02-04-2011
Statistics are showing that in the last half year the percentage of older people under the poverty line is up drastically. The percentage of children under the poverty line is up drastically. The average spending power of the people in Britain is down by near 25%, while the top 10% earners spending power is up drastically.
Osbourne, which via an abbreviation can be brought back to Obvious Stupidity Borne, other wise there can be no explanation for his and her meaning Osbourne and Cameron's statement, "that we all are in it together" Unless it means that we are all in it together in which the 90% of the population suffers and the 10% of the population profits. Cameron and Osbourne being the once who making the profit by stealing it from the rest. We do not want to get into what they receive for getting the oil from Libya for Qatar's Al Thani's and the US Obama's. They certainly do not do this for nothing, although the people in the country have to feed their bills for hundreds of millions spent on Libya, they no doubt will be making a profit now or as Blair did later.
In the time between the population is suffering, by the lack of spending power, and they have to keep their hands on their ears to stop hearing the continues roaring laughter of the Government of Britain, while having their luxury dinners and expensive wines, where one diner cost as much as saving an pensioner from dying. Examples enough, have a look at Jaywick, a former holiday resort in Tendring DC near Clacton.
A charming place, a place loved by the people who are living there. It consists out of 4 separate parts, the worst being the Brooklands right on the sea wall. It is one of the most deprived areas of England. The why of it is an easy one to answer. The Conservative Council have tried and failed for years to get the people out of Jaywick, with bribes, expulsions and today's with creating a complete derelict area, by refusing to do the simple basics of a normal council. Rubbish is left on the streets, roads demolished by Council vehicles never repaired, deliberate discrimination against the many disbles older people who living there, as walking or having a wheelchair is like an army training ground with high obstacles and deep holes. Although the Essex CC has a duty to repair, they do not do so as they have declared the road to be not adopted. Their way, the Tory way, of saying stuff yourself we not doing it, your lot are poor old and or disabled, so there is nothing what you can do about it. In short the typical pre-Victorian slave holders mentality.
With a Council Tax that is high by any standards, and one of the highest in the country as to take an comparison between Tendring DC as a Tory council and as an example the most expensive London Borough of Tory Kensington and Chelsea, the we find that the D band of Kensington and Chelsea is less expensive then the A band in Tendring DC. And in the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea all the roads are taken care of so far as possible all the older and disabled people are taken care of. However Tendring DC still demands a near 1000 pounds minimum a year as Council tax for services not provided, even if a house is used for holiday only, even when it is 100% not occupied Council tax need to be paid in which case council tax is paid and 100% no service provided.
This stands at the root of the derelict creation by Tendring Council. Owners who not using it or only using it for holidays need to pay the council tax just as others in Tendring DC who are living there permanent. The result is that many owners do not bother anymore and simple leaving it to rot instead of keeping it up. The council with his near fascist attitude derelict creation idea, then uses the derelict properties to show that the WHOLE of Jaywick is like that. That this is a lie does not the matter they are Tories so what is a lie, if you tell it long enough people start to believe it and then the lie is not longer a lie. You can see that from the replies of the more simple souls on articles in the local newspapers.
The question is however is it really that bad? The answer must be a re-sounding NO. The problem mainly lays in the refusal of the Council to create roads. The roads are there but are not attended to for many, many years for which the council used one stupid excuse after another none of it being legal. The point being that roads that were still to be seen as roads were almost deliberate ploughed in with heavy trucks, which demolished the concrete roads completely, without that the demolishing council attempted to repair them. As a result some roads, with one in the Grasslands being the worst, are in rain periods swimming pools and not roads, this in turns means that the residents cannot leave unless they have a car to drive out and that is dangerous as because of the water the deep holes cannot be seen. The use of wheelchair is obvious impossible. In the winter the roads can be used as skating rinks. The result of this is that the road which are filled with water, further demolishing the roads it self. Tendring DC knows this, hence the reason they do not do anything. While the rich and Tory members in Tendring DC only have to snap their fingers to get anything done they want, the poor and the disabled get nothing.
The result of that action was that more and more owners simple gave up. That resulted in the houses not being done up or repaired, which resulted into the derelict state as it is now. At the same time the council does all they can to make the situation worse by refusing to act, by refusing to do their duty for which they cashing in on the council tax, refusing to clear the rundown homes, this again with the most absurd reason they could think of. At the same time they have forbidding any form of home improvement to make sure that it will be looking derelict for a long time to come. In short a normal Tory reaction against the poor the disabled and the unemployed. That they breaking many laws do not the matter as the Tories control the courts so what ever they do even outside the law and legality it is always legal in Tory eyes.
There were many changes the council had to correct the situation, but as they are controlled by an control freak a kind of local dictator for which even the local MP stays quit nothing was ever done. As we reported before a request was made with a suggestion in May 2009 in Brussels Belgium for a project in Britain that was so deprived, by the British that a large fund injection would be needed to update the situation. Therefore a person from the institution in Brussels who do select the projects, that are deliberate placed in a deprived situation, was nominated to investigate the possibilities for Jaywick the small town on the east Essex coast in Britain.
Jaywick was selected for an investigation as the village was indicated by the British Government to be third deprived area in Britain. This village as all deprived areas is under Tory control. As it turned out it would be a simple project at a much lower estimate, then was given by the Conservative Essex County Council. The project would be viable and to be realized within a short time-span.
The most difficult problem was to get information from the Highway department regarding the roads.
Britain still has the middle age system of public roads which are classified as being private but in fact belong to the Local or State Government but are kept private in order to avoid responsibility while at the same time refuse the owners on those roads to improve them.
As it turned out it was made rather obvious that even if there were millions to be spent it would never be spent on the roads in Jaywick. The only way those millions would be used is for the building of new houses, at high rental costs, so that they make a fortune in rent, then sling everyone in Jaywick on to the street, or better the prehistoric paths that Tendring DC calls roads.
In short whatever money there will be given, where ever it comes from, it will never be spent on the roads. Or as the leader of Tendring said "we will never spent money on the roads of Jaywick" That he breaks the Human rights act does not bother him all costs for action against him would be made by the citizen anyway. The conservatives want to have the area for themselves, for their own new houses like a Great Bentley or Holland on sea, for rich conservatives only. Suddenly the sea level will not rise anymore, money to be spent will be plenty, the environment agency will have no objections anymore, and the Tory Government will give the glorious go ahead.
This entails that people still have in rain periods mud paths instead of proper roads. It is obvious that the houses on those roads in all deprived areas of which Britain has the most and the most deprived of western Europe. People who living there are either retired or social near the bottom level. The run down version is artificial created for the best effect, and kept in that state by a committee, the JSLG special appointed to keep the outlook as derelict as possible and even slowly try to change it into an Industrial estate starting the Brooklands.
The only conclusion therefore that can be made is that the deprived situation of the area is a deliberate act by the Tory Councils, the Essex County Council and the Tendring district council. Even the entrance to Brookland on the roundabout Tamarisk way/Lotus way/The Brooklands it was obvious that a deliberate run down view was created. Such a view is typical for places were the local Council has already made plans to alter the area at such a way that they, the local council can make the most money.
The investigator after a half year was still not able to receive one sensible answer of either Essex County Council or Tendring District Council. The local MP Carswell simple did not react at all. The system from both councils was simple, if you asked one a question then they pointed him to the other, then the other pointed him back to the first. Even a local Representative of the JSLG what stands for Jaywick Strategic Leadership Group but with obvious no leader in sight it is a local talk group, all the same. There is no strategy no action to improve no real activities regarding the actual deprivation of the area is observed. The main strategy is persuading people to move away to other areas. They did come up with one answer which was going back to the local council and the local council answer was going back to Essex CC. In another word a dead end.
The Brookland Area would need a complete alteration, but could be recreated as a park Home area after certain alterations. It would bring extra money for the Council, in time no housing benefit to be paid or exemption of council tax, as park homes would be owner living in or privately rented out. It was never rejected flat, including the proposal for industrial development south of St.Osyth, annex Jaywick but was simple hold off and put back and forwards.
The group which entails Essex CC, Tendring DC, Homes and Communities Agency, East of England Development Agency, the Environment Agency, and for some odd reason the Primary care trust. That odd reason being that the person who pulls the string at TDC is married to her. Those two earning a small fortune out of it and by obeying the Business establishment they do not give two pennies for what the common people think or want.
The collection of this group gives the strongest indication that Essex has an alternative plan, in which there is no place for a sea side community. The clear obstruction given to the investigator by Essex CC and Tendring DC leave no other way to interpret their actions.
Years ago Jaywick had a strong plan to regenerate the area; however Essex CC made sure that this disappearing in the dustbin on the earliest opportunity.
The previous leader of Essex County Council was the person who in effect launched the line that money for the roads for the poor was a waste of money. This illustrates the negative sight that the Tories have of the poorer site of the population. It also shows that they prefer the site to be derelict as it suits their hidden plans.
Hidden because in time of this investigation it was coming obvious clear, that wall paper was used to stick over the cracks of a failed cover up of the real intentions.
The suggestion of real intention ware becoming stronger as the investigation was closing in on details. So what is the intention of the TDC couple that runs it, there are other councillors but they are just there for the money and do not have the slightest of interest to do something for the people. This has a result that the Clacton area once renowned for their sandy shores is now a dead end coastal resort. There is one road to Clacton, the dead end road to nowhere. This road should have been widened to 4 lanes many years ago. It would have made it possible for people actual to reach Clacton, but also it would have been opened up for the Industry.
Now business cars/vans/trucks are stuck forever in an endless cue special in the spring and summer when Grandma and Granddad decide to drive to Clacton at 25 miles an hour to enjoy the view, deaf for the noise from angry cars driving behind them. Obvious no sensible person would start a business unless it is a must in Clacton with their roads to nowhere. The TDC leader wants to keep Clacton small as that way it is easier to control.
So what are the plans the TDC leader has for Jaywick?
To start they have plans to create a Brookland industrial estate, their idea is to break down most of the Brookland arcades and places and to persuade Industrial entrepreneurs to make a go of the estate. There are already plans at the TDC for storage and repair facilities at the Brooklands. The reason behind it is the make the area more an run down industrial estate, and hope that more people will accept their offer to abandon their property in exchange for an rental, low rent to start and high rents to end up with at the now agreed planned housing estate at the St. John road and Little Clacton road, first rejected then installed is obvious mend to house the tenants of the Brookland Area, after which the owners will be served with an order to sell.
