01-02-2011
For the people who did not know there was a Security Conference in Munich Germany. The highlight was the signing by the USA and Russia of the weapons reduction treaty. Useless actions as the weapon stags from other Western countries are not included, including the nuclear production of weapons by Israel and their stockpiles. While the Russians are reducing the Israeli are doubling their stock piles. America knows this and therefore they in fact are playing a double game.
The same kind of game is played in Afghanistan where Afghan President Karzai has stated, at the Security Conference that the transition of security responsibility in Afghanistan would begin in the spring.
Afghan President Hamid Karzai announced at the Munich security conference, that he would give the details on 21 March. The assumptions of responsibility for security are a prerequisite for the withdrawal of the international security force Isaf, or in short the Americans and the NATO.
By the end of 2014, the president will have taken over responsibility for security throughout the country. The Afghan president herewith confirmed this objective. The president went on to say that the work of Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRT) of ISAF would be made soon on known. We should take more of the burden on our shoulders from the ISAF.
The leading Western politicians, meanwhile, were sceptical after the popular uprising in Egypt to the idea to hold there quickly elections. "We need an orderly transition," said Chancellor Angela Merkel in Munich and reminded those present government, ministers and experts from around the world on their own experience from the year of the unification of Germany. An orderly transition was not possible without political re-structures, those re-structures needed time and time to develop. The German chancellor followed hereby the American line, no doubt as instructed by them. Similarly was obvious, as expressed by USA Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: "The United States supports the transition that the Egyptian government has announced." This means that they following the instruction given to Mubarak by the USA to stay in office till at least September 2011, it even could be meaning that the President will run again for a new period. This will be possible if the present situation is subsided as the signs are.
It is a matter of course, said the Chancellor that Germany stood together with the EU and the Western world on the side of people who had rebelled in Egypt and Tunisia. USA Secretary Clinton emphasized that the transition must be accomplished. However, the result of this process is a matter for the Egyptians. Although she gave thus some advice and expressed to confess of influence, she avoided it like the Chancellor and the British Prime Minister David Cameron, to demand the immediate departure of the Egyptian President Mubarak.
Mrs Merkel made clear, however, that there should be an observance of human rights without compromise. This is rich coming from a chancellor that admits that there is a great divided line between the Germans and the ones who immigrated to Germany. The balance in Egypt is and has to be between the core values and the interests of security and stability. In the future, they would pay more attention to the "adherence to our principles. The EU is against the criticism in protectionism, as they had made that in recent days, and to little convincing clear picture. The EU wants reforms no they have insisted on reforms. The problem is that they will not get it. It would put the treaty between Israel and Egypt in a danger zone. Israel does not want this, Mubarak for different reasons does not want that and nor does the USA.
A symbolic significance was the short ceremony in which USA Secretary Clinton and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov exchanged ratification instruments of the Treaty on the reduction of strategic nuclear weapons of both sides. Thus, the Treaty entered into force. A for many reason useless treaty, political well liked by the Americans and the Russians. It opens the way to the WTO for Russia, and it wins political goodwill for the USA in the Western world. However the cost of removing and reducing those nuclear arsenals would likely delay the real action of the predicament.
The two powers are trying as long as possible to prolong their existence as world powers. India and China are the new future powers especially China, it has recently shot his first man into space, and as in the USA, its strategic missile program is further advanced than most advisors expect. It could also be China's space program if it does not run out of steam as a matter of speaking. China also will and can hardly be prohibited to build a similar nuclear arsenal. The same is true for America's vassal Israel, France and England. With the abandonment of their nuclear weapons they would be in complete political irrelevance. While England and France would use the weapons as a last resort this will not be the case with tiny Israel they would use it as the first line of attack regardless who friend or foe. Israel is the new upcoming fascist state in the world, one armed with nuclear weapons and a well funded (USA) nuclear weapon program.
The Israeli have stated that they are Gods people and above all others, we can be sure that they will proof this by wiping the rest of the world out, just to proof a point.
================================================================
03-02-2011
Disability is recognised all over the planet as a handicap to someone’s ability to perform the daily business as others do. This does not mean that certain disabilities do not allow the person to for fill the normal business in life, but it is done with more difficulty and sometimes with the help of artificial or medical means.
However, it is also a fact that some disabled identified persons using their disability, visible or not, to get advantages other non-disabled people cannot get and create an advantage above the normal norm. Many are using their disability and in most cases they are the ones with minor disabilities to milk the system for all that is possible. Sometimes they need assistance in an awful lot of cases they don't.
There is a time in anyone’s life that they feel sorry for the disabled person but were also fed up with their constant whinging about it. This are the once who are milking the system. They are the ones who playing tennis while claiming they cannot walk. The real disabled person does not complain all the time accept the situation and try to make the best of it. Logical they need with that some help or sometimes a lot of help. However outwards they behave themselves as a disabled person that goes on with life.
There is never a reason for a disabled person to be whinging all the time. OK they can feel upset and feel sorry for the situation they are in. They can feel frustrated with the lack of help and the time it takes to get help, but they have no reason the whinge.
On the other hand there are people who make it and hobby to mock people who have a disability. There are people who are complaining that a severe disabled person sits in their own garden because from the neighbour’s upstairs window they can see that person and they do not like it. That kinds of people even go so far that they make complains concerning this to the police or local authorities.
Then on the other side there are people who try to get one over on someone by using their disability. Take the story of Paul Maynard, disabled but not in such a way that he cannot do his daily job which is in this case being an
Member of Parliament, not sure of that is a job or just an appointment to receive a good income, but beside that, he apparently complained that members of the opposition where making faces of him because of his disability. That is using his disability to get one over on the opposition.
There is no record or video that this did happen and as we all know in every parliament in the world the speaker, regardless of this is the ruling party or the opposition is always the one to poke fun at. We can safely assume that this was the case special when while he was speaking he had a go at the poorest of the society.
As a Conservative member of parliament in Britain they have as standard always a go at the poorest in the society as they are not able to defend themselves, therefore they are an easy target. As members of parliament they are an example of what happens when excessive power remains unchecked. Those are the very people who are calling every person that is disabled or has a disability a fraudster, and benefit fraudster. That is rich coming from people who are accused time after time of defrauding the state and the voters. No doubt we get the people who need the government for keeping their job siding with the Member of Parliament, although there is no proof what so ever that anyone mocked the Member of Parliament.
Although there is no reasonable reason as why a disabled person cannot look after themselves alone or with help of others or with financial assistance, there is a sneaky discriminating attitude by the members of the government against those who are or having a disability. That they still have time for action against them is a miracle itself as filling their pockets takes up most of their time. They are doing this with the unscrupulous help of the news media's. The reason why the media does this is to enhance the changes for to get his hands on any available news media in Britain as he is promised by the conservatives in return for their help.
To classify the disabled as disabled complete is an invention of the previous Labour government. Till then a partly deaf person was just partly deaf, now he is disabled and therefore entitled for a disability benefit. The person with a finger missing was till then just a person with a finger missing, now it is a disabled person with a disability benefit and entitled to a disability parking badge. However, this need to be set against the person who can hardly walk but is refused such a parking badge because he is either over 60 years of age or does not receive disability benefits. People over 65 even when they receive a disability related benefit and cannot walk far cannot get a disabled parking badge as then suddenly he is too old or can still move his arms and hands.
It will be obvious, that government state and local just make up the rules as they go along. A wealthy person deaf on one side gets an parking badge (RBK&C in the UK) and an person over 65 with an disability since the age of 40 but refused to claim disability benefit, but need an parking badge as he cannot walk more then 15 yards at most does not get such a badge as he is not wealthy and therefore has no rights (RBK&C in the UK).
Therefore we have the situation were Britain is so famous for, if you refuse to take benefits then you are not entitled to what you need. That is the reason why they all take what they need and try to get some more, after which the media and the Conservative government call them scroungers for taking the benefits. If they refuse to take them then they are shoved to one site as non-existing.
Obvious the state create the scroungers so that in bad time they have someone to blame and in better times lower the unemployment figures.
People therefore as Paul Maynard should not be a member of parliament, if you do not want to get wet do not stand in the rain. It is as simple as that.
If he has a problem than he should suck it up and, if it really happened, put it down to where it comes from, but it has certainly taken long enough to come out into the open, so it couldn't have been that bad.
However using his disability to score points gives the real disabled a bad name. We still live with huge ignorance and on occasion arrogance from so called able even if they have a manageable handicap, people! With a mind as small and negative as people like Paul Maynard we can only pity for them and my motto is be careful of such discriminative behaviour as you never know what life may bring you further. However it will be a good guess that the event never did happen but that it is and was used as a party political event.
It the Times he said about the event, "It probably affects the way some people see me, and there will always be people who write you off because of it - but I've never let them stop me." Well it obvious does otherwise he would never have mentioned it. Party propaganda should be left to the party and disability should not be part of the program.
====================================================
05-02-2011
What do we know about Hosni Mubark or Mubarak as the western press prefer to name him. He was born on May 4, 1928, in Kafr-El-Meselha, Monufia Governorate. Completed his high school and joined the Egyptian Military Academy, where he received a Bachelor's degree in Military Sciences. In 1949, Mubarak left the Military Academy and joined the Air Force Academy, receiving his commission as an officer on March 13, 1950. He is married to Suzanne Mubarak, and has two sons: Alaa and Gamal.
As an Egyptian Air Force officer, after served in various units, he returned to the Air Force Academy, this time as an instructor. From February 1959 to June 1961, Mubarak undertook further training in the Soviet Union, attending a Soviet pilot training school in Moscow and another at Kant Air Base, near Bishkek in Kyrgyzstan, an airfield that is today home to the Russian 5th Air Army's 999th Air Base. In November 1967 Mubarak became the Air Force Academy's commander and in 1969 he became Chief of Staff for the Egyptian Air Force.
He was called a war hero, although it is not clear as why? The war he was involved in were both lost in a short time, still he was appointed in 1972
Commander of the Air Force and Egyptian Deputy Minister of Defence and in 1973 he was promoted to air chief marshal in recognition of service during the October War of 1973.
Mubarak was used by Sadat to attend numerous meetings with foreign leaders. After the killing of Sadat by disgruntled soldiers, as we are told, who were upset by the arrangements between Egypt and Israel. Who ever gave the order for the killing of Sadat, it made Mubark the new president and his still is and will over the next couple of years.
Under his leadership, Egypt managed to be one of the most corrupt countries in the world and conservative estimates see the wealth of the Mubark family at a minimum of 70 billion, mainly gathered in the seventy and eighty years by backhanders in arms deals.
Under his leadership Egypt was the first country to land in Saudi Arabia to help to attack a fellow Muslim country, Iraq. The amount the USA paid is unknown but reports are there that suggest that 500.00 dollar per soldier were paid either in cash or by debt reduction, fact also is that the Gulf states and the EU cancelled the 14 billion debt of Egypt.
The amount that the USA gives yearly to Egypt for helping Israel against the Gaza population is 1.5 billion a year minimal. Not bad for a Sunni Muslim for helping to fight against Sunni Muslims. He deprives the Gaza strip of the most needed goods by allowing Israel to keep the border closed.
President Mubarak re-elected himself by arranging majority votes in a referendum for successive terms on four occasions: in 1987, 1993, 1999. The referendum in itself and its results are of very questionable validity. However nobody would complain as Egypt stood and stands under the protection of the USA and the EU. Still no one can run against the President due to a restriction in the Egyptian constitution in which the People's Assembly played the main role in electing the President of the Republic.
The September 2005 ballot saw a multiple candidate election rather than a referendum, but as the electoral institutions, the security apparatus remain under the control of the President multiple candidates have no chance. The official state media, including the three government newspapers and state television also express views identical to the official line taken by Mubarak. In recent years however, there has been a steady growth in independent news outlets, especially independent newspapers which occasionally criticize the President and his family severely. Freedom of the press is still unknown in Egypt they rank 144 out of 168 states.
That fact saw many journalists during the last 10 days arrested and even killed, press agencies were closed and media workers expelled from Egypt.
This can be done as the corruption in the Mubarak administration's Ministry of Interior has risen dramatically, due to the increased power over the institutional system. Such corruption has led to the imprisonment of political figures and young activists without trials, even INGO volunteers to be arrested because of their looks. There are many in illegal undocumented hidden detention facilities, from rejecting universities, mosques, newspapers staff members based on political inclination.
The secret police hidden on the streets as common workers are allowed to violate citizens privacy mounting using unconditioned arrests due to the always there being emergency law. However Egypt's president can do what he want when he want it and how as he is protected by the USA who need him to protect Israel. The way the military and the police were acting was a clear USA page book scenario. Just let them run do not use violence and it all will calm down as people have to work and to live, secretly remove the leaders and never to be seen again. And it does work, Mubark now want to stand for a next term that is unless the USA does prefer an change of leadership and who better then Vice President Suleiman the USA CIA man in Egypt. That will be a great full other stooge who will do their bidding after being overloaded with billions to protect Israel.
Obvious it exposes the USA as a phoney democratic state, since the Bush period the democratic values were already wiped out in the USA. The secret service (SS) runs rampart, people are arrested on phoney accusations, freedom of the press is almost non-existing as the Media has to follow the Government line or face being taken over by a government sided Media mogul or the staff is simple fired. Bribery or persons and states are now normality and more arms are entering the streets and so-called opposition groups in other states then ever before.
Egypt itself is a presidential republic under Emergency Law. Under the law, police powers are extended, constitutional rights suspended and censorship is legal. The law sharply pinpoint any non-governmental political activity: street demonstrations, non-approved political organizations, unregistered financial donations are banned. Some 42,000 people are detained under the law, and estimates of political prisoners run as high as 50,000 rising by the day. It is estimated that over the last 10 days more then 10.000 people were abducted from the streets alone. Under the law the government has the right to imprison individuals for unlimited time for ever if needed, for they do not have to have a reason.
The government continues the claim that opposition groups like the Muslim Brotherhood could come into power in Egypt if the current government did would have parliamentary elections. They confiscate opposition group’s finances and the financier’s possessions. They detain opposition leaders, which would be impossible without emergency law an independed judicial-system does not exist. Democracy in Egypt does not exist under the dictature of Mubark.
The secret service has already plans to "shut down" the capital, Cairo, upon Mubarak's death with uniformed and plainclothes security service officers ready to "squelch any dissent." An interim government under the vice president is planned and any opposition that could create turmoil would be brought down harshly. It means that the US tanks will once more controlling the streets if that scenario would occur.
