the enormous amounts they receive from the US and stabilise their position. They could have run for president then without the present presidents opposite. Here however is the problem that at least two of the opposition leaders are in the US pocket and at election time they had to go head to head they would not like that and they would not have stand for it. Now they are disgraced in Iran, although not by the US, but their chance to run both for president is now remote.
The US claim that they cannot check the Iran nuclear program, is an obvious publicity stunt as the US has no inspection rights. Then again it seems that the IAEA is directly reporting to the US instead of forming their own opinion. The secret cables from the US confirm that the deputy director of the IAEA deliberate accused the Iranians of having secret document which shows a different alternative then to the plans Iran showed the IAEA. It seem strange that the Director of the IAEA made a statement that all was inspected and alright and then the deputy after correspondence with the US suddenly find documents that shows something different. Is it strange that the deputy director direct reported not to his director but straight to the US as the secret cables shows, it is less strange if it is a plot by the US to create certain documents to keep the sanctions going.
It all has nothing to do with nuclear energy or weapons, the US knows as every amateur physicist does that it would take many years before Iran was even near a nuclear weapon if they wanted one. No it all has to do that they want the Iranian oil and gas. They have now Iraq's oil, Kuwait’s oil the Saudi oil they attempting at the moment to get the Libya oil and after that they go after Venezuela and that is where it is all about. That is why they did not bother with Egypt, it has no oil. In the meantime the corrupt opposition in Iran, and we do not mean the real opposition, fills their pockets and try to sell Iran to the Americans, just as the Arabs have done.
The dope of British politic the pocket filler and recognised liar in politics Tony Blair the destroyer of the Labour party in the UK said that the west should go to war against Iran. A silly statement showing his incompetence but probably he was paid for saying that by his American masters. He said that Iran would not give up the nuclear weapons. Obvious not, they do not have any however we did not hear him saying that Israel should give up their nuclear weapons. Of course he would not that is where gets paid. The man who was a failure to the politic who ruined Britain and came away with a fortune, followed with: "building nuclear weapons, which would threaten everyone who does not think and act like them". This shows that he does not knows Adam from Eve, it is the US and Israel that are building nuclear weapons and with that they are threatening everyone who does not think and act like them, and the US have used that threat already against many countries from the Caribbean to China from South America to Russia and they are the only country that actual used atomic bombs against civilians, not against military targets, no civilians, the act of real cowards which you can also find back in their history. The restless genocide and destruction of the original population of North America, just as they do now in Afghanistan, even little children are now their target.
Tony Blair is in effect a war criminal who only comes away with it because the ICC obeys the US and the US protect Blair, as the fool said in the latest Iraq inquiry Britain needed to stand as strongly against Iran as it had against Iraq. However Iraq did not do anything to anyone it was no threat to anyone it had no nuclear weapons or weapons of mass destruction and it had only a small army. It where the lying stories of Blair who started that war and the hundreds of thousands who died because of it, the man has blood on his hand, he makes from Torqimade a saint.
The nuclear power countries minus Israel, Pakistan and India try to persuade Iran to give up nuclear power but to buy it from other countries, the other countries being the USA, Russia, China, Britain, France and the creator of both world wars Germany. They want the profit and they want the control. However the UN manifest shows that what Iran is doing is within his rights, that Israel does not like that so what, that Aston of the EU does not like it so what, the EU is a slave of the USA they have to do what the US wants them to do. Israel is a friend of the US in so far that the US has to follow Israelis lead if they want to have any more credit for their bankrupt junk status (kept at AAA because they control the agency). There is no proof that Iran has any intention or possibility to create nuclear weapons, Israel however does and we do not hear Aston or any of the other slaves asking for inspection or control on their nuclear weapons and production plants in the Negev. Maybe the EU should get someone with a brain to think instead of a bunch of money grabbers, maybe just maybe the world would be a better place to live on.
On this moment in time the US and the EU acting like street bullies by shouting to their targets give us your money Oil and gas in this case) or die. They are then surprised if the victims are refusing to do so. So far the US and the EU have only attacked weak and dis-organised countries, just as the street bullies take on the old and the frail, the chance is that they on a certain moment in desperate need of money (or oil and gas for that matter), pick on the wrong one. The simple rule of life is that you catch mice with cheese easier then with an hammer. They have stepped into the Jewish trap of hate and aggression.
The Jews where like that if you have to believe their history always. Always at war always had disputes, always fighting and look what it brought them. Destruction and hate and they still do not learn.
This however does not mean that the US and the EU have to step once more in their trap to destruction. They even killed Jesus and they would do it again and again. He said: "you shall not kill" so they kill. "You should be good to your neighbours" so they kill them. "You shall not steal" so they steal. "You shall not take what belongs to your neighbour" so they stealing it all. They do that all, it is not a reason for Christians to do the same and still call themselves Christians.
=================================================================
13-03-2011
Murder allowed but only when the victims are Jewish.
Last week boys who were throwing stones at the passers-by were told off and when they did not stop they were arrested. The INTERNET was screaming The Western press managed to get a one full column as comment in the papers; Aljazeere had the time of their life. Now they have always the time of their life if they can get one over on the designated targets of the Al Thani/BBC combination. After all this were just Jewish nothing to write about, if they had been Arabs, yeah that would have been a different question, probably an UNSC meeting and total condemnation.
This was in Israel, so not a word of sympathy about the slaying of a family 5 in their sleep by two Palestinians but their mouth full of the fact that the Israeli premier had more then enough of that and decided to put forwards an accelerated program of new settlements. What he really should say is that enough is enough. It is obvious that the leaders of the Palestinian fractions do not want peace, do not want land of their own, all what they want is power over people, so-called control freaks. And if we look little closer freaks they are indeed.
The Arab's, the Palestinians say they want peace, however having half of their public places named after the once who killed the most of the Israeli does not really rings a bell, but that is what they do. Which place in the world will have streets, squares and buildings named after terrorist killer? The Arabs! From Palestinian Media Watch, I learned that Dalal Mughrabi, the terrorist who, in 1978, was responsible for the most lethal attack against Israel, is now immortalized by having the following named for her: two elementary schools, a kindergarten, a computer center, summer camps, football tournaments, a community center, a sports team, a public square, a street, an election course, an adult education course, a university club, a dance troupe, a military unit, a dormitory in a youth center, a TV quiz team and a graduation ceremony.
A Palestinian child can walk to school along a street named after the terrorist Abu Jihad, who planned a bus hijacking that killed 37, spend the day in a school named after Ahmad Yassin, the man who founded Hamas, play soccer in the afternoon in a tournament honoring terrorist Abd Al-Basset Odeh, who killed 31, and end his day at a youth center named after Abu Iyad, who was responsible for killing 11 Israeli Olympic athletes in Munich.
This are the supporters of murderers and they are proud of it. Only people who are mentally ill can go into a home and kill the family of a Rabin just for fun. The nations of the West should open their eyes and see what is really going on there. Not what the divided Arab states want them to see what is there but to see the reality; of there ever will be peace in the Middle East. The question is however do want the Arab states peace? Lebanon will create peace under the control of the UN French troops it is Hezballah own interest what lays on the bottom of it. They know that they can create damage but never will win. Syria and Jordan are in a similar situation indeed. This leaves Egypt, however even in the worst situation Egypt would not yet again take a road what twice already led to their defeat and would do again if they tried it again.
We can go on making excuses, Obama can go on with saying they should talk, and the EU can go on with telling their people about those poor Palestinians. But those poor Palestinians are not any better then the leader of Libya Gadaffi. They want power, they want control, and they want wealth for them selves, not for their people. These people who committed this crime and those who have fathered them and protecting them, still, they are terrorist nothing else. Not the police but the IDF should hunt them down and all who protect them in a search and if needed to destroy as you do with vermin. Remember all of those that known them that feed them that help and support them are on the same path and should receive the same faith. Netanyahu must make tishuvah. He must say to the nations this is Israel to here and not further. The word of my people is the Torah-the Word of Hashem. In that Word - we will not make any concessions any more no talks no promises no more land for peace. From now on the motivation the promises the concessions the peace has to come from them.
Netanyahu must open his eyes to the reason for the continued existence of Israel. A better Israel a complete Israel, an Israel in which all can live peacefully. He must realize that Israel has the right on his side that the voices for peace are in the majority. Even though we start off this week with very sad news, it is up to us to make the world a better place to make a difference so that heinous crimes like the massacre of the Fogel family no longer take place. May we all do what we can to turn this sad beginning of a week into a week of good, love and living life to the fullest, unlike the extreme Muslims who live by the sword? They slay an entire Israeli family in their house while they were sleeping: Rabbi Udi Fogel (36), his wife Ruth (34), 11-year-old Yoav, four-year-old Elad and three-month-old Hadas, an act from cowards nothing else.
The Israeli cabinet has now approved the long overdue building of hundreds of new homes for Jewish settlers in the occupied West Bank, a day after five members of a settlement family were killed. The Israeli prime minister's office said the approval was a stern political message to Palestinians following the incident in a remote settlement over the weekend.
A statement from Binyamin Netanyahu's office said the ministerial team on settlements decided on Saturday night to approve the construction of several hundred units at Gush Etzion, Maale Adumim, Ariel and Kyriat Sefer. And this is not before time. That construction will be in major settlement blocs that Israel expects to hold on to in any final peace deal.
Netanyahu is expected to deliver a major policy speech soon, possibly proposing a Palestinian state within temporary borders as a way out of a longstanding negotiations impasse. But the Palestinians vehemently oppose such proposal, as it falls short of a contiguous Palestine state, then again who care's. The knife attack on Friday killed two young children, a baby and their parents, and is reported to be the deadliest in years. It closed the doors on any friendly way of dealing with the Palestinian matter. They had their chance they did not take it; no doubt Obama and the EU are putting pressure on Israel to start a new initiative and the Palestinians pushing for international recognition of an independent state with or without a peace deal, well let them.
The Palestinian Authority (PA) on Sunday condemned the "decision of the Israeli government to speed up and increase the building of settlements", said Saeb Erakat, the former chief Palestinian negotiator and senior PLO official. "[The PA] strongly condemns the settler attacks against the Palestinian people in the West Bank and we ask the Quartet [the United Nations, European Union, United States and Russia] to urgently intervene to stop the actions of the settlers," Erakat said. Naturally they do not condemn the murder on children as that is a normal act for the Palestinians. No they blame others for the trouble they are creating and activating them selves, like bullies on a school grounds who are found out and then starting to cry foul.
Why should we take any notice of the rambling of people like Nabil Abu Rudeina, a spokesman for Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian president, as he denounced the move as "a mistake" which was likely to create "big problems". He is wrong his Palestine action has already created the "big problems" and indeed that was a big mistake. Israel doesn’t not need the Palestinians but the Palestinians need Israel. Rambling Nabil Abu Rudeina went on to say: "The decision taken to build new settlements is a mistake and unacceptable," he said in a statement. "It will destroy everything and will lead to big problems." It will lead to problems, not for Israel who should act more forceful against the breakers of promises, killers of children, problem creators and word breakers.
The problem should have been solved a long time ago, the time for a Palestinian state has passed; an autonomic state is still possible under Israeli administration, where the Palestinians could have autonomic control, but a separate state, that time has now passed. The Arab states can disagree, but they themselves have not been very cooperative to solve the problem either. If they do not want to listen then in ignorance of Obama and the EU, Israel should use the power they have to solve the problem once and for all. It is as simple as that.
=================================================================
15-03-2011
For an web site that has the majority of writers critical of the actions of Israel, it is surprising that they actual allowed an voice to defend the practice of stealing land, throwing people out of their houses arresting them, jailing them and killing them. We have seen the reactions on the press comments in the Dutch papers being twenty to one in favour of the Palestinians, with that they showing that they know the history of Palestine.
However let us enlightening the minds of the ones who see the Israeli as the always being victim.
So let us start with some back ground first: On May 14 1948 one day before the British Mandate expired, David Ben-Gurion declared the establishment of the State of Israel. The declaration of the state referred to the decision of the UN General Assembly as a legal justification for the establishment of the state. With all the direct involved countries against, the Western Countries decided, mainly not to embarrass Great Britain and France, in favour of it. In short they simple ignored the neighbours of the new state. To put it more in this time what those Western countries did was the same as by example to re-locate the State of Iran in the middle of the USA, they would not like it. Placing a Jewish State in the middle of Muslim countries is however exactly the same. The excuse of the Jews that their God had given it to them can only be seen as a fraud. There is no proof of this and if someone on this moment in time would do the same as the story figure Abram say for example in the USA and declare that God just had spoken to him and giving him all the land of the US and placed him above the nations, then within minutes he would be in a straight jacket and in a mental institution. So forget the story times and keep to the reality which means they did and do not have the right.
It does not mean that the Jews should not have the right to live together as one people in one State, only not on land given to them by countries who did not own it nor had the right to do so. If the US was so set on giving the Jews land to live on to live together to form a State, then the US had itself places empty enough to give them a place to do so. However the US simple thought, "Not in our back yard". Hence that in accordance with the UN Resolution, the Declaration promised that the State of Israel would ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion, race or sex, and guaranteed freedom of religion, conscience, language, education and culture. The whole of the problem is that they never intended to keep that promise; they simple did not want those Arabs near to them. The two stupidities of the Western nations was the termination of the British mandate over Palestine and the Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel.
It sparked a full-scale war which erupted after May 14, 1948. On 15/16 May, the four armies of Jordan, Syria, Egypt and Iraq invaded the newly self-declared state followed by units from Lebanon. Israel would have lost if it were not for the advanced weapons from the US and the UK delivered on forehand to the new state. Although afterwards the Israeli spread the word that the Arabs were advised to flee Israel, there is actual no evidence that the Arab leadership made that calls for evacuation. It were the many rumours of awful acts of violence and torture which were committed by Jewish fighters as well as a number of serious deadly violent actions taken by Jewish forces led to a growing number of fleeing Arab population.
The deliberate aggravation to build-up the conflict along the Jordanian border was done gradual. Small Israeli raids to the major Israeli incursions, Beit Jalla, Qibya massacre, Ma'ale Akrabim massacre, Nahalin reprisal raid, Rantis and Falameh reprisal raid to mention some of them. The Lavon Affair, an oyher illegal operation in Egypt in 1954 an type of covert operation they have done in many countries was that a group of Jews in Egypt would plant bombs in USA and UK owned targets and then blame the Muslim brotherhood, it failed but it led to a deeper distrust of Jews in Egypt, from whose community key agents in the operation had been recruited, and as a result Egypt retaliated against its Jewish community. It was only after Israel's raid on an Egyptian military outpost in Gaza in February 1955 that the Egyptian government began to actively sponsor, train, and arm the Palestinian volunteers from Gaza. The result of the unprovoked attack on the outpost of Egypt resulted in 37 Egyptian soldiers killed.
In 1967, under the not proven treats from the Arab countries mention threatening gestures from other neighbouring Arab nations; Israel launched a pre-emptive strike against Egypt. The strike and the operations that followed became known as the Six-Day War. Later Israel declared that Egypt had started the 6 day war however it was Israel who had started it purely for the grab of land. At the end of the Six-Day War, Israel had captured, among other territories, the Gaza Strip from Egypt and the West Bank from Jordan (including East Jerusalem). Shortly after Israel seized control over Jerusalem, Israel asserted sovereignty over the entire city of Jerusalem and the Palestinian residents of East Jerusalem. This all was against the UN mandate but their actions were supported by the USA and the UK.