With this they creating a regeneration area, for more luxury homes with garages and well maintained roads, and a small Industrial estate, the new pier would be build as that plan is shelved but not withdrawn. The golf course would receive their extension for restaurant and view area. The airfield would receive a helidrome and an extension north of Alton park road. And last but not least Lion point Broome Way would be developed to a protected sea harbour for pleasure boats. It also would be the starting sign for more development after demolishing part of Road Way's buildings to update the area.
These are facts however the TDC and the JSLG will deny this and state that there are always rumors. They should remember that there is no smoke without a fire. And they should not hide behind "we did not know" while it was known to them all the time. This and the fact that they refuse to update the roads means that they have an alternative project running alongside. Lord Hanningfield before his arrest assured the adviser via a clerk that the way forward for Jaywick was to break down the non-occupied homes, however they had trouble to find the owners. This on itself is a false statement as the investigation team had within two day all owners accept two of all the derelict homes. It all indicates that the view of a rundown area would be kept and enhanced.
All but one replies from Essex CC, TDC, and JSLG plus the Dept. of Environment, said that it was no use as there would never be any money available to update the roads. And even if there was money from the outside coming in it would not be used for Jaywick. That on itself is a rather strange statement. Essex wasted 2 million last year to do up a high street done already up two years before. Their council leader was arrested for putting his hand in the till, the TDC leader was under investigation for taking bribes end last year. While the Essex CC leader is under similar investigations.
They have money plenty for themselves the small group of Tory councillors and their lackey's. In fact they are the prototype type of Tory Government, always kicking the poor the old and the disabled.
Their day of having fun is to go to a deprived area and see the poor and the old suffer, Jaywick is such prime example. Then they take the money from the poor and the old, the Council tax for the smallest burn out house if there is still a possibility to live in be 20 pounds a week, and even if they cannot live in it is still 20 pounds a week. One of the highest in Britain or 70 pence the square meter a week. Then on the weekends they say to their children after having taken the money of the poor, we are not poor we are conservatives, come let us go to the deprived area and watch those poor people, we take some food with us and then you can feed them, but be careful that they do will not bite you. They are not sitting behind a fence yet.
Take this as an example, and remind yourself that this is a Tory Government a Tory County Council and a Tory district council. We all know that TORY stands for "That's Ours, Robbing You". However, the same is actual seen by the State Government, David Cameron the man who is almost never in Britain. Free travel, free food, free drinks life is good, following foreign orders and sealed envelopes for the safe, it all cost money however, so simple kicking some old and poor to get some more in.
This Essex CC has just giving themselves a whopping 1,600,00.00 pound pay rise were others pay are frozen or downgraded. Mind you hey have to sack 250 staff to get that money together. However who cares, those people can get unemployment benefit which is not bad, so long Essex CC gets his raise.
You think that is a lot, no it is not, anyway not in the eyes of greedy Tories after all to enable them to get it they had to blow a staggering amount of over 20,000,000.00+ pounds for consultants to advice them how to save cash. It will be of no interest that those advisors all belonged to the close friends of the Essex CC.
At the same time that they want to sack 250+ workers they want to others a 2 year freeze, otherwise it would not be possible to fill their own pockets quick enough. The whole of Jaywick would be in a perfect state of up keep if those 20,000,000.00+ pounds was spent on them.
On the other hand then their friends would have been without their lavish income. Here on the continent we call that corruption, in Britain they call that care for deprived area's consultants.
Funny thing is that the three stooges of British politics, advising the public to tighten your belts, they themselves and their compatriots of Essex CC, do the opposite but this does happen on this moment all over the Conservative Councils, filling their pockets quicker then filling a bucket of water with a fireman's hose pipe.
Essex excuse is that they have to save 300 million over the next couple of years, they have to otherwise it slows down the filling of their pockets, as everyone in Essex, excluding the Councilors and their affiliated Tory friends, will has to be part of the trimming of the services system.
As real Highway robbers they take it from the poor to give it to the rich, themselves. The leader of Tendring Neil Stock, the dictator of Tendring DC a man well known in Tendring for being economical with the truth if he wants to have his way, and who is supported by his wife Sarah Candy and together they can afford a lot of candy by earning over 100,000.00 a year are also the two who most obstructing the regeneration of Jaywick. They are the controllers who want to keep Clacton small and poor, as it is easier to control.
Both are conservative which means they both are pocket fillers and robbers from the poor the old and the disabled, for whom they do not have the slightest respect. The amount the CEO of Essex receives nearly 250,000.00 pound a year excluding would be enough for at least two roads in Jawick to be updated to residential requirements or all the roads in Grass and Brooklands to Park Home requirement.
Therefore the JSLG who's officers in daily control maybe genuine in their ideas to get progress, the simple fact that Sarah Candy, via North Essex PCT, Neil Stock via TDC both representing the Conservatives with their principle all for us and nothing for others in the JSLG, and the other Conservatives who running Essex CC and Tendring DC, makes it impossible that something ever will be done for Jaywick, as the JSLG is only installed so far as we can see as an control to keep Jaywick in check.
In any case the Tory government has decided that sea defenses are not needed urgent and the money is therefore withdrawn, probably into the wine/dine and travel pot for Cameron and his friends.
It does means that they as the leaders of Tendring DC in reality do not give two pennies for Tendring and that their primary goal is power and greed and wealth. There was a time that evil people were burned on a stake maybe we should ask ourselves are those Tendring Conservative leaders that evil. Do we have enough stake's? Fact is that they the ECC and the TDC deliberate want to make the people ill. They even are proud that Jaywick has a higher death and illness rate than anywhere else in Tendring. However they made people ill, they create stress and anxiety, and they put people in a harness of rules and regulations, which indeed it makes you ill. The main project of the JSLG is to make sure that the area looks as undesirable as possible and they getting well paid for this.
One of the JSLG said that the vision of the foundation was a solid one and has visibility, then came back two days later with it cannot be done as TDC will not cooperate with any plan. At the moment we writing this in July 2010, the investigation into the possibility of a road plan is still ongoing, but the rumours are that Essex CC and the TDC try to do all they can to obstruct by withholding simple information. Fair play is what the committee who investigate the possibilities looks for. However, Tendring is Conservatives and fair play is for them something what others do not the TDC dictator. It is something that he does not understand.
He understands power, money and greed. Fair play, honesty, care no that is not available if you cannot make a profit or can show off to your friends. However if he was willing to sift through the proposals he would find that he could make profit, that he would be fair and as an almost impossibility would be honest for a change.
That is the reason that we can predict that Tendring will have successfully torpedoed once again a possibility to show a human face. Then again a conservative human? That is also not possible they are on this moment in time blaming Labour for the bankers fiddling with money the USA bankers that is. They will not take any reasonble measures to lift the country out of recession. They will increase VAT, taxes direct and indirect, launch plans against the poor the disable the unemployed.
And if that does not get result he will go to war, Thatcher did it when she could not solve the problem, Blair did it twice when he could not solve the problems and mark our words Cameron will, and any excuse will do.
And when it is finished the JSLG, then standing for Jaywick Society Luxury Genteel will chair the new luxury estates of the conservatives then standing were once Brookland was, looking out over the new pier, already designed in 2008 and ready for construction, while were once was the Tudor estate is then a heliport and harbour so that the rich Conservatives do not have to walk to far. And the people who were living there before, they are crammed in small cramped accommodation of Little Clacton way, if they were still alive, the rest was made successful made so ill by stress and anxiety that they died early.
Who need a camp with barbwire and watch towers if you have the conservatives they do the same only they make you suffer longer, but they will kill you at the end.
=====================================================================
04-04-2011
We are told by our peers, that because they say so, we should believe them. The church authority also makes it quit clear that we have to believe it. And when we are young we will do so as we are told that they know best. However, when we grow up the question sooner or later will propping up, as normally do they? If they are wrong then the question has to ask why? When they are right then we still have to ask why? Wrong or right we want to know the answer, not that by all possibilities our life would change, but simple we want to know.
The question right and why is then answered with because God say so and he is the Creator of all that is on Earth and the creator of the whole of the Universe. However, that is not completely right, the bible does not mention the universe they only mention heaven and earth, with the stars at the firmament above. It is obvious that this universe is added as a replacement for heaven. However that heaven can wait as in the time that the writers wrote the story down universe was not known. They knew heaven they knew the firmament with the stars, but they did not have a clue an inclination that beyond the firmament and the heaven above was an whole system of many thousands of systems altogether making the universe as we now it till now. Universe is still changing, day by day, new discoveries are made in what is called the universe. However that is as far as it goes at the moment, what the universe really is and how far it will go and what it entails, is still not clear and will not be clear for many centuries to come. We will be able to scout a little further day by day month by month year by year, but it will be little steps compared with the gigantic universe possibility.
So we ask it again is right, right or is right wrong? This is rather interesting, because as it turns out they do not have any proof not in the slightest, not the right and not the wrong, that this is indeed correct in either case. If it is right the church will say, God is good and God is our savour and protector. If we believe that than we stepping in the same trap once more. That God is good on that one we can in principle agree at the agreement that there is indeed a God. However, the savour, the protector, in that we are not so sure. Take as an example the people who call themselves the choice people by God. The Jewish people. If God was their savour and protector, then how can it be explained that they after 2500 years still are some of the smallest populations in the world, it is estimated that there are such a 14 million of them in the world. We know that this question will be retorted with, " We could have been much larger if it was not for the persecution around the world in the last 2500 years". However that is exactly the point, it shows that there was no savour, no protector. Instead they where at war most of that 2500 years and mostly by their own doing and in 99% till this moment they always lost, to be decimated once again.
Yes it is true, they do believe as it is in their Good Book, however proof fails. However this make the word \u201c believe\u201d a rather power full word. That power full word is protected, that believe is protected, they even kill for it and that is something else as the Good Book clearly does not allow killing. So here we have the contradiction in the I am right part of this God exist it is in the Good Book so we have to believe and obey it, at the same time they say I do believe but disobey it. It make the claim of I believe at the same time a rather silly one. If my neighbour tells me he is the new President, we do not believe him, and we are thinking he is joking or mad, we ignore him or we call the man in white coats.