==============================================================
07-02-2011
The writing was on the wall for a long time, it started when Lieberman took Office and his policy of contempt for all what lives and is not a perfect 100% Israeli Jew is well noted. Problem with this is that Lieberman may call himself an Israeli or a bouncer what ever he prefers, but he is in fact Russian born citizen from Moldova. The fact that he took the Israeli nationality does not alter the original facts. As the expression goes, "He wants to be holier then the Pope". It mostly affects people with a born in inferiority complex who then in life try to find something to offset that inferiority. The violent and bully tactics of the state of Israel is perfect suitable for such a labile behaviour, in Lieberman's case violence and aggression. In the mean time the Israeli parliament, the Knesset is debating and drawing up the end of democratic rule in Israel with a collection of anti-democratic laws.
It is well know that the democracy in Israel is death for many years, we found that out before Christmas when three brave IDF soldiers pointed their barrels of the guns onto our chest. The reason, we made space for a woman to pass, what made the IDF angry was because the woman was obvious a Palestinian woman and they have no rights. No rights that is in a fascist Israel, nor did we as foreigners in Israel had any rights, although of the same belief in YWH Jewish laws and rules. We were well more then obvious recognizable as Jews. This however did not stop those brave IDF soldiers to take our passports and let us sit for more then two hours in the back of an IDF truck. We actual did receive our passports back, but were advised to go home. We did, we left Israel the same day and none of us will ever come back. Israel may call themselves a Jewish state but their behaviour and actions are against the laws and rules as given by YWH, therefore they are no Jews. The behaviour we have seen could be coming straight out of a middle age time warp, were they had changed the sling and spear for hand guns and automatic weapons, however their attitude and behaviour was obvious not updated to this time but still stuck hundreds of years ago.
Now they want to go a step further back and only allow real Israeli Jews on places they have annexed as theirs, the South Africa apartheid policies with an Israeli coat. If the Admissions Committee law passes, for example, Israeli passport holders but non-Jews could find themselves barred from living in certain communities and villages, even those built on public land. If this Bill is approved, organisations that commemorate the 1948 expulsion of Palestinians will be ineligible for public funds. We have to point out that this fascist anti-democracy bill is one which is already watered down several times. The original version sought to imprison anyone who breathed the word Nakba Day. Other legislation aims to silence individuals and groups that criticise the government just as this is done under dictatorial rule.
The Israeli problem is that the Israeli Jewish population just as the Germans under Hitler do not realise what is going on, they do not see it yet as a serious threat to the country their way of life and security. The killing of Democracy is a slow process. Slow enough to make sure that the population does not realise the changes. However the writing is on the wall. The people who are concerned is still waiting for the moment they still hope that what they fear will not happening. When they realise that it did happen it will be too late to take the steps needed to defend the democracy. The ruling dictator’s name could be Lieberman. He has as a corporal this in common with another corporal in 1928, and as a bouncer the experience of following orders and using his elbows to get further with the use of aggravated violence, all the ingenious for a dictator. He was the one who started the Irangate situation with the suggestion that Iran was the biggest threat facing the Jewish people since WW2. What he did mean was the biggest threat to Israel, as Iran is no threat to the majority of the Jewish believers in the world. However playing the sympathy card is more in line with his way of thinking then an honest assessment.
With a critical look upon Israel an in depended observer might say that Israel was never a democracy in the true sense of the word. It was always so that it would be a 100% Jewish state. They had reluctantly to accept non Jewish citizen as part of the US/UK UN deal but the Arab citizens of the state were always under martial law from 1949 to 1966. After which illegal undemocratic occupation of Palestinian land started. The news laws are just a logical follow up of what had already started in 1967. The danger of fascism is now clearly visible in Israel for all to see, however they fail to do so, till it is too late. The fear however is spreading under the Israeli non-Jewish population, action meetings are hardly attended as the fear for the feared Israeli SS, the secret service.
Now the end game for the Israeli has started and it is coming in the form of anti-democratic legislation that would limit free speech and campaigns against Israeli human rights organisations and imprisonment for any critic on the government. The Boycott Bill seeks to criminalize those who advocate for the international boycott of Israel, subjecting them to steep fines.
The Anti-Incitement Bill will criminalize all those who publish anything that denies Israel's Jewish and democratic character. However, this would mean that people like Lieberman and most of the Government of Israel will be labelled as criminals, we realise that is not much change, they are the once who denying Israel Jewish character and wiping out any form of democracy. They are the once who are breaking YWH's laws and instruction almost every minute of the day and therewith stick up two fingers to the Jewish believe. Jewish means believing in the law's given by YWH. It does not mean being an Israeli.
An American Jew is an American with a Jewish belief. Just as a Christian or Muslim American beliefs his religion but still is an American. The Israeli attempt to make it look like that all who are Jewish also are Israeli is false, more an attempt to defraud then to run a state in the hope that what did happen in WW2 may force the world to say we feel sorry for them. In any case a country that must force people to call it democratic, on pain of imprisonment, is not longer a democracy.
The question remains of Israel will slide slowly to fascism or will it be an outright fascist state.
In the mean time the Knesset is considering the creation of committees that will investigate the funding of left-wing civil and human rights organisations and any organisation that is critical of the Israeli occupation. It is simple a political witch-hunt as government supporting groups will not be investigated. They also point out that such an investigation, which is the responsibility of the legal branch, would exceed the Knesset's power but than again the Secret service has surpassed that Knesset's power already a long time ago.
The rumour on the streets of Tel Aviv is that if you see 5 people standing together you can count on it that at least two of them are informers for the Israeli secret police, based on the old KGB system of Russia. This in combination with the loyalty oath, which forces Israeli, would be non-Jewish citizens to pledge allegiance to a sole Jewish and democratic state. This is again a mirror picture likened Israel to Nazi Germany early stages. That was the time that Hitler instigated the laws which were the beginning to the systematic and deadly persecution of Jews was created as a prelude to the future concentration camps. Israel is going the same way with many of Hitler’s way of dealing already in place in Israel.
The new intended laws also called the Lieberman laws should not even being considered in a democratic state. The question is really are they not sliding towards fascism. The question also is are there enough members in the Knesset that will support the Lieberman laws, the fear abroad is that there will be a large enough majority to pass them. In the mean time Israel have already taken action against groups they do not like or who do not obey the leader and the state of Israel in their pre-fascist state actions, by closing social websites from those groups. In the prelude to the WW2 actions of Hitler the German population was marching with him. In Israel the Israeli Jewish population may do the same and moves to silence the dissent groups. Whatever the Lieberman laws do it seems that the Israeli Jewish population will march with them.
Statistically more then the half of the Israeli Jewish population is willing to curb the press freedom if it does not upheld the Israeli state image, while 2/3 of the Israeli Jewish population would clamp down on freedom of speech. Regardless of the Lieberman laws are passed in the Knesset they will have severely damaged the image of the state of Israel. The problem is that not alone on the street the voice is against anything that is not Jewish in Israel, those voices are also racist and anti-democratic. Even the Government and the Knesset have not been protesting against those proposed laws, neither is there any opposition from the premier of Israel. Even the USA who calls themselves a democratic state have not yet protested against those measures in the form of the Lieberman laws.
In USA style the newspapers are reporting only the government view of the situation, not the reality of the situation.
However as was seen in WW2 Germany, violence grows violence in an increasing tempo. When the person on the street reads in the newspaper that the Knesset members want to interrogate these organisations about their funding, it gives them a feeling of security. Man can expect that the Human Rights organisation would let hear his voice, but they however, are silent. Slowly the anti-democratic process is rolling forwards to a fascist state for Israeli Jews only. Soon the message on the entry ports into Israel will give the message, "entry for Jews only, no other humans, animals or Palestians allowed, unless accompanied by a never ending bank full account.
The courts are already under tied control and are to weak to take the decision they should be making, part of the Juridical system falls now under the Army and their courts, in which an defended has no rights and is found guilty for the fact that they are brought into the court. The political parties have lost there centre ground, while there is in name still a left it is in reality ultra right. This is again in line with Hitler’s socialist party which over the years did grow to a fascist party ultra right.
Fascism is a tool for the weak to be strong Netanyahu and Lieberman are such weak parts and therefore need to be strong which can only be done by creating situations published in the press, rightly or non-existing, like the abduction of thousands of Jewish girls by the Palestinians, a lie but it is actual believed as a fact by the Israeli Jewish population. The simplest of search could have pointed then to the truth, but they do not want truth they want to follow the leader, just as the Germans followed Hitler. The result is that the person on the street screams for more protection from those violent Palestinians, and Netanyahu and Lieberman are more then willing to oblige. Was it not Netanyahu who called the Palestinians in the past a threat was it not Lieberman who said that non-Jews would have no place in Jewish Israel. Both are now in power as prime minister and deputy prime minister.
The writing is on the wall, they have already their concentration camps, their walls, and their torture and jails now the leader need to be stepping forwards to lead them. As in WW2 Germany that leader will lead them to destruction, the destruction of the state of Israel and the spreading of the Israeli's world wide again, this time permanent as there will be no come back this time.
============================================================
09-02-2011
They were told this for many years, for many decennia’s; Britain needs to develop more in science and research. In reality, can someone really point out a British research centre that is still doing research for Britain. We do not mean the many foreign establishments that carrying out research and having a British name and are working in a British place. We mean a real British company, it does not exist, it is either in foreign hands or established with foreign capital. It is however all we have left the rest mainly under Thatcher is sold off. Only gold was left and that was sold of by Blair. The result is that the British citizen has one of the most expensive house fuels in the world, one of the most expensive car fuels in the world; water prices nearly double that of other countries. And they have one of the highest stealth taxes in Europe.
It is now so that the British are calling car makers like Ford and Nissan British Companies. Power companies such as EDF are now seen as British, Train and bus companies are presented as British companies, and Water companies are now called British. They are not the all have one thing in common they have foreign owners and working with foreign capital. Europe is right soon all what there is in Britain will have the owner abroad, with a British CEO to give it some pretence.
Even the Government of Her Majesty the Queen is controlled by the foreigners in Brussels and the puppet masters in Washington. The government cannot make a decision without first having to ask Brussels or Washington permission.
Britain needs to step up public support for research and development if it is to have international competitiveness, they need indeed. The loss of Pfizer’s research in Sandwich Kent with the loss of 2400 jobs is indeed shocking. There is not much job opportunity in that part of the country, even not with the rapid development of the airport just outside Ramsgate, and the also rapidly laid down new roads to and from the airport. The Government was aware of this a long time ago, Pfizer’s had pointed out the availability of modern complexes of workspace and offices, near two motor way's and an airport with several seaports nearby under which the port of Dover and the channel tunnel train project.
However the government did what they have done since they got in power, absolute nothing than talking, making promises, putting the fear in business and the middle and lower classes, by increasing all what they were able to do. However they left themselves and the higher classes well out of it. If it is not taxed yet it will be soon, hold your breath as otherwise that will be taxed as well.
The European Union research and innovation commissioner will caution ministers that Britain’s research policy is at odds with that of other big EU countries such as France and Germany and risks losing ground world wide.
You can take that it will mean that they will be making a point out of this to defend their position. It is this area, were investments need to be made regardless of the cuts which have to be made in other areas of an economy, the research needs investment. We have China just behind us and Europe and the USA in front of us. Mean while other European countries are going wide out to support the research and development in Britain there is done absolute nothing. It is therefore strange to see the UK first minister to state in Parliament that Britain is doing well. He must have a strange way of looking at the output figures. Production is lower then expected, import is considerable higher then export. We losing companies to other European countries and a large part of the young population have no job to go to.
Then again he has big ideas; the big society, the society in which the rich have all and the rest have nothing and the having nothing will be on a daily base joined by other people who have just lost job and/or home. We are doing well he said, we taken money from the banks were Labour was giving it to them. Look at it the real way and we see that the Conservative supporters and members created the loss on the banks and bonds market, the Labour government tried to stop the disaster and re-fuelled the banks with money which they had to borrow, to the great pleasure of the bonds market.
However, it kept the economy going in a time that in other countries such as Greece bankruptcy was calling on the door.
We are now taking it back Cameron said from the banks. What he simple say is that the banks are raking in at the moment money and that over those profits tax need to be paid, that is the money he takes back. What he should have taken back is the re-payment of the billions of loans his friends and supporters received from Labour. There can be no doubt that the combination of Cameron and Osborne looks more and more as a created episode of the children entertainment of Punch and Judy.
In the time the conservatives are in power they have managed the already climbing economy under Labour (1.7) to bring down again (0.4). They have managed the screw the unemployment up, the same with the taxes and the stealth taxes which increased the daily product prices sharp. The big society he said, we bring in the rich foreigners and their educated staff, and the new rich foreigners and the conservatives friends can then have their pick out of the unemployed to create again the by the conservative so loved Victorian times with cheap servants down stairs and the rich families upstairs.
The situation as with Pfizer's leaving Britain can be seen in a wider aspect, they simple leaving the fast sinking ship. The conservatives first created the iceberg of banking debts, and while Labour managed to sail around them carefully, the conservatives now have rammed the Titanic ship of state into the by themselves created iceberg. While the masses are drowning in high taxes high prices and no income, the conservatives have commanded the lifeboats for themselves and their rich friends to survive, while the IMF saving ship is still at a distant and telegraph to them we will save you at a price. That again is the price that will have to be paid by the masses who by a miracle have survived the disaster, as the rich can not be expected to part from their money.
In the meantime all that was said before the election, all the promises that ware given are disappeared into the rubbish bin. The conservative principle is once again established; keep the poor poorer and the rich richer. There is simple no money to go around Cameron said. That does not stop him from giving money away to every country he goes, he or his foreign secretary who just handed over 8 million pound to Tunisia, who do not need it, who do not have a proper government yet and of which country we do not know which way it will go. However, money plenty so he gave it anyway. He just has to rob some old and disabled people in Britain to get it back.
Remember to stories in the government supporting media that poor large families were living in expensive homes paid for by the government. That it was an absolute disgusting situation which needed to be corrected as soon as possible. Nothing was done while the ordinaries rents for properties are shooting up high and more and more people fall into the Housing benefit trap thanks to the conservatives, the high rents for living into rich houses is still going on.
The principle here is that the landlord needs to make a lot of money; most landlords are conservative supporters or even members of the party so that the conservative government cannot cut down on those rents. Their friends would not stand for it.