It took eleven years before the Palestinians retaliated. On March 11, 1978, a force of nearly a dozen armed Palestinian terrorists landed their boats near a major coastal road in Israel. There they hijacked a bus and sprayed gunfire inside and at passing vehicles, killing thirty-seven civilians. It delayed the Israeli attack on Lebanon. The IDF launched Operation Litani planned far in advance of the bus killings; however in Israeli style they used it to have an excuse for the Lebanon attack. The Government of Israel goal was the taking of control of Southern Lebanon up to the Litani River.
In mid-1982 Israel again took to war this time to invade Lebanon in the so-called Lebanon War on June 6, the excuse was to protect the northern border of Israel. In reality they simple wanted more land and more control. IDF invaded Lebanon and even occupied Beirut. To end the siege, the US and UK governments brokered an agreement guaranteeing safe passage for Arafat and Fatah guarded by a multinational force to exile in Tunis. During the war, Israeli supported the allied Phalangist Christian militia's to carry out the bloody Sabra and Shatila Massacre in which 1000-3,500 unarmed Palestinians were killed by the Phalangist militias while the Israeli troops surrounded the camps with tanks and checkpoints, monitoring entrances and exits and making sure that none of the Palestinians could escape. For its involvement in the Lebanese war and its indirect responsibility for the Sabra and Shatila Massacre, Israel was heavily criticized. However it resulted in an accelerated program of weapons to Israel by the USA as a reward for the massacre.
Over the course of the First Intifada, a total of near 2000 Palestinians and 400 Israeli were killed. The USA led western press had their pages full of the 400 death Israeli but not a word about the 2000 death. It was due to the surrounding Arab states that Israel could go on with the killings, the attacks and the land grabbing. The mainly the Arab countries excluded Syria who was a victim of the Israeli aggression themselves, stabbed the Palestinians in the back by making a knee fall deep in the dust for the Jews, with the Saudi's in front. With that they recognised the USA led Jewish superiority. That USA led support came in the form of billions of US dollars to the Arab states on this moment at the rate of 3 billion a year for the protection of 6 million Israeli.
In February 1994 during the Cave of the Patriarchs massacre a follower of the Kach movement killed 25 Palestinian-Arabs at the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron. Now many Palestinians consider the Second Intifada to be a legitimate war of national liberation against foreign occupation, whereas many Israelis consider it to be a terrorist campaign. However if that is the case then every attack done by the IDF the Israeli death force is in fact an terrorist attack. The Palestinians attacks were in their own country against the illegal occupation where the Israeli attacks were actions on foreign soil. At the Beirut Summit in 2002, the Arab League proposed an alternative political plan aimed at ending the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but it was rejected by Israel.
The PA who was the legislative council was in effect an USA/Israeli led group who completely ignored the Palestinian wishes and rights, money received went mainly in their pockets while the Palestinian population did see nothing of it. This did change in 2006 when Hamas won a majority in the elections, they refused to play ball with the USA/Israeli government and wanted a better situation for the Palestinians. This prompted the United States and many European countries to cut off all funds to the Hamas and the Palestinian Authority insisting that the Hamas must recognize Israel, renounce violence and accept previous peace pacts. What that in reality did entail was to accept the killings by the Israeli and obey their wishes. They refused and Israel refused to negotiate with Hamas, since Hamas never renounced its beliefs that Israel has no right to exist and that the entire State of Israel is an illegal occupation which must end. The fact that they are in principle right is not a matter for the USA and the EU.
From that time Israel was searching for an opportunity to eliminate all the Palestinians in Gaza, while at the same time attempting to drive the West Bank Palestinians into Jordan. Israel made a concentration camp WW2 style with controlled in and outs and near daily raids. Hamas and Israel could not agree on conditions to extend the truce Hamas blamed Israel for not lifting the Gaza Strip concentration camp blockade, and for an Israeli raid on the Gaza Palestinians. Israel accuses Hamas in effect of attempting to feed the Gaza population by importing food what is seen by Israel as a violating of the truce. An explosion caused by an Israeli air strike in Gaza during the 2008/2009 Israel Gaza conflict. The piracy of Israel on a Turkey's ship and the killings following show that Israel does not step back from any violation of rights law and International law. It resulted in a closer and faster weapon delivery program from the US.
As always the Israeli operation began after the ferocious air strikes with an intense bombardment of the Gaza Strip targeting whatever they could hit regardless, police training camps, police headquarters and offices. Civilian infrastructure, including mosques, houses, medical facilities and schools, were also deliberate attacked even UN facilities were hit. Israel laughable excuse was that all those building were full with weapons and rockets. Hamas intensified its rocket and mortar attacks against targets in Israel throughout the conflict, hitting previously untargeted cities such as Beersheba and Ashdod. It did not stop Israel from starting the offensive they really had in mind when the bombing started a ground invasion in the hope to kill all. It started on January 3, 2009; the Israeli ground invasion began against a country without an army.
The operation resulted in the deaths of more than 1,500 civilian Palestinians. The IDF released a report stating that the vast majority of the dead were Hamas militants man woman and children even babies they all were terrorists. The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights reported that most of the 1,417 dead had been civilians and non-combatants.
It was the Balfour Declaration in 1917 to "favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, but that nothing should be done to prejudice the civil and religious rights of the existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine." what started the killings. Israel will not stop unless all Palestine are either slaves in the Israeli state or be killed. It is a repeat of the Jewish history, they always started the fighting and at the end they always lost. In short the arrogance is in their blood, they have never learned anything from history. Not even that History always repeats.
History shows the devious mind of the Israeli government, how terrible it may be the killing of that family in the West Bank it was an atrocity waiting to happen. However what was the first word what the Israeli said? The Palestinians.
However how do they know, what kind of proof do they have. We are well aware that they if in need they will frame some Palestinians, as under Israeli actions no proof is required a more then 100 charges against them by the United Nations are the clear proof of that. However, was it the Palestinians? In the middle of a Jewish settlement under tied security, and they were not seen, not heard not noticed?
Has it maybe something to do with the troop concentration near the Syria/Lebanon border, the already weeks ago drawn up plans for another 500 more houses on stolen land, land stolen from the Palestinians. Was this again one of the covert operations to create a reason for launching that housing plan, or is it the covert reason for an attack on either Lebanon or Syria? And if this was one of the many covert operations does this mean that it were the Israeli who carried out those murders as a covert operation. They way of killing clearly shows a well programmed plan with the execution with a military precision in such a way that the Settlement security did not noticed it.
OR
Was it indeed a Palestinian attack in revenge of the many arrest, the Aqsa Martyrs of Fatah will no doubt claim responsibility as they always do, even if the do not have a clue where it is all about, revenge for the land theft and the many killings by the Israeli? We will never know, however if the Israeli had shown over the last 60 years a little less arrogance and a more attention to the future this all would not have happened. So who ever did the killing, an disgruntled Jew, a fanatic Palestinian or the covert operation of the military, the blame can be squarely lay on the door step of the Israeli Government, regardless.
==================================================================
17-03-2011
Man can wonder over the actions of one man, man can wonder over the actions of a group and man can wonder of a group of countries; however the exception seems to be always where it concerns the UK the almost disappeared Liberal Democrat party. Their ministers seem to dead set on destroying the party, destroying the UK image so that they can cash in.
Look at the deputy premier Nick Glegg, clueless in all his actions but pretence. Look at Ian Duncan Smith pretending to know it all with his actions proven that just as his mate Glegg, that he does not have a clue, they both hope to sit it out and cash in. Jobless people will be forced to work he said. Clueless or what? They will have to do 30 hours a week, for which they will receive 30 pounds or 1 pound an hour. Clueless maybe but financial clever, as the workers who are now doing the job of cleaning the parks and cleaning graffiti at the rate of 6.00 pounds an hour can then be fired and forced to do their old job for 1.00 an hour.
Youth unemployment is not that bad, the figure are distorted by counting unemployed youngsters who could be studying as unemployed, he said if you do not count the youngsters who are unemployed but could have been in study, and then the figure of unemployed youngsters is much lower. Clueless or what? If this way of counting was enforced then any youngster under the age of 25 and being unemployed should not be counted as in principle all of them could have been in study.
By getting all the permanent staff fires and their job re-advertised as part-time the number of unemployed over 25 years of age would also been halved. That all those people will not have enough earnings to live and have to ask for social benefits are not the point; the point is to artificially reduce the number of unemployed people. That more people will end up in poverty, who cares? The show the Liberal Democrat show will have to go on to safe guard their income.
Let us not forget the rudest of them, Danny Alexander his arrogance could be forgiven the lack of experience was the base for this. He wants all the rich of the world coming to live in the UK. The only place, if the coalition have half their chance, where those rich can get the cheapest of domestic staff, as the majority will be forced in to the labour market. Those rich can start their business in the UK; however they are allowed to employ the staff from their own country to bring to the UK to work. There is no benefit for the UK population but the government will cash in and stuff the population, they were stupid enough to vote for them and although they did not win, simple took the power appointed themselves as the government of the UK.
That sitting government by the coalition of two parties that could not win the election and who in the statistics today are both together smaller in support then the Labour party, cashing in. The president of the US and his controlling staff had never so clean licked shoes in their life. Look at the Libyan situation. It has nothing to do with the UK but the premier is asking for a no fly zone over Libya, as he said to protect the civilians, while in his own country created the environment to kill them of quicker. However, it is not the UK who wants to get their hand on the Libyan oil, it is the US, but the US president has to start thinking on his re-election and therefore cannot be seen to be starting yet another war in Libya.
Here is were his servant Cameron comes in, together with the other servant in France they can do the dirty work while the US organise the vote in the UN via their protégé the secretary general of the UN. Ok it will cost the US bags of money and a lot of pressure, but at the and seeing the fact that most of the non-permanent members of the Security Council are protégées of the US or receivers of large amounts of yearly money they should get a majority even if not a large. Countries like Brazil, Germany, India, China and Russia will certainly not support this.
Take the forced payment for students of up to 9000 pounds for a study year. The Government will pay it for them and then they have to pay it back over 25 years out of their earnings over 21,000 a year at the rate of 9%. The government borrows that at the rate of maximum 3% so they make a nice earner over the backs of the students of 6% a year. The student after 25 years has then paid 85,000 back to the government.
More elderly people are to be forced to pay for care homes because of funding decisions slipped through by the Government. Ministers have effectively lowered the amount of savings individuals can have before they become liable for their own fees. Some 250,000 people over 65 are thought to have their residential care funded by councils. Charges are based on a means test, under which anyone with savings and assets - including property - worth more than 23,250 pounds must pay the full sum until the value has been reduced below the threshold. Normally, the limit increases each year to take account of inflation and rising values of assets, but the coalition has quietly decided to freeze the level for at least two years. A lower capital limit of 14,250 pounds- above which councils pay part of the fees - has also been frozen.
Long time disabled will be taken away their in depended transport if they so unlucky to be in a residential home, care or otherwise. Short term disabled will be re-assessed and sent back to work that does not exist, ending up on social benefits they did not want to start with. However they stand accused of being disabled and that is in the UK almost a crime that needs to be punished.
The NHS that is the UK National Health Service, were a rubber glove which cost in the shop 25 pence cost there 4.00 pound. Where the nurses are doing the administration, and the managers go to long lunches and diners on the NHS expense costs. That will be now going into private hands part by part. The government of the UK said that it is not a privatisation; however it is via the back door with the government making a nice little earner. The coalition government needs this as they need more money, they spending already more then Labour the previous government did, but they need more. So the UK has now the highest of fuel prices home and transport. That has resulted in higher food and clothing prices and that in turn created more poor children one of the highest levels in Europe, more poor elderly and near starving long term disabled.
And that is what the UK government calls protecting the civilians, only they do not mean the UK civilians only the civilians in countries they have oil or any other product the USA try to get their hands on and using the UK to get it.
The master and his servants are in this case acting the same
==================================================================
19-03-2011
I am a man of peace said Obama when he went into office. One day later the world knew that he also was a liar and a manipulation artist received the peace price, the first peace price ever awarded to a man who has proven that killing is a second nature to him, besides being a liar. When time went on the signs where ever stronger and stronger the smell of blood surrounding him when he was acting as a ruthless tyrant taking one oil well after another just as his predecessor Bush had done, only more ruthless. Those days you only have to follow the trail of blood dripping from his hands when he is walking, although that could have come from shaking hands with Bush or Blair they also leave a trail behind them where ever they go. Next on his list was always Libya, before his actions against Venezuela what is next on his list. He would have preferred Russia but that could have drawn in China, and he wanted the oil not his destruction.
He did try on several occasions to get Libya, but all failed.
At the end the USA got his way. They started the uprising via Tobrok into Benghazi and expected a quick fall of the Government of Libya. This did not happen, what ever the Western/Arab press tells about the support for the rebels it was not there. It was simple an attempt that failed, even the arms supply by France and Britain did not made a different. There is popular dismay and anger at the UN decision, with many knowing that the rebellion in the east was not a popular uprising against dictatorship as portrayed by the Western (USA) press but as a criminal enterprise supported by foreign powers and aimed at plundering Libya's oil. As such it failed. An other action had to be taken quickly before the whole of the uprising was gone to nowhere.
Here it is were the always obedient servant of the USA David Cameron stepped in announcing it as his idea to create a no fly zone above Libya. It was not his idea but that of the USA, but with a president who soon has to start fighting for a next term, it was not in his interest to show his cards. After al his servants could do the job no doubt against payment. It was quickly clear that the playboy president of France was willing to deal the USA card; his hatred against Muslims is well recorded. The USA preferable would have used the option to invade Libya, but as Libya is much larger then their previous victims the risk was enormous, therefore a no fly zone with the option to invade if needed.
The Security Council was as always under tied control of the USA, it was called much easier because the USA had managed to have appointed non-permanent members who were tightly controlled by the USA. Like Bosnia which without the USA funding would not even exist. Colombia where in fact the USA is in control of the country, Gabon and receiver of Billions, Lebanon hand and foot tied to the USA, it is that what stops the Israeli forces to attack Lebanon. Nigeria near 100% controlled by the USA oil companies and their money, of which the population does not see a penny. Portugal, severe tied to the USA which saved them to go the same way as Ireland. South Africa which economy would collapse instantly if Western funding was withdrawn. Those were the countries that would obey the USA at all times or if not doing so would ring the bell for their own destruction. France and the UK are simple servants of the USA; it is the sole reason that the EU is still standing, financial. This was the bunch who would vote over the Lebanon proposal, seconded by the UK and France to take every measure to stop the maiming and killing in Libya. All three countries have a rich history of just doing that, killing civilians.
Now here we have a metaphor, Libya, which is attacked by a rebel force from the east and supplied from there with all they need but experience, has to lay down their arms, while the rebels are encouraged to go on fighting. To take it a little closer to reality and turn it to Afghanistan where the USA under the cover of the NATO is fighting the population of Afghanistan, what if the USA was told to lay down there arms but the population was allowed to fight on. Would the USA do what they expect of Libya and stop fighting when they are under attack, or would they do what the USA does best and simple go on killing the civilians regardless. We all know the answer on that one. For that reason is the no fly zone nothing else then a UN war declaration against one of his members.
It is the first time that the United Nations declared war on one of their members so that other members can rob the country of the oil. In both cases Gadaffi Libya or the USA Libya the civilians would suffer and would not see a penny. Look at Iraq and Saudi Arabia as an example.