Then we have the wrong side, the ones who do not believe the Good Book, they believe it came all into existence by pure coincidence, at the right time under the right conditions and it developed from there. We are urged to believe that version of events as they have found evidence that cannot be ignored. However if we look very careful at the evidence then we are not a step further, as their evidence proofs only that, the earth have certain development stages over a long period of time. It does not proof that the Good Book is right or wrong. It also does not proof that they are wrong or right. Wrong wants us to believe that the earth has coming into existence due to a slow evolution, while the right wants us to believe to believe a Book that was written a 16 or 17 hundreds of years ago, made from stories of tribes in what is now the Middle East collected an 2500 years ago before it was written down completely. And that it all happened 4 to 5 thousand years ago.
We are to believe that Adam was the first man on Earth, although the Book itself disputes that. We have to believe that in the Garden of Eden suddenly a serpent, a non-human, start to talk to Eve. Which is about the same as my neighbour would tell me that he just had spoken with the serpent next door, I would believe he would mean one of his neighbours wife\u2019s, but if he would tell me it was a real serpent I would ignoring him or make a straight call the nearest Mental Health unit for assistance.
However it is in the Good Book therefore it must be right they say, and not only that they are serious believing this.
The good Adam had two sons; the one killed the other and was sent away and found a wife on other outside of the Garden of Eden. We have to believe that if you have only two sons and you are the first man on earth and your wife the first woman, and that if one son kills the other, he suddenly finds a wife and build a city. It seems to be rather useless to build an city for two people special as we are urging to believe that there were no other people then Adam Eve and the only surviving son Cain, who the suddenly found a wife. It is on this point that we have to start believing in miracles, it was not there and suddenly it is, now that is a miracle.
We also have to believe as we are told that the Garden of Eden was perfect. Then we have two questions what was that tree doing there and where did that speaking serpent coming from both are obvious not perfect. We are told that we do not have to take this too serious, however if we do not take it serious why should we take the rest serious. And if we are not longer taking it serious would that mean that the Bible is therefore just another book that can be set on one line with other books, Jane Eyer, The Lord of the Rings to mention some. The scriptures have us to believe, although that is disputed, that Adam and Eve spoke Hebrew. That means that it was the same language as what the serpent was speaking.
If that is so then they would have enough to form discussion groups forever. Then Adam was slung out of the Garden for something his wife did, this we have to believe we are told as an angel with a flaming sword stood guard to stop them from re-entering. If we believe that than this means that their God held the man responsible for the woman\u2019s mistakes. If we would believe that and were living to the rules in the Good Book, then we would not have need for woman prisons, as the man was responsible automatically. It also means that we can forget about God being good as he blames the innocents for the offence of others. We can then also forget that he is fair as it can hardly be called fair to ban someone for something someone else did. This also clearly shown in the fact that God deliberate instigated the wrongs in the garden in the hope that Adam or Eve would be trapped by it, as such we can allocate the invention and the first entrapment to God. Not fair indeed and not good either.
However, if we believe this then the next question has to be, where is the Garden of Eden and the animals therein. The trees and the plants, and above all were is the angel with his flaming sword? After the Good book tells us that Adam left, the Garden of Eden seems to have disappeared of the face of the earth as never anything is found back of it. A kind of never never land that went missing just as the ten tribes later on in the book, who also suddenly were missing and maybe are living in that missing Garden. What we try to point out is that we do not question the book, it has all it needs to be the best seller it is, but it is simple not a real happened story, maybe a real happened wishful thinking but that is as far as it goes.
The Israeli population believes that God give them the right to own that country. We have no problem with the State of Israel being there, they lived there before and were thrown out so many times that it would be time that they settled down in peace for a while. However, here we have the Good Book again, one day or night when Abram was sitting in or in front of his tent God game to him and started a conversation, it is unknown of Abram did offer Him a drink the Good Book does not mention it, but the conversation as Abram told his followers, was as follows, I do give you this land and all the land you can see for you and for your family to come, forever. Then God was gone and Abram told his followers that he had spoken with God and that this was the place they would stay. Then God sent in a draught and they had to fled to Egypt. The Good Book said so, however this is a part we do not understand. First he gives it to them to stay forever, and then he makes it impossible to stay. Now here is a contradiction. But we are told we have to believe it as it is in the Good Book. Too many times we see in the Good Book that when the main characters are under stress they do the weirdest of things, just as we see almost every day in daily life. It does not mean we have to believe it.
It is that simple, believing is a question of believing it or not. Right or wrong have no part in it. God as an Creator throws up the same problem, we have to believe. The Creator made the Universe and all what is in it, we have to believe, However the question does arise as, who created the creator? We are then told to believe that the Creator was always there, but if we have to believe this then we can extend this to: "The universe was always there" of either there is no proof. Here we have a contradiction; we should only believe what we see we are told. However, at the same time we are told we should believe what we cannot see, and what others wants us to believe, it is in the Good Book.
We are wrong we are told, we should believe, as the Creator is all around us, in all what we see and can see, He created it, there is no proof needed as it is the Good Book.
The Good Book has to be right, if we believe the supporters of the Good Book, they confirming that the whole Good Book story was drawn up at the Anshei Knesset Hagedolah around 500 to 450 BC. We think that in stead of drawn up the story it need to be seen as creating a story as they made up the story as they were going along. This is even obvious as most of the children born in that period had names of ancient cities in and around the Fertile Crescent. Some points of the Good Book are in the cuneiforms founds, and in the Enuma Elish and Gilgamesh story. It will be obvious that the Great Assembly simple collecting the many stories and brought them together as one. We have no doubt that they believed that what they did was correct and they did believe that it was the instruction of God to do so at least that is what we hope for. We also have to believe that this was more then 2500 years ago.
The question is not that we doubt what was written by the Assembly, we doubt of they had their facts right but they did the best they could do in that time, which was an achievement on his own. If we would believe that they had their fact right we also should believe the Good Book it self. However, the assemble itself later had already doubts as shows in the Pentateuch this is not a doubt on the account of the Great Assembly, after all they were human and they had to go back in thousands of years of history of which a large part never was written but just told from father to son. What makes us to have doubt of that you have to be believe, is the adding of the exclamation that it was the word of God, and the word of God is that we have to believe, however if we can believe that, then we have to accept that it was indeed the word of God.
This brings us to the other side of the coin, the evolutionist who claim that the whole story of Creator is a lot of rubbish as to them the world and the Universe did establish themselves, to put it into the popularity phrase The Big Bang.
However that is also not proven, we are asking to believe it as the scientist say so. Then we are on the same stretch as the Good Book we have to believe as the Good Book says so. The evolutionist try to proof their side, with pointers to the Millions of years of the earth development. In reality they have shown animals and plants they say are not mentioned in the Good Book, but the Good Book does not give the names of the animals and or plants. They are till this moment in time also not able to proof that the suggestion that there was an Big Bang indeed did happen as they want us to believe.
This brings us to the point of no return. The right ones as they claim they are, cannot proof the existence of God, nor can the ones who call the others wrong proof there is not a God. Here we have the absurd situation that the Creationist try to proof that it al was created which is impossible and they know it. So they instead of trying to proof God exist they are now only trying to point out possible floors in the evolutionist findings, while the evolutionist are trying their best to get clarity in what they see as an evolution process over millions of years.
If God indeed exist he must be more then being amused by the actions of the creationists, who by lack of getting ever the proof they need simple criticizing others who do real research. Those creationist are cashing in on the fear for God, because you never know. At the same time they cashing in on that fear, something real creationist supporters never would do. It points to an creation to create a money source with nothing to do with God. Although the phrase, "God we make a lot of money out of it" could be their slogan.
===================================================================
06-04-2011
How to get friends.
While Europe is slowly falling to pieces under the watchful eyes of the EU commissioners and their President, wringing their hand in anticipation of yet another country falling into their claws, and the lack of cash and funding is starting to be more then obvious. With an American President having carefully to manoeuvre to get funding which would make its outlook to a second term more possible, there is a British PM who throws money around as of it is confetti. Not his money that is obvious.
So while the Western world try to wring themselves in all kind of hoops to get money and to keep money, the British Government in the form of his PM travels the world and leaves a trail of money presents where ever he goes. We are not talking of a million here and a million there, we talking here of hundreds of millions to countries who have them selves enough and therefore spent the money they do not need but are given as a present, on buying weapons.
The poor British population is forced to pay worlds highest petrol prices which include a seventy percent tax, one of the highest tax, the highest food and clothing prices to make the hand outs to the world possible. So what is the reason that this PM an political nobody, an upstart, who wants to be somebody, spent all that money that does not belong to him. Friendship! He is buying friendship he gives the money in the hope that people will like him and accept him as an friend. And they do, until the money runs out and then that PM has to go back and handover more money that does not below to him. If an civilian would give money away that did not belong to him, he would be arrested for theft.
He follows the footsteps of a former PM Tony Blair, also a failure as a PM, but as a lawyer very good in talking all what was wrong into right. The war in Iraq and his WMD lie, is a good example, pure lies but it was the way he told the people that made them to believe him. He also did spent billions on getting friends and it did work, the result was that from a average middle class lawyer he resigned as PM being a multi millionaire. And that is the example that this PM wants to follow.
There is an saying that says there is honour under thief\u2019s, there is the same under elected politicians. They know from each other what they do and what they do wrong. That is then stored and will come around when one of them breaks the band. By obeying the rules all is possible, getting rich beyond dreams, president of the EU, secretary general of the NATO all is possible, it is this that the PM of Britain is trying to achieve. The Basis for his future riches just as Blair.
Then there are the British people who suffering one disaster after another day after day. They are given promises which are then broken again or followed by new promises which then also are broken again. Then there is the little boy blue which find of himself that he is the man Britain cannot do without Clegg. Clegg is famous for betraying his own voters so that the party is now less then the half as it was before the last election. Clegg himself does not have a clue of what he actual is doing but he tries to do this so long as possible, and if someone tells him off, and that almost the whole of the British population then he cries as the little boy blue. At the same time he is cashing in as life has to go on. Sad thing is that Clegg only is in the job not because what he knowns but because who he knows, or better who his daddy knew. If it was not for daddy he would have not got anywhere at all.
Then there is an jolly good fellow who knows it all, however till this moment he has failed to reveal that what he knows all to the British population. Osborne a man who never was able to explain what he was doing on board of a Russian Billionaires yacht in the Mediterranean. No he never did indeed, however he was double quick to question the reason why others where on that yacht, making suggestion and half accusations as coming out of an film move writers sheet. However, no he did never explained why he was there himself, he was not a close friend of the Russian Billionaire so why? Then again the man so far has never revealed that he actual does know anything. This is however the man who tells Britain that, \u201cWe are all in it together\u201d. And that is yet looking at his many freebies it is clearly another fantasy.