That the poorer people have to walk through mud, that wheelchair users cannot go outs as there are no proper roads, that while the rich can add and build to their house all they want the poorer are restricted on all points. Crime is rising the fact that the police is advised not to log certain events makes it look like it stabilise but the reality shows different. The conservatives are living the life of Reilly wealth without an end and the poor in droves to pay for it.
The conservatives are wondering why Cameron is less popular the Margaret Thatcher in her last days, well let him look at the figures. Does he wonder why the conservatives are running low in the opinion polls, does he really wonder, or does he simple not care as his pockets are full. Osborne does not have a clue how to come out of the self created slump, and this time there is no ship waiting with wealthy owners to go and drowns his sorrows.
===============================================================
11-02-2011
Many years ago the comment was made during a speech that it would be more convenient if Canada was a mere state in the United States it would lock Alaska within the borders of the United States and from the north of Alaska to the south of the border with Mexico it would be one fast Country. The Liberal government of Canada always waved question about this to the land of fairy tales. However the Liberals are gone and so are the Liberal ideas. The word is now on partnerships with the United States.
The new shared vision for perimeter security and economic competitiveness will be a step towards the order Obama have set himself to get the economic integration with Canada going. This shared vision is just the first step to make the rest more easily to obtain. This is possible since it is in principle an agreement to create future agreements. But make no mistake; the Beyond the Border declaration has the potential to take Canada into economic integration with the United States.
What was told at the press conference in Washington was limited indeed, the little information that was given about the creation of a United States-Canada Regularly Cooperation council which will be in charge to flatten out the small ripples on either side of the border. However it is not only about flattening the ripples of the regulations, their always will be some, as there is between other parts of the United States. It will change the way that business, tourists and others can use the borders. Some of it will be acceptable other s will straight out object. What ever it will be the end will see the border between the United States and Canada disappear. Maybe not tomorrow or next year but it will go. There is simple nothing Canada can do about it.
Mr. Harper acknowledged that the Washington declaration is a “starting point” for “an ambitious agenda.” He played down fears about Canada’s sovereignty being trampled by saying the deal is in the national interest. Although he will be realist enough to see that this will happen in time. However, there’s no disguising the fact that if the border deal is done with the logical conclusion, Canada will be indeed a very different Country then it is now.
Possible problem can in the beginning arise how the Countries will work together to establish and verify the identities of travellers and conduct screening of travellers from the early beginning.
The intention is that fingerprints and retinal scans will become a question of routine, leading to the evolution of an integrated entry-exit system, where entry into one country serves to verify exit from the other. This will lead to an extra amount of personal information that will be used and stored on an unprecedented scale. Although the United States and Canada already share the watch-for list plus the ticket and passengers boarding list for border crossings, it may to be seen of the Canadian public is willing to hand over more and more personal information to the Americans
As we noticed before it all was small on detail on how the border crossings may be working in the future and of indeed it will work at all. Actual beyond a reference to increased cooperation across air, land and maritime ports, as well as space and cyberspace.” It will be obvious that the NORAD will be used as the established joint air defence model it may well be adopted on land and sea as well. The end build up will be a one custom stop crossing till such a time that Canada will be seen as the 51 state into the United States, time will tell. However the tell tale signs are there for everyone to see.
Let us have a view at the reality of the project, what will it mean in reality. Will Canada's defence system come under United States control, just as the Canadian force already is in Afghanistan. Will it sign up to the Ballistic Missile Defence program that that always was rejected when the Liberals were in power? Will Canada give in and let the United States navy patrol the Northwest Passage, which the U.S. sees as an international waterway, what it is not as it crossed the Canadian land, but Canada claims as an internal strait? But if the United Navy will patrol this what will that entail for the Canadian Arctic sovereignty strategy?
Harper is under pressure from the United States, even with an election coming up he will be not able to resist the United States. It is well remembered what did happen before, the Americans stepped up security at the border after 9/11, they exerted extreme pressure on Canada’s trade jugular. A look only at the tourism statistics which give some indication of the impact it had. In 2009, overnight visits from the U.S. totalled 11.7 million, down from more than 17-million in 2002. Harper knows that the United States could put more pressure on the tourist and trade jugular, even near stop it. The only interruption the border had was for goods needed in the United States.
It was the coming of Barack Obama did solve part of the problem as Obama had his own reason for wanting trade to flow more freely, not least his stated ambition to double U.S. exports. The potential for a deal was greatly improved by the improved relation ship apparent between Harper and Obama the President, who have cooperated effectively on thorny issues ranging from the auto bailout to help in Afghanistan. It is not on this moment to tell of the display of unity will last, remember Bush had the same idea with Vincence Fox of Mexico, although more modest even so it collapsed before the ink was dry. It will depend of Harper and Obama really want to put their mind to it.
The largest hurdle for Harper will to convince the Canadian electorate that the deal really is in the interest of the Canadian people. We wish him luck but the early comments and the comments of the opposition political parties show that those parties will use it to left Harper out of the government saddle. It will bring Canada more prosperity, but they will loose their independence, and what is happening in Europe shows that beside the prosperity there are dangers ahead.
What it will bring is unfettered access to the United States and from the United States. It will bring job possibilities although that could be limited as the United States is then also able to bring their own staff into Canada.
For complete access to the U.S., Canada must be existing only on paper. That way Canada remove the border altogether, the question is how long the Canadian electorate will allow the present government to sell out to the United States, to break up Canada and allow the Americans to run the country. Already the Canadian government allows foreign governments to stake out the north unchallenged. The opposition will tell the people that we can still trade with them but we will dictate the terms. The problem is however, that there is nothing to dictate. Instead of making deals with the United States and slowly sell out Canada to them. He should tell the Canadian business to get off their butts and diversify by investing and selling overseas.
Harper told the Americans 14 years ago that when he was done with Canada, we wouldn't recognize it, that we're a backwater welfare state. And now everyone's all surprised that he's selling out to the United States, It seems that this was his master plan from the very beginning. After all it is going on for years, the United States got what they wanted, when they wanted it. Already the United States have preferred access to the oil and gas and natural resources. Canada gets their war on drugs, war on terror and the NRA. It is now obvious why Harper needs nine billion for prisons.
The proposal entails that a significant tightening of security will smooth the cross border movement of people, goods and services between the US and Canada, it will not, not at Europe, open borders and constant problems. The reason that the United States and Canada are given for this new closeness together, if smoothing the flow of people, goods and services is the true objective, then why not less security? Here is the suspicion that the objective is not the stated objective but a hidden agenda.
The US has a clear agenda, a clear objective which is secure the Canadian resources vital to its economy and to extend the control it exerts over its own population to control over Canadians. This till such time that the United States for state security reason simple takes over the whole of Canada and the United States will from the north in Alaska to the borders of Mexico.
================================================================
13-02-2011
If the UK co-leader of the Conservative party Lady Warsi thinks us non Muslims are Islam phobic she is wrong, because phobia means an un-rational fear. Well for one the fear of Islam is real and rational and this will tell you why, and PM Cameron shares it to, by the speech he gave on Saturday. Every time the news comes on then somewhere in the world a bomb has gone off killing men, women & children and wounding many in the name of a Jihad terrorist version of Islam be it Shiite or Sunni. Our Security Services keep issuing weekly chilling warnings that it is monitoring over 2000 dangerous Muslim fanatics and dozens of active terrorists plots, mostly home grown by UK Muslims, and many educated to the highest level at our Universities.
Every day for months our news carries in detail the terrible tales of suffering & carnage that took place when Islamism extremists attacked London Transport in London England, as evidence is given to the Inquest into 52 people that died that day. In fact as I write this the radio has said a bomb has gone off in Moscow airport killing many, it won be the Salivation Army that did it? Europeans object to the cruel and harsh sharia law and its barbaric punishments, for instance death by stoning for being gay, and polygamy and the suppression of women, arranged marriages, honour killings if daughters disobey their male relative wishes. The terrible practice of female circumcision is not required by the Quran, the production of meat in a manner that is unnecessarily cruel to the animals.
It is to worry that in surveys of Muslims, find that many think 9/11 attack and the 3000 that died was justified. Europeans are alarmed that a study by The Policy Exchange found that 37% of young Muslims want sharia law in the UK, and 36% think you should have your head sawn off, if as a Muslim you convert to another religion. Having read the Quran cover to cover it shows that it preaches in many of its verses (62%) hatred & vitriol to all non Muslims and particularly Jews, and have nasty names to describe the non-believers.
When somebody users the lazy term Islamic phobia like Lady Warsi, It is obvious to know that it is someone whose judgment has been corrupted by the political correctness and Islamic lobby and wants to silence any debate by non Muslims of Islam, because any criticism of their perfect faith is in its self a sin and therefore not acceptable. I just thank the way things are going I am not female, Jewish or gay or worse still all three, because I would be for the multi chop when we get the Sharia law in Europe that so many want?
King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarch and keeper of the holy places of Mecca, and Medina and as such he holds a special place at the heart of Islam for the Sunni followers, what he says has grave weight. He claims to be a friend of the west and has taken control with his ultraconservative Wahhabi religious advisors of the Fatwas or religious rulings that dictate Muslim life. He has banned Fatwas from other sources, including more moderate interpretation by Royal degree. The ideology that now reigns in Saudi Arabia comes into shape focus if you view Fatwas issued on the website of the Council of Senior Religious Scholars.
You can read that little boys and girls sharing a swimming pool that you might find charming and innocent are mischief and evil and are banned from now on. You can learn that bringing flowers to a hospital patient is a Christian or Western practice that must be discouraged because it a foreign custom that limit Allah adversaries. And that is how the friend of the west really thinks about us as adversaries to his God and Muslims.
Other Fatwas are injunctions against movie watching as they may promote lewdness and immorality well his got that right, hey but I like a bit of lewdness. But the one that says it all is this mutual affection, love, brotherhood or friendship with Non Muslims or even initiating an exchange of greetings with non believing infidels is unacceptable. There is nothing new in this but not many people realise that this obligation of hating non Muslims is a requirement of the Quran and is known as Al-Wala, wal- Barra, you love what Allah loves and hate what Allah hates.
He hates the non believer, all of us and that what is driving the jihad & terror attacks along with Blair's Bush's illegal wars against Islamic Countries and thus the whole brotherhood or Ummah! It is the inconvenient truth but it needs to be widely known by our ruling classes and police, its no good repeating its a religion of peace, it might be but only to other Muslims, within the Sunni or Shia grouping as both consider each other infidels and the rest of us as kuffars, waiting hells fire.
Having briefly digested some of the comments thus far it must be clear to most people that there has to be a teaching in the Koran that must lead SOME Muslims to commit acts of terrorism etc. It is certainly not the point of making any 'broad brushed' statement that 'ALL' Muslims are terrorists etc, however the more 'moderate' Muslims have to ask themselves some searching questions. When some Muslims receive the revelation via teachings that Jesus Christ is LORD (The Son of God) and not just a prophet, then in Islamic countries they are put to death if they don't re-convert.
With the growth of Islam in Europe how long would it be before such a fate awaits Muslims that believe Jesus Christ is the promised Messiah, the Son of God, descended from the son of the promise? There never has been a time in this once great Europe we living in the last hundreds of years and that was built on strong Christian values that other religions met such a fate as the Europeans do now. However, look again to the Netherlands were as an example in Amsterdam the Capital city of the Netherlands Muslim school get all the help, permissions and space they need, while other schools are deprived from space and permissions.
Man can ask where are all the so called moderate Muslims? They should be condoning these kinds of atrocities... unless they are happy to have Islam represented by these extremists? Islam seems to be presenting themselves through this absence of complain to the actions of those extremist, nothing but a barbaric religion/cult that thrives on pain and suffering. And it is only natural that the moderate Muslims are silence over the extreme activities of the extremists. They are reaping the benefits of the European governments who are to afraid to open their mouth and to say, enough is enough. They maybe want to, but the un-elected dictatorship that runs Europe has declared that any action, any negative word against the Muslims is discrimination and an infringement of their human rights. Never mind the rights of the Europeans, as that is not where the money for those un-elected decision makers comes from. The quick rich brigade has other sources of income.
The USA intelligence service regards UK Muslims as one of the biggest terrorist's threats to their own and world security. Home grown Muslims placed the bombs in London UK and many hundreds UK Muslims are in prison for planning acts of terror in this country. The UK security services have said that at any one time they are looking up at to 2000 home grown Islamic threats of terrorist's action in the UK. If you go on to moderate Islamic sites on the internet you can download advice on how to become a Muslim which is quite simple done by declaring the Shahada; where you bear witness that there is no deity but Allah, and bear witness that Mohammad is the messenger of Allah. You then get further advice on how the Quran requires you to behave the most important being the statement that you must love what Allah loves and hate what Allah hates.
Therefore it is obvious you must dissociate yourself completely from the unbelievers and refuse to be influenced by them, both in worldly and religious matters. This statement is repeated on all Islamic sites we have looked at, and some are great deal more extreme. It is to believe that this is the fundamental principal of the Islamic faith and the main reason why multi cultralism can never work and why relations between Muslims and infidels will always be difficult and is a route cause of most Islamic terrorism. It is not a surprise not to have ever seen this important fact discussed or mentioned any were in the media by politicians or religious leaders. Perhaps this can be the start an honest debate without that the Europeans are being called Islamic phobic by the thought the UK lady Warsi and the police?
However some aspects of the Islam may be understandable. The question is however, who wants to live or has the desire to live in a country governed by strict Islamic laws, nobody, not even the European Muslims themselves. However it is also clear, that there are people who seek to ferment anti-Muslim feelings for their own political purposes. We should be positioning ourselves to take advantage for our own political benefit and end of the growing wave of public support for the Islam which is being whipped up by the mass media. They are banging on about Islam. Why? Because to the ordinary public out there it's the thing they can understand. It's the thing the newspaper editors sell newspapers with. If we were to attack some other ethnic groups some people say we should attack the Jews, and then the same media would support the Jews.
However, they never support the European originals. If those Media would do this then they would be collectedly accused by the European un-elected dictators of deliberate discrimination against the Jews and the Muslims. And as the Jews are paying they would be protected first. That's what the public would think. It wouldn't get the Europeans anywhere other than being slung further backwards to protect the Muslims. They would create a little box situation in which they could lock up all those original Europeans to keep them quit. Those Europeans would then be labelled in public of mainly Muslims as the "extremist crank lunatics, nothing to do with the European government. And that way they would keep the power and the pockets filled.