This is an concept that could have repercussion in the future as it means that the US only have to create a majority in the Security council to attack any country they like. We know they do that already, but it could mean that if as an example the UK not longer wants to obey their master the USA, the USA could arrange expulsion of the Security Council or simple declare unofficial war on the UK. Remember the UK has oil as well and are therefore in the USA a legitimate target in case the UK not longer wants to obey the USA.
There can be no doubt that Gadaffi should have been removed a long time ago; regardless of it has mountains of oil as a matter of speaking. Gaddafi has ruled Libya for more than 40 years. An uprising against him was organised in the trail of the uprising of Egypt and Tunisia. What is absolutely clear is the UN Security Council resolution said he must stop what he is doing, brutalising his people however what he is doing is to defend Libya against a bunch of USA led opportunist from the East. “Mr Cameron told the BBC.”If not, all necessary measures can follow to make him stop." That is a normal statement of a man who does not know his left from his right. A man who is ferocious attempting to impoverish the population of his country so fast as possible. Protecting the civilians, but would it not be time that he start protecting the civilians of his own country?
"We don’t do body counts" General Franks once said, and the civilian deaths were accumulating fast a 109,906 in Iraq, and already a 210,000 civilians in Afghanistan and rising not included the drone’s deaths in Pakistan which are also rising fast. Here there is no call by the UK for a no fly zone as here the killings of civilians are done by the USA and the UK has to obey his master. In the mean time the killing of civilians is going on by the USA under the cover of the NATO as they do not have the courage to admit it themselves. Here no calls for a No-fly zone at a place where it really was needed.
RAF Tornado and Typhoon fighters will start heading to the Mediterranean to join international operations to protect the Libyan people from Colonel Muammar Gaddafi's forces, David Cameron has said. Problem is that beside the small group of rebels in the East, most of the Libyan people are still behind Gadaffi regardless for what reason. The premier of the UK in the time between saw another opportunity to rip the people of his country of by deploying aircrafts which cost money he did not have even not by ripping of every citizen in his country except the rich and wealthy as they are his friends and you do not rip of your friends so long you still need them.
However did he the unselected premier of Britain had a parliamentary approval for this? Was there a vote over this, was he willing to tell the real reason for his obedience to the USA? No he had not and there been not a vote, the unselected premier of Britain took the decision himself, the civilians were not asking. Gadaffi did what was to be expected and declared as a member of the UN compliance, and was stopping all military operations. The move follows Thursday night's resolution by the United Nations Security Council authorising "all measures necessary" short of sending in ground troops to protect the Libyan population. Obvious the protection of the civilians was never the real reason, getting there hands on the oil is the main one, the protection of the civilians is just a covert action.
Strange is that with the killings in Bahrain there is suddenly not that restrain that they want from Gadaffi
Anti-war activists said the Prime Minister had been "itching" to bomb Libya, accusing him of not learning the lessons of the "disastrous" wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. A spokesman for the Stop The War Coalition said: "Air attacks on Libya will not help end the civil war but will escalate it and could be the prelude to a much wider war". They do not understand that Cameron simple does what any western country does when in problems; just start a war, Thatcher done it, Blair done it and Cameron does it. That it will cost lives, will get more terrorist to the UK for revenge, that more innocent civilians will be dying in the UK, he could not care less, being a premier is quick filling your pockets as you do not know how long you have.
The problem is that the UK never have understand and still not do that they lost there Empire because the children did remember the actions of the Britton to their parents, and took revenge. Just as the Muslims will remember the action from the Americans and the British which killed their parents, it is just a question of time. Now Britain is a small country with one of the highest defence spending in the world. That would not matter if it had a purpose but it does not. It has now the highest defence spending, the highest house and car fuels, the highest food prices, the highest child poverty rate, the highest death rate of elderly people, and so we can on, they have everything the highest except integrity; they simple go where the most of the money can be received. It will not escape public scrutiny that imposing a No Fly zone in Libya from bases 1000's of miles away is going to cost an absolute fortune. Politicians have enough blood on their hands from ill thought out military interventions. Look at Blair he even leaves a trail.
The UK population is right in their reactions, there they are, all without money and there sacking everybody including British forces and pilots, disbanding the NHS, and just about getting rid of everything that is not nailed down.............................And then they send out planes and who knows what else to some country that started a revolution on there own, nothing to do with the UK population what so ever. You could not make it up really yourself not even as a fantasy but Cameron can.
China distances itself from this, so does Russia, so does Brazil, Germany and India, two third of the representation of the world population does not agree and Cameron the fool of British politics jump right in as if they are still some great world power instead of a small country to arrogant to see how really small they are. Not only that, their premier regardless of everything, intend to make them even more to pay in the name of cost savings. Don’t these politicians look at the past, learn anything of the past or do they have indeed have there heads firmly stuck in there ass?
As Susan Rice the US/UN rep. said so correctly: "to protect innocent civilians". But only if the USA can make money out of it. The rest is history as the USA does go on killing civilians, babies, children, girls and woman as they are all terrorists in their opinion, even if proven otherwise. They even killing in Pakistan showing their complete ignorance of borders, and civilians. While you hear the Human rights organisation screaming about the thousands dead in the fighting in Libya, they are absolute quit about the random civilian killings in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. The why is because those organisations are led and protected by the USA.
Will al that manoeuvre of the USA to get their hands on the Libyan oil work, well maybe, they have already allocated a new leader who will obey the USA complete just as Saddam and Mubarak and that villain president in Georgia, the one who under cover of the night, while the worlds attention was at the Olympic games, with support of the USA (Rice) attempted to commit genocide on the Ossetian people. So all that shouting of Barack Obama is just to cover up that he is one of the most violent aggressive presidents the USA ever had, and he commits his crimes under the cover of the Int. Peace price.
In the meantime Obama showed his blood dripped hands by demanding that the Governments forces from Libya would hand over cities under control of the government to the rebels, how sick can you be how low can you sink? In Obama's case it does not care what does happen so long it brings him the money he wants. The man is a coward who only thinks in money death of others no object. It will solve nothing, the people of Libya will not get more rights just as they do not have in Iraq and Afghanistan, if they object the USA will kill those Libyan civilians just as easy as they have done and still do in Iraq and almost hourly do in Afghanistan. The civilians they say they want to protect are then slaughtered just as easy as the Americans have done by the thousands in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan to mention some. The lives of the civilians they want to protect now are by then a burden and need to be eradicated Obama style.
So what is the next move of the master and his servants, the US, the UK and France. They are in a difficult position they know from their own security reports that the rebels who started the rebellion are a mixture of gangsters, international terrorist, the same terrorist who where fighting against the US in Afghanistan, and local tribes man.
They know that if they remove the Gadaffi government, who will take their place, 1. the terrorists, nothing will be changing, 2.the gangsters, nothing will be changing, 3.the tribesman under a strong man, in which case nothing would be changing unless the American choice can be placed safely as president, and still nothing would be changing. In case 1 and 2 the USA would order the NATO for a full war on Libya in the Iraqi and Afghan style.
Under that scenario, as proven in Iraq and Afghanistan 100 of thousands innocent civilians will be dying; a normal outcome of an US led war regardless under what kind of name the fight. However, the death of civilians under Gadaffi was the reason that the UN called for a war against their own member. In that scenario Gadaffi may have killed in the war against the rebels 10 of thousands, it will be nothing in comparison with the deaths by the US/NATO as that would be as proven before in the 100 of thousands. Will the UN in such a case call for a war against the US or the NATO countries? No they would not as the UN is the USA.
There are clear examples of the double game ploys of the US; they demand that Gadaffi obeys the Security Council’s resolutions at once. Gadaffi did, although fighting will go on as Gadaffi's man will not stand for the fact the US supported army of International terrorists, gangsters and local tribes man are killing innocent civilians as they have been doing on large scale. It reached not conveniently the pages of Al Jazeera, Al Thani would not allow it as he sits well tied in the US pocket. The USA controlled papers in France and the UK did not mention it as their masters would not allow that, the government controlled papers in the US, the UK and France did not mentioned it as they would be expelled from further press engagements. It does not mean that it did not happen, so the fighting will go on, the US needs a reason to get their hand on the Libyan oil before the ones who are waiting in the wings, India and China get their hands on it.
In the time between all this it is remarkable that the US, and the UK, and France the countries who are the players for the oil in Libya, always have stayed absolute quit when UN resolutions against Israel were handed out more then hundred so far, and titled by Israel as wasted papers. Here the demand they gave Gadaffi to obey or feel the consequence was never given to Israel. There was no application by any country for a no-fly zone above Gaza when the citizen there were ruthless bombed. We know the Israeli are the friends of the US, the UK and France and there is no oil in Gaza. Still it shows the double plot of those wars like countries. The UK like France had large overseas property, which they lost because the children of the killed parents did remember. The USA entered much later in that field and is now doing the same France and the UK done hundreds of years ago invading and stealing the population’s property. However the many hundreds of thousands killed by them have children who will remember if not in first line then in second line, unless as the Americans done in their own country simple murdered all the original inhabitants, or like the UK did in Australia, in which case there are no children left to remember.
Do we see action against the Saudi's in Bahrain which they now have taken over, and since then it can be called the killing fields, although Al Jazeera and the Western press ignore what is happening there. Do we see any actions in Yemen were also the killings are allowed to go on? No we don’t, Bahrain has no oil and is the bases for the US fleet, and Yemen is a US friend. Although with friends as the US were the Presidents leaves a trail of blood wherever he goes you never know.
====================================================================
21-03-2011
"We cannot watch peoples hopes snuffed out by tanks and planes", Tony Blair said concerning Libya. We all know Tony Blair you always can see when he lies, his lips are moving. The crisis in Libya was created by the US with rebels from gangster and terrorist organisations helped by tribal bands of young man. The US and Britain were on the scene from day one with weapons and training even helping the new "recruits" to sign up. The US made at least an effort to dress up as tribal man. The British simple did not bother and were easily to be recognised. Hence their even so easy arrest, after an couple of hours gun fight, although the arrest was made public by pure coincidence the fighting was forgotten and did not show up in the Western papers or on the Al Thani owned Al Jazeera.
However the man who led Britain into a war what cost that country billions they did not have, so that he could fill his pockets from the US rewards afterwards, and that all on a deliberate lie, killed by that action not ten thousands of deaths of civilians but hundred of thousands of civilians. His policy was always to interfere in other countries politics on order of the Americans. He had found out rather quickly that by doing their bidding his pockets would be quicker filled with money then ever before, and so it did.
He is of course well aware that the Western story of poor Libyans is a fantasy out of the writing room of the CIA. There are maybe some poor Libyans but the majority has a similar standard of living as they could have in some EU countries. The average level of people living on or under the poverty line is smaller then that in Britain, 95% has a mobile phone and the average age is 78 years. There average income is much better then that of Egypt and considerable higher then their other neighbour Tunisia. So let us forget that "poor" Libyans. The west mainly the US (who else) with the UK and France will display an force of fighter planes several times higher then what Libya has, and six of those planes are in rebel hands with one of them shot down leaves Libya with 15 fighter planes and there is not much what you can do with that.
The western papers in order of the US with the Murdoch papers and Al Jazeera in front are demanding that the Libyan government should give all the cities of Libya to the rebels, did you ever remember to have seen such a message before it is like saying that all the Americans have to leave their cities and give to the Indians who ground they stole in the first place. Before Obama, the American politics did in some strange way make any sense. Under Obama it is simple the rule of a tyrant who want the world on his feet and employs the states he has already enslaved, such as the main Sunny Muslim states, Canada and the European union. Now he wants the rest.
Russia did not veto this absurd war declaration by the United Nations against one of his members as the USA has still not decided of they will have Russia into the World Trade Organisation a trade organisation Russia does not need. However the Russian accepted the USA blackmail and abstained. China does not want to bring the delicate trade situation and their growing influence in Africa in jeopardy so they also gave in to the USA blackmail and abstained instead of vetoing it. However they now have opened the door for the US tyrant to create the same situation in China as they have done so successful in Easter Europe. Throw money to the tribes and provinces to start a liberation fight. If China would retaliate the UN would be able to suspend the China seat on the Security Council and vote for a halt to all action by the Chinese against the rebels or start a war against China.
Then we have the dope of British politics Cameron who is still trying to find out what is left or what is right. Not to worry about that he will get there in the end. This man that has managed in a nearly year time to bring most of the middle and lower classes in Britain to poverty has actual an opinion of his own “Libya has no future with Gadaffi" he said. Well Britain has no future with Cameron, but it does not mean that we want to kill him. Actual the measures of Cameron are killing more civilians in Britain then the Libyan forces are killing civilians. Under Blair and Cameron civilians in Libya are all those people who using weapons to kill others, but if they are killed then they are civilians. Civilians who are supporting Gadaffi and that is the majority if they are killed by the US/UK led rebels then they are fighters even if they have never hold a weapon in their hand. Those way only civilians can be killed on the rebel site as the Libyan site does not have civilians in Blair and Cameron opinions. We hear the sound dollars dropping in their pockets.
The Western Warlord Obama said " The choice is comply or face action" in that form it means that if they comply than we will make sure that we will create the action and blame it on the Libyan forces who are defending their country against rebels. It would be interesting to see what the tyrant Obama would do if in the States rebels came armed in action. We know the answer incidence of the past have given the answer already, they all would be killed. In the UK the story is the same, the IRA fought to get Northern Ireland what always was one with the whole of Ireland but deliberate was separated, back to one Ireland and what did the UK do, they killed and killed again and if there was nothing to kill then they created a reason for killing, remember Bloody Sunday.
Blair the liar, clearly contracted by the media to do the US bidding to persuade the British people to believe the US lies, said, "In Libya there is no way out offered to its people". He knows he is not telling the correct story, then again with a solicitor’s origin he does what they do best create their side of the story rightly or wrongly. He went on tell that it is his duty to interfere in other countries. But what would he have said when he was premier and the Irish had demanded the full rights over their original land Northern Ireland and was forced by other countries to give it to them, would he, of course he would not, and nor should the Libyans. It is their fight it is their country and more of it is their oil. Then we have another” I do not know what I am doing" called Liam Fox his chance to show him self on the world stage, a defence minister.
This man is like Cameron a born failure hence he is in politics there he does not have to know anything he just has to know the right people and do their bidding, and so he does, it is time to build his new country house. There was nothing wrong with Libya anymore the terrorist past was indeed in the past. The USA government did declare so themselves they even appointed Libya for a post as non-permanent member of the Security Council for the period 2008/9. Also in August 2008, the US and Libya signed a bilateral comprehensive claims settlement agreement to compensate claimants in both countries who allege injury or death at the hands of the other country. In October 2008, the US Government received $1.5 billion pursuant to the agreement to distribute to US national claimants, and as a result effectively normalized its bilateral relationship with Libya. The two countries then exchanged ambassadors for the first time since 1973 in January 2009. Libya in May 2010 was elected to its first three-year seat on the UN Human Rights Council. If they get rid of Gadaffy would repayment still be done to the victims?