This government in Britain has actual the nerve to tell the people if you are ill, stop being it and get back to work, if you are disabled but can still lift a pencil you can go back to work. There is no work but still if you are not working than you are a scrounger, a thief from others people hard earned money. You cannot have things for free the PM said. Not for free? What is he getting then, while he is saying you cannot have a home for free, not for free? However, what does he pays then for his free homes in London and the country side, NOTHING at all it's free. His petrol is free, his diners are free, almost everything he does is free, how does that goes together with you cannot get things for free, we are all in it together.
This PM, the man who tell the civilians that they cannot get anything for free is a free-loader himself not an ordinary free-loader but a rich free-loader. So does he gives away his own money to make friends worldwide, friends he fly to on the purse of the British people, friends he pays from the British people purse, invite to diner out of the British people purse and gives them millions out of the British people purse. This is the man that gets millions that is not his to spent, and get richly paid for it, and then calls people who try to survive on 70 pounds a week, free loaders. 70 pounds of which 40 pounds goes to Tax, Gas, Electricity, Phone and Water, the simple basics, the 30 pounds left goes on food, drink, clothing and cleaning plus travelling. It is more then enough the PM and his co-pilot's in this disaster say, while picking up their rich pickings in wages and free goods, free travelling and services.
This PM, the only man in the Western world who know every thing better then all the world leaders together, that is if you want to believe him, as he is a good talker, it is probably all he is, decide to fire a large part of his military force, including flight and marine equipment and then start a war for no other reason than to start a war to stop Libya to nationalise the oil business, on an excuse that makes the WMD of Iraq sounds serious. It is done in second line mainly to get the British attention away from the statistically poor situation in Britain. What better way to do it then gather the population around the flag and present the new started war as the removal of an evil dictator. It would maybe have worked if he not made a pact with an Gulf dictator from Qatar.
That evil dictator in this presentation case is Gaddafi of Libya. The man that is not a dictator not even a president or an PM, but just an head of state just as the British queen and we hardly could call her an dictator, while she is head many atrocities were committed by the British army, just as that did happen with Gaddafi, does not the matter. The fact that this Libya just was praised by the UN for their outstanding human rights record in all part of the population, does not the matter. Libya that was, till that PM of Britain started the war, a member of the UN Human rights commission, does not the matter. That Libya what was just a year before a member of the UN security council, does not the matter. That Libya that was hailed by the UN as an excellent member, does not the matter. That was that Libya that had a lot of oil that was needed by the USA and Britain corporate rulers to fill their pockets and under threat of nationalising and that did does matter. It was the reason that the USA created the so-called rebellion, then gave the order to Britain and the French, where a midget on high heels was in charge to start the war.
So the upstart of Britain and the high heeled midget followed orders and started the war, that it cost millions and millions something both countries cannot afford, Britain even less then France, is not the point the civilians have to pay and to pay through their noses. The USA controlled press, such as News International was recruited, to persuade the population that what their PM was doing is trying to remove an evil dictator. That News International it self is not so straight is shown out of the facts that they are willing to pay up to 20 million in damages for phone tapping and lies. However it did work and the British population was indeed willing to believe the PM's Lie just as they believed Blair's lie of the WMD in Iraq. Now a donkey never hit themselves twice on the same stone, but the British do. It gives a clear indication about them.
While he sacked a part of the military and went to war, he at the same time launched advertising on the TV in Britain to persuade people to join the army. Now here we have an contradiction in terms. That was something that PM found out himself so he made his usual U turn, as he always does U turn after U turn so that the civilians in Britain are so confused that they do not know any more what is what after so many U turns. The budget calculators needed more time to calculate all the U turns and alteration and had to include the extra hundreds of millions for the war in Libya. At the same time they had to calculate the reduced take of petrol due to the highly increased prices. The supporting press made up the stories the good sounding stories to tell the people the big lie but on such a way that it looks like the truth. It is done in the same way as the Nazi Germans did, tell a lie long enough and people will believe it, so some column writers in the Sun and the News of the World fantasy transferred as real situations written in a way that it sound believable, however it still is a fantasy.
So what is there left of those fantastic promises that the self appointed PM made before the last election. Out of the EU, is now deep in it, all fault of the previous party in charge they say. It is not the truth but who cares, not the PM of that party that after 13 years in opposition still was not able to win the majority to rule the country, and therefore with the help of a down and out leader of another party managed just to get enough to form a government which hangs on their finger nails almost every time of the day. That is why he needed a war, but even that he could not do proper and the government he wanted to remove is still in power. Like the hands of Blair the hands of the PM now also starting to leave a trail of blood of the innocent in Afghanistan and Libya man, woman children babies under the heading they are all terrorists or murderers.
Even the help of another dictator in the Middle east, the great friend of that British PM, Al Thani of Qatar, the man who threw his own father out of the job while he was out of the country as real cowards do, simple took the power and does not allow any form of opposition, hence the population is less then a million. No parliament, no elections, not even once in since he took power. The only other in charge under this Al Thani regime are his own family. This self appointed dictator of Qatar is good friends with the self appointed leader of Britain, both are spending money that really should go to the people of the country, they both are interfering in other countries just for the profit, while of the people of those countries many die. Look at Bahrain, look at Libya.
For the British self appointed leader it means getting richer and known, for the self appointed dictator of Qatar it means a free hand in obtaining the good he wants for the cheap to sell them with a huge profit. Life's for both self appointed leaders being an PM or a dictator do not count, prestige and money that is all what counts. For both counts however that they have to obey the USA, without that submission Qatar would be taken over by the USA and Britain would be bankrupt.
For both count obvious that there no grain of interest for the well-being of the population, and in the case of that British PM he follows the orders of the USA as of he is an US governor instead of an British PM, while his deputy PM follows the orders of the EU commissioners as of Britain is a province of the EU, instead of a proud nation.
It must be for the British population if they understand of what is going on terrible to know that Britain is sold three ways, to the corporate business for profit, to the USA as part of the USA, and to the EU as part of the EU State. For all three the British population has to pay like it or not. So while the population is starving in the middle and lower classes, the wealthy, the rich and the corporate scroungers and manipulators making an fortune over the backs of the population stimulated by corporate media who distorting the real situation. And that PM he loves it, he gets what he wants, and the people, well who cares about the people, they are there only for the money and if they do not have that, well let them rot. And that is exactly the program what the evil four have in mind, Cameron, Clegg, Osborne and Duncan Smith, millionaires with not a clue of real life between them. They think they are great but in reality they are just like the French high heeled one, midgets nothing else.
====================================================================
08-04-2011
In the Israeli press there is lately a lot of talk about the San Remo conference between the four powers of that time.
The Israeli press suggest that at the San Remo conference the Jews were given the right of the land of Palestine.
This however is incorrect: It was the establishment in Palestine of a national home for Jewish people.
The San Remo conference was hastily convened. Great Britain and France both agreed to recognize the provisional independence of Syria and Mesopotamia, while "reluctantly" claiming mandates for their administration. Palestine was composed of the Ottoman administrative districts of southern Syria. Under customary international law, premature recognition of its independence would be a gross affront to the government of the newly declared parent state.
San Remo Resolution - April 25, 1920
It was agreed –
(a) To accept the terms of the Mandates Article as given below with reference to Palestine, on the understanding that there was inserted in the process-verbal an undertaking by the Mandatory Power that this would not involve the surrender of the rights hitherto enjoyed by the non-Jewish communities in Palestine; this undertaking not to refer to the question of the religious protectorate of France, which had been settled earlier in the previous afternoon by the undertaking given by the French Government that they recognized this protectorate as being at an end.
(b) That the terms of the Mandates Article should be as follows:
The High Contracting Parties agree that Syria and Mesopotamia shall, in accordance with the fourth paragraph of Article 22, Part I (Covenant of the League of Nations), be provisionally recognized as independent States, subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone. The boundaries of the said States will be determined, and the selection of the Mandatories made, by the Principal Allied Powers.
The High Contracting Parties agree to entrust, by application of the provisions of Article 22, the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory, to be selected by the said Powers. The Mandatory will be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 8, 1917, by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
La Puissance mandataire s’engage a nommer dans le plus bref delai une Commission speciale pour etudier toute question et toute reclamation concernant les differentes communautes religieuses et en etablir le reglement. Il sera tenu compte dans la composition de cette Commission des interets religieux en jeu. Le President de la Commission sera nomme par le Conseil de la Societe des Nations.
The terms of the mandates in respect of the above territories will be formulated by the Principal Allied Powers and submitted to the Council of the League of Nations for approval.
Turkey hereby undertakes, in accordance with the provisions of Article [132 of the Treaty of Sèvres] to accept any decisions which may be taken in this connection.
(c) Les mandataires choisis par les principales Puissances allies sont: la France pour la Syrie, et la Grande Bretagne pour la Mesopotamie, et la Palestine.
In reference to the above decision the Supreme Council took note of the following reservation of the Italian Delegation:
La Delegation Italienne en consideration des grands interets economiques que l’Italie en tant que puissance exclusivement mediterraneenne possede en Asie Mineure, reserve son approbation a la presente resolution, jusqu’au reglement des interets italiens en Turquie d’Asie.
During the meetings of the "Council of Four" in 1919, British Prime Minister Lloyd George stated that the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence was a treaty obligation. He also explained that the agreement with Hussein had been the basis for the Sykes-Picot Agreement. Under the terms of the Sykes-Picot Agreement, the British and French had agreed to an independent Arab state.
On 6 January 1920 Prince Faisal initialled an agreement with French Prime Minister Clemenceau which acknowledged "the right of the Syrians to unite to govern themselves as an independent nation".[6] A Pan-Syrian Congress, meeting in Damascus, had declared an independent state of Syria on 8 March 1920.[7] The new state included Syria, Palestine, Lebanon and portions of northern Mesopotamia which had been set aside under the Sykes-Picot Agreement for an independent Arab state, or confederation of states. King Faisal was declared the head of state. At the same time Prince Zeid, Faisal's brother, was declared regent of Mesopotamia.
British Mandate for Palestine
The three principles of the British Balfour Declaration regarding Palestine were adopted in the Treaty of Sèvres:
ARTICLE 95.