==================================================================
15-02-2011
A report out said that in the UK the border inspections are balanced in favour of the incoming illegal immigrants. Their service is directed to making money and customer service but not to stopping illegal immigrants from entering the country. After work those inspectors are going home and complaining about the too many illegal immigrants that entering the country. The responsible minister in the UK admits that this is not right, but profit goes first plus customer service. If that would not be the case then every illegal immigrant would apply to the UK courts that their Human Rights were infringed on and will under the current absurd European laws be awarded a small fortune. After that they leave the UK and come back a couple of months later to do it all over again.
This can be seen as absurd, and so it is. However it is not as half as absurd as the situation in the Netherlands and Germany. Here we have the situation that actual the customs on the border are told to let the Turkey population in at all times. They do not need a Visa they do not need permission. All they have to do is to say that they are entering as a business and as such the judicial brain deaths have given the order to the government to let them in.
The Turk’s do this, they all come in as a business with their whole extended families and as the family of such a business from Turkey cannot be refused entry. Many business of Turkey’s citizen in the Netherlands, this as an example are being there for many many years, do not pay tax do not employ people, and in many cases do not have shops or business premises. They claiming social payments for themselves and their extended families, but because they are listed as a business they can stay for however long they want.
Is this maybe absurd, then what about this; A 21 year old woman took from the rubbish outside an superstore some food that had been thrown out because of out of date and discarded. This food was thrown out and had therefore no value any-more. Now there is a law in the United Kingdom, mainly produced to give the police the change to arrest people who are innocent on fantasy charges. It stops them from going after the real criminals as that can be dangerous. The British police are proud that they are as they themselves say are the best police are the world and that nobody comes away with crime. This is maybe so in their eyes but can they explain why the United Kingdom has the highest level of unsolved criminal cases in Europe. As a fact the change to be arrested for a real crime in the United Kingdom is less ten 1 in 10. This means that of every one hundred crimes, real crimes, 90 come away with it permanent.
Back to the 21 year old woman who collected some rubbish outside a superstore. We have to high-lightening this as it shows how the police under the Conservative party now in partial power work. This super market was one of the Tesco stores, the one which say that “every little helps”. And so it does as the little more expensive side of their products make the profit for Tesco higher, not for the customers who are paying on average considerate more then in other Super markets. The only reason why people shop in Tesco is because Tesco under the good old days of Margaret Thatcher also a Conservative leader in the past, Tesco was allowed to buy up land to prevent other super markets from building their super market near Tesco, in which case the profit for Tesco would be non-existing.
This Tesco branch did indeed display their complete contempt for the customers. However they are part of a rich family and as you can guess that is the lever for the police actual to do something. In the mean time the 21 year old put the rubbish in her bag and was prompt arrested at her home for theft by finding. Now this theft by finding is an invention nowhere else to be found in the world as a law. What it means is that if someone drops a butt end of a cigarette and someone picks it up that person can be arrested for theft by finding. Or in autumn the leaves are falling of the trees and someone collect some because of the colour or any other reason they can be arrested for theft by finding. The show the absurdity of this law special created to give the police something to do in the UK, if a dog would drop his mess onto the street and someone else not being the dog’s owner, picks it up, that person in principle could be arrested for theft by finding. In any case the list is endless.
OK back to the 21 year old who was arrested in her home for theft by finding, she was forcefully arrested as a hardened criminal. The British police well know internationally for their lack of tack and civilised behaviour was subjected to the heavy handed police tactics and warned that if the door was not opened quickly they would use a battering ram. Let we remind the reader we still talking her about collecting some thrown away rubbish. However the police not only arrested her but also raided her whole house after she was led away. There was no reason for this, no indication of real crime to do this, the police was just not doing there job.
A Tesco spokesman when asked said: “We are assisting the police with their inquiries. We seek to minimise waste in all our stores and where possible will seek to reuse and recycle it.”This was a typical face saving statement which did not work, they thrown it away by the rubbish the rest is just damage limitation. It will be obvious that Tesco’s “every little help” is just a tag-line to increase their profits and indeed in that case every little helps. In the mean time the 21 year old have to go to court for theft she did not commit. However, it is also well known in the United Kingdom that not committing a crime is not a reason not to be arrested, after all the UK police main line of operation is “if you first not succeed cheat”. Under that heading many are arrested and a crime allocated to them by the police, a crime the person was not aware of.
And that is what the police in the United Kingdom are doing....... catching the real criminals after they invented a crime for them. In a more organised society the police would catch criminals, instead of wasting police time on making up charges to fit a person. Man can only hope that the arresting police and the ones who obeyed the demand from Tesco are included in the by the British government announced 10,000 police who will lose their job. In which case they would be lucky if they had the change to search through the bins of Tesco for food themselves. In the mean time it is obvious that Tesco have no consideration for their customers. Man can wonder how many Tesco customers are shopping somewhere else, if we have to believe the tags, many.
People that shop in supermarkets like Tesco are mad. On the other hand it is always possible that they where afraid that someone would be ill from eating that food, and they cannot be fines if they say it was taken by theft. However people in Britain are in contradiction with international law guilty unless proven innocent. It makes from every British citizen an instant criminal unless they can proof that they are innocent, it explains the average rudeness and arrogance of the police against all citizen, unless rich and wealthy.
Staying by the good old England, if you thought the above stories ware absurd, well then you do not have seen anything. In the UK they have a system of legal aid. It means that people who are wronged some way or another can be taken the wrong doer to Court and have the cost paid. The last time that the Conservatives were ruling the country, that time when they sold off all the UK’s family silver and left the country with nothing to be proud off, they lowered the possibilities of people to get that legal aid in fact they made it almost impossible for the poor to get their rights. This time around they do one better, it will be now almost impossible to get legal aid. The excuse of them is that too many using it. That is right and wrong at the same time. The people who need it do not get it, the people who should not need it or do not need it get it anyway, freely.
Legal aid is required to assist the communities with help against nasty people like bad bosses and bad politicians. So it appears that the Conservatives are looking after their own self again. There are cuts and again there are direct and punitive cuts this appears to be the case in this instance bully boy tactics. The best thing for the British is to get elections and then come back Labour all is forgiven. The criminal inmates in the mean time are using it for all what is possible; toilet paper is to hard, the TV is too loud, the DVD is an to old model, the warden did not say excuse me sir but just he you, all reasons for the inmates to claim a new court case under the Human Rights laws so efficient used in the United Kingdom while elsewhere it is ignored.
Illegal immigrants coming into the country and are not welcomed proper and as such they take the government to court for breach of human rights. They are not given a large home instantly, so they taken the government to court by breach of their human rights. In the mean time the elaborate justice system in the UK where solicitors cannot fight their case in court but have to hire a so-called barrister is so expensive that the Legal Aid Funds is eroding in a quick tempo. The problem with legal aid is the CPS has a budget which they have to stick to, the defence solicitors/ Barristers should be getting paid for what they actual do. However, they do not have a budget they have to stick to, with other words it is their interest to let a case run so long as possible it increases their earning it also means that the defence can spent more then the Prosecution.
The Government in Britain would be wise if they accepted the system used world wide. Have a pool of public defenders under control of the justice department out of which the illegal and criminals would be allocated a solicitor on a set budget. If a criminal or an illegal person wants a more expensive solicitor then they have to pay for that them selves. If they do not want a pool solicitor or cannot afford an expensive one they always can defend themselves. Let the solicitors act in the Courts without the use of the expensive barrister; they can do the more difficult cases which need expertise. That way the common citizen of Britain who is really to poor to fight their own case can have a normal solicitor.
On this moment in Britain only the rich have a right on their day in court; it would be nice if the poor could also have their day in court. Not on fantasy charges as in the case of the 21 year old, but to get their right. That however will take some time as the police in Britain works in principle only for the rich and the ones in power. Take the case from Kate Price a British celebrity for unknown reasons other that she jumps from one celebrity to another to stay in the limelights. However, that is apparently good enough for the police the waste police time once more to even close the motorway to let her drive on it. We can only wonder which policeman in charge gave that order; he must have had his hands full. Then again whatever that person does the police will find her innocent and indeed will have their hands full, non-stop.
Would it not be nice if the authority in Europe would go back to protecting the population of their own country instead of looking at the wishes of the rich and famous and do their bidding, look after their own population instead of that in other countries. Would it not be nice if the police started to solve crimes instead of obeying the wealthy rich and famous.
Then again it is the Western world, pockets need to be filled, food need to be on the table. The rich, wealthy and famous can give you that not the poor. In that case they have to suffer at no end.
===================================================================
17-02-2011
Pakistani police say an American held after shooting dead two men committed "cold-blooded murder".
The claims came as a judge ordered the man's detention extended for 14 days in a local jail and told the Pakistani government to clarify if he has diplomatic immunity. This is a story that took a long time to get all the details and to sift through the many obstacles put up by the Americans. The USA claims the man had diplomatic immunity and therefore should be realised instantly. However, the police claims and extended detention are likely to further inflame tensions over the case between the US and Pakistan, whose uneasy partnership is considered key to ending the war in Afghanistan. The US says the American, 36-year-old Raymond Allen Davis, shot two Pakistanis on January 27 because they were trying to rob him in the eastern city of Lahore. However that story does not add up as the American listed under the name Raymond Allen Davis said that they pointed a gun at him and he had to draw his own gun to defend himself. The two men were Pakistani state security man so the story of robbery fails to make an impression in Pakistan.
A nice story, however, it does not add up. If someone points a gun at you do you really have the time to pull your own gun put the safety off and shoot? What was the robber doing all that time while he was pulling his gun and made ready to shoot, playing poker or something? This is special curios as the robber alleged gun was still on safety and no bullet was in the chamber. We have here the situation if we have to believe Mr Davis that two men wanted to rob him on gun point with a gun which was on safety and no bullet in the chamber while the two robbers gave him (Davis) time enough to pull his own gun and use it. To use a daily expression, "pull the other one this one failed".
To add another point even if he was a part of the diplomatic mission of the USA, he is still not allowed to shoot two people in broad daylight he is not even allowed to have a gun. In reality it seemed to be an execution which went wrong as by coincidence police was nearby, hence he was arrested. Now the USA says he has diplomatic immunity as part of the consular staff in Lahore. However, According to his 2009 visa application, Davis was born in Wise, Virginia. He gave an address in Las Vegas, where he is listed in Nevada state registration records as the co-owner of a firm called Hyperion Protective Services.
The business registration shows the following details:
Business Name: HYPERION PROTECTIVE SERVICES, LLC NO: 20101521438.
Business Officer: 1st. Male Managing Member - Mr. RAYMOND A. DAVIS
Business Address: 9811 W. Charleston Blvd-420, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89117, USA
Business Officer: 2nd. Female Managing Member - Mrs. DAVIS
Business Address: 9811 W. Charleston Blvd-420, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89117, USA
Business Managed By: Two Managing Members
Business Type: Domestic Limited-Liability Company (LLC) - Status: Active
There is no mention of any US government accredited business.
However, Washington insists his detention is illegal under international agreements covering diplomats because he was a US Embassy staff member, and American officials have begun curbing diplomatic contacts and threatening to cut off billions in aid to Pakistan if he is not freed. This is the normal bullying tactic which as usual in the long term will back fire. They Americans are well aware that he is a private security operative working for the US government without having a diplomatic status. It is practise that if a foreign mission fails the person that failed is either instant eliminated or receives instant diplomatic immunity. It is called coming away with murder.
The Pakistani government already saddled with the enormous anti American sentiment in Pakistan due to the many illegal drone attacks on people and villages have here to make a calculated decision giving in to the USA blackmail and let the USA come away with murder. There is here a danger that the American feeble use of diplomatic immunity can be used world wide by governments when one of their citizens kills an American by simple announcing that that person had diplomatic immunity. It would not stop the Americans from charging that person but it would mean that the USA never could use it again. The Pakistani government is right if they say that it is up to the courts. However, the stupidity of Davis could open a can with worms, the fact is that the rival political parties control the federal government and the government of Punjab province where the trial if any, would be held, is further complicating the governments of Pakistan's response.
The situation was so that Davis would be held for two weeks in what time the USA has to prove that Davis did have diplomatic immunity. For the Americans that are the easy part of the situation they simple create. However the added complication was that the police in Lahore said that the investigation into the shooting had shown that there was no ground to the story of Davis that he was defending himself but that it was, "an intentional and cold-blooded murder". The dead man's pistol was in his clothing with the safety on and no bullets in the chamber, a rather weird way of robbing someone and giving the so-called victim all the time to get his own gun and use it.
Lying is a typical American business and big business coming to that, remember the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and the nuclear bombs in IRAN. It is therefore not a surprise that the Consular spokesman Beale said, "We regret that this incident resulted in loss of life, however eyewitness reports on the day of the incident showed the American diplomat acted in self defence. There is no doubt he has diplomatic immunity, and we are working with the government of Pakistan to resolve the issue." The problem here is that the witnesses contradicting Beale, and that on the moment of the killing Davis had no diplomatic immunity. We have no doubt that he has it now back dated, but not actual when he did the shooting.
What did come out of the reports is that Davis is a security operative via his security company in Las Vegas; his record also shows that he has army experience Special Forces. His record did not show that he had diplomatic immunity. He is the director of his Security Company, and private security company. It is also known that he had CIA contacts and that he was working in Pakistan in secret operations, in fact a hired killer. The report also shows that the two men he killed were both intelligent agents of Pakistan. It all point to an assassination that went wrong. This is accentuated by the fact that the American consulate in Lahore did not explain why Davis was carrying a gun for which he had no licence. Nor were they able to explain what his job was at the consulate. One source said he was a technical operative another source said he was an administrative staff member.
The problem for the Americans is that the diplomatic staffs in Pakistan is not allowed to carry weapons and for that reason Pakistan have reason enough to keep him, so long they are not giving in to the USA blackmail as Thailand did with the Russian Businessman Bout, and many others. The problem is complicated as the reports from Pakistan say that the man killed were in fact trailing him as intelligent agents for the Pakistani security service (ISI). Let us make it clear this story is about a man who did not wanted to be followed as he was up to something that was illegal and therefore simple killed his followers. That he as the USA say was a diplomat is an obvious lie as he was carrying a gun which is not allowed he had obvious as the English say, "a licence to kill" and that was just what he was doing.
The PPP in Pakistan was quick to reply, so said the Secretary of information of the PPP that Davis was an person with diplomatic immunity. After all the USA is the largest taker of Pakistani goods.