Slowly Libya was changing already and the committee elections this year could have seen that all the provinces would have their own reps. sitting in it. It is also not correct that Libyans are poor their income is on average rather high for the area of North Africa. It is also not true that Gadaffi is the president or the head of state, he is not he has the same function as in Britain the Queen has, no real power. The head of government is: Secretary of the General People's Committee (Prime Minister) al-Baghdadi Ali al-MAHMUDI (since 5 March 2006)
The government cabinet: General People's Committee established by the General People's Congress
The elections are complicated via village committee’s then tribal elders then to hierarchy of people's committees; The head of government is elected by the General People's Congress; election last held in March 2010 (next elections expected in early 2011)
So let us cut the cr...p and call a horse an horse. The US started this thing after the Egypt experience they thought they could create the same in Libya to get their hands on Libyan oil that is the only thing they always wanted. It did not go as they expected it to go, hence the absurd actions of the US Warlord in the UN. As he is up for re-election he could not do it himself the US people would not stand for it as it is already rumbling in the States, so the failures of European politics were recruited, past and present to do the running, that way if Libyans would take revenge they would take it in Britain and in France. After all who cares about the civilians, certainly not Blair who has already shown in the past that a live does not count if it is used against him he can always change religion again. Certainly not for Cameron who is trying to eliminate most of the British people to get them replaced by the rich and wealthy of the world, against payment of course as those poor British people do not have the money he wants.
That Blair was drafted in by the Media was to help to convince the people, 45% after all still support Labour, that what Cameron was doing was right. Wasting the millions he needed for the British civilians on warfare he did not needed, so it could be seen as right. Attracting terrorist in revenge to Britain ready for another 7/7 and the deaths of civilians, so that this could be seen as right. After all civilians in other countries need to be protected, in his own country they could be killed. Every killing would be an saving on future benefits, so in fact it would save the payments of benefits and that must be a good thing. However will the British people once more be fooled, they were already fooled twice before, or would they at last open their eyes for reality. Regardless of the liar, liar impersonation of Blair, Cameron and Fox be honest we think that the original Liar, Liar with Jim Carey was the better one.
===================================================================
23-03-2011
Following the trail of blood.
The Americans are always calling themselves a peaceful country, respecting other people’s countries and habitats. Then again they also say that they are honest while they are the most corrupt country in the world even far more then for example. However this counts for the cooperate and the government and secret services. The reality is that they always were a country of warlords and violence. From the early days (1775) till present they fought for 203 years always a battle anywhere at any place on earth. While in the years they were not actively involve in killing people were making preparations for yet another onslaught. It does not mean that other countries did not have their wars as we here in Kharvoc are well aware off. However rivers of blood as the USA have flooding that is a different story.
The stream of blood started with the murder of the authentic population of America, however that was getting boring, they had to find other wars and so they did, no reason needed, the line, America said so, was enough, they picked on the French, actual there was no reason but they invented one, to protect the commerce of the USA, sounds a little like the WMD in Iraq and that was a lie as well. Thirty years after that they took on the British, then Algeria and so we can go on and on. The short is they always wanted to fight, to kill, and to steal.
Of the native Indians it is estimated that the amount of Indians killed by the Western Americans is well over 100,000,000 It makes it the largest mass murder in the world it dwarfs the 11,000,000 of the Nazi Holocaust. And that is what the Americans are calling protecting the civilians.
We all remember the violent attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, were special civilians were selected to be killed, not government buildings, no army buildings, no airports, no deliberate civillians,105,000 dying on the first day and another 90,000 in the following years as a result of cowardly attack. The excuse was as always we had to force the Japanese government to obey. It must be the lousiest excuse ever to be used in any war at any time in the world.
The stream of blood was getting wider, their taste of killing civilians only was getting larger and larger as civilians were an easy target they did not fought back. And it was always the policy of the USA and still is to attack the small almost not armed ones for an easier success. Look at the war at Libya, Libya is not allowed to fight and therefore the US rockets are an easy target to kill so many civilian as possible. The psychology here is that in the USA eyes ever person, babies born or not yet born children young people, the elderly are terrorist even if the are not able or not willing to take up arms, if they die then they were terrorists regardless.
And the stream of blood is going faster and faster. The Korean War created the death of 3,600,000 civilians, estimate annex the near five and a half a million military deaths. The total death thanks to the USA intervention is estimated on over ten million. Did that war that was not needed and for that reason is called the forgotten war and out of which we have now the dangerous situation of a renegade state with nuclear power, the next one was even more disastrous for the USA.
The Vietnam war was again created out of a fantasy of the USA who invented a never happened attack by Vietnam as the excuse to have the dead of near 5,000,000 civilians on their hands, shooting them was not enough, napalm was used to kill them faster, the river of blood was now running wild and the USA now got the taste for it. The critic on the use of WMD was severe and the USA promised never to use it again, but in the Iraqi war they were at it again, still children are dying on the effect of WMD that the USA used on civilians, again not on army or rebels, no on civilians only.
The US government makes sure that fact and fiction is muddled, an ideal help is Fox news as part of the Murdoch empire is always good for a streaming series of fabricated lies, it is therefore no surprise that they as only news channel report that the plane shot down over Benghazi was an Gadaffi one while in reality it was a rebel plane attacking the Gadaffi forces who had a ceasefire as instructed by the UN. However what is a lie in the Murdoch empire if it brings in the money. In the time between they see the killing of the thousands of civilians on day one of the air bombardments as a step in the right direction.
Official until the UN resolution the dead of rebels and civilians were together estimated as 20,000. Which is indeed a large quantity, and then again it were the rebels who started the fight, not the Libyan government.
The so-called protectors of civilian will have succeeded that amount by the end of day one and as there is expected a long barrage of cowardly bombing from a distance we may expect that the level of death civilians may rise to the levels in Iraq and Afghanistan. Deaths not killed by the Libyan government but by the so-called protectors of civilians who are protecting the civilians by killing them 5 times more ands quicker then was done in the fighting between the US/UK organised rebels and the legitimate government of Libya.
The main rhetoric was and is obvious, if you do not want to be a puppet of the US, and the Western world controlled by the US then you have to be removed. It is the same approach as Adolf Hitler had in WW2, France and Sweden decided to be a puppet of the German Reich (Vichy France) and those cowards from then are now launching from a distance bombs on innocent civilians, cowards indeed. Then again they have a president play/midget and we all know that that kind of people wants to stick out and if they cannot do that by length and statue than by violence and atrocities.
However as recently as January 2011, a U.N. report uncritically praised Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi's human rights record. Of course, the U.N. body issuing the report included Syria, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, Cuba, Iran and the dictatorial junta of Myanmar. Pots apparently don't call kettles black in the international community. Yet the U.N. corrected course with surprising alacrity once the North African revolutions reached Libya's shores and Gadafi departed from the peaceful precedent of his fellow dictators. The General Assembly quickly suspended Libya from the Human Rights Council, and the Security Council has now authorized a no-fly zone and "all necessary measures" to protect Libyan civilians.
It shows that the UN secretary general is well tied to the pocket of the USA. That secretary General could in effect not care less what is happening in the world so long he get his regards, his money and the honours, he rest who cares, he just follows the USA trail, the trail of blood, which gets wider in streams by every decennia passed.
The so called civilians are US armed local gangsters, together with escapees from Egypt and local tribes man, The CIA report also clearly said that several so-called civilians were terrorist, the same terrorist they were fighting in Afghanistan, a couple of them were as such recognized.
Just look at the local news extract a5t 1403 hrs: Bab Qargarish 11 death 17 wounded, Bu Sittah 4 death 11 wounded,Qabilat 17 death 9 wounded, Dajibitah 16 death 24 wounded, Suqul 28 death 7 wounded. Jun'ah 3 death 19 wounded, Azziyah 26 death 21 wounded, Qurji 46 death 63 wounded, Bin Aamd 44 death 63 wounded. Hayy 11 death 16 wounded, Shatal 57 death 11 wounded so far. Tahura 26 death 49 wounded, Abyaras 3 death 7 wounded, Sababil 9 death 16 wounded, Sayyad Ah 63 death 97 wounded so far, Janzur i al 18 death under which 11 children 34 wounded, all children. Al Kufrah 23 death unknown wounded Al Jawf 34 death unknown wounded by attack on the air strip. This are only the ones who are reaching at this moment the news points, there are many more attacks of which no deaths are known yet. The pilots do not have to kill regardless as they are not attack by killing civilians they are government supported killers. And this from the US/UK France version we want to protect the civilians. All those deaths are probably seen by the US as army from the age of one onwards.
The cowards in France and Britain will see those killings as Gadaffi propaganda; they know in reality, that the death of civilians is considerable higher. Then we have the absurd situation that an army is told not to fight if they are attack and to call the Americans to kill of any defending of life, it like putting a boxer in the ring his hands tied bind to his body so that he cannot defend himself while the other fighter is told to start fighting guess who will win. This is the same in Libya, Gadaffi did not started this fight the US did, they could not win it outright so as the real cowards they are they tied the army of Libya and then sent a rubble of gangsters terrorist and tribal failures to over run them in the hope that their leader will be the puppet Gadaffi refused to be. They hope to mix their created stream of blood with the oil wells in Libya and bleed the population, now one of the highest earners in that part of the world dry. They did that successful in Iraq also a high earner country before the American attack and now one of the poorest.
Question is since when do "poor civilians have warplanes, tanks and missiles etc". Since when is there a ceasefire whereby one party has to stop the fighting and the other can go on and is helped by others to achieve this.
Make no mistake this is not about poor civilians, it’s about de-posing Gaddafi because he will not be a puppet for the west. It is just as that plane that was shot down over Benghazi was in fact a rebel (poor civilians) warplane targeting Gaddafi troops. (This is a FACT, not widely covered in news stories the Murdoch press even denies it)
Meanwhile the west turns a blind eye to the dictators that are killing there people in Yemen, Bahrain and Saudi, (The Saudi's even sent ground forces into Bahrain to assist in the killing). However these dictators will play ball with the west, unlike Gaddafi!
Why did they not attack Gaddaffi when he killed innocent British people in the Lockerbie tragedy? Why didn't they defend our own people? The country has are having cuts left right and centre and yet, we can afford to pay out millions on a war, which is not our argument. There are lots of unjust things that happen all over the world, we are a tiny country in the scheme of things, we cannot put the world to rights. It's an old saying, but "charity has to begin at home". Our forces should be there to defend OUR country, OUR people. The majority of Libyans won't even want us there. All we are doing is increasing our chance of terrorist’s attacks at a very high cost. And the costs are high; however Obama, Cameron and the midget of France, even smaller without his high heels on are in need to get the attention away from their situation.
Obama needs re-election although that is not really important, as corporate US will simple shovel the votes around until their favoured wins regardless, however money he does not have but spent as water is a problem. Take the UK, take the self appointed premier Cameron, just have spend the highest ever borrowed amount of 11.8 billion in February, has the rip of his population, made an fortune out of the highest tax loaded petrol prices in the Western world and is still short. Problem is that nobody is able to find out where he did spend the money on, it is simple gone. Now he spends 15 million a day minimal on killing civilians he calls soldiers as an excuse to kill them. What does Gadaffi knows about Britain that makes Cameron so set to eliminate Gadaffi. He knows that Gadaffi if killed would not make a different to the Libyan situation, as Gadaffi is head of state but not the government, just like the Queen of Britain is head of state but not the government.
Is it not a coincidence that the United Nations Human Rights Council was scheduled to take a vote over Libya's Human Rights Record.
The Council was about to vote on a report that showed, affirmed and praised Libya and Colonel Ghaddafi for THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS RECORD. The report said that the Ghaddafi government protected "not only political rights, but also economic, educational, social and cultural rights," and praised it for the nation's treatment of religious minorities, and the "human rights training" received by security forces. It was to be approved at a vote later this month. When the USA/UK corporate system decided that to screw up the Cameron popularity without damaging the status of their puppet at home (USA) Obama that voting was put on hold. On this moment they have by protecting civilians killed already more civilians then the Libyan forced have done. The Western Corporate leaders who are pulling the strings of Obama, Cameron and the dwarf of France, are not interested in killing or not killing they are interested in selling and making money.
Look at the money they make from the hardware used in those killing of the civilians of Libya or as they calling it the No Fly Zone protection, what is used by the British cowards behind their desks to extend that to demolishing whole housing estates in Tripoli, on such estate caused the death of over 1100 death and more the 800 wounded. Reported by the Western press as 40 deaths, by Libyan forces. Ironic absurdities by puppets that are to much cowards to report proper and to insist that the real facts are reported.
The main puppets who misscrewing the real data are that of Hamids Al Thani Al Jazeera, were honesty does not count as so long it brings in the money, and their counter part the Murdoch Media with Fox in the USA and News International in the UK. Al Jazeera went even so far that their team 27 kilometer outside Benghazi were witness who rebels of Pakistani origin slashed two captured civilians throat and then reported it as have not seen anything. They were taken in Tripoli to the damaged sites but again Aljazeera did not see anything. AlJazeera should therefore be translated as The Local Liar; the fact that it is owned by the Al Thani's makes that an obvious choice. It shows the danger of Arab countries stabbing other Arab countries in the back (Al Thani/Al Jazeera) for influence and money. Muslim law and rules suddenly do not count anymore for the Al Thani's not that it ever did special not when in Paris or London. It is however against the teachings of the Islam, to support and active help infidels against brother Muslims. Al Thani uses the Sharia laws it should be used at Al Thani and Obama. There are stones enough for both of them.
The world is indeed a wild and dangerous place. The masses live in poverty and yearn for the freedom and wealth displayed by the few. Governments, whether democratic or not, view this threat with alarm and have no compunction in using violence to thwart it. Other countries happily accept the money offered to join actions which are illegal and inhumane. The actions of the Bahraini elite are no better than Libya's, yet have elicited hardly any condemnation, let alone military intervention. Idealism in international politics is always mitigated by pragmatism and self interest. The statements of the special British commanders who expressed to be proud to kill people and to support rebels against a member of the UN, they particular find it heroic to shoot at people who cannot defend themselves, they are just as their premier, COWARDS!.
====================================================================
25-03-2011
The population of Britain must have been watching with complete amazement the smirked smile at the lips of their Finance minister Osbourne, when presenting his budget or to be accurate his summing up on how to rip of the poor, nearly rip of the not so poor yet and to feature the rich and wealthy where ever they are in the world.
The wealthy Tory MP's of the so-called front benches where cheering and laughing every time Osbourne was opening his mouth and that while they know that if Osbournes opens his mouth only lies comes out. The budget was for the Tory millionaires indeed something to shout about and that was what they ware doing, loudly.
Chancellor George Osborne is to set out plans for creating at least 10 "enterprise zones" across Britain, in a scaled down revival of the Thatcher government's urban renewal scheme.
The zones will be targeted in areas of "high growth potential" and offer incentives such as simpler planning rules and tax breaks for firms. Councils will also be allowed to keep revenue from business rates so it can be ploughed back into the local economy. Speaking at the Conservative spring conference in Cardiff, Mr Osborne will insist the system will have more success at promoting growth away from the South East than Labour's "bureaucratic" Regional Development Agencies (RDAs). Critics however, have warned that the £100 million of funding available over four years is not enough, given that RDAs were handed billions of pounds.
His main part and what he saw as a glory point was the lowering of one pence of the price of a litre of petrol, that it still is by far the highest in the Western world after that was not his problem he gets it for free as most of his wealthy cronies. That Osbourne is good in attracting money towards him did he proof, years ago by accusing Mandelson to be on a ship of a Russian Billionaire to get money, Osbourne's accusation. However he never explained why he was there in the first place as that Russian businessman had no relation ship to him or his friends.