The High Contracting Parties agree to entrust, by application of the provisions of Article 22, the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory to be selected by the said Powers. The Mandatory will be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2, 1917, by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
The letter shows the intention of a national home for the Jewish people. The only right herein are the religion and civil rights of non-Jewish.
Foreign Office,
November 2nd, 1917.
Dear Lord Rothschild,
I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet:
"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country".
I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
Yours sincerely
Arthur James Balfour
Balfour explained:
"The contradiction between the letters of the Covenant [of the League of Nations] and the policy of the Allies is even more flagrant in the case of the ‘independent nation’ of Palestine than in that of the ‘independent nation‘of Syria. For in Palestine we do not propose to even go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country though the American [King-Crane] Commission is going through the form of asking what they are.
The Four Great Powers [Britain, France, Italy and the United States] are committed to Zionism. And Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age-long traditions, in present needs, and future hopes, of far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land. In my opinion that is right.
What I have never been able to understand is how it can be harmonized with the [Anglo-French] declaration, the Covenant, or the instruction to the [King-Crane] Commission of Enquiry.
I do not think that Zionism will hurt the Arabs, but they will never say they want it. Whatever be the future of Palestine it is not now an ‘independent nation’, nor is it yet on the way to become one. Whatever deference should be paid to the views of those living there, the Powers in their selection of a mandatory do not propose, as I understand the matter, to consult them. In short, so far as Palestine is concerned, the Powers have made no statement of fact which is not admittedly wrong, and no declaration of policy which, at least in the letter, they have not always intended to violate.
If Zionism is to influence the Jewish problem throughout the world Palestine must be made available for the largest number of Jewish immigrants. It is therefore eminently desirable that it should obtain the command of the water-power which naturally belongs to it whether by extending its borders to the north, or by treaty with the mandatory of Syria, to whom the southward flowing waters of Hamon could not in any event be of much value.
For the same reason Palestine should be extended into the lands lying east of the Jordan. It should not, however, be allowed to include the Hedjaz Railway, which is too distinctly bound up with exclusively Arab Interests..."
The Declarations conferred basic rights on all the inhabitants of the Jewish and Arab states without distinction of sex, nationality, language, race or religion and protected the rights and property of all nationals of the country who differed in race, religion, or language from the majority of the inhabitants of the country. The country concerned had to acknowledge the clauses of the treaty: as fundamental laws of State and no law, regulation or official action could conflict or interfere with their stipulations, nor could any law, regulation or official action prevail over them. The States also had to acknowledge these rights as obligations of international concern placed under the guarantee of the United Nations. Compromissory clauses were included granting the International Court jurisdiction.
Abba Eban subsequently declared that the rights stipulated in section C. Declaration, chapters 1 and 2 of UN resolution 181(II) had been constitutionally embodied as the fundamental law of the state of Israel as required by that resolution and assured the committee that Israel would not invoke Article 2, paragraph 7 of the Charter, regarding its domestic jurisdiction. The instruments that he cited during the hearings were the Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel, and various cables and letters of confirmation addressed to the Secretary General. Mr. Eban's explanations and Israel's undertakings were noted in the text of A/RES/273 (III), 11 May 1949. A similar Declaration of the State of Palestine, supplied by the Palestine National Council, was accepted as being in line with the General Assembly resolution in A/RES/43/177, 15 December 1988.
When the state of Israel was declared the population was in percentage as below.
Territory Arab and other population % Arab and other Jewish population % Jewish Total population
Arab State 725,000 99% 10,000 1% 735,000
Jewish State 407,000 45% 498,000 55% 905,000
International 105,000 51% 100,000 49% 205,000
Total 1,237,000 67% 608,000 33% 1,845,000
Data from the Report of UNSCOP — 1947
Report, A/AC.14/32, dated 11 November 1947
It should be noted that the term Beersheba Bedouin has a meaning more definite than one would expect in the case of a nomad population. These tribes, wherever they are found in Palestine, will always describe themselves as Beersheba tribes. Their attachment to the area arises from their land rights there and their historic association with it. The Bedouin population at approximately 127,000. Note: most Bedouin's are now removed in some cases forcible from their villages and tents in the Negev.
Passage of the resolution required a two-thirds majority of valid votes (i.e. not counting abstaining and absent members). Prior to the final vote, when countries indicated their voting intentions, it was evident that the required majority was not available. The vote would have been: for 30, against 16, abstaining 10 - one short of a two-thirds majority.
On 29 November 1947, the United Nations General Assembly voted 33 to 13, with 10 abstentions, in favour of the Partition Plan, while making some adjustments to the boundaries between the two states proposed by it.
The Zionist played a vile and contemptible part in the lead up to the voting, the Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru spoke with anger and contempt for the way the UN vote had been lined up. He said the Zionists had tried to bribe India with millions and at the same time his sister, Vijayalalshmi Pandit, had received daily warnings that her life was in danger unless "she voted right.
Three countries — Haiti, Liberia, the Philippines — were persuaded to change their positions, which enabled the required majority to be reached. Liberia's Ambassador to the United States complained that the US delegation threatened aid cuts to several countries and warned of dire consequences if they did not vote according to the wished of the Americans and the Zionists. In short the only reason Israel did come in existence by one vote was due to blackmail and treats.
In favour, (33 countries, 59%):
30 countries (54%) initially in favour:
Australia, Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, Belo Russian SSR, Canada, Costa Rica, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, France, Guatemala, Iceland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Sweden, South Africa, Ukrainian SSR, United States of America, Soviet Union, Uruguay, Venezuela.
An additional 3 (5%) switched to in favour:
Haiti, Liberia, Philippines.
Against, (13 countries, 23%):
Afghanistan, Cuba, Egypt, Greece, India, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, Yemen.
Abstentions, (10 countries, 18%):
Argentina, Chile, Republic of China, Colombia, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Honduras, Mexico, United Kingdom, Yugoslavia.
Absent, (1 country, 0%):
Thailand
The San Remo conference did not promise a right and only blackmail and bribery established the State of Israel.
Not exactly the right way of starting a State on someone else land given by countries who did not own it but used treats and blackmail to give away that was not theirs to give away.
There can be no doubt that Israel has the right to exist, they have however no right to make it a secular Jewish state. So long the USA protects them under pressure of the Jewish bankers to protect the trillions debt of the USA, Israel will be save. If that protection falls away what then will be happening is anyone’s guess, we would not hold our breath.
====================================================================
10-04-2011
What do you do when you are unpopular have no funds to play with and are hand and foot tied to the US, you start a war. Europe is yet again at war, this time without a war declaration just as they done with Afghanistan. A war is it in any case. They are united via the NATO a defence organisation when it was organised, now a sole attacking force world wide. It is a part of the USA defence system where as by they give the orders and the Europeans pay the costs and the USA get the spoils. The Countries in Europe are in deep trouble financial and that already for several years.
The writing was on the wall for a long time on a sliding scale, the self-delusion of the Euro as the coin for a united Europe the self-delusion as a world dominant power bloc, their self-delusion pompous idea of greatness. It was obvious that it would go wrong as the organisers who filled in the finer points where it self no responsible for anything they did or do. It was for that reason it would go wrong as they, those self appointed rulers of failed politicians did not realise that giving people a blanc check would lead to problems. It was a blanc spent spent spent card which would if it failed be bared by the ones who had behaved themselves proper. And as predicted in 2008 it did happen in 2010, the countries who did the spent spent spent expected that when they failed the other countries opened up their purses and bailed the spent spent spent ones out, and so they did.
It is a measure of European politicians that they failed to see what the rest of the world did see. It is an form of self-delusion that Angela Merkel, Germany's premier, called the Euro-zone summit on March 24th-25th a big step forwards in solving the Euro's debt crisis. What did happen was exactly nothing then telling themselves that it only gets better. Those leaders fell well short on almost every task they set themselves. They now agreed on a permanent rescue mechanism to be introduced in 2013, but could fund it properly, because Angela Merkel refused to put up money her finance minister had pledged without asking.
As an result the club in Brussels could do nothing or almost nothing to help Greece, Ireland and Portugal with Spain and Britain close following, the Euro zone troubled economies. Those countries failure to act to reduce the problems will get worst, they will blame the others instead of their own failures. The citizen of those countries are already loaded to the neck with extra costs and taxes. It does not stop countries like Spain and Britain to waster hundreds of millions more by going to war in Libya as real cowards without a war declaration.
England and Spain are both in a dangerous position as they have both rebels fighting for rights on their own country just as the rebels in Libya. What if another country decide to actively start helping those rebels in Britain or Spain. And what would those brave countries of Britain and Spain response be if that scenario would happen. They would just as Libya attempt to drive those rebels out.
The Portuguese prime minister resigned on March 23rd after failing to win support for the fourth austerity package in a year. The country's credit rating was slashed to the status level the US and UK should be near junk. In the time between the ten-year bond yields have risen above 8% as investors fear Portugal will have to turn to the European Union and the IMF for loans. The economies of both Greece and Ireland, are shrinking faster than expected, and bond yields, at almost 13% for Greece and over 10% for Ireland, remain stubbornly high. This while the status of Britain and Spain are growing desperately close to the credit low status. Even when like in Britain the population is hanging out to dry. Investors simple do not believe the measures and the rescues will work.
There was a warning in 2008 that not including a self responsibility into the Euro zone for the countries to control their budgets. They were right. These economies are on a course to destruction, to late the governments started to realise that careful budgeting without relying on others to bail them out. Greece is trying hard to free up its rigid economy. Portugal has lagged in scrapping stifling rules, but its fiscal tightening is bold. They can make all the efforts however the blame solely can put on the shoulders of those in Brussels, they made the mistakes by not putting in place guarantees needed to stop the Euro countries from relying on others to pay for them.
It is now the same people who made the original mistake who now insist that those countries slash their budget deficits regardless of the consequences on growth. However that in turn creates problems as more stringed measures will drag down their output, their enormous debt's expected to peak at 160% of GDP for Greece, 125% for Ireland and at least 100% for Portugal so bond yields will stay high. The result is a further downwards trend. The European Central Bank will raise the interest rates either in April or in May and other countries will follow. It will hopefully make for the time being the Euro looking stronger but falls to be seen of that will last as it will reduce the competitive of the EU nations.