What it means is that so long as the USA is buying the goods and the money comes in the country the Americans so far it the PPP concerns can do what they, when they like it and to whom they like it to do. The president hold the opinion that the killing of two members of the security by an American should not be a problem. What he did say in reality was as so long the USA pays they can do what they want even if they are killing the Pakistani citizen. We think the real point is here that money talks and apparently very loud in the ears of the PPP and the President.
The question here is will the Americans ever learn, as the answer is laying in front of them.
Their vassal England has Pervez Musharraf, the Pakistani government wants him. The American government wants Davis out, just switch the Pakistani have then Musharraf and the Americans have their killer back. It is as simple as that.
==================================================================
19-02-2011
Playing the game of death, with blood on his hands.
The Middle East is in chaos if we have to believe the Western media dictated by their Governments. The people want to have more freedom more democracy if we have to believe the Western and special the American press.However, it is not alone in the Middle East were people are protesting and demonstrating, Look at America, look at Wisconsin where for the fourth day running more then 100,000 people are in protest and demonstrating against government, it made protest like in Iran, Kuwait, and Oman small fry.
However, in the Middle East it seems to have more to do with the rising food prices and the lack of government reaction to those prices. If the rumours are correct then with the exception of Egypt the USA seems to be behind most protests, fact is that there is American money used to persuade protesters such as in Kuwait and Oman to go onto the streets. It is for certain that the clashes in Yemen, Bahrain and Iran were an USA initiative after they had the experience of the protests in Tunisia and Egypt. What a better change to stir the whole of the Middle East, shake the cards and see what comes out of it.
A couple of point here while the protests in Tunisia were right where it concerned the fast rising prices, prices driven up by the Americans for profit. After all it was the American Banks who created the recession. It are the American speculators who driving up the prices. Rising prices which are nothing else then quick profit taking with the hope that they are able to keep the prices high in the future. Higher prices means more profit for the revenue system and a right way to come out the by the banks created recession. America would not be America if they would not use (miss) the situation for their own benefit. Who cares about some more death protesters, certainly not the Americans. Death is their hobby as is well documented.
In America it self it is impossible to get an protest on the street, the security services are organised in such a way and with such a strength that the security service of dictator Mubarak when in power is dwarfed. In America any one who opens his mouth in public is maybe not instantly, they have to keep the facade up, but will be arrested, fitted up with a crime for life or simple has an unfortunate accident. The streets are more stacked rubbish tips surrounded by people who have to find a way of getting food. People are dying on the street as the health service is now so expensive that even the better off are complaining.
In the mean time the president of America have shown his hand. The man who received the peace price. The only person who received the peace price before he did anything. The only man also who received the peace price for more wars and killings then any president before him. It maybe is not done by American soldiers although they do their outmost best to set new record on killing. No the most killings are done as an effect of American actions world wide. On one hand the president condemns the killing done by other states of Arabs, probably jalousie that he did not get the change to do it, on the other hand he gives Israel the carte blanc to remove or kill the whole Palestinian population and steal the land. If Obama thinks that the Lieberman government of Israel will stop there he must be more stupid than he really is.
Israel wants Syria, Lebanon and Jordan. Lieberman sees himself as the new Israeli leader who controls all. We are well aware that Lieberman is the Foreign minister of Israel but that is only in name. In reality he is the one who calls the shots.
In the mean time Obama has shown his hand, the blood still dripping of it. In the UN he just has given Israel permission to remove and to kill off the whole of the non-Jewish population living in and surrounding the state of Israel. His big words in the past have now shown did not mean anything. This son of a British citizen in it then British Kenya, who is therefore in reality an British citizen but via a technicality managed not only to have an American citizenship but also managed at a curios way to accumulate a fortune behaves more as a tribal war-head then as a president of the America's.
With his rather stupid decision in the UN he has showed his bloodied hand, he will have set the prelude of a full blown war in the Middle east to please the 6 million Jews in America, 6 million Jews in the USA who now control the lives, wealth income and peace of 300 million plus citizen of America because they have a coward as president. Israel would not have stopped the building, the killing the theft and the removal of the rightful owners. They never have paid any notion to what the UN said, the over 100 ignored resolutions by Israel are proof of this. So why this 100% support for the building, killing theft and the removal of the rightful owners now? In simple terms, he wants an all out war, as the only way out of trouble. In short the troubles in the world to day are directly pointed back to the 7 million Jews in Israel and the 6 million Jews in America.
However, you have to see it from the America government side. With a 55 trillion USA total debt and depending for near 100% on the Jewish owned banks, abstain or agreeing this time was not an option. Israel has his hands very tied around the America throat and only has to squeeze a little more to have the whole of America in bankruptcy. The Israeli government controlled by Lieberman a former Russian citizen and therefore used to a Stalinist rule and behaviour, will take no prisoners. His vision is Israel for Jews only and the creation of an Great Israel which include Jordan and Syria, the West Bank what is in effect all ready under Israeli control they only have to remove or kill the Palestinians and Gaza where they have already large chunks of land inside Gaza under 100% Israeli control and the rest is just waiting to be removed or been killed.
Fact remains that Israel has 100% control over the USA spending and can direct Obama in any direction they want. The American people kept dumb by the USA media under USA control can do nothing else than listen and obey the Jewish demands. The Jewish people could have a peaceful state surrounded by peaceful neighbours. However power corrupt and that is what is happening in Israel.
However Obama self is not satisfied with the attempt to create a war in the Middle East, he also wants one in the Far East a war, hopingly to set one up, the Russians against the Japanese would be a start. China against Japan would be another; Obama tries hard enough to inflame however his luck is not with him. He tried the North Korea against the South, which failed even with a nutter being president in the South and a desperado president in the North. In the mean time he tries to set-up Vietnam for trouble and demonises Iran. While the presidential election in Iran was more fair, than the last three presidential elections in America.
However the American population is on aware of Obama's war lord ambitions under Israeli instructions, the tied control of the US media makes sure of that. Together with the always un-trustable and devious foreign minister Hillary Clinton he slowly is moving to sow unrest in every country where he can see profit for the Americans. Dictators are fine, torturing and slaying people for fun is fine as so long that perpetrator is obeying Obama's wishes.
However as we have seen bribing people to demonstrate does not always works out the way it was planned. The protesters encouraged by the silly remarks of Hilary Clinton in her effort to inflame clashed with pro-government mobs and security in almost every country they tried to set alight. The leaders of those countries regardless of they are just elected but not liked by the Americans or long standing dictators supported by the USA and some as enemy of the USA showed that they are the leaders of the Country. Violence is the latest sign that the tools of repression that leaders in the region have relied on for years. It is the same tool that America uses against their own population via their Security Services, the FBI, and Homeland Security etc. etc.
Instead of making the attempt to understand the problem and try to solve it, they use violence to quell the protest, deadly. In Bahrain, hundreds of police officers broke up a protest that had brought thousands to the heart of the country's financial district to demand sweeping political reforms. Sheikh Khalifa was fast enough to declare that it was all a misunderstanding and did apologise for the deaths, only to kill more the next day. That is killed on the street, how many there are killed in the dungeons after torture is not known, but the Khalifa's do have a reputation in line with Torqimada reputation in the far past.
The system used is fear, just as the Israeli and the Americans use it in the West Bank and Gaza, Iraq and Afghanistan, and just as they will be using it into the 5 oil states between Russia, China and Iran when they are ready to attack. The fear factor has been broken, declared Abu Lahoum, a top ruling party member and influential tribal leader, he is wrong the fear is still there but the amount of dollars to protest is simple much larger. Governments have had some success in quelling the recent wave of demonstrators, most notably in Iran where the demonstration were against the cities instruction and with out permission, however the were on a lesser scale then the student demonstrations and protest in England last month also less violent. Of the mainly student and western demonstrators will appear again will depending heavenly on how much Obama is willing to spent. But while USA supported and in some places organised rebellions spread across the Middle East, many old formulas of suppressing them are faltering, with protesters relentlessly defying their regimes as the reward in US dollars is this time considerable higher and so are the food prices.
The new sense of empowerment has grown dramatically since Egyptian President Mubarak stepped down. Activists have declared that if Egyptians could overthrow Mubarak, widely seen as the region's most influential and most stubborn autocrat, they could also get rid of their own governments. Others drew confidence from the refusal of the armies in Egypt and Tunisia to become tools of government. However, in Egypt nothing has changed, Mubarak was a Military commander in the Army and the army has now simple changed leader. The protests were long and in some case violent but after that life goes on and nothing did change. The USA would not allow it as it would endanger their masters in Israel.
At the same time, protesters are reassured by the Obama’s support for the pro-democracy movements. Many said they were re-energized by the USA. We are sure the United States will be on our side," said Tawakkol Karman, a well-known Yemeni activist. The United States now knows it is on the right track by siding with the people. In this way, the U.S. will regain the influence in countries where they obvious lost it.
It will have no doubt that by the killings mercenaries will be active to increase the violence and therewith the sentiment against government. The US media will be saying that Libya is using mercenaries the reality will be that they are US paid. We will see from places were there is no contact possible suddenly a person managed continues to launches one report after another without giving verifiable indication. In all those countries unless they have oil and gas will change nothing. In Libya the situation is different, there is oil in the ground and the US wants it, there we will see the mercenaries killing people on large scale to be blamed by the US media under orders of the US government blaming it on the Libya security forces.
Although there can be no doubt that a need of change is needed, but an US linked government would make the live of the Libyans even worse, as all of the earnings would go to the US. It will be however just there were the US will use all the hidden force and Media to get there way. That is best to see that on many of the protests the slogans are although held in Arab countries written in English. It is the best indication that foreign powers are behind it. However America is spending money they do not have and never will be able to repay, unless they can create a worldwide war. And so they will with the peace price of Obama as the war banner.
=============================================================
21-02-2011
The millionaires club or the cowards of society.
Great Britain, not so great anymore and without the constant support of America even just another medium size country, manage still to get the attention upon them even if it is just for all the wrong reason. They are a little like one of there out side Britain little known home made celebrities Jordan, also always in the focus of the media and also mostly for the wrong reasons. We can only presume that to manage this it has to be something typical British stepping forwards for the wrong reasons.
Even when it goes completely wrong, they manage to make it even worse, as said it must be something typical British. Look at their financial situation, it cannot get worse but they still slinging money around as of there is no tomorrow. It seems that their Foreign aid double the size of even the largest countries in Europe is even to be increased, probably to increase every country in the world.
Although they are surrounded by water have no known enemies with weapons that could reach them, they still have official the fourth largest defence budget, actual even near the second largest if it was not that they put some weapon production under by other departments. They are the main vassal of the United States and therefore oblige to be involved in any war the United States starts.
This all cost money, unlike the United States who can rely on a constant flow of money from the Jewish bankers who in exchange are assured that Israel will be always protected even against the wishes of the rest of the world. Britain therefore have to find a different way of cashing in for their luxury wishes, foreign aid and high defence costs, actual war costs a war they fighting for the United States. The easy way would be as is done in other countries to charge the millionaires of the country a one off 20% tax over their fortune. However as it are the millionaires who are leading the government this would mean that they themselves would have to pay that 20%. That would not do, and here it gets interested, here suddenly the scrooge mentality so famous on the British isle for everything that is wrong, creeps in. If you do not want to charge your friends to pay you simple find another victim.
As most countries Britain has a high dependency rate of people depending on state care. What would be easier then to take the care payments away and safe the countries financial troubles by taking their money, like taking candy from a child? None of the present British government are actual high flyers, maybe with the exception of the Foreign office minister, with some of them actual really dumb. It is therefore not a surprise that the feeling is that the government does not run that country but simple stumbles from one disaster into another. It is also not a surprise that none of the present European commissioners are taken the British leaders serious. Actual they milking them from every side they can. They will not admit that but the gossip in the corridors speaks loudly.
So what is that finance saving scheme they have invented, actual it is a very simple, you take from the poor to give it to the rich. Indeed very simple. As the first minister said via their supporting media we all have to make sacrifices.
The only different was that he had no intention to make any sacrifices himself nor any of his friends. So the second face was put in action by his team and his supporting media, blame on the poor, the unemployed, the sick and the disabled. Easy targets, easy to blame, easy to be indoctrinated and best of all easy to dispose off. A good plan and savings all around.
It had nothing to do with the sick the disabled the poor and the unemployed, they were themselves victims of a system produced and created by the government themselves, it was under a previous Conservatives government that the system of placed on a permanent sick system was created to ease the high level of unemployment. Now a similar government uses it as an excuse to hit the same people twice. There would be some kind of point if there was indeed employment enough in the United Kingdom, but there is not 100 people fighting for one job and that job is mostly part-time. However, the government, the government controlled media and the ones with a stable well paid job, mostly for the government or government supporting industries, say those unemployed are nothing else then scroungers. Never mind that they running after every job that is advertised, never mind that they are spending a fortune on travel costs on public transport that is one of the most expensive in the world and who's prices are rising faster then the sun in the morning. No they did not get the job and therefore they are scroungers.
The original word scrounger means, "To get things for free".
In this contexts it means that the British government are nothing else then a collection of scroungers, in short they accuse the ones who are sick, disabled, poor or unemployed of being scroungers, wanting things for nothing, while in reality it are the very people who say that who are the scroungers.
So who are the main players who want in effect to eradicate the sick, the disabled, the poor and the unemployed?
Fore most it is the Finance minister and the deputy first minister. Both have a complete lack of understanding and compassion and both are not stepping away from promoting themselves above all. The deputy first minister can also be proud to be the first leader of a party that managed to get the party faster reduced in oblivion then any other party leader before him. The media did carry some time ago a piece that said, "How do you know of the deputy pre-Minster tell the truth? Answer was, "his lips did not move". The next question was but how do you know when he lies, answer, "he does moves his lips". That does portray him perfect.
So what is the plan to create an ultimate poor underdog of society and society of scroungers?
We do not think they have figured out themselves complete, therefore the miss the knowledge and the understanding of the problem.
However, first they will take on the older disabled, old people are always in Conservative eyes an easy target, special if those older people are not belonging to the Conservative rich and wealthy circles. The proposal is to take away the basics of daily living, so that all those over 65 years of age will be forced to sit in a kind of jail, four walls and a TV, nothing else. The older disabled will also have taken away the told what makes them able to deal with their disability the Disability livings allowance (DLA). Statistics have shown that if you lock up older and older disabled people stop them from going out they will die much quicker. That is the soul of the measures taken; those older and older disabled have to die, fast as possible to save money.