In any case he could afford that one pence, it would be compensated by the fast rising daily goods prices in the UK, that way he would get his one penny back in the form of VAT on other goods. And he will need it as the war on Libya what will be followed by a war on Syria and Lebanon in the near future, will cost him at least 15 million a day in hardware use and flying fuel. His statement before the budget that it would be over in a couple of days resembles the statement of the Labour government regarding in that time about Iraq, and we all know how long it took.
At the moment we writing this there are already 6 day's gone and a near 100 million wasted, wasted are the changes of doing business in the future with Libya as the USA will take over together with Arab Oil. However as servants of the USA corporate government they have to obey and so will have the NATO. Although NATO was set-up and was intended for defence, it is now well established as the USA attacking force, attacking countries that cannot defend themselves, which is the main of the corporate USA politics. As their servants the British government but also the opposition have to follow their orders. For the Conservative party an extra burden is their agreement before the election that Murdoch could take over SKY-BSB, the main reason Murdoch changed sites, again!
The fact is that they are blatantly and unashamedly Thatcherites disciples of the most evil person ever to disgrace the name of politician. The LibDem are only in it for the personal glory their foreman are also millionaires and have therefore the same smirk on their faces as the Conservatives. They also getting everything for free, plus a king’s ransom in wages and expenses while the rest of their voters are getting poorer by the day. Statistically they are already the fourth party with less then 18% of the populations vote if there were now elections. They are in effect a disgrace to the name Liberal Democrat, the policies they are backing are neither liberal nor democratic, and they are fascist right.
Another thing Osbourne could introduce from the eighties is the Poll Tax if he half had the chance. This would be the right time as more than 50% of the population hate them so a little more hate would do them not much harm. When the time for election arrives you simple lower it drastically and hope the best with the Murdoch press launching lies after lies, fantasy after fantasy, to persuade the population that emptying their pockets and ripping them off will be to their advantage in the future. Look at them paying themselves a fortune of a yearly income before expenses £300,000 a year (Essex County Council) of our money for doing very little if anything and leaving people without proper roads and facilities normal in this time.
Then we have 100 million for repairing the roads, this must be a laugh. 100 Million where 250 million is needed, then blocking the council tax and reducing the council’s income. Obvious that Osbourne want to increase his attacks on the civilians in this country, by killing them off quickly.
Most councils are already reducing or cancelling help to the elderly, disabled house bound people are already in many cases removed from any form of help, attack those elderly civilians and kill them of quickly pensions and benefits will be saved.
Man can really ask what is the different between Gaddafi and Cameron/Osbourne, the answer must be none, they both intent to kill the civilians, therefore it is save to say that both have blood on their hands.
But he increased the taxing level for the poor so that they have an extra 7.50 a week extra, which they then have to spent on the fast rising house fuel prices, the fast food prices, clothing and other daily needs, so that on the end of that week the extra 7.50 is spent on the extra VAT, that way the government did not loose anything but the Murdoch papers can say it was an benefit to help the poor. It amounts to 147 pounds a week income over which still the NI need to be paid, so that after paying that plus the fuel charges and the telephone there is maximum 84 pounds left, an amount that the government find is more then enough to live from. If that is so why need Cameron then 180,000 a year, he has every thing already for free. He needs it to get richer and that has to be over the backs of the civilians.
It is the same with “We getting rid of the quangos”, there will be a bonfire, he said. There is no bonfire of the quangos. All that has happened is that some of the brass plates have been unscrewed from the front doors; the people are still in the buildings behind them, still doing the same thing under a different name and reporting to a different person. Quangos has now become a pejorative term - written or spoken dismissively, as if such bodes are populated by incompetents who are wasting public resources and are unaccountable to anyone.
Look at some weird examples which benefit the big companies but cost the civilians a fortune, Fensa, no window can be placed without their permission, every builder can put in a window but if they do not Fensa's permission it cannot be done, it is also called RED TAPE, that is the tape the government said the would remove. They did not remove it but are tempting to tie is around the British peoples neck, tied.
The government said that they did remove some quango, however some quangos are very clever hidden inside other quangos. On this moment there are 1162 quangos at the cost of 64 billion mainly in high salaries paid to the chairs or executives who have that function not because they know what they are doing but because they know someone who know someone who can give them the job.
Look at some of the absurdities they calling quangos.
BIS Aircraft and Shipbuilding Industries Arbitration Tribunal Abolish
BIS British Shipbuilders Abolish
BIS Union Modernisation Fund Supervisory Board Abolish
CO Office for Civil Society Advisory Body Abolish
Communities and Local Government (CLG) Advisory Panel for the Local Innovation Awards Scheme Abolish CLG National Housing and Planning Advice Unit Abolish
CLG National Tenant Voice Abolish
CLG Standards Board for England Abolish
DCMS Advisory Council on Libraries Abolish
DCMS Legal Deposit Advisory Panel Abolish
Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) Advisory Committee on Carbon Abatement Technologies Abolish
DECC Renewable Advisory Board Abolish
Defra Advisory Committee on Organic Standards Abolish
Defra Agricultural Dwelling House Advisory Committees (x16) Abolish
Defra Agricultural Wages Board for England and Wales Abolish
Defra Agricultural Wages Committees (x15) Abolish
Defra Animal Health and Welfare Strategy England Implementation Group Abolish
Defra Committee on Agricultural Valuation Abolish
Defra Commons Commissioners Abolish
Defra Expert Panel on Air Quality Standards Abolish
Defra Food from Britain Abolish
Defra Inland Waterways Advisory Council Abolish
Defra Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution Abolish
DfE Teachers TV Board of Governors Abolish
FCO Caribbean Board Abolish
MoJ Administrative Justice and Tribunal Council Abolish
MoJ Courts Boards (x 19) Abolish
MoJ Legal Services Ombudsman Abolish
MoJ Public Guardian Board Abolish
MoJ Victim’s Advisory Panel Abolish
MoJ Youth Justice Board for England and Wales Abolish
MoD Animal Welfare Advisory Committee Abolish
DfT Railway Heritage Committee Abolish
Abolish (with some or all functions transferred to civil service, local government, other quango, expert committee, charity or private sector)
BIS British Nuclear Fuels Limited
BIS Competition Service
BIS Copyright Tribunal
BIS Design Council
BIS Hearing Aid Council
BIS NESTA (National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts)
BIS Regional Development Agencies (x eight)
BIS SITPRO Ltd
BIS Strategic Advisory Board for Intellectual Property
BIS Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Advisory Body (WAB)
CO Civil Service Appeal Board
CO Commission for the Compact
CO Government Strategic Marketing Advisory Board
CO Main Honours Advisory Committee
CO Security Commission
CLG Advisory Panel on Standards for the Planning Inspectorate
CLG Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the National Health Service in England
CLG Community Development Foundation
CLG Firebuy
CLG Infrastructure Planning Commission
CLG London Thames Gateway Development Corporation
CLG Olympic Park Legacy Company Ltd
CLG Rent Assessment Panels / Residential Property Tribunal Service
CLG The Office for Tenants and Social Landlords (also known as Tenant Services Authority)
CLG Thurrock Development Corporation
CLG Valuation Tribunal for England
CLG Valuation Tribunal Service
CLG West Northamptonshire Development Corporation
Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) Advisory Committee on Historic Wreck Sites
DCMS Advisory Committee on National Historic Ships
DCMS Advisory Committee on the Government Art Collection
DCMS Football Licensing Authority
DCMS Horserace Totalisator Board
DCMS Museums, Libraries and Archives Council
DCMS Public Lending Right
DCMS The Theatres Trust
DCMS UK Film Council
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) Advisory Committee on Hazardous Substances
Defra Advisory Committee on Packaging
Defra Advisory Committee on Pesticides
Defra Air Quality Expert Group
Defra British Waterways
Defra Commission for Rural Communities
Defra Darwin Advisory Committee
Defra Farm Animal Welfare Council
Defra National Standing Committee on Farm Animal Genetic Resources
Defra Pesticide Residues Committee
Defra Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee
Defra Veterinary Residues Committee
Defra Zoos Forum
Department for Education (DfE) British Educational Communications and Technology Agency
DfE General Teaching Council for England
DfE Qualifications and Curriculum Development Agency
DfE School Food Trust
DH Advisory Board on the Registration of Homeopathic Products
DH Advisory Committee on Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infections
DH Advisory Committee on Borderline Substances
DH Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens
DH Advisory Committee on the Safety of Blood, Tissues and Organs
DH Advisory Group on Hepatitis
DH Alcohol Education and Research Council
DH Appointments Commission
DH Committee on Carcogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment
DH Committee on Medical Effects of Air Pollutants
DH Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment
DH Committee on Mutagenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment
DH Committee on the Safety of Devices
DH Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence
DH Expert Advisory Group on AIDS
DH Gene Therapy Advisory Committee
DH General Social Care Council
DH Genetics and Insurance Committee
DH Health Protection Agency
DH Herbal Medicines Advisory Committee
DH Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority
DH Human Genetics Commission
DH Human Tissue Authority
DH Independent Advisory Group on Sexual Health and HIV
DH Independent Review Panel for the Classification of Borderline Products
DH Independent Review panel on the Advertising of Medicines
DH Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisations
DH National Information Governance Board for Health and Social Care
DH National Joint Registry Steering Committee
DH Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition
MoJ Chief Coroner of England and Wales/Chief Coroner’s Office (1 body)
MoJ Crown Court Rule Committee
MoJ HM Inspectorate of Court Administration
MoJ Legal Services Commission
MoJ Magistrates’ Courts Rule Committee
HO Security Industry Authority
GEO Women’s National Commission
Department for Transport (DfT) BRB (Residuary) Ltd
DfT Cycling England
DfT Renewable Fuels Agency
Department of Work and Pensions(DWP) Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
DWP Disability Employment Advisory Committee
DWP Disability Living Allowance / Attendance Allowance Advisory Board
Merge
BIS Ofcom Merge
DCMS Gambling Commission Merge
DCMS UK Sport Merge
Ministry of Justice (MoJ) Advisory Committee on Justices of the Peace (x 101) Merge
MoJ Advisory Council on Historical Manuscripts Merge
MoJ Advisory Council on Public Records Merge
MoJ Crown Prosecution Service Merge
MoJ Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office Merge
HO Serious Organised Crime Agency Merge
DWP Pensions Ombudsman Merge
DWP Pensions Protection Fund Ombudsman Merge
BIS Central Arbitration Committee Merge
BIS Certification Office Merge
BIS Competition Commission Merge
BIS Office of Fair Trading Merge
BIS Postcomm Merge
DCMS National Lottery Commission Merge
DCMS Sport England Merge
Retain
Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) ACAS (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service) Retain
BIS British Hallmarking Council Retain
BIS Capital for Enterprise Limited Retain
BIS Competition Appeals Tribunal Retain
BIS Construction Industry Training Board Retain
BIS Export Credit Guarantee Department *1 Retain
BIS Export Guarantees Advisory Council *2 Retain
BIS HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England) Retain
BIS Industrial Development Advisory Board Retain
BIS Low Pay Commission Retain
BIS Office of Manpower Economics Retain
BIS Research Councils (x 7) Retain
BIS Royal Mail Holdings Plc Retain
BIS Technology Strategy Board Retain
BIS UKTI* (UK Trade International)3 Retain
Cabinet Office (CO) Advisory Committee on Business Appointments Retain
CO Charity Commission for England and Wales Retain
CO Committee on Standards in Public Life Retain
CO House of Lords Appointments Commission Retain
CO Security Vetting Appeals Panel Retain
CO Senior Salaries Review Body Retain
CLG Architects Registration Board Retain
CLG Building Regulations Advisory Committee Retain
CLG Homes and Communities Agency Retain
CLG Independent Housing Ombudsman Ltd Retain
CLG Commission for Administration (also known as Local Government Ombudsman) Retain
CLG Ordnance Survey Retain
DCMS Arts Council England Retain
DCMS BBC Retain
DCMS Big Lottery Fund Retain
DCMS British Library Retain
DCMS Channel 4 Retain
DCMS Churches Conservation Trust Retain
DCMS English Heritage Retain
DCMS Historic Royal Palaces Retain
DCMS Horserace Betting Levy Appeal Tribunal Retain
DCMS Horserace Betting Levy Board Retain
DCMS Museums and Galleries (British Museum, Horniman Museum, Geffrye Museum, Imperial War Museum, Museum of Science and Industry Manchester, National Gallery, National Maritime Museum, National Museum of Science and Industry, National Museums Liverpool, National Portrait Gallery, Natural History Museum, Royal Armouries, Sir John Sloane’s Museum, Tate Gallery, Victoria & Albert Museum, Wallace Collection) Retain
DCMS National Heritage Memorial Fund/Heritage Lottery Fund Retain
DCMS Olympic Delivery Authority Retain
DCMS Olympic Lottery Distributor Retain
DCMS Reviewing Committee on the Export of Works of Art Retain
DCMS S4C Retain
DCMS Treasure Valuation Committee Retain
DCMS UK Anti Doping Retain
DCMS Visit Britain Retain
DCMS Visit England Retain
DECC Civil Nuclear Police Authority Retain
DECC Coal Authority Retain
DECC Committee on Climate Change Retain
DECC Committee on Radioactive Waste Management Retain
DECC Fuel Poverty Advisory Group Retain
DECC Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Retain
DECC Nuclear Liabilities Fund Retain
DECC Nuclear Liability Financing Assurance Board Retain
DECC Ofgem Retain
Defra Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment Retain
Defra British Wool Marketing Board Retain
Defra Broads Authority Retain
Defra Covent Garden Market Authority Retain
Defra Environment Agency Retain
Defra Forestry Commission Retain
Defra Gangmasters Licensing Authority Retain
Defra Independent Agricultural Appeals Panel Retain
Defra Internal Drainage Boards (x 160) Retain
Defra Joint Nature Conservation Committee Retain
Defra Marine Management Organisation Retain
Defra National Forest Company Retain
Defra National Parks Authorities (x9) Retain
Defra Natural England Retain
Defra OFWAT Retain
Defra Royal Botanic Gardens Kew Retain
Defra Science Advisory Council Retain
Defra Sea Fish Industry Authority Retain
Defra Veterinary Products Committee Retain
DfE Ofqual Retain
DfE Ofsted Retain
DfE School Teachers’ Review Body Retain
Department for International Development (DfID) Commonwealth Development Corporation Retain
DfID Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the UK Retain
Department of Health (DH) Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee Retain
DH Advisory Committee on Clinical Excellence Awards Retain
DH British Pharmacopoeia Commission Retain
DH Care Quality Commission Retain
DH Commission on Human Medicines Retain
DH Independent Reconfiguration Panel Retain
DH Medical Education England Retain
DH Monitor Retain
DH NHS Pay Review Body Retain
DH Review Body on Doctors’ and Dentists’ Remuneration Retain
Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) BBC World Service Retain
FCO British Council Retain
FCO Marshall Aid Commemoration Commission Retain
FCO The Westminster Foundation for Democracy Retain
HM Treasury Royal Mint Advisory Committee on the design of coins, medals, seals and decorations Retain
MoJ Advisory Committee on Civil Costs Retain
MoJ Advisory Council on National Records and Archives Retain
MoJ Assessor for Compensation for Miscarriages of Justice Retain
MoJ Civil Justice Council Retain
MoJ Civil Procedure Rule Committee Retain
MoJ Courts Fund Office Retain
MoJ Criminal Cases Review Commission Retain
MoJ Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority Retain
MoJ Criminal Procedure Rule Committee Retain
MoJ Family Justice Council Retain
MoJ Family Procedure Rule Committee Retain
MoJ HM Inspectorate of Prisons Retain
MoJ HM Inspectorate of Probation Retain
MoJ Prisons and Probation Ombudsman Retain
MoJ HM Land Registry Retain
MoJ Independent Advisory Panel on Deaths in Custody Retain
MoJ Independent Monitoring Boards of Prisons, Immigration Removal Centres and Short-Term Holding Rooms (x 147) Retain