Some politicians are still demanding higher corporate taxes but that would block the growth and the way out of the problems. Britain even lowered even just slightly the corporate tax. Most pernicious, though, is the perverse logic of the Euro zone's rescue mechanisms. Europe declines debt reduction now, but then expect that any country requiring help from 2013 may need to have its debt restructured and that new official lending will take priority over bondholders. It is an stupidity that shows that they realise that they made a mistake but not really has a clue how to come out of it. This insecurity will keeps the yields high for the time being but that in turn torpedo's the rescue plans.
The most logic measure they could take now would be to reassign the rules for the Euro, in which every country is responsible for their own debts and has to take measures to solve debts if they occur. That the Central bank could help at normal banking standards but that the burden should not be spread over the other nations. If that would be done they then could start restructuring as final phase the debts of Greece and Ireland and lent an helping hand to Portugal and Spain. Not to Britain as that is not part of the Euro zone although at this moment they have the responsibility to help to fund the other countries debts. The big obstacle is here an political will.
The ECB, remains opposed to debt restructuring it in basics find that the countries themselves need to solve their own problems a point that is now also clearly supported by Angela Merkel. Ireland is talking about forcing the senior bondholders of its banks in trouble to take a hit. Greece should start to take the measures needed to get the country on the straight and narrow again and push for restructuring either via the ECB or the IMF, however the IMF seems to be the best chance. It is time that the IMF presses the European politicians into taking the measures they should have been taken a long time ago, responsibility for the EU. It is an absurdity that a group of unelected self appointed politicians take decisions which should be taken by an elected EU minister so that they can called to explain their handling of the issue, any issue. This is something that cannot be done yet as the commissioners have so much power that they as a group can over rule any decision made.
What the markets' agenda is however, to make profits and an balancing EU is a and can be a money spinner, therefore the EU has to place clear markers as were and how far the markets are able to interfere in the EU financial stability. However of that will happen falls to be seen, to many politicians have well established interest in the markets and certainly do not want to cut of their profits special in the UK. It is for that reason that the UK with all its fiscal mess, has so far escaped the markets attention. The Euro zone should help the weak members to avoid failing but at the same time should ensure that in doing so, they avoid the hidden danger as there should be strict rules about what a country in fiscal trouble should do.
So long as there are still countries in the EU who think that the austerity measures placed on Greece are unreasonable, unjustifiable and have no way of achieving their goal of repaying the debt. Then the chance that the EU can work out an measure to stabilize is far away. A country such as Greece has enough State property to raise funding and to attract private investments if the rules of employment are adjusted. It will encourage economic growth. But this will require increased spending, reduced taxes and growing wages - quite the contrary of the austerity measures required from both the IMF and the EU (with Germany in the front line) and almost impossible to achieve so long as Germany follows the doctrine of keeping its real-wage growth below increases of productivity in order to sell its products on other markets.
However, as so long the unelected group of failed politicians using the EU for their benefit and their income earning base then there will be no restructuring of the basics of the EURO. Fact is that more countries are balancing on the level of Junk and are only saved by their servant like attitude to the US. As soon as they lose that attitude and are becoming independent countries again they will be declared Junk status and the market gamblers will step in to take all what is possible. In 2008 we warned against the EU stand of open for all attitude regarding the EURO, it was not accepted and we had a lot of negative response from well establish economical institutions, only to proof two years later that what we had warned for was happening indeed.
It is still not over more countries will fall if the EU does not get their act together and start acting as the EU with a proper council of elected government, responsible to the EU parliament. Countries who do not want to be part of the political adhesion should be allowed to get the status of trading partners, only then we would get the stability the EU need. We fear that personal politics of the EU politicians will turn to be a real block to progress.
===================================================================
12-04-2011
In this piece we presume that Muslims and Christians both worship the same God because they both believe in one God.
It is the same God; it is the God of Adam and Eve.
All, Muslims Christians and Jews belong to the Abrahamic religion.
They all have the same God, and the same history to support their religion.
The different between them is Jesus. Christians say it is the Son of God. The Muslims believe it is a prophet, while the Jews believe it was a fake messiah. Therefore, the clear different is obvious. However, God is still the same God of all three Abrahamic religions. The vision spread out of the Bible and the Koran are the same, however, again Jesus is the disturbing factor, but God is still the same and only God. The God of Adam and Eve.
Jesus himself preached the one God and claimed to be his Son, maybe so but two of the three Abrahamic religions disagree. This does not mean that God is not God, or that the God of Adam and Eve is a different God for the Muslims although being the God of Adam and Eve. Nor does it means that the Jewish God is a different one although being the God of Adam and Eve. It does mean however, that it is the same God for all three Abrahamic religions.
The studies of the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim books show that it is indeed the same and only God.
There maybe different in the way their believes are expressed, by the three Abrahamic religions, but the God they believe in is the same God. It would be a different case if Christians only believed the teachings of Jesus and not the God of Adam and Eve. However, as they have God’s Son they do believe in the same God the God of Adam and Eve. Again, this is the same God of Adam and Eve in which the Muslims believe, hence the God of the Christians and the Muslims are the same. As they have taken the history of the Jews as their lead, it is also the God of the Jews.
The Christians to their needs adapt the interpretation of the bible taken seriously by the Jews and the Muslims.
The way the Christians have changed and altered the bible over the centuries is clearly to see if only we take an example over the last 100 or 150 years.
Two examples are needed to enlighten the above statement.
Revelation 22.18/19 “I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds anything to them, God will add to him the plaques described in this book.
And if anyone takes words away from this book of prophecy, God will take away from him his share in the tree of life and in the Holy city, which are described in this book.
Bible version 1966
This book of revelation 22.18/19 has indeed added and taken away if compared with the bibles as in 1908 and 1868 versions.
An other example is Ecclesiastes 1.2 “Vanity of vanity said the preacher, vanity of vanities, it is all vanity.
Bible 1868 and 1908 version.
The 1966 version reads: Ecclesiastes 1.2 “meaningless! Meaningless!” says the teacher
utterly meaningless! Everything is meaningless.
The Christian fanatics will argue it means in principle the same, but that argument will be indeed meaningless.
Meaningless = having no meaning (no synonym available)
Vanity = excessive pride or the quality of being worthless.
However, having no meaning or being worthless are two complete different entities and in no relationship with each other, although via a twisted intent to update and alter lengthening or shortening the Bible, a phrase or words can be altered to suit the intent.
It does not mean it is right or correct, as we should not change or correct the word of God in whatever form. Revelation 22.18/19 clearly forbids altering but that is just what they did.
The point being that there is only one God in which we all believe. Regardless of we are Christians, Jewish or Muslims, the different is as pointed out earlier Jesus.
Seen as Son of God by the Christians, Prophet by the Muslims and as a fake messiah by the Jews. However, God is God and that is all there is to it.
Many Christians will say that the Muslims are different, and so they are, they have a different view as they are not hampered by the words of Jesus and therefore can live to the rules set out by God and Mohammed the Prophet, just as the Christians adhere to the words of God and the teachings of Jesus. However regardless of Jesus or Mohammed, God is still the only God, the God of Adam and Eve.
We maybe differ at interpretations but we all in the Abrahamic religions believe in the same God, regardless.
As in all religions, there are fanatics who spoil the view, nowhere this is more obvious then in the Muslim religion, but let us not forget this is a small section and the same fanatics are active in the Christian and Jewish faiths, just read the blogs. We also have to remember, to realise that Jesus teaches that all the Pentateuch’s laws had to be kept in place and to include the Ten Commandments, the social laws and the system of that therein.
The Prophet Mohammed also in the Koran confirms the Pentateuch, and to follow the God given social legislation.
The above proofs that the God of the Christians is the same God as that of the Muslims and the Jews. Suggesting the different means a lack of faith in God and God’s judgment.
====================================================================
14-04-2011
Suomen-Finland.
To update the story underneath The priest is defrocked by the terrorism supporting Church in Finland. It means that all who now attend the church in Finland are active supporting Terrorism.
Do not pay any attention to the stories of the Kazkav center which is the US intelligent center in Finland to destabilize Russia by funding to organize the many terrorist attacks in Russia. They still, the US and the Caucasus terrorist, want to break Russia up, so that the US can use the free coming oil of the Caucasus. The Finnish government completely support this terrorist Establishment. Don't be fooled by their fantasy stories only mentally unstable would believe.
----------------------
High at the North of the EU is the State of Finland or the republic of Finland or in their own words Suomen.
It was till the end of the tent century a walking through country of many tribes of which the Sami is the only one steadily consisted. It was in the eleventh century that Sweden started to develop and got some interest for that land on the other side of that water at the east of Stockholm, a basic fishing embarking village. In the twelve century it was made a province, and later a Grand Duchy of Sweden at the end of the 19th century Russia took over and as such Finland was a Grand Duchy of Russia till 1917, when Finland declared themselves in depended due to the internal problems and war in Russia. The first world war. It took till 2000 before they had a proper constitution, something that was not really important as the population was always small and it still is a mere 5 million, mostly spread over the cities with Helsinki over a million. However it still not accepts in full the ICJ jurisdiction. It is the only country in the North that has accepted the Euro as coin.
Most of this is well known and generally the Finnish are seen as a small population depending on industry to buy the food they need to live on as the countries food production available land is very small indeed. It favours the USA as leader but at the same time is a member of the EU. They are also the sole promoter of terrorist organisations operating in Russia Doku Umarov is a near hero by the Finnish government who do not want to hear a bad word about him. They even let him use their country to spread their terrorist ideology all over the world under the heading of free speech.
That is free for terrorists but not for the Finnish people. It seems to an outsider that Finland works as the money transfer for the North Caucasus terrorists to make life difficult for the Russian government. So freedom of speech and facilities for terrorists and other charged with racial hatred for describing one of the world’s most wanted Islamic terrorists as a “terrorist.” A Finnish priest is being persecuted after speaking out against Russia’s number one terrorist Doku Umarov and his internet propaganda arm. The pastor also claims he’s been receiving constant death threats from the leader of the Chechen militants.
Finland insists the priest is the real criminal. The reason being that he dared to use the free speech, to have a free speech. The Finnish government has made it crystal clear that free speech is only for the terrorists who are paid by the USA to cause death and destruction. Doku Umarov himself admitted to the funding. Police have questioned Pastor Juha Molari after he gave an interview to RT in which he discussed Doku Umarov, the man behind the Moscow metro and airport bombings. Russia’s number one outlaw Chechen terrorist Doku Umarov is also high-up on the international most-wanted list. But it seems one of Russia’s neighbours isn’t interested in helping bring him to justice as he is under USA protection. Apparently the Finnish government over a handful of citizen sees the leader of the international terrorists as a President.