Next they want to take the DLA away from disabled in residential homes, as they say if in a hospital they will have it taken away as well. Maria Miller Minister for the Disabled shows with this that indeed she does not have a clue where she is talking about. Disabled people in a hospital do have the facilities they do not have in a residential care home. In fact in a hospital they have more facilities then they would have if the were at home. Therefore that argument of Miller can be dropped where it should have been in the first place, the waste bin. Followed by the minister for the disabled.
We have to explain this: the DLA has two components, one for care one for motobility. That motobility needs to be explained as it is a typical business invention.
It works like this: A disabled person who receives and DLA motobility can with that lease a car for his transport, which last for 3 years but can also last longer. The motobility part of the DLA pays for the car, the lease, the repairs and the insurance/road assistance. This means a car dealer sells a car and makes profits over which tax is paid. The lease company makes the lease, the profit over which tax is paid, the garage does the repairs, and makes the profit over which tax is paid, and the car has a comprehensive insurance via an Insurance company who make the profit over which they pay tax. The car uses fuel so that over a year’s period the money made from the car before tax is taken is 2500 pounds. At the end of the lease period the car is sold over which price tax is paid.
This does means that the Government over the three year lease period at least get 7500 pounds back in taxes excluding taxes such as tax on income from the car dealer and other employees involved, in short the Government cannot loose. So what that Maria Miller does is killing the goose with the golden eggs just to get one over on the disabled. Every car less sold is a loss of revenue for the Government, can result in the car dealer firing staff, which results in less tax revenues and more state handouts. We have to explain that in contradiction as in other countries ministers in Britain are not selected on what they know but who they know. This can result that nobodies like Maria Miller who have shown not to have a clue of the basics of human compassion and state economics ends up as a minister of the Disabled.
However that is only the beginning, without informing the citizens it is also a new measure that more elderly people are to be forced to pay for care homes because of funding decisions slipped through by the Government. Ministers have effectively lowered the amount of savings individuals can have before they become liable for their own fees.
Some 250,000 people over 65 are thought to have their residential care funded by councils. Charges are based on a means test, under which anyone with savings and assets - including property - worth more than £23,250 must pay the full sum until the value has been reduced below the threshold. Normally, the limit increases each year to take account of inflation and rising values of assets, but the coalition has quietly decided to freeze the level for at least two years. A lower capital limit of £14,250 - above which councils pay part of the fees - has also been frozen.
The decision makes it clear that the move is to raise more money from elderly people. To bleed them dry so that they will die. The intention is to raise additional revenue, from residential care charges. The capital limits will not be reviewed until the next local government finance settlement in the autumn of 2012, according to the government. In the meantime the cost of living is rising faster in the United Kingdom then in any other country and is mainly activated to get so much money as possible, mainly to spend on defence and foreign aid.
Next in line are the disabled who are at home and try to live at home. After all under the British Government rules they are disabled so they have two choices, they either stop being disabled, and even when we write this even dying people are told that they are completely healthy and should go to work, but if that is not possible then life should be made so difficult made for them as possible. After all the quicker they die the quicker money is saved. There is however one exception that measure is only for the poorer disabled not for the wealthy and rich they instead getting more state handouts.
So what is the system? Disabled people at home need in almost all cases a carer to help them to get up eat, wash and get dressed. By the poorer person that is done by family or friends as they cannot afford the high carer prices of between 15 to 25 pounds an hour. That family member or friend has a job themselves but in near 250,000 cases the disability is such that they have to care as a full time job. That for many had the result of quitting their own job. With full time caring and no paid job they received an income support; on top of that they would receive a carer’s allowance. However because they are poor they get only the half of the carers allowance were the wealthy and rich who do not need the small amount of the carers allowance get the full amount.
Outside Britain they will say that is not fair, however in Britain it is always fair to get one over on the poor as they cannot defend themselves. Now another I am rich but have no brains have found a better way to have the poor carers punished for keeping the disabled alive. An Ian Duncan Smith member of the disgraced turncoat party in Britain the Liberal Democrats, a party just left of the middle but who's government ministers are far right, has decided that people who care for the disabled but are on income support because of their care will have their care allowance taken away and are getting what the government call the scroungers Universal credit, which is the minimum people can survive on. They will loose the care allowance but are expected to do the caring and to look for an job annex as well so that an carer who does 40 to 60 hours a week on care have to find a 40 hours a week job next to it. That is of course not possible so the disabled is left without care and will die, and that is exactly what Ian Duncan Smith has in mind.
Maybe the reader will find that this kind of measures are not possible in the 21st century, maybe so, but the Government in Britain lives in reality in pre-Victorian times and they are desperate to get cheap labour for their lavish homes and in today labour payments they cannot afford series of dressers for the wife, so make them poor make them suffer and cheap labour you have. That the carers are saving the government at least 25 to 50 thousand pounds a year does not the matter. However, for every of the 250,000 carers they force to look for a job the place one more disabled in a residential care home at the cost of 25,000 to 50,000 pounds a year.
So let us get this right, Ian Duncan Smith is willing to spent 6,250,000,000 pound to save 375,000,000 a year. As with the motobility economics is obvious not the British governments strongest side. That is also to see that in the period they are in power and made savings they actual spent more. Let us be clear the British government calls spending 6,250,000,000.00 on residential care homes a saving other wise they had to spent 375,000,000 on care allowance.
They have not figure out yet that spending 6 billion two hundred fifty million is more then the three hundred seventy five million on care allowance, it is no wonder that the spending is faster then ever before.
The worst of it is that there is in Britain an organisation calling themselves Carers UK, they say that they have the best interest of the Carers in the UK in mind, do not belief this they actual support the Government in getting rid of 250,000 carers because they are on as they call it mean tested benefit. It is that old British story we are working for the wealthy and rich and stuff the poor.
It is in Britain own interest if the Europeans take over the economic side of Britain while this government is in power. Europe should look after the human interest of the older and disabled people in Britain as it is obvious that the British Government is based in greed and greed alone with no human interest in sight.
===============================================================
23-02-2011
With the Islamic countries in the Middle East in turmoil and the rising anti-Muslim tendencies in Europe, Israel and the USA it would seem reasonable to bring the Islam a little nearer to the reality of thinking and show that it does not stand so far away from Judaism and Christianity. Like the Judaism and the Christians, the Islam found his beginning into the Middle East, into the old books of the Hebrews and follows most of the instructions given by a monotheistic instruction by the One God.
As in Christianity the original revelations are the basis for the way of daily life. However where the Bible over the centuries slowly managed to lose his way in translation alteration and modernization, the Qur'an managed to stay the same and the wording is still the same in the Arabic language. However many scholars and rulers through the centuries have added their vision to it, however it does not form part of the Qur'an.
Islam is the religion articulated by the Qur'an, a book considered by its adherents to be the verbatim word of the single incomparable God and by the Islamic prophet Muhammad's demonstrations and real-life examples. It is collected through narration of his companions in the volumes of Hadith. The word Islam is however, a homograph, having multiple meanings, and a trilateral of the word salaam, which directly translates as peace. Other meanings include submission, or the total surrender of oneself to God.
An adherent of Islam is a Muslim, meaning "one who submits to Allah. The word Muslim is the participle of the same verb of which Islam is the infinitive. Muslims regard their religion as the completed and universal version of a monotheistic faith revealed to many times and places before, including, notably, to the prophets Abraham, Moses and Jesus. Islamic tradition holds that previous messages and revelations have been changed and distorted over time. This is still done to adjust to time.
Practices include the Five Pillars of Islam, where religious practices include the Five Pillars of Islam, which are five duties that unite Muslims into a community. Islamic law (Sharia) touches on virtually every aspect of life and society, and includes almost everything from dietary laws and banking to warfare and welfare. The vast majority of Muslims belong to one of two major denominations, the Sunni (87-90%) and Shi'a (10-13%).
Islam is the predominant religion in much of Africa, the Middle East and major parts of Asia. Communities are also found in China, Russia and the Caribbean. About 15% of Muslims live in Indonesia, the world largest Muslim country, 31% of Muslims are living at the Indian Subcontinent and 20% in mostly Arab countries in the Middle East and Iran. Converts and immigrant communities are found in almost every part of the world with Muslims leaving their original countries for an accumulation of reasons. However mainly economical. With 1.5 billion Muslims, Islam is the second-largest religion in the world and arguably the fastest growing religion in the world.
The word Islam second explanation is a verbal noun originating from the trilateral root s-l-m, and is derived from the Arabic verb Aslama, which means "to accept, surrender or submit. Thus, Islam means acceptance of and submission to Allah, and believers must demonstrate this by worshipping him, following his commands, and avoiding polytheism.
The word is given a number of meanings in the Qur'an. In some sura\u2019s the quality of Islam as an internal conviction is stressed: Whomsoever Allah desires to guide, He expands his breast to Islam. Other verses connect isl\u0101m and religion. Today, I have perfected your religion for you; I have completed My blessing upon you; I have approved Islam for your religion.
Still others describe Islam as an action of returning to Allah, more than just a verbal affirmation of faith. Another technical meaning in Islamic thought is as one part of a triad of Islam, im\u0101n (faith), and ihs\u0101n (excellence) where it represents acts of worship (`ib\u0101dah) and Islamic law (sharia). The Qur'an states that all Muslims must believe in God, his revelations, his angels, his messengers, and in the "Day of Judgment". Also, there are other beliefs that differ between particular sects. The Sunni concept of predestination is called divine decree, while the Shi'a version is called divine justice. Unique to the Shi'a is the doctrine of Imamah, or the political and spiritual leadership of the Imams.
Muslims believe that God revealed his final message to humanity through the Islamic prophet Muhammad via the archangel Gabriel. For them, Muhammad was God's final prophet and the Qur'an is the holy book of revelations he received over more than two decades. In Islam, prophets are men selected by God to be his messengers. Muslims believe that prophets are human and not divine, though some are able to perform miracles to prove their claim. Islamic prophets are considered to be the closest to perfection of all humans, and are uniquely the recipients of divine revelation.
The Qur'an mentions the names of numerous figures considered prophets in Islam, including Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses and Jesus, among others. Islamic theology says that all of God's messengers since Adam preached the message of Islam\u0081\submission to the will of God. Islam is described in the Qur'an as the primordial nature upon which God created mankind, and the Qur'an indicate that the name Muslim was given by Abraham, therefore it must be correct although the time schedule may indicate a different.
The Islam originated in Arabia in the early 7th century. Islamic texts depict Judaism and Christianity as prophetic successor traditions to the teachings of Abraham. The Qur'an calls Jews and Christians "People of the Book" (ahl al-kit\u0101b), and distinguishes them from polytheists. Muslims believe that parts of the scriptures, the Tawrat (Torah) and the Injil (Gospels), had become distorted\u0081\either in interpretation, in text, or both.
Islam's fundamental theological belief is that there is only one god. The Arabic term for God is Allah; most scholars believe it was derived from a contraction of the words al- (the) and \u02beil\u0101h (deity, masculine form), meaning "the god" (al-il\u0101h), but others trace its origin to the Aramaic Al\u0101h\u0101. The first of the Five Pillars of Islam, tawh\u012bd is expressed in the shahadah (testification), which declares that there is no god but God, and that Muhammad is his prophet. In traditional Islamic theology, God is beyond all comprehension; Muslims are not expected to visualize God but to worship and adore him as a protector.
Although Muslims believe that Jesus was a prophet, they reject the Christian doctrine of the Trinity, comparing it to polytheism. In Islamic theology, Jesus was just a man and not the son of God. God is described in a sura of the Qur'an as "\u0081cGod, the One and Only; God, the Eternal, Absolute; He begetteth not, nor is He begotten; And there is none like unto Him.
Muslims consider the Qur'an to be the literal word of God; it is the central religious text of Islam. Muslims believe that the verses of the Qur'an were revealed to Muhammad by God through the angel Gabriel on many occasions between 610 and his death on June 8, 632. The Qur'an was reportedly written down by Muhammad's companions while he was alive, although the prime method of transmission was orally. It was compiled in the time of Abu Bakr, the first caliph, and was standardized under the administration of Uthman, the third caliph. The text of Qu'ran has not changed since the beginning.
The Qur'an is divided into 114 suras, which combined, contain 6,236 verses. The chronologically earlier suras, revealed at Mecca, are primarily concerned with ethical and spiritual topics. The later Medinan suras mostly discuss social and moral issues relevant to the Muslim community. The Qur'an is more concerned with moral guidance than legal instruction, and is considered the "sourcebook of Islamic principles and values.
The word Qur'an means "recitation". When Muslims speak in the abstract about "the Qur'an", they usually mean the scripture as recited in Arabic rather than the printed work or any translation of it. To Muslims, the Qur'an is perfect only as revealed in the original Arabic. Spreading the Islam worldwide did mean that translations are necessary. However only the original Arabic version is the real Qur'an. And therefore it is impossible of preserving the original's inspired style. Translations are therefore regarded only as translated comments on the Qur'an, and an interpretation of its meaning.
Muhammad (c. 570 \u2013 June 8, 632) is the prophet of Islam. He was a trader turned religious, and a political, and military leader who founded the religion of Islam. Muslims view him not as the creator of a new religion, but as the restorer of the original, uncorrupted monotheistic faith of Adam, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and others. In Muslim tradition, Muhammad is viewed as the last and the greatest in a series of prophets.
Like in the Christian belief, they belief in the Day of Resurrection, yawm al-Qiy\u0101mah also known as yawm ad-d\u012bn, (Day of Judgment). The as-s\u0101`a, the Last Hour is also crucial for Muslims. They believe that the time of Qiy\u0101mah is preordained by God but unknown to man. The trials and tribulations preceding and during the Qiy\u0101mah are described in the Qur'an and the hadith, and also in the commentaries of Islamic scholars. The Qur'an emphasizes bodily resurrection, a break from the pre-Islamic Arabian understanding of death. It states that resurrection will be followed by the gathering of mankind, culminating in their judgment by God. This also written into the Revelations of the Christians.
The Qur'an lists several sins that can condemn a person to hell, such as disbelief, and dishonesty. Muslims view paradise (jannah) as a place of joy and bliss, with Qur'anic references describing its features and the physical pleasures to come. There are also references to a greater joy\u0081\acceptance by God. Mystical traditions in Islam place these heavenly delights in the context of an ecstatic awareness of God.
In accordance with the Sunni Islamic belief in pre-destination, or divine pre-ordainment (al-qad\u0101 wa'l-qadar), God has full knowledge and control over all that occurs. This is explained in Qur'an only that will happen what Allah has decreed for us: He is our protector'\u0081c Everything in the world that occurs, good or evil, has been pre-ordained and nothing can happen unless permitted by God. According to Muslim theologians, although events are pre-ordained, man possesses free will in that he has the faculty to choose between right and wrong, and is thus responsible for his actions.