MoJ Information Commissioner’s Office Retain
MoJ Insolvency Rules Committee Retain
MoJ Land Registration Rule Committee Retain
MoJ Law Commission of England and Wales Retain
MoJ Legal Services Board Retain
MoJ Office for Legal Complaints (funded by profession) Retain
MoJ Official Solicitor Retain
MoJ Parole Board of England and Wales Retain
MoJ Probation Trusts (x 35) Retain
MoJ Prison Services Pay Review Body Retain
MoJ Public Trustee Retain
MoJ Restraint Accreditation Board Retain
MoJ Sentencing Council for England and Wales Retain
MoJ The National Archives Retain
MoJ Tribunal Procedure Committee Retain
MoJ Victims Commissioner Retain
Home Office (HO) Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs Retain
HO Animal Procedures Committee Retain
HO Forensic Science Service Retain
HO Independent Police Complaints Commission Retain
HO Investigatory Powers Tribunal Retain
HO Migration Advisory Committee Retain
HO National DNA Database Ethics Group Retain
HO Office of Surveillance Commissioners Retain
HO Police Discipline Appeals Tribunal Retain
HO Technical Advisory Board Retain
Government Equalities Office (GEO) Equality and Human Rights Commission Retain
Ministry of Defence (MoD) Advisory Committee on Conscientious Objectors Retain
MoD Advisory Group on Military Medicine Retain
MoD Armed Forces Pay Review Body Retain
MoD Central Advisory Committee on Pensions and Compensation Retain
MoD Defence Nuclear Safety Committee Retain
MoD Defence Scientific Advisory Council Retain
MoD Independent Monitoring Board for the Military Corrective Training Centre Retain
MoD National Army Museum Retain
MoD National Museum of the Royal Navy Retain
MoD Nuclear Research Advisory Council Retain
MoD Oil and Pipelines Agency Retain
MoD Review Board for Government Contracts Retain
MoD Royal Air Force Museum Retain
MoD Science Advisory Committee on the Medical Implications of Less-Lethal Weapons Retain
MoD Veterans Advisory and Pensions Committees (x 13) Retain
DfT British Transport Police Authority Retain
DfT Civil Aviation Authority Retain
DfT Directly Operated Railways Ltd Retain
DfT London and Continental Railways Ltd Retain
DfT Northern Lighthouse Board Retain
DfT Office of Rail Regulation Retain
DfT Passenger Focus/Passengers’ Council Retain
DfT Traffic Commissioners and Deputies Retain
DfT Trinity House Lighthouse Service Retain
DWP Equality 2025 Retain
DWP Health and Safety Executive Retain
DWP Industrial Injuries Advisory Council Retain
DWP National Employment Savings Trust (succeeded the Personal Accounts Delivery Authority on 5 July 2010) Retain
DWP Pension Protection Fund Retain
DWP Pensions Regulator Retain
DWP Social Security Advisory Committee Retain
DWP The Pensions Advisory Service Retain
BIS Financial Reporting Council Retain
Under consideration
BIS Engineering Construction Industry Training Board Under consideration
BIS Film Industry Training Board Under consideration
BIS Insolvency Practitioners Tribunal Under consideration
BIS Local Better Regulation Office Under consideration
BIS Office for Fair Access Under consideration
BIS Student Loans Company Under consideration
BIS UK Atomic Energy Authority Under consideration
BIS UK Commission for Employment and Skills Under consideration
CO Central Office of Information Under consideration
CO National School of Government Under consideration
CLG The Leasehold Advisory Service Under consideration
DCMS Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment Under consideration
Defra Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board Under consideration
Defra Agricultural Land Tribunal Under consideration
Defra Consumer Council for Water Under consideration
Defra Plant Varieties and Seeds Tribunal Under consideration
Defra Sea Fish Licence Tribunal Under consideration
Defra Sustainable Development Commission Under consideration
DfE Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service Under consideration
DfE Children’s Workforce Development Council Under consideration
DfE National College for Leadership of Schools and Children’s Services Under consideration
DfE Partnerships for Schools Under consideration
DfE School Support Staff Negotiating Body Under consideration
DfE The Office of the Children’s Commissioner Under consideration
DfE Training and Development Agency for Schools Under consideration
DfE Young People’s Learning Agency Under consideration
FCO Diplomatic Service Appeals Board Under consideration
FCO Foreign Compensation Commission Under consideration
FCO Great Britain China Centre Under consideration
FCO UK India Round Table Under consideration
MoJ Advisory Panel on Public Sector Information Under consideration
MoJ Judicial Appointments Commission Under consideration
MoJ Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman Under consideration
HO Independent Safeguarding Authority Under consideration
HO Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner Under consideration
HO Police Advisory Board, Police Negotiating Board and Police Arbitration Tribunal Under consideration
MoD National Employer Advisory Board Under consideration
DWP Independent Living Fund Under consideration
DWP Remploy Ltd Under consideration
Attorney General 4 817 0 57.9
Non Ministerial Departments 3 9017 684.8 715.8
Cabinet Office 16 1518 68.35 434.63
Communities and Local Government 28 6240 2522.6 1104.7
Local Authorities 469 2927000 92490 145569
Constitutional Affairs 578 33097 1161.77 2404.47
Culture, Media and Sport 63 45545.25 1657.81 8412.84
Defence 48 41117 8877.3 4877.8
Education and Skills 22 12408 18887.4 19738.47
Enviroment, Food and Rural Affairs 107 29842 3337.51 5909.47
Export Credit Guarantee Department 1 0 0 0
Food Standards Agency 6 1478 33 91.33
Foreign and Commonwealth Office 12 10972 467.26 930.42
Forestry Commission (Great Britain/ England) 3 1255 23.11 52.36
Health 59 20050 818.6 3488.2
HM Revenue and Customs 1 4428 0 201.29
Home Office 33 59409 3538.04 3994.09
International Development 4 6785 15.78 137.5
Trade and Industry 66 244365 6161.77 23033.32
Transport 19 22030 2303.79 6502.22
Treasury 9 8222 317.58 920.46
Work and Pensions 23 115453 4817.08 7304.62
Scottish Executive 148 40169 6685 8434.9
Northern Ireland Executive 11 1357 8.18 36.09
Welsh Assembly 38 3241 1154.32 1234.86
Total Quangos, Agencies and Non-Ministerial Departments
and another 64 billion gone.
The interest rate Dopey Osbourne said is much lower then in other countries. He most probably found some countries unknown to the Western world. He mentioned countries with a much higher level of interest.
Look at the real actual rates:
Spain he said was much higher in fact it is 3.6% February 2011
Portugal he said was much higher it is 3.5% February 2011
Greece he said was much higher it is the same as Britain 4.4% in February 2011.
New Zealand 4% in February 2011
England 4.4% ,
Australia 2.7% ,
Europe area 2.4% ,
Canada 2.2% ,
USA 2.1% ,
Switzerland 0.5% ,
Japan 0% ,
China 4.9% ,
We can only conclude that there are lies dammed lies and Tory lies.
With the employment rates it was the same Euro Area O.1% up.
Up to 0.3% in both zones combined, with 1.1% for Britain.
==================
The unemployment rate in Britain is 8.3% while Britain has the highest rate of part time employment in the Euro Area.
This budget, a give away for big business, and benefits for the government itself.
The UK Government wants to lower the taxes for big business to attract more business as other countries business rates are much lower he said. However look at the figures in reality: Belgium 54%. Finland 46.6%. Germany 45%. Denmark 44.4%. Italy 43%. France 40%. USA 35%. Australia 31.5%. Japan 31%. Poland 19%. Swiss 20%. Quatar 11%. Hongkong 24%. Singapore 25%. UAE 14.1%. So we can go on What Osbourne actual wants to do is the Slovenian factor. The country has been intent on building an investor-friendly climate. So in 2004 it swept away 21 categories of personal income taxes, five tax brackets, and scores of exemptions and deductions, replacing them with a flat 19% rate. Slovak officials say that their flat-tax reform was crucial in securing Billions of new business.
Osbourne want to hook in on this except he wants the keep the flat rate high on at least 34%. With the cost of labour being one of the lowest it would attract more business but impoverish the total civilian population. This on it self is no object for the Conservatives as they in government will not feel the pain and the suffering the civilians are feeling, many extra will die due to this.
This budget was made for the Murdoch press to spin their fantasies over the civilians in the hope the British people would be Dom enough to accept it without searching the Internet to see of what he was saying was actual correct. It was not it was a fake and so is that coalition government. They are not this while big business is leaving because the government was not willing to attract more business, look at what did happen at pzilzer in Sandwhich. Look at the many missed changes all over the country. They will take action to help low earners however after tax and NI there will hardly anything left with the still fast rising prices. In the time between Osborne's Treasury press office has refused to provide the figures that show exactly how much worse off families across the UK are because of his budget on Wednesday. The Treasury wants to delay releasing the figures for two weeks in the hope the fuss will have blown over, and had have the chance to fill in the gabs and make it look better then it is in reality.
The Treasury knows it must release the figures under the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act. But it knows that a FOI request allows it 20 working days to respond, so it is delaying by less than that. It is using a freedom of information loophole to delay giving taxpayer’s information it could - and should - publish instantly. They simple wait till other world news have taken the attention of the British people and we can be sure that the Murdoch press is already working to create a fantasy to get the attention away from the real facts. However, these are figures produced for the public at taxpayers expense. Taxpayers have a right to see them now. The civil service is supposed to be neutral and serve the country not be party political. This is the conservatives all over again, lying cheating and being dishonest. With out the help of the Murdoch Media they would not stand a chance in hell, the only place for the sake of Britain they should be.
======================================================================
27-03-2011
Statistics are showing that in the last half year the percentage of older people under the poverty line is up drastically. The percentage of children under the poverty line is up drastically. The average spending power of the people in Britain is down by near 25%, while the top 10% earners spending power is up drastically.
Osbourne, which via an abbreviation can be brought back to Obvious Stupidity Borne, other wise there can be no explanation for his and her meaning Osbourne and Cameron's statement, "that we all are in it together" Unless it means that we are all in it together in which the 90% of the population suffers and the 10% of the population profits. Cameron and Osbourne being the once who making the profit by stealing it from the rest. We do not want to get into what they receive for getting the oil from Libya for Qatar's Al Thani's and the US Obama's. They certainly do not do this for nothing, although the people in the country have to feed their bills for hundreds of millions spent on Libya, they no doubt will be making a profit now or as Blair did later.
In the time between the population is suffering, by the lack of spending power, and they have to keep their hands on their ears to stop hearing the continues roaring laughter of the Government of Britain, while having their luxury dinners and expensive wines, where one diner cost as much as saving an pensioner from dying. Examples enough, have a look at Jaywick, a former holiday resort in Tendring DC near Clacton.
A charming place, a place loved by the people who are living there. It consists out of 4 separate parts, the worst being the Brooklands right on the sea wall. It is one of the most deprived areas of England. The why of it is an easy one to answer. The Conservative Council have tried and failed for years to get the people out of Jaywick, with bribes, expulsions and today's with creating a complete derelict area, by refusing to do the simple basics of a normal council. Rubbish is left on the streets, roads demolished by Council vehicles never repaired, deliberate discrimination against the many disbles older people who living there, as walking or having a wheelchair is like an army training ground with high obstacles and deep holes. Although the Essex CC has a duty to repair, they do not do so as they have declared the road to be not adopted. Their way, the Tory way, of saying stuff yourself we not doing it, your lot are poor old and or disabled, so there is nothing what you can do about it. In short the typical pre-Victorian slave holders mentality. With a Council Tax that is high by any standards, and one of the highest in the country as to take an comparison between Tendring DC as a Tory council and as an example the most expensive London Borough of Tory Kensington and Chelsea, the we find that the D band of Kensington and Chelsea is less expensive then the A band in Tendring DC. And in the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea all the roads are taken care of so far as possible all the older and disabled people are taken care of. However Tendring DC still demands a near 1000 pounds minimum a year as Council tax for services not provided, even if a house is used for holiday only, even when it is 100% not occupied Council tax need to be paid in which case council tax is paid and 100% no service provided.
This stands at the root of the derelict creation by Tendring Council. Owners who not using it or only using it for holidays need to pay the council tax just as others in Tendring DC who are living there permanent. The result is that many owners do not bother anymore and simple leaving it to rot instead of keeping it up. The council with his near fascist attitude derelict creation idea, then uses the derelict properties to show that the WHOLE of Jaywick is like that. That this is a lie does not the matter they are Tories so what is a lie, if you tell it long enough people start to believe it and then the lie is not longer a lie. You can see that from the replies of the more simple souls on articles in the local newspapers.
The question is however is it really that bad? The answer must be a re-sounding NO. The problem mainly lays in the refusal of the Council to create roads. The roads are there but are not attended to for many, many years for which the council used one stupid excuse after another none of it being legal. The point being that roads that were still to be seen as roads were almost deliberate ploughed in with heavy trucks, which demolished the concrete roads completely, without that the demolishing council attempted to repair them. As a result some roads, with one in the Grasslands being the worst, are in rain periods swimming pools and not roads, this in turns means that the residents cannot leave unless they have a car to drive out and that is dangerous as because of the water the deep holes cannot be seen. The use of wheelchair is obvious impossible. In the winter the roads can be used as skating rinks. The result of this is that the road which are filled with water, further demolishing the roads it self. Tendring DC knows this, hence the reason they do not do anything. While the rich and Tory members in Tendring DC only have to snap their fingers to get anything done they want, the poor and the disabled get nothing.
The result of that action was that more and more owners simple gave up. That resulted in the houses not being done up or repaired, which resulted into the derelict state as it is now. At the same time the council does all they can to make the situation worse by refusing to act, by refusing to do their duty for which they cashing in on the council tax, refusing to clear the rundown homes, this again with the most absurd reason they could think of. At the same time they have forbidding any form of home improvement to make sure that it will be looking derelict for a long time to come. In short a normal Tory reaction against the poor the disabled and the unemployed. That they breaking many laws do not the matter as the Tories control the courts so what ever they do even outside the law and legality it is always legal in Tory eyes.
There were many changes the council had to correct the situation, but as they are controlled by an control freak a kind of local dictator for which even the local MP stays quit nothing was ever done. As we reported before a request was made with a suggestion in May 2009 in Brussels Belgium for a project in Britain that was so deprived, by the British that a large fund injection would be needed to update the situation. Therefore a person from the institution in Brussels who do select the projects, that are deliberate placed in a deprived situation, was nominated to investigate the possibilities for Jaywick the small town on the east Essex coast in Britain.
Jaywick was selected for an investigation as the village was indicated by the British Government to be third deprived area in Britain. This village as all deprived areas is under Tory control. As it turned out it would be a simple project at a much lower estimate, then was given by the Conservative Essex County Council. The project would be viable and to be realized within a short time-span.
The most difficult problem was to get information from the Highway department regarding the roads.
Britain still has the middle age system of public roads which are classified as being private but in fact belong to the Local or State Government but are kept private in order to avoid responsibility while at the same time refuse the owners on those roads to improve them.