The pastor has been a long-time critic of a website called the Kavkaz Center, where extremists freely express their views. The Kavzak center is forbidden in almost every country in the world and the whole of Europe except Finland. In Finland they can operate freely and with Government support who will arrest anyone who dares to have critic on the by them protected terrorist. Apart from facing being defrocked for speaking out against Doku Umarov and his internet mouthpiece Kavzak, Juha Molari is receiving threats of a different kind. The Kavzak website no doubt with Finnish government approval as they did not act when the death treats were made, warned “We advise you to stop your activity against the Kavkaz Center. If you don’t come to your senses we’ll cut off the heads of you and your family”.
So much for the standards of the United Europe, it promotes the USA double standards, it promote international terrorism, says Gennady Gudkov in a reaction on the Finnish terrorist promotion. Gennady Gudkov is the Deputy Head of Russia’s State Duma Security Committee. Gudkov also remarked it is alarming that Finland is among the countries which call Chechen terrorism a liberation movement. In which case the Continued IRA in Northern Ireland can also be seen as a liberation movement, or the Bask organisation in Spain and France can be re-named liberation movements.
“Terrorism is terrorism, no matter how it’s disguised,” says Gudkov. Terrorism is a menace to all of mankind. Double standards are the reason terrorism still exists. The promotion by the USA and the United Kingdom of terrorism in countries they want to rob of their minerals lead to increasing terrorism and rebellion. Once a country labels militants from illegal armed groups who commit terror attacks against innocent people as terrorists, for another country to proclaim them freedom fighters is just despicable. Then again the Finnish have proven in the past to be very selective in supporting freedom and terrorism. It simple confirms that they are well and truly in the claws of the USA secret service. Personal we never expected anything like this from the Finnish authorities. then again looking back on their human right records we could have expected it.
At least the Finnish population is now aware that free speech in their country is only for the terrorist and if a citizen dares to open his mouth he knows that jail is waiting. Europe does understand most of the open countries do understand that there is a clear link between terrorist action and terrorist propaganda. And that terrorist propaganda or information is a part of global terrorist action; however, the payments and treats from the US secret service will keep at such that they do not dare to speak out against the promotion of terrorism in Finland. We may expect that the Finnish Government opened a bottle of champagne when the deaths at the Russian Moscow airport were announced and their most favoured terrorist proclaimed he was the organiser.
Some people in the intelligence community say: look, we need to keep them open because by keeping them open we could scrutinize what they do, could get a global view on their acquaintance, we can see exactly with which organizations they are in touch and that helps the global counter-terrorism struggle. This is an argument that is heard many times before even before the Internet existed and nobody was never convinced. Just collecting intelligence on terrorists and doing nothing is a counter-productive policy. It actual promotes terrorism and with an increasing Muslim population it may be expected that funding from Muslim dictators to fund the terrorism is not far behind, just look at the money spending of the Emir of Qatar.
There are people in Finland who say that it is the right policy by the Finnish government. It will prevent that Finland itself will be a victim of a terrorist attack. It’s sad but even here the leftist media and the government don’t use the word TERRORIST even when they know full well that attacks were committed by TERRORIST. The right word is backhanders and cowards. What they have done in fact is handing their country to the will of the terrorist. They cannot now decline or remove as the terrorist; cowards as they are would bomb the Finnish airport and stations. In Finland it is now safer to be a terrorist/Muslim in a Christian country than a priest. The church in Finland also breaks in fast succession the laws of God. They shall not kill is now translated by the Finnish church as, they shall support the killings. Here we need to remind ourselves that the Finnish population and the Church glorified the killings of Russians when Russia wanted to take back what was theirs the Grand duchy of Russia.
Before we know, they will it find being against the law to be a Christian or a Jew because by being a Christian or a Jew could be inciting racial hatred. Not possible? For a country that supports terrorism against Christians while calling themselves a Christian nation, all id possible just a question who pays most. Finland is less then 100 years an in depended country but is now very well tied to the USA without it would be an EU no mans land. It is no wonder that the degree of depression and stress is higher then anywhere in the world, who would not be depressed with a government that promote just like Iran, terrorism and penalise Christians for pointing out the obvious. And the rest of Europe, there are to busy to invade yet another Muslim country to rob it from their oil and gas to see the danger lurking in the North.
The ones who do notice are to busy with filling their pockets with dollars. Man can really wonder of the support for Muslim terrorism is a cover to hide that they at the same time killing Muslims in other countries.
Look at the USA every time they want to shove a bad idea to the throats of the American people then used the Blacks as an excuse. That is now changed and it is now the Muslims and the Mexicans who have taken over that blame function of the blacks. That is what they are doing in Europe’s highest northern country, blame Gaddafi for the ills created by the NATO and hail as a hero the monster that killed at the stations at the schools at the airports of Russia. That way nobody can say that NATO and EU are against Muslims which they are killing in ever larger quantities, with the help of Muslim dictators as the one in Qatar, as they protect the terrorist Muslims of Russia. The principle being they can kill they can maim they can cut peoples head off but don’t call them terrorists, call them freedom fighters, that suits the USA better, according the clown Hillary Clinton. We know she talks but while she is opening her mouth we are sure that the sound comes from some where lower at the back. In the time between the Finnish governments simple ignores their population’s wishes and follows the USA advice.
The Finnish population do not want Finland involved in the NATO terrorist attacks on Libya, the Finnish government ignores it, and maybe the sound of the dollar is more interesting. 94% is against, but 50% said they want humanitarian help to Libya, so the Finnish Government refuses. They are a left minority so they only listening to the small minorities. In between the Government in Finland simple ignores their own Bank which tells them that they are running a deficit of more than 2.5% of GDP this year while government debt tops 50 per cent. In 2008, before the financial crisis and subsequent recession, Finland had debt of only 44 per cent and a surplus of 4 per cent of GDP. IN A MEETING on Tuesday morning, President Tarja Halonen and the Cabinet Committee on Foreign and Security Policy agreed on Finnish participation in EU planning for a crisis management operation. Finland’s stance on participation – even of a military nature – is positive in principle. If the issue becomes topical, it will be decided in accordance with the Act on Military Crisis Management.
This includes the protection of the terrorist properties of Doku Umarov.
In a poor man’s version of democracy, Finland goes to polls next month to elect MPs to the 200-member parliament. The real McCoy, direct democracy, has never taken root at Finnish soil. There have been, in fact, only two referendums in Finland’s history – way back in 1931 on prohibition and in 1994 on joining the EU. In contrast, there have been over 300 referendums in Europe in the last 15 years alone. Therefore as foreigners we have to admit to being confused by contradictory attitudes that occur during these intriguing times. Finnish people in our experience, spend the majority of their lives trying to avoid contact with each other. They will specifically move seats on the bus rather than sit close to another human being, and eye contact to them is something that only occurs purely coincidental. Yet, put them in a mökki with a few beers and a barbeque and they spend the entire time in a state of semi-nakedness while chatting continuously to each other throughout. We have to admit that spending half of the weekend in a room full of naked men while sweating out of control, the sauna, is not our view of paradise.
A Helsinki bus driver was so badly beaten by a group of dubious origin on board his night bus that he remained in intensive care for over a week. This latest case of violence on the buses caused bus drivers’ representatives to threaten industrial action last week unless Helsinki Regional Transport (HSL) provided details on how it will improve security. However how can security be improved as terrorist are allowed to roam the streets and cannot be held responsible for what ever they do because the government protect the terrorists. And what does the rest of Europe they close their eyes and hopes they cannot see it.
===================================================================
16-04-2011
Excerpts from an article by Anis Shivani
This is the season of demystification. What people of my generation never understood about the mass delusions of recent history--Nazism, Stalinism, holocaust, genocide, thought crimes, totalitarian spying--is all becoming crystal clear.
We who grew up since the youth and social justice movements of the 1960s used to ask ourselves: How could the intelligentsia in Germany have been so acquiescent in the 1930s? Could Germans really not have known that mass extermination of Jews was under way? Why didn't the Jews fight back? Why did they let themselves be annihilated? Why was there nobody able to pinpoint the precise nature of what was happening, until after it was over? How these things could have happened, and could they ever happen again?
Of course they couldn't happen again! There is no Great Depression now. The world is so much more interconnected, information travels so fast and wide, nothing can remain hidden for too long, there simply isn't the stomach to embark on mass repression and annihilation of entire peoples, the liberal consensus about protecting human rights is too strong, wealth is so spread out that ordinary people put portfolios before pogroms, too many institutionalised liberal barriers exist to counter a dictator making the world over in his brutal image.
This is what some of us continue to believe.
Evidence doesn't matter. What we see and read and hear and intuit as about to happen takes secondary place to what our rational faculties tell us about the nature of the modern world.
We are in mass denial, mass psychosis, and mass deceit once again...
...Is it still not clear what is happening?
Until a few weeks ago, there was little mention in the media, even in most of its alternative, progressive form, of words like "fascism," "totalitarianism," "dictatorship," "police state," "martial law," "genocide," "concentration camps," etc. So the dirty work of laying the foundations of the genocide state occurred in full sight, with open "coverage" by the media.
The entire framework for martial rule under the most extreme conditions of surveillance was allowed to come into existence; and it is happening even as we speak, with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), essentially the president's nearly 200,000 strong paramilitary, coming into being as the entity that will harbour the brown shirts of this country, and give them license to annihilate common decency.
What is Bush's sticking point with congress over DHS? That there not be civil service protections for the 170,000 workers that will fall under its jurisdiction. No whistle-blower and freedom of information protections. So if you don't fall in with whatever it is that they have planned for us, you can be fired immediately--no thirty-day notice! And replaced with any of a legion of workers with fascist sympathies more than happy to embark on the genocide.
The alarm bells are going up now, but it is too late. The dirty work has already been done. It has already been demonstrated what is possible to achieve with one orchestrated "attack." Wait till the next bio terror "attack," or anything using "weapons of mass destruction" is orchestrated, and every dissenting voice will shut up. Then the brown shirts will go into action.