The Shi'a understanding of free will is the divine justice (Adalah). This doctrine, originally developed by the Mu'tazila, stresses the importance of man's responsibility for his own actions.
The Sharia is the Islamic law formed by traditional Islamic scholarship, which most Muslim groups adhere to. In Islam, Sharia is the expression of the divine will, and constitutes a system of duties that are incumbent upon a Muslim by virtue of his religious belief. Although the Qur'an defines specific crimes, it does not order the Sharia as law. This law is formed over a period via Islamic scholarship and covers
All aspects of life, from matters of state, like governance and foreign relations, to issues of daily living.
The Qur'an defines the punishments for five specific crimes: unlawful intercourse, false accusation of unlawful intercourse, consumption of alcohol, theft, and highway robbery. The Qur'an and Sunnah also contain laws of inheritance, marriage, and restitution for injuries and murder, as well as rules for fasting, charity, and prayer. However, these prescriptions and prohibitions may be broad, so their application in practice varies. Islamic scholars have elaborated systems of law on the basis of these rules and their own interpretations.
According to Islamic legal theory, law has four fundamental roots, which are given precedence in this order: the Qur'an, the Sunnah, the consensus of the Muslim jurists (ijma), and analogical reasoning (qiyas). For early Islamic jurists, theory was less important than pragmatic application of the law. In the 9th century, the jurist ash-Shafi'i provided a theoretical basis for Islamic law by codifying the principles of jurisprudence. As in Christianity many theoretical basis for the laws are the decisions made by scholars, sometimes many hundreds of years after the basic version.
Mainstream Islamic law does not distinguish between religion and the state. In practice, Islamic rulers frequently bypassed the Sharia courts with a parallel system of so-called Grievance courts over which they had sole and complete control. Scholars then adopted the ruling and passed it on as the theoretical basis for the Islamis law. Although it has no connection with the original Sharia laws. Each state and each ruler added to the laws and used them for their convenience if needed.
Muslims, as with Jews, are restricted in their diet. Prohibited foods include pork products, blood, carrion, and alcohol. All meat must come from an herbivorous animal slaughtered in the name of God by a Muslim, Jew, or Christian, with the exception of game that one has hunted or fished for oneself. The Halal food.
The Jihads are divided into the greater (self-perfection) spiritual meaning. And the lesser Jihad which means in simple words War. Jihad is usually taken to mean military exertion against non-Muslim combatants in the defence or expansion of the Islamic state, the ultimate purpose of which is to universalise Islam. Jihad, the only form of warfare permissible in Islamic law, may be declared against anyone such as rebels, highway robbers, violent groups, un-Islamic leaders or states which refuse to submit to the authority of Islam. Most Muslims today interpret Jihad as only a defensive form of warfare, however others see it more extreme as a continues action against non-Muslims wherever they are.
Islam's historical development from day one resulted in major political, economic, and military effects inside and outside the Islamic world. As within the Christian religion the faith was spread by word and sword, but mainly by sword. Within a century of Muhammad's first recitations of the Qur'an, an Islamic empire stretched from the Atlantic Ocean in the west to Central Asia in the east. This fast led into civil war, and successor states fought each other and outside forces.
However, Islam continued to spread into regions like Africa, the Indian subcontinent, and Southeast Asia. The Islamic civilization was one of the most advanced in the world during the middle Ages, but was surpassed by Europe with the economic and military growth of the West. During the 18th and 19th centuries, Islamic dynasties such as the Ottomans and Mughals fell under the sway of European imperial powers. In the 20th century new religious and political movements and newfound wealth in the Islamic world led to both rebirth and conflict. This rebirth and conflict is both a curse and liberation for the Islamic world and only the future can tell the Path that Allah have set out for the followers of Muhammad.
==============================================================
25-02-2011
Democracy, versus the corporate dictators USA style.
Sometimes we have the feeling, that awful feeling we had under John Major and Margaret Thatcher that the party of the Conservatives is behaving as just a retired older people who want to do something after their retirement. As so many retired couples they decide to join the antique circuit and sell what they have found in their attic. They sell all they have and the bits and bobs they have further lay around, till it is all gone and they are back to square one.
Did Margaret Thatcher sold off most of the family silver and other valuables, this government of Punch and Judy decided to sell of all the bits and bobs left to sell. Almost all public services could be opened up to private companies under plans being put forward by Prime Minister David Cameron.
Under Margaret Thatcher it was to improve services as which result we have now the most expensive services, of the ones she sold off. David Cameron goes one better he does not want it only the most expensive, he want to improve the standards for users. Now the reader will expect that the user in this case is the customer, well think again. The user in his idea will be the ones who will run the services for profit, their profit not the customers.
The plan is to let private companies and such private initiative bid to provide the services which would allow the Government to transform public services without having to legislate repeatedly to allow different providers to get involved. The plan behind it is that they hope that so many companies and other groups will put a bid in for the services. That means that corporate Britain will supply the means to get the government to make the right choice. After all there are many cheap investment possibilities that can be used by the government for investment purposes out of the supply of means from Cooperate Britain.
The rumours are that the proposed change will be set out in a White Paper within the next two weeks or so, it could allow non-public providers to run schools, hospitals and council services such as maintaining parks, adult care, special schools and roads maintenance. The only negative problem is that it overall will cost more as the companies and others will have to make a profit, hence the payment by government, state or local will result in higher local tax, unless the government will find something that is not already taxed to the hilt.
The government thinks that it will create a new presumption that public services should be open to a range of providers competing to offer a better service. Of course, there are some areas - like national security services or the judiciary - where this wouldn't make sense yet, however it can be expected that in time they will find a solution to sell that off as well. It means in short that the government will receive the same or more taxes, but has less to spend.
The changes, the government said via his spokesman, would release the public sector from "the grip of state control", ending the era of "old-fashioned, top-down, take-what you're-given" services. The Government hopes that the plan will reduce bureaucracy, improve quality and save money. That last one that saving money we do believe, the government will save. The same or higher taxes and less to pay, but note the most important part, "The government will save", not the public they have to pay through their noses if they have any money left.
Mr Cameron indicated that the opening up of public services to private sector providers was an important part of his "Big Society" agenda."I would argue that our plans to devolve power from Whitehall, and to modernise public services, are more significant aspects of our Big Society agenda than the work we're doing to boost social action, according to David Cameron.
And here we have it the basics of the "Big Society" The people pay more in taxes and auxiliary costs, the government spent less but receives more and will say " You see we create money where Labour failed" The fact that the people are getting poorer having to pay more taxes, the highest prices for fuel, car and home. The highest food prices is not a point for the government as just before the next elections they will either lower sharp the taxes or if that is not possible find an enemy to go to war. That last one was Margaret Thathers most favoured solutions.
Any sensible person who had the right solution for Britain in mind would oppose this absurd idea. However, the Conservatives are not a democratic party, they are a corporative party. This means they work for the corporative management, for the Big Business of the USA, and take their orders from them. The corporate managers do not have the well being of Britain in mind but their own shareholders their bonuses and their profit. The citizen\u2019s interests are not coming into it.
Before Thatcher came into power the government was always working in more or lesser way for the people of Britain. However, that is changed now the government works for the corporate management worldwide, they give the instructions and they take the profit. Look at Centrica nearly 50% more profit, which is good news for the shareholders and for the government but in a lesser way, but disastrous for the citizens. Then again there is no one in Government or in Corporate management who gives two pennies for what does happen with the citizen of Britain as so long they pay their dues, screwed up to the highest possible way by the government on instructions of the corporate management.
You would think that these conservatives would learn from the past it was an absolute disaster last time around when they did this; a people revolt was the result. The hated poll tax was removed and so was the creator Thatcher. It was a disaster then and it will be a disaster this time around. However the corporate management was not as strong then as it is now. In that time Britain had still some kind of democracy left, and democracy won. However corporate management strengthened fast and Blair was already under complete control of the corporate power. The corporate management of the US media had stretched their fingers and took total control of Blair. It is not known of he resisted, but fact is that the Media corporate management switched sites and went behind Blair. His lucrative engagement after he left office, mainly in the USA, proofs the point.
Brown was less willing to accept the corporate management and was punished for it. Instead the corporate management went after the conservatives, although their standing in the public opinion was lower then that of Brown. However after the Media had the Conservative agreement, their view changed and the Media made a full swing to the Conservatives from Labour. As it turned out their corporate support was not enough to get the victory the Corporate Media had hoped for. The Conservatives had a slight advantage over Labour which should have been a massive swing. It were the always un-trustable Liberal Democrats a kind of opportunist party which in the past had reliable leaders but now just took what they could get, and it were those un-reliable leaders who betrayed the voters and made a full swing from left of the middle to ultra right of the spectrum. Together with the Conservatives they have a slight majority, but the popularity of both the Conservatives and the Liberal democrats is now lower that the Labour party. The ongoing mud slinging of the corporate media had not done their work proper and is still ongoing with the principle that a lie is seen as the truth if you tell the lie long enough.
However the corporate management insist on receiving more money, after all that is why they are in business, to milk the system and get out of it what is possible. The government knows this and they know what can happen if the corporate management gets angry, whole Britain remembers "Kelly". The question is will they come away with it, they know that privatisation takes away the rights of the average citizen. Every aspect of an ordinary person\u2019s life is at the wimp of untrustworthy power mad right wing thugs under corporate control. There is no fear that the conservatives or the liberal democrats will lose their mutual trust, the corporate management would not allow it, people can fall, people can fail, but the coalition is in the benefit of the corporate management therefore it will stay. The time that people could decide who would win the election is gone a long time ago. Look at Bush lost the election but was appointed by the appointees of the corporate management.
In Britain it will be the same way. Via it electronic voting system votes will be allocating to the party that is selected by the corporate management to win the election. Many people will say this cannot happen. Those people live in the past, democracy is a term, but as a people and governmental system it is death. Cameron is under total control of the corporate management, his intentions maybe good but he simple has to do what he is told to keep his lavish life style and the image that he is somebody.
However, the fact is that under the voting system of Britain, there was no outright winner; hence no prime minister was elected. Under those terms David Cameron is an un-elected prime minister just as the prime minister before him, Brown. It therefore that under the democratic system as Britain is supposedly to have he cannot order a complete privatisation as he did not have a mandate to do so. It is already bad enough that David Cameron have made more U turns then ever a leader did before him, on this moment every promise he made before the election is turned around. Against Europe is now inside Europe. Protecting the disabled is now battering the disabled, stopping immigration is now an open invitation to anyone with money enough. Criminals all countries if you have the money unite yourself in Britain the land of opportunity and cheap labour. All criminals with international arrest warrants are welcome at a price, except those with an arrest warrant from or via the USA. Corporate USA demand that those arrest warrants are kept and the people handed over to them even when it is obvious clear that there is no ground for a warrant. Corporate USA has spoken Britain obeys.
If Cameron\u2019s big presumption is that the people of this country will just take what he is told to throw at the people, then it could be well the case that by picking of the conservative and Liberal MP's in by election, the Labour party would be the biggest party again. Red Ed will be saying now that he will not accept the corporate management of the US. However, when in power he will or perish. It is well know that some people indeed believe that what the corporate media tells the people is the correct version, it is not it is either a complete lie or a version of half truths. Look at the story of Libya the corporate press is suggesting that what Labour did in freeing the Lockerbie bomber was wrong as he is not dying. That is a direct lie as he is dying, however a person can either be dying soon or its own will power can carry it for a longer time.
Take the story of the woman what was in the press several years ago, with severe meningitis total paralysed and given a year maybe a year and a half to live. Not by one doctor, not by one consultant but by a whole small army of doctors and consultants. 10 years on she was still alive, still paralysed, but still alive. Or the man who had throat cancer ands was told it would be ending soon. Five years later he died. However it is not the truth that will sell, lies does.
In Libya\u2019s case, it was not Labour who made peace with Libya but the USA, they accepted Libya back, and they gave Libya a seat on the Security Council and the Human rights council. Not Labour but George Bush. Labour just used to permission of the US to deal with Libya. This contradict the corporate media in Britain, their principle is why telling the truth a lie sounds better and is quicker to believe and it sells newspapers. Or as they say in Fox news in the US so long a story sells it does not the matter of it is the truth or a lie. It is for that reason Fox news always ends with, \u201cmaybe it is incorrect but that is the news".
However it could be that the prime minister has seen the light as he made the statement for, \u201cpay by performance", no performance, no pay and that makes sense, "so out he goes", with his bunch of profiteers.
The problem is would do Labour much better, as all three parties in Britain are now standing formally on the right side of the spectrum. Therefore in principle it make no different who will create a win in the elections, they all will obey the same corporate management. Brown was different, passionate of the British people but even he did the bidding of the corporate management in a lesser way. A real independed leader would have dropped the failing banks and saved billions. If Brown had done that there can be a severe doubt of he still would be doing what he does today.
How can privatisation improve standards for users?! Anyone who swallows such rubbish after all the awful experiences Britain have had as a nation due to existing privatisation, needs psychiatrically treatment if they accept this or have their pockets full of backhanders. Hospitals have become bug ridden death traps since private companies became involved in their maintenance. Public transport is filthy, profit orientated, inefficient and grossly overpriced. We pay far more for the privatised utilities than we would if they were still state owned - not to mention all the 'extra' charges from these services, some are now introducing standing charges as an extra and cashing in more. Banks are charging up to 50% interest with government permission.
The mess that private sector involvement has caused within the civil service is well documented. The disgrace of private companies such as ATOS running the medicals for sickness benefit applicants in search for profit which they receive by every claimant they clear for work, as that is how it works. They make extra money by disallowing claims, and by carrying out unnecessary procedures including subjecting physically disabled people who are clearly unfit to work. They do tests that are deliberate forms of torture with permission of the government. A woman unable to speak, unable to use her arms or hands who could not walk and could only sit when in a harness was actual told in contradiction of an report of her condition over 15 years period that they could not see a reason that she could not work. They were angry when she could not sign the document due to lack of muscle power and control. At least Hitler killed the disabled quick the Conservative have found a way to prolong torture, stress and pain.