As it turned out it was made rather obvious that even if there were millions to be spent it would never be spent on the roads in Jaywick. The only way those millions would be used is for the building of new houses, at high rental costs, so that they make a fortune in rent, then sling everyone in Jaywick on to the street, or better the prehistoric paths that Tendring DC calls roads.
In short whatever money there will be given, where ever it comes from, it will never be spent on the roads. Or as the leader of Tendring said "we will never spent money on the roads of Jaywick" That he breaks the Human rights act does not bother him all costs for action against him would be made by the citizen anyway. The conservatives want to have the area for themselves, for their own new houses like a Great Bentley or Holland on sea, for rich conservatives only. Suddenly the sea level will not rise anymore, money to be spent will be plenty, the environment agency will have no objections anymore, and the Tory Government will give the glorious go ahead.
This entails that people still have in rain periods mud paths instead of proper roads. It is obvious that the houses on those roads in all deprived areas of which Britain has the most and the most deprived of western Europe. People who living there are either retired or social near the bottom level. The run down version is artificial created for the best effect, and kept in that state by a committee, the JSLG special appointed to keep the outlook as derelict as possible and even slowly try to change it into an Industrial estate starting the Brooklands.
The only conclusion therefore that can be made is that the deprived situation of the area is a deliberate act by the Tory Councils, the Essex County Council and the Tendring district council. Even the entrance to Brookland on the roundabout Tamarisk way/Lotus way/The Brooklands it was obvious that a deliberate run down view was created. Such a view is typical for places were the local Council has already made plans to alter the area at such a way that they, the local council can make the most money.
The investigator after a half year was still not able to receive one sensible answer of either Essex County Council or Tendring District Council. The local MP Carswell simple did not react at all. The system from both councils was simple, if you asked one a question then they pointed him to the other, then the other pointed him back to the first. Even a local Representative of the JSLG what stands for Jaywick Strategic Leadership Group but with obvious no leader in sight it is a local talk group, all the same. There is no strategy no action to improve no real activities regarding the actual deprivation of the area is observed. The main strategy is persuading people to move away to other areas. They did come up with one answer which was going back to the local council and the local council answer was going back to Essex CC. In another word a dead end.
The Brookland Area would need a complete alteration, but could be recreated as a park Home area after certain alterations. It would bring extra money for the Council, in time no housing benefit to be paid or exemption of council tax, as park homes would be owner living in or privately rented out. It was never rejected flat, including the proposal for industrial development south of St.Osyth, annex Jaywick but was simple hold off and put back and forwards.
The group which entails Essex CC, Tendring DC, Homes and Communities Agency, East of England Development Agency, the Environment Agency, and for some odd reason the Primary care trust. That odd reason being that the person who pulls the string at TDC is married to her. Those two earning a small fortune out of it and by obeying the Business establishment they do not give two pennies for what the common people think or want.
The collection of this group gives the strongest indication that Essex has an alternative plan, in which there is no place for a sea side community. The clear obstruction given to the investigator by Essex CC and Tendring DC leave no other way to interpret their actions.
Years ago Jaywick had a strong plan to regenerate the area; however Essex CC made sure that this disappearing in the dustbin on the earliest opportunity.
The previous leader of Essex County Council was the person who in effect launched the line that money for the roads for the poor was a waste of money. This illustrates the negative sight that the Tories have of the poorer site of the population. It also shows that they prefer the site to be derelict as it suits their hidden plans.
Hidden because in time of this investigation it was coming obvious clear, that wall paper was used to stick over the cracks of a failed cover up of the real intentions.
The suggestion of real intention ware becoming stronger as the investigation was closing in on details. So what is the intention of the TDC couple that runs it, there are other councillors but they are just there for the money and do not have the slightest of interest to do something for the people. This has a result that the Clacton area once renowned for their sandy shores is now a dead end coastal resort. There is one road to Clacton, the dead end road to nowhere. This road should have been widened to 4 lanes many years ago. It would have made it possible for people actual to reach Clacton, but also it would have been opened up for the Industry.
Now business cars/vans/trucks are stuck forever in an endless cue special in the spring and summer when Grandma and Granddad decide to drive to Clacton at 25 miles an hour to enjoy the view, deaf for the noise from angry cars driving behind them. Obvious no sensible person would start a business unless it is a must in Clacton with their roads to nowhere. The TDC leader wants to keep Clacton small as that way it is easier to control.
So what are the plans the TDC leader has for Jaywick?
To start they have plans to create a Brookland industrial estate, their idea is to break down most of the Brookland arcades and places and to persuade Industrial entrepreneurs to make a go of the estate. There are already plans at the TDC for storage and repair facilities at the Brooklands. The reason behind it is the make the area more an run down industrial estate, and hope that more people will accept their offer to abandon their property in exchange for an rental, low rent to start and high rents to end up with at the now agreed planned housing estate at the St. John road and Little Clacton road, first rejected then installed is obvious mend to house the tenants of the Brookland Area, after which the owners will be served with an order to sell.
With this they creating a regeneration area, for more luxury homes with garages and well maintained roads, and a small Industrial estate, the new pier would be build as that plan is shelved but not withdrawn. The golf course would receive their extension for restaurant and view area. The airfield would receive a helidrome and an extension north of Alton park road. And last but not least Lion point Broome Way would be developed to a protected sea harbour for pleasure boats. It also would be the starting sign for more development after demolishing part of Road Way's buildings to update the area.
These are facts however the TDC and the JSLG will deny this and state that there are always rumors. They should remember that there is no smoke without a fire. And they should not hide behind "we did not know" while it was known to them all the time. This and the fact that they refuse to update the roads means that they have an alternative project running alongside. Lord Hanningfield before his arrest assured the adviser via a clerk that the way forward for Jaywick was to break down the non-occupied homes, however they had trouble to find the owners. This on itself is a false statement as the investigation team had within two day all owners accept two of all the derelict homes. It all indicates that the view of a rundown area would be kept and enhanced.
All but one replies from Essex CC, TDC, and JSLG plus the Dept. of Environment, said that it was no use as there would never be any money available to update the roads. And even if there was money from the outside coming in it would not be used for Jaywick. That on itself is a rather strange statement. Essex wasted 2 million last year to do up a high street done already up two years before. Their council leader was arrested for putting his hand in the till, the TDC leader was under investigation for taking bribes end last year. While the Essex CC leader is under similar investigations.
They have money plenty for themselves the small group of Tory councillors and their lackey's. In fact they are the prototype type of Tory Government, always kicking the poor the old and the disabled.
Their day of having fun is to go to a deprived area and see the poor and the old suffer, Jaywick is such prime example. Then they take the money from the poor and the old, the Council tax for the smallest burn out house if there is still a possibility to live in be 20 pounds a week, and even if they cannot live in it is still 20 pounds a week. One of the highest in Britain or 70 pence the square meter a week. Then on the weekends they say to their children after having taken the money of the poor, we are not poor we are conservatives, come let us go to the deprived area and watch those poor people, we take some food with us and then you can feed them, but be careful that they do will not bite you. They are not sitting behind a fence yet.
Take this as an example, and remind yourself that this is a Tory Government a Tory County Council and a Tory district council. We all know that TORY stands for "That's Ours, Robbing You". However, the same is actual seen by the State Government, David Cameron the man who is almost never in Britain. Free travel, free food, free drinks life is good, following foreign orders and sealed envelopes for the safe, it all cost money however, so simple kicking some old and poor to get some more in.
This Essex CC has just giving themselves a whopping 1,600,00.00 pound pay rise were others pay are frozen or downgraded. Mind you hey have to sack 250 staff to get that money together. However who cares, those people can get unemployment benefit which is not bad, so long Essex CC gets his raise.
You think that is a lot, no it is not, anyway not in the eyes of greedy Tories after all to enable them to get it they had to blow a staggering amount of over 20,000,000.00+ pounds for consultants to advice them how to save cash. It will be of no interest that those advisors all belonged to the close friends of the Essex CC.
At the same time that they want to sack 250+ workers they want to others a 2 year freeze, otherwise it would not be possible to fill their own pockets quick enough. The whole of Jaywick would be in a perfect state of up keep if those 20,000,000.00+ pounds was spent on them.
On the other hand then their friends would have been without their lavish income. Here on the continent we call that corruption, in Britain they call that care for deprived area's consultants.
Funny thing is that the three stooges of British politics, advising the public to tighten your belts, they themselves and their compatriots of Essex CC, do the opposite but this does happen on this moment all over the Conservative Councils, filling their pockets quicker then filling a bucket of water with a fireman's hose pipe.
Essex excuse is that they have to save 300 million over the next couple of years, they have to otherwise it slows down the filling of their pockets, as everyone in Essex, excluding the Councilors and their affiliated Tory friends, will has to be part of the trimming of the services system.
As real Highway robbers they take it from the poor to give it to the rich, themselves. The leader of Tendring Neil Stock, the dictator of Tendring DC a man well known in Tendring for being economical with the truth if he wants to have his way, and who is supported by his wife Sarah Candy and together they can afford a lot of candy by earning over 100,000.00 a year are also the two who most obstructing the regeneration of Jaywick. They are the controllers who want to keep Clacton small and poor, as it is easier to control.
Both are conservative which means they both are pocket fillers and robbers from the poor the old and the disabled, for whom they do not have the slightest respect. The amount the CEO of Essex receives nearly 250,000.00 pound a year excluding would be enough for at least two roads in Jawick to be updated to residential requirements or all the roads in Grass and Brooklands to Park Home requirement.
Therefore the JSLG who's officers in daily control maybe genuine in their ideas to get progress, the simple fact that Sarah Candy, via North Essex PCT, Neil Stock via TDC both representing the Conservatives with their principle all for us and nothing for others in the JSLG, and the other Conservatives who running Essex CC and Tendring DC, makes it impossible that something ever will be done for Jaywick, as the JSLG is only installed so far as we can see as an control to keep Jaywick in check.
In any case the Tory government has decided that sea defenses are not needed urgent and the money is therefore withdrawn, probably into the wine/dine and travel pot for Cameron and his friends.
It does means that they as the leaders of Tendring DC in reality do not give two pennies for Tendring and that their primary goal is power and greed and wealth. There was a time that evil people were burned on a stake maybe we should ask ourselves are those Tendring Conservative leaders that evil. Do we have enough stake's? Fact is that they the ECC and the TDC deliberate want to make the people ill. They even are proud that Jaywick has a higher death and illness rate than anywhere else in Tendring. However they made people ill, they create stress and anxiety, and they put people in a harness of rules and regulations, which indeed it makes you ill. The main project of the JSLG is to make sure that the area looks as undesirable as possible and they getting well paid for this.
One of the JSLG said that the vision of the foundation was a solid one and has visibility, then came back two days later with it cannot be done as TDC will not cooperate with any plan. At the moment we writing this in July 2010, the investigation into the possibility of a road plan is still ongoing, but the rumours are that Essex CC and the TDC try to do all they can to obstruct by withholding simple information. Fair play is what the committee who investigate the possibilities looks for. However, Tendring is Conservatives and fair play is for them something what others do not the TDC dictator. It is something that he does not understand.
He understands power, money and greed. Fair play, honesty, care no that is not available if you cannot make a profit or can show off to your friends. However if he was willing to sift through the proposals he would find that he could make profit, that he would be fair and as an almost impossibility would be honest for a change.
That is the reason that we can predict that Tendring will have successfully torpedoed once again a possibility to show a human face. Then again a conservative human? That is also not possible they are on this moment in time blaming Labour for the bankers fiddling with money the USA bankers that is. They will not take any reasonble measures to lift the country out of recession. They will increase VAT, taxes direct and indirect, launch plans against the poor the disable the unemployed.
And if that does not get result he will go to war, Thatcher did it when she could not solve the problem, Blair did it twice when he could not solve the problems and mark our words Cameron will, and any excuse will do.
And when it is finished the JSLG, then standing for Jaywick Society Luxury Genteel will chair the new luxury estates of the conservatives then standing were once Brookland was, looking out over the new pier, already designed in 2008 and ready for construction, while were once was the Tudor estate is then a heliport and harbour so that the rich Conservatives do not have to walk to far. And the people who were living there before, they are crammed in small cramped accommodation of Little Clacton way, if they were still alive, the rest was made successful made so ill by stress and anxiety that they died early.
Who need a camp with barbwire and watch towers if you have the conservatives they do the same only they make you suffer longer, but they will kill you at the end.
Mario M Marras.
Note: today 27/03/2011 it was reported that the local council Tendring DC successful had created the most deprived area in Britain, Jawick.
The reason that this article was placed again is due to the fact that some of the original found plans, then denied, are now coming into force. A second reason is to expose the Cameron dribble as that he wants to protect civilians, as he has shown and still is showing only if they are living out side Britain. Inside civilians dying is a lucrative business for his government. This is the main reason that he keeps the people poor as poor people die quicker.
=================================================================
29-03-2011
There is a strange phenomenon in the world today, the Russian and the Chinese have stepped in the perfect trap the USA could set for them. Russia and China both have a problem that the USA does not have, they are land surrounded. This means that terrorist can easily slip through borders, where with the USA that danger does not or almost not exist. They also have minority groups that can start a similar rebellion as that of Libyan. The USA does not have that they successful murdered the minorities of a long time ago. It is estimated that over a 50 years period the USA killed of more then 100 million Indians, sometimes special in cases of children by clubbing them to death as that saved bullets.
The filling of the trap means that rebellions in Russia or China can now being used by the NATO to invade those countries simple by suspension of their UNSC membership, a new resolution by the US and his allies and the invasion in Russia or China has begun. The USA and the UK will say they would never do such a thing, they would, would they. As the two most corrupted countries in the Western world they will have no corporate troubles to interfere everywhere where they can make profit, putting the Mafia in the shade. In the USA people are already dying on the street(that is called looking after civilians) in the UK they are making in roads trying to catch up with the US to have the same result of people dying on the streets (protecting civilians)
A little in the same style as they did in Vietnam and Iraq and now doing in Afghanistan, Libya, America and Australia. Those millions of death were not done in a regular war, no they were calculated murders were even baby's were killed by simple kicking them to death to save bullets, as said it is still their way of doing things. Only now they are not kicked to death but bombed from a distance and as usual with the same predictable excuses. Such as that baby was a terrorist it had a rifle laying next to it.
However, why attacking others? The America's have one problem they are now so much in debt that they need a war to get the attention away from the spending. In other times they could rely on Britain, but they have the same problems short of money. However in Britain there was a young man that was without any knowledge and experience and although sitting in a deep hole of debts was prepared against reparations, to do once again the dirty work for the US. It should have been a short action, quick delivery of weapons and money to the Egypt/Libyan border and the so-called rebels could do the rest. Even with the knowledge that well known terrorist organisations would get hold at the weapons and the money as suggested by the CIA in America.
The rebels after a couple of days were going nowhere, the money disappeared quickly, and the rebels wanted to fight but not if the Libyan government would start fighting back. Then a little dwarf like man on high heels living in France and in need of a spectacular action just before local election and a re-election in sight. He went in contact with the UK where an inexperience young man also in need of a spectacular action just before a local election and a referendum and a falling popularity faster then a heavy rock in water, was willing to help him.
They reported back to the US which carefully orchestrated the trap to catch Russian and China. It will be a request the US said, for limited air surveillance and other action to install a no fly zone. Russia was promised a quick entry into the WTO and China was promised that the US would laying of any request to re-valuation of the Yuan. With a limited action to a no fly zone, Russia and China could agree on not to Veto it. That they were double crossed did only cross their mind when it was too late.
Now the US and his conspirators installed the no fly zone and demanded that the Libyan forces should lay down the weapons and hand it over to the small US/UK armed rebels. The Libyan state thought different they decided to defend themselves and not to hand the country over to the US/UK armed rebels. That was where the US had waited for, well knowing no country ever would hand over their country to rebels. However it gave the US/UK an ample opportunity to start attacking the population under the heading of destroying the Libyan armour and saving civilians by killing them regardless.
However the US came under pressure of Big business not to stand in front publicly. In reality they would do most of the destruction and killings as that was in their blood. No the cover would be the NATO, an organisation original set-up to protect the North Atlantic against a possible Russian attack, however now an attacking force worldwide. They do not supply war declarations; they act as a terrorist organisation hence that the name is still NATO but now means North Atlantic Terrorist Organisation.
That NATO, which makes use of other terrorist organisation, to combine power, is controlled for 100% by the Americans.
They organise and command it, it is in effect the US but also a hiding place for the actions of the US that really cannot see daylight. Libya is such an action. Libya slowly but certain was changing since 2008 into a more democratic government. A government where every citizen once a year could vote for the social committees who advised the government. A country that had the highest living standard in that part of the world. Was at the point of being complimented on his Human Rights record by the UN just four weeks ago. A better Human rights record then Israel, this as an example.
The US made sure that this good image did change by instructing their media to falsify details and statistics combined with lies and made up stories so that the Western population would support their action. This on it self is not a surprise as Obama himself has refused to show his REAL birth certificate. The point of the action was that because the fast rising oil prices the US needed more control on production, and the only way to get it in Libya was to attack it and this was the reason of the so-called rebel attacks.
It was easy to see who was getting paid by the US to give an favourable statement about the situation, favourable for the US, certain people against any action suddenly started to make statement which could have come straight out of the White house speech writers pen. However, still the actions of the rebels did going nowhere, so the US via his servant the UK planned the next stage, weapon deliveries and wilful destructions of anything that could be from the government of Libya. So desperate the US is for that oil control that they even accept their enemy in Afghanistan as their partner in Libya, just to get hold of the oil.
It was decided that the NATO, the North Atlantic Terrorist Organisation, would meet in London, to address further murder and killings and destruction of a state system which would leave people poor, just as they had done this in Iraq, also before the US attack one of the high income states for the people and now reduced till a very poor Middle East Country were the US is in control of the country a facto and in control of the oil. It is this what they have in mind for Libya.
The US taking care of civilians simple means ignore them or kill them as a carbon copy as what they have done in Iraq and as what they are doing in Afghanistan. Therefore the NATO this time calling themselves Global powers which in real terms means the US, and their servants of the NATO and the Muslim slaves. Those Global powers are therefore in a meeting in London to discuss military action in Libya and to plan a post-Gaddafi future for the North African nation. Or to put it straight dividing the spoils of war, or who get which part of the oil.
The position of the Muslim states needs to be explained a little more. The only reason the Muslim countries in the Middle East have money is because of the oil and the result of action out of that oil revenue. The only reason the US/UK have not invaded those countries is because they received the oil cheap and could simple order the Muslim states as of they were mere slaves and in fact that is what they are what ever title they give themselves, they are just slaves. If they ever would resist the US/UK then they would come down on them like the figural ton of bricks and wipe them out as the have done with the Indians in America and the Maoris is Australia.
Opening the talks on Tuesday, David Cameron, the inexperienced British prime minister, told the parties there were "better days ahead for Libya" as he said coalition forces would continue their no-fly zone over the country. "Today I believe should be about a new beginning for Libya - a future in which the people of Libya can determine their own destiny, free from violence and oppression," he said. A country taken over by the British as history will tell you never had people in it that could determ their own destiny; they always had to fight for it. "But the reason for being here today is that the Libyan people cannot reach that future on their own." he went on. They can but that would mean that the US could not get their hands on the oil. Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, told the conference that coalition military strikes would continue until Gaddafi, the Libyan leader, fully complies with UN demands to end violence against civilians. He did this 10 days ago and then the US started to attack them. What Clinton said was in line with her character, the Libyan forces should stay still otherwise it is impossible to kill them if they move al the time. In the mean time the CIA and the SAS will support the rebels and guiding the bombers to hit targets they otherwise would have missed.
This is rich coming from a woman who has shown the world that she was a failure as a woman and as an wife and certainly is a failure as a foreign secretary. She said the international community would work to boost pressure on and isolate his government to "make clear to Gaddafi that he must go." The international community being less then 25% of the worlds countries and less then 10% of the world population are demanding that the world obeys them.
They have agreed to set up a group that will decide on who gets what from Libya after it is destroyed. And that once again it is Al Thani who is clapping the whip, the British Foreign Office said that the first meeting of the group will be held in Qatar, though it is unclear when this would be. They have to wait till the fighting is over and if going on at the speed they doing it a quarter of the population should be successful been killed by the weapons of the US/UK and at the ground in rebel hands and the indiscriminate bombing of every building that still stand upright. As all those countries want to get a piece from Libya to cover their terrorist attacks the participating countries will take on a rotating chairmanship of the group to make sure that they all get something out of it.
"When the fighting is over, we will need to put right the damage that Gaddafi has inflicted - repairing the hospitals ruined by shells, rebuilding the homes demolished by Gaddafi's tank rounds, and restoring the mosques and minarets smashed by his barbarity," Cameron said. Well honesty as the British civilians have seen is not one of Camerons strongest sides, instead it is proven that lies are his speciality. It is not the shelling of the Libyan army, but the indiscriminate targeting of the US/UK and France of civilian area's hospitals and schools, the explanation being that all those buildings are in fact military buildings. Nor was it Gaddafi who inflicted anything, he is not the Government of Libya, only the head of state just as the Queen in Britain and she rules already longer then Gaddafi does this means she has to go?
Susan Rice, the US ambassador to the UN has said that the administration of Barack Obama, the US president, had not ruled out arming Libya's rebels in a bid to end Gaddafi's rule. However, telling a lie does not mean it is the truth, the US and the UK are already arming the rebels, they admitted to those ten days ago. The question is how far will the US/UK go? Are they prepared to kill them all just as the US did with the Indians or the British with the Maori’s? Or will they let some live to create an image of an Libya that still has an government, how far are they willing to go and how much time will they give the rebels before the US/NATO steps in with ground troops. They are in a hurry as the next country that the US wants to round up is Syria the weapons and money placed there was done to early as Libya has taken longer then they thought.
Turkey who is next on the list after Syria and Lebanon, has offered to attempt to mediate between the two sides, has also said the talks would gauge international support for scenarios under which Gaddafi could quit, including whether he could appoint another person in his place. This rejected out of hand, they cannot have an mediator country that is on the US/UK list for destruction.
In the time between the US and NATO have broken almost every line of the UN resolution, they are killing civilians which they should protect, they have taken side in a by the US created civil war, and a might of 600 million against 6 million is indeed an "Barbaric offensive" And rightly so the Libyan government called on foreign powers to end their "barbaric offensive" against Libya, in a letter addressed to the London conference, and likened the NATO-led air strikes to military campaigns launched by Adolf Hitler during World War II. We would like to add the WW2 campaigns were less barbaric then those directly pointed against civilians in Libya by the NATO. A spokesperson for the British foreign office said it would not dignify the letter with any further comment. They would obvious being embarrassed as they know they acting like Attila the Hun, and probably more aggressive.
"Libya is an independent country with full sovereignty," That is where the problem lays. And that is what the US and the UK don’t want. That Libya dares to have no trillions of debt, dares to have plenty of oil, and dares to have a different political system that actual works. "The Libyan people are the only ones that have the right decide the country's future, and planning division of Libya or imposing a foreign political system is not accepted." "We call upon Obama and the Western leaders to be peacemakers not warmongers, and not to push Libyans towards a civil war and more death and destruction". Earlier on Tuesday Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, and William Hague, met Mahmoud Jibril, a leading member of the Libyan opposition in London but then again every rebel find that he is the leader so to whom should they actual talk. The best US/UK way forward is to take over the country, kill of the rest of the population who survives the present onslaught and appoints an US educated person to be the new Libyan president, the Iraqi war al over.
Britain foreign minister Hague said the Libyan transitional council was an "important and legitimate political interlocutor" but that Britain was committed to strengthening ties with a "wide range of members of the Libyan opposition". With that showing that in reality he did not have a clue and that he just was following his masters (USA) orders. In the mean time the UN secretary General is drawing up a list of every uprising, every terrorist attack every bombing in the world since Gaddafi came in power, to see of they can blame all what did happen in the world was due to Gaddafi.
The result of the US blatant stupidity is that more young man will travel the world in revenge on the US and NATO countries, it are not the ruthless leaders who will be blown up, die and be maimed. No it will be the civilians on the street, no protection for them. However do the leaders of the USA the UK the NATO and Al Thani of Qatar care? No they are to busy to count their gains out of the spoils of Libya, they have to do it quick and then up to the destruction of the next country. Qatar starts next week already with buying up the spoils of the East of Libya in a deal with the rebels, who do not own it but sell it anyway, in fact as the country is not yet in the hands of a new government, they are rebels and thieves at the same time, concerning that Al Thani is in good company. With all this the Al Thani's show that he is not a good Muslim, a Muslim would not kill regardless other Muslims or helping infidels to kill Muslims, the man is a disgrace.
====================================================================
31-03-2011
Baroness Warsi, the Conservative Party chairman, was scoring a spectacular own goal in her speech about the British National Party. Her point was that less then a third of the world population uses a system similar to that of the UK, it does not mean automatically that this is the right voting system. Then she went on to explain the BNP could severely benefit of the voting system was changed, "It would give power to the extremists" she said. The system of scaring voters to change their opinion is done already since Goebels in Germany under Hitler. Cameron and Obama using it almost daily to get support for their wars for oil where ever that may be, which is at this moment in Libya. It does not mean that what they say is correct. In the majority of cases it is at least a fabrication or at most a blatant lie.
However, something strange does happen in the UK, since Cameron is in power. The man thinks that he is Gods favourite in running the country. However, how can he be sure of that when he ignores the commands of God, thou shall not kill, and just when that is Cameron, Osborne and Liam fox most pleasure hobby. Thou shall not steal, in Cameron's opinion God must be wrong there, after all stealing is fun, special when you steal from people who cannot defend themselves. Thou shall not bear false witness, however in Cameron's opinion that is going to far. God has to be reasonable: "killing if profit can be made should be good, stealing from the poor regardless of that are people or countries is always good, and lying about your neighbors, why not if it brings profit". No the God of the Islam is more up to date, just kill when you can make a profit, steal when you can make a profit and lie when you can make a profit, look how well the Saudi's and the Al Thani's do out of that.
However the statistics show he is actual running the country into the ground. He need to save money drastically, so why the hundreds of millions spent on the removal of Gaddafi in Libya, a man who in health forms was on his way out to start with. Libya was already recommended for their Human rights record, better then most countries in the Middle East and North Africa, Libya started to open up for Western development, so why the complete waste of weapons money and human life if he has to save money. The Goebel style news reporting and Hitler like statements of Cameron and Hague may show that they had a reason, reality shows they did not. They simple acted on instructions of the US who wanted to get Britain out of Libya and the US companies in. At such they succeeded the British now have no hope in hell that they even under a new government would be allowed to do business again under the same guaranties as they had before. The US and Al Thani will have taken over, and both are well known to be paying well for services rendered.
Coming to the Al Thani's who are taken over business after business, were before foreign buyers, we all remember the government (Tory) actions against the Al Fayads intention to take over Harrods, in Al Thani's case it was practical given to them. So we have an Muslim Tory Chair, we have English Christian people convicted because they accidental caused damage to a Muslim owned property, while the Muslims degrading the memories of the British soldiers are almost rewarded for this. English churches having problems to get permission to develop, but Mosque is given permission forthwith. Demonstrations by English/Christians are opposed and curtailed but Muslim demonstrations are supported and protected.
This lead to the question where is the leader up to, close friends with rich Arabs, even using their country for meetings concerning Britain, appeasing and helping the Muslims, given preferential help to Muslims, appointing a Muslim as Chair of the party, no action, although not visible against Muslims who are intended to use violence, such with the Marriage of Prince William of Britain. Supporting Muslim Business, giving extra funding to Muslim actions and charities where the same is withdrawn from Christian groups. Is it his intention to make it a Muslim Country, already he has given to use of Sharia laws to the big cities in Britain, for the time being only for administrative matters, where it really should be only the English laws. However where there is a beginning there will be a follow up.
It is therefore no wonder that senior Conservatives joined Labour and Lib Dem politicians in criticising Lady Warsi after she made that rather stupid statement it severely put question marks on her judgment and actions. A Yes vote in the referendum on electoral reform would boost the prospects of the BNP, she said. However the other parties and the seniors of the Tories pointed out that the BNP was on the same side as the Tories in opposing a switch to the alternative vote (AV). Her critics accused her of giving the BNP credibility and publicity the very things she argued that AV would provide for the far-right party. There should be a feeling by the senior Tory members that she should be removed as Chair and moved to a less harmful job as a departmental minister. The point is that even Muslim groups were criticizing her.
This is a severe backlash against the Tories who just had managed to climb up by starting a war against Libya, it make them look as of they know that they would be wiped out if the alternative voting system would be introduced.
Just when Ed Miliband joined Liberal Democrats and Greens in a cross-party push for a Yes vote. Mr Cameron himself does not seem to be that sure of a urge to vote No, it was for that reason that he was accused by some Tories of not campaigning hard enough for a No vote, but he told his MPs last night that he would make one speech each week opposing AV until the referendum. It seems however that he wants a yes vote but needs a no vote to stay in charge. A yes vote would be in favour of the Islamic parties if formed, as they via the back door could come into parliament.
Sadiq Khan, the shadow Justice Secretary, accused Lady Warsi of irresponsible scare mongering. "The very fact that the BNP opposes AV shows just how desperate her argument has become," he said. "None of the MPs or campaigners I have spoken to on either side of the AV debate have any intention of 'pandering' to extremists."
Baroness (Kishwer) Falkner, a Liberal Democrat peer, said: "Under AV, no one can get elected unless the majority of people support them which quite obviously make it harder, not easier, for extremist parties. That's exactly why the BNP are campaigning for a No vote." That this is not exactly correct does not the matter, by a yes vote their would be more instability, where stability is essential for running a country.
Farooq Murad, secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said: "AV means all voters will have a stronger say in our elections, and all politicians will have to... secure majority support from the communities they seek to represent. The BNP is campaigning for a No vote because it knows what a Yes vote means that racists who won't reach out have no future." However, that was the opinion just before the German Labour party took power in Germany in 1928. And as proven they were racist.
The problem seems to be that Warsi has secret plans, plans that cannot be seen yet but an indication is given this year in several speeches she made. The puzzling part is however Cameron and his admiration for all what are Arab and Muslim. Obvious he will dismiss this as rubbish, however the fact remains that English/Christians are at a clear disadvantage when it comes to the legal side of things if it involves Muslims. His lack of action against Muslim Fanatics and the vast amounts that are available for Muslim groups point to this.
================================================================
Other pages:
This is the text-only version of this page. Click here to see this page with graphics.
Edit this page |
Manage website
Make Your Own Website: 2-Minute-Website.com