The corporate management that runs the USA and Britain will also soon run Europe. They have already representive's in the European council, but look at the US - a healthcare system where people are charged a small fortune for medications that they mostly do not need however profit need to be made so they are charged. That is what Cameron wants in Britain. Soon just as in the US people cannot get life saving operations because they cannot afford them, cannot get insurance, or the insurers wont pay up, not paying up as insurer is a typical well documented English disease. They did run the Middle East as an corporate business for 30 years, now see how that failed, all their pieces of the puzzle falling one by one, Bahrain only survived for now by the force of the USA fleet stationed there. However as a corporate business they failed. Reason is the same as they are now creating in the USA and in Britain, high unemployment and high food prices. In Britain many permanent jobs are now separated into part time jobs to keep the employment figures down for the time being. However as the demonstrations in January in London Britain and the demonstrations in February in Wisconsin USA shown the volcano is not erupting yet but under the survey pressure is building, just as it did in the Middle East.
The cases were people have been sent to jail for petty crimes because of collusion between judges and the corporate management's private operators of jails. Look in the UK where the founder of Wikileaks is be handed over to Sweden for a crime what is not a crime in this country, a more then obvious Swedish fabrication under US corporate control. He dared to lift a little of the secrets on how the corporate management works, so he needs to be punished. The US is already making charges relating to nothing as he not an US citizen and his work was not done in the US. Still the US corporative management have set in an army of specialist who have to make fake documents and create charges against him creating false emails and documentation just to GET him. That army has the experience they did this before many of times against complete innocent people who had in one way or another something the corporate management wanted.
Look at Bout the Russian entrepreneur the corporate for years wanted his business and could not get it. So they made up fake and created charges of which even the most simple of persons can see it is a fake charge but he will as so many other under the create, fake and jail procedure of the corporate management spent his life in jail as many others for something he never did. He will soon be joined by the Wikileak founder on similar charges and never to be seen again. In Nazi Germany they had the same system and many of their children working now for the corporate system in the US. That is the sort of society Britain is heading towards just as the US a supposedly developed country that yet has charities to support the literally millions of people WITHIN the United States who do not have enough to eat, and people actual are dying on the street in the middle of the piled up un-collected rubbish. The greed of the corporate management will kill all eventually, and Britain will have let it happen by sitting back and doing nothing.
Britain is a proud nation with a history to be proud of. When will Britain realise that hanging on the sleeves of the US following their orders following their corporate management will reduce Britain to just another state. When is Britain as a nation, and as a species, going to realise that the mindless pursuit of wealth is destroying the country, is unethical, immoral, and ignoble and the rest. When Britain going to wake up to the fact that this obsessive pursuit of wealth by the corporate management of the US and Wall Street, is simply in most cases yet another dangerous addiction, literally so, and in the same category as drug abuse, sex addiction and alcoholism. The difference being in that when a drunkard gets behind the wheel of a car he may injure or kill one or two people. However, an out of control executive gets behind the wheel of a company or companies and can run entire industries, economies and countries down, wrecking the lives of thousands, if not millions in the process. Is that what Cameron has in mind in his pursuit of money and more money, to be a slave of the corporate management well paid but still a slave, to follow all the orders given like it or not. Does he not have even the basic sense of honour, future will show, but there is severe doubt.
==================================================================
27-02-2011
Fighting for oil.
Israel has now found Gas, it actual is for the most parts in Lebanon waters but other countries rights was never a problem for the Israeli; they simple steal it or start a war. If they cannot win then in the North of Israel, then the USA and the France are more then willing to help them, against payment or services. They did find oil as well in Rosh Ha'ayin but it is doubtful of that can be used for industrial production. The USA controls already the Iraqi oil and gas supplies, the situation is the same with Kuwait which leaves for Israel only Iran to control. Hence the fantasy stories in the Israeli press taken over by the US controlled press of Nuclear weapons in Iran, their killings of scientists and instigation of violence. However, Iran is a democratic country, much more as is the case then corporate USA.
However again, the USA controls the Western press; therefore the only stories allowed in the press are the stories, mostly made up by Iranians living in the US, with no relationship to the reality. We did see the two small demonstrations in Iran, with all the fantasy stories around them none of them correct. However the Iran opposition has to see to do something for all the money they receive from the US. So the fall of one protester is filmed many times from different angles and presented as many, after all the American principle is just as The Nazi one in WW2 that a lie is only a lie if it is not repeated long enough, tell it long enough and people believe it.
However large demonstrations were held in the US, Wisconsin, the demonstrations were held out of the press and other Media. As in the US there are no demonstrations. The US follows the line the Nazi's did have during the socialist period of Hitler. In fact the US follows most of the lines the of Hitler's book which the Nazi's did follow in that period. That on itself is no wonder the children of the tens of thousands of Nazi political and scientists who were taken to the US by the US forces, not as prisoners but as friends, those children are now in charge of the most important parts of the political and war machine in the US, they control the American SS (secret service) the HS (homeland security) but also the CIA and the FBI. The last one is beginning more and more to look WW2 German SD. They also did arrest anyone on suspicion, presumed suspicion and on no suspicion at all just as in the USA.
However the demonstration of hundred thousand people in the USA was for real over a period of 6 days against the states government, and just as in Libya the state government simple ignored the demonstrators. Again just as in Libya the state government used the SS and the SD look alike to act against the demonstrators. While the ignorance for the Libya people by their Government is condemned, the demonstrations in the USA are condemned, not the ignorance of the government. As usual the US government is measuring with two different measures; demonstration in countries with oil is a good thing but bad in their own country, the USA. That people in the US dying on the street, sleeping between the rubbish failing to have the basics of human living that is not a problem. It is only a problem if it happens in oil rich countries. When in former Rhodesia a mad dictator was killing the people maiming and torturing them they did not lift a finger, just were counting the diamonds they were receiving. When in Saudi Arabia the many princes and princesses, in reality just children and grandchildren of the Sheik, who's position like in all the other gulf states were elevated to the status of kings by the West, are living in absurd riches and the people are poor and live under the violent instructions of the King and his followers, then that is OK so long the oil riches are coming to America.
If a country is democratic has every four or five years election for parliament and head of state then that is good if they are a friend of the US. Outside the Western countries that are not many, however if they are a supporter or friend of the US, no problem. However if the have an democratic system, have elections every for or five years, then they are bad and corrupt violent and war mongers, if they are no friend of the US even if their is no shred of proof. The US can create any proof they want, they can create any witness they want, they can make up any story they want, just to get what they want. Hitler where ever he is in after life, must be rolling of laughter that all what he wanted is now slowly starting to unfold, main different he wanted the main world trouble makers out of the way, the Jews, and they still are the centre of all the worlds trouble on this moment, the US wants the Islam out of the way. Not because they are trouble makers but because they have the oil and gas the US wants and needs.
In both cases in Nazi Germany and Corporate US the people were and are not aware of the danger of their governments till it was and is too late. People never listen carefully, they see the shine of the leaders wealth, the voice, and the promises and never check of what is done or promised is indeed correct, till it is too late. While Nazi Germany was relaying on Socialism, the US is relaying on the Jewish Bible, best seller made up a 2500 years ago by some clever story tellers. And just as the public believes the stories of the government controlled press as truth, so do they believe what is in the bible. However that was also a government instigated invented book. It does show however the drive of the Americans to go to war where ever they can, the bible shows that the Hebrews, later Israel, then Judaism and now the state of Israel controlled by Judaism had wars almost non-stop against anyone near and far and if there was no enemy that they where waging war among themselves. As the US government is financial under control of the Jewish bankers at the rate on this moment of 16 trillion a year with only 14 trillion a year GDP they have to do the Jewish bidding.
Libya is on fire, the people want freedom, they will not get it as the next government will just as in the other Middle East states except Israel and Iran and temporarily maybe except Iraq, have the people under total control. The laws of the Islam will make sure of that. The Islam allows a form of democracy but only if it is based on the Islam. Libya is no exception, many will be pushing forwards to be the new leader; however the USA will make sure that whoever is clever enough to get the people on his side, will obey the US rules. To make sure of that they have managed the Security Council of the UN, in facto a part of the US administration, although the UN prefers to be held to be seen in depended, however they are not, to put sanctions against Libya. This will hurt the Libyan people not the near death leader Ghadafi. However it will tie control any future leader under the treat of leaving the sanctions in place if the new leader does not obey the US. An Billion or half US dollars to the new Leader will do the rest. It worked in Egypt it will work in Libya, however did it?
The US vision it says is a world without fear and free and fearless society, no fear for invasions no fear of nuclear attacks. However, who is it that attacks other countries, who is it who bribes leaders to obey the US, who is the only state who used atomic weapons, and who is the only country that still is threatening other countries with a possible nuclear attack, so far more then a hundred times since WW2. No fear? Who is bringing fear into many countries who are bribing people to create fear via demonstrations who are bombing villages under an absurd excuse, the US. Fear that destroys people's life, their children their families, fear because they are told that they are the enemies, extremist or what ever other name they will give it. Burned out villages, people death man, woman and children, woman and children with severe burns, which is done off by the US as they burned themselves to get sympathy, Sick. Again this is a straight page out of Hitler's book seen that done that been there scenario.
A world without fear will be a world without the present corporate USA, just because they murdered every original citizen of the land they are now living in does not mean they can murder where ever they want to. Is it not deadly amusing how the US uses any excuse they can use to cover up their killings? Look at Pakistan where an CIA contractor shot death two Pakistani state security with an absurd excuse, and Walla the US has suddenly a new member of the diplomatic services to let him come away with it, by-passing the fact that diplomatic staff is not allowed to carry weapons.
If they think that is a weird way of acting look then at the absurd behaviour of a former advisor to Dick Cheney, David Wormser who had the in his eye perfect explanation as why the MD of corporate America Obama, with or without permission of his corporate chief executive, lied and cheated and did a U turn on Israel by allowing Israel to take the Arab land and use it for them selves by removing and killing the present owners via a Veto in the Security Council. That David Wormser said that Israel had the right to take the Arab land as nobody had told them in the past that this was not allowed. Such a near idiotic statement does explain a lot about some of the statements made by Dick Cheney when Wormser was his adviser. We do not say that Wormser has no brain but he certainly does not have knowledge and understanding, it only can be presumed that he had the job as adviser because he knew someone, who knew someone who could give him a job because he was a Jew. Although in the USA there are only 6 million Jews living, they are getting the best jobs in government, they are reverend to although they are descending of the very people who killed Christ, and who will kill him again when he comes down to judge as by the Jews he is a false prophet. However because of that for the Christian Americans they are the hero's. It makes the Christian Americans look like cowards does it not?
In Iran the only reactor being started up is sabotaged by the Israeli/USA via the Stuxnet virus. Once more an act of coward Israel knows that they story of WMD in Iraq was a lie, while the citizen of Israel are working to make the country great, the government behave themselves as little boys who found an treasure cowardly and spoilt. They know that the Iran nuclear weapons are a lie, but Israel wants the Iranian oil, they need the Iranian oil, desperate. All their intended wars will come unstuck if they cannot rely on constant oil. Now they can count on the USA to supply them, but the USA is slowly sliding into oblivion if they go on with attacking one country after another. So far they have the support from the UK, question is for how long. How many recession dips will the UK people accept before they put a stop to that dithering government? The NATO is helping them although the supply is slowly drying up while the NATO it self is a dinosaurs. The Middle East countries helping after that Israel, doubtful. In short if they could make enough in routes into Iran to get hold on the oil they would be saved. They could of course use their nuclear weapons; however that would only delay the end of Israel as Countries such as China and Pakistan not to forget Russia would retaliate and knowing the size of Israel it would be flattened within an hour.
Iran has closed down the fuel from the reactor core of a brand new nuclear power plant. This is done on the advice of Russia that the reactor in the southern city of Bushehr has built. The Iranian ambassador to UN nuclear watchdog IAEA has announced this to state media. According to ambassador Ali Asghar Soltanieh should "experiments and maintenance are carried out". It was not said what the problem with the reactor is.
The construction of the reactor itself took decades. A German company started the construction in 1975, then under the regime of the Shah. After the Islamic revolution of 1979 the work came to a halt. Last year construction was completed by Russia. The West sees on instigation of Israel the nuclear program of Iran as controversial.
The West fears that the regime in Tehran is secretly working on a nuclear bomb. Although the IAEA cannot find any proof of this in Iran. The same IAEA is not allowed to inspect the Israeli Nuclear plants in the Negev, however they demand that Iran is inspected time after time if not constant, but not them. The USA supports this double standard action of Israel. According to rumours the United States and Israel are working on the computer worm Stuxnet to kill of the Iranian facility at Natanz. That this plant is infected with a worm Stuxnet that is well known. The Russians are being on the safe side before they carry out some final tests. The double standards from Obama are obvious clear Israel is allowed to have nuclear weapons and the rest of the world must simple obey their wishes. Note that the aggressor in the region is Israel. It suppresses and kills Palestinians with the help and agreement of the Americans.
It is a strange feeling that people who are defending their country are called by the enemy (USA) rebels and terrorists, insurgents, after all what they do is defending their land. That defending is a right well logged into the UN manifest. It is also clearly logged that NO country will attack another country. Two countries in the world are just doing that time after time Israel and the USA. The United Nations are there for all countries and they obey the UN resolutions, two countries ignore them constant, Israel and the USA. The USA and Israel can call people what they want and it can even be repeated by their NATO vassals. However those same countries those same vassals of the US called the defenders of the countries attacked by Germany not rebels, not extremists but resistance fighters and hero's. It is possible a good thing to close down the reactor, the aggressor Israel could be making use of the turbulence in the Middle East to do a cowardly attack on Iran; as such Russia is wise to minimize the damage. After all the actions of cowards can never be predicted. And with dictator Lieberman in Israel there is indeed any change of such an attack.
If the world, the democratic world, not the corporate world of the US, would attack Israel, the USA would scream murder, just as they do about Libya and just as about Libya they will scream for a war crime trail however that would be rich coming from a country with a record of having attacked so many countries in the world and never won. After all after atomic bomb casualties, the Korea wars, the Vietnam wars the quick and small war worldwide, the Iraqi wars, the Afghanistan wars, the attacks on Pakistan, the support of terrorist gangs in the Caucasus and so we can go on and on, the use of atomic bombs, chemical weapons, WMD the USA would be the only country in the world where the leaders should be facing the war tribunal. As real cowards they did not sign up to it, well knowing what would be in store for them if they did.
They have brave soldiers, but utterly cowards as leaders.
================================================================
Other pages:
This is the text-only version of this page. Click here to see this page with graphics.
Edit this page |
Manage website
Make Your Own Website: 2-Minute-Website.com