Two things above all are necessary to complete the genocide state. The national ID card, which will be unlike anything anyone's ever seen or dreamed of. Eventually, every fact about your life--where you travel, who you speak with on the phone, what government aid you have received that you were or were not qualified for, what books you read, what magazines you subscribe to, what organizations you belong to, how much money you have and what bills you're behind on, what diseases you've been treated for or are susceptible to--will potentially be instantly available. So if you're stopped by the police--and the line between police and intelligence and military is being blurred to nothingness--and you've ever done anything that as a good bourgeois following the lines of responsible capitalist living you ought not to have done, you're in trouble.
This national ID card is coming. If nothing else, as soon as the second massive "attack" occurs, its execution will go into overdrive. As a side note, one of the companies eager to assimilate every known bit of data available to American corporations about the trivialities of your life--which are not so trivial anymore when the spooks are putting everything into a profile of terrorists, or dissidents, which are now one and the same thing--is Choice point, the same company that illegally purged tens of thousands of black voters in Florida under Jeb Bush and Katherine Harris's patronage.
Second, the military must be allowed to supersede civilian authority--in "emergencies" of course, except that the state of emergency, as in all dictatorships, will become permanent. The second "attack" will be the excuse to let the military take over. We've already heard that the military will monitor the 2002 and 2004 elections, that it will "quarantine" people in case of bio terrorism, that it should have, according to Tom Ridge, shoot-to-kill and arrest powers. Senator Biden agrees that the Posse Commutates Act of 1878, which forbids military involvement in civil affairs, ought to be subject to review. The idea has already been put forth. It is as good as accepted doctrine. The Northern Commander, General Ralph Eberhart, is for scrapping the Posse Commutates Act as we know it. The Northern Command, functioning with the new DHS, will take us to Stalinist Russia, Hitler Germany.
What they want to do more than anything else is an excuse to search people's homes, go door to door, ask for everyone's papers, make anyone who fits the "terrorist" or dissident profile disappear without a trace, as they already have been doing on a small, preparatory scale.
The East German style TIPS (the Terrorist Information and Prevention System) program will recruit more than a million service workers--phone, gas, mail, and delivery people--to send in tips about suspicious people or activities to the government. What is suspicious? If I read books on terrorism to write a scholarly article, I'm suspect. The librarian or bookstore owner is already being forced to turn over this information. Millions of "tips" about suspicious people will end up in a permanent database, to be used as and when necessary...
...The Bush administration fought hard to replace a liberal member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights with a hard-right ideologue. This same Peter Kirsanow now says that in the event of a second attack--which we've already been assured is inevitable--Korematsu (the Supreme Court decision of 1944 upholding the internment of Japanese Americans) would make a comeback, that there would be no civil rights for certain ethnic or religious groups.
There, he's already said what's on everyone's mind. Now do we wonder why the Jews didn't leave Germany? Why the Japanese in California professed patriotism to the end, thinking it couldn't happen to them?
Absolutely every immigrant is deportable now, even if you have never done anything to break the law. Ashcroft says that all non-citizens are to report a change of address within 10 days, or face deportation. Even if you follow this procedure, will the INS admit to having received the notification, if you're among those targeted for deportation?...
...That is all coming, and if you don't see that, then--well, maybe it will be all right in the end, and we will come away mostly unscathed.
====================================================================
18-04-2011
Statement of the jolly jokers of Evil war lords of the West.
The Christian Countries of the West have decided that the Lords law; Thou shall not kill, need to be changed into: Thou shall always kill relentless.
There for the following statement was given by the Evil Warlords of the West:
We have to bear in mind that all three are in political difficulties and could face defeat in coming elections, in fact they fighting for their political careers. They find the best way to do this is to start a war. They rob their own countries people from prosperity they waste billions on a civil war started by the US, where by he let his governors from Britain and France take the most of the costs and the intake of the hundred of thousands of Muslim fugitives into Europe. With that they creating an instability in Europe which will destroy it.
Britain will probably have less problems as that country is in facto all ready a semi Muslim state, including Sharia law's and with a near Muslim Conservative party that on this moment has the power without winning the elections out right. They rule as an dictatorship in which the population is dragged into the gutter and in to poverty, but the millionaires club what is the conservative government getting richer quick and fast. As soon as they have destroyed Libya as the have done in Iraq, once rich now poor, and now Libya ones rich and will be poor. The spoil equal divided between the dictator of Qatar and the Anti-Christ in the US. With Britain and France following as true slaves.
-----------------------------------------
Here follows the statement, please read it seriously without laughing, as the attempted murder on a country is serious.
Together with our NATO allies and coalition partners, the United States, France and Britain have been united at the UN Security Council, as well as the following Paris Conference, in building a broad-based coalition to respond to the crisis in Libya. We are equally united on what needs to happen in order to end it.
Even as we continue military operations today to protect civilians in Libya, we are determined to look to the future. We are convinced that better times lie ahead for the people of Libya, and a pathway can be forged to achieve just that.
We must never forget the reasons why the international community was obliged to act in the first place. As Libya descended into chaos with Colonel Qadhafi attacking his own people, the Arab League called for action. The Libyan opposition called for help. And the people of Libya looked to the world in their hour of need. In an historic Resolution, the United Nations Security Council authorized all necessary measures to protect the people of Libya from the attacks upon them. By responding immediately, our countries halted the advance of Qadhafi\u2019s forces. The bloodbath that he had promised to inflict upon the citizens of the besieged city of Benghazi has been prevented.
Tens of thousands of lives have been protected. But the people of Libya are suffering terrible horrors at Qadhafi's hands each and every day. His rockets and his shells rained down on defenseless civilians in Ajdabiya. The city of Misrata is enduring a mediaeval siege, as Qadhafi tries to strangle its population into submission. The evidence of disappearances and abuses grows daily.
Our duty and our mandate under UN Security Council Resolution 1973 is to protect civilians, and we are doing that. It is not to remove Qadhafi by force. But it is impossible to imagine a future for Libya with Qadhafi in power. The International Criminal Court is rightly investigating the crimes committed against civilians and the grievous violations of international law. It is unthinkable that someone who has tried to massacre his own people can play a part in their future government. The brave citizens of those towns that have held out against forces that have been mercilessly targeting them would face a fearful vengeance if the world accepted such an arrangement. It would be an unconscionable betrayal.
Furthermore, it would condemn Libya to being not only a pariah state, but a failed state too. Qadhafi has promised to carry out terrorist attacks against civilian
ships and airliners. And because he has lost the consent of his people any deal that leaves him in power would lead to further chaos and lawlessness. We know from bitter experience what that would mean. Neither Europe, the region, or the world can afford a new safe haven for extremists.
There is a pathway to peace that promises new hope for the people of Libya. A future without Qadhafi that preserves Libya\u2019s integrity and sovereignty, and restores her economy and the prosperity and security of her people. This needs to begin with a genuine end to violence, marked by deeds not words. The regime has to pull back from the cities it is besieging, including Ajdabiya, Misrata and Zintan, and their forces return to their barracks. However, so long as Qadhafi is in power, NATO and its coalition partners must maintain their operations so that civilians remain protected and the pressure on the regime builds. Then a genuine transition from dictatorship to an inclusive constitutional process can really begin, led by a new generation of leaders. In order for that transition to succeed, Colonel Qadhafi must go and go for good. At that point, the United Nations and its members should help the Libyan people as they rebuild where Qadhafi has destroyed to repair homes and hospitals, to restore basic utilities, and to assist Libyans as they develop the institutions to underpin a prosperous and open society.
This vision for the future of Libya has the support of a broad coalition of countries, including many from the Arab world. These countries came together in London on 29 March and founded a Contact Group which met this week in Doha to support a solution to the crisis that respects the will of the Libyan people.
Today, NATO and its coalition partners are acting in the name of the United Nations with an unprecedented international legal mandate. But it will be the people of Libya, not the UN, that choose their new constitution, elect their new leaders, and write the next chapter in their history.
Britain, France and the United States will not rest until the United Nations Security Council resolutions have been implemented and the Libyan people can choose their own future.
-------------------------------------------
The readers will agree that this is the greatest baloney they have ever seen, we will therefore explain the epistle.
The article starts that those evil three wants Gaddafi to go, just like the populations of the US/UK/France want OBAMA-CAMERON and SARKOZY to go permanent.
They then go on saying that they are united at the security council. Honesty was never the strongest point by the US/UK, the resolution was only passed by bribery and abstaining. Where Russia and China both were fooled with false promises. There is not a broad based coalition as the half of the NATO does not agree with the warlords of the US/UK and France.
Line three state: That the reason for action was due to the fact that Gaddafi was attacking his own people. An obvious lie, just as the WMD in Iraq. It were the US/UK lead rebels most of them not even from Libya who attacked Libya. The Arab League called for action. What they say in reality is that they made a deal with the Dictator of Qatar to share the spoils. The Western fantasy story of Gadaffi wanted to kill all the people of Benghazi can be put at the same level as the WMD in Iraq.
That the defenseless civilians of Misrata have heavy armory and even tanks, which are hidden in civilian yards and cars does not the matter, after all as those followers imitators of the NAZI's say a lie is only a lie if you tell it once, however if you tell it long enough people believe it as the truth. And if you are found out you simple make an U turn, ask Cameron he has made so many U turns that he does not know anymore which way to go.
The tonnage of the speech is the same as Hitler did to excuse his occupation of Sudetenland before the beginning of WW2, same lies same fantasies same evil intentions, man can wonder are Obama and Cameron having the Mein Kampf as bedtime reading. Their actions are most certainly the same.
And this comes from countries who between them in the last 250 years killed at least 200 million civilians in the same way as the rebels of Libya are civilians.
The rhetoric is the same as by the destruction of Iraq an middle class earners level country, due to the US/UK an low earners country on the balance of civil war.
That is what they want in Libya, also before their on attack Libya it was a middle class earners level country and now fast sliding to a low earners country if not bankrupt. In both cases it will be mainly the USA who gets the benefits of the oil for near to nothing, while the Libyan people get near to nothing in return, see the situation in Iraq. Notice that the US/UK are doing the same in Afghanistan.
The broad coalition of countries, which is in reality a small coalition and many of them only acting under US duress, while the Arab world are the Dictator Qatar and others. Qatar, where the ruler threw his father out while hi was out of the country, which makes him a real coward not facing up to his own actions. Has never wrote out elections for the people, does not accept international laws and has for the country only one law, His. All the revenue of his oil goes in his pockets, while the people are still standing on a near poverty level. This man steals the oil from Libya and sells it expensive, this is the same man who obtained the world renewed Store of Harrods of London and then breaks his staffing promise as he always breaks his promises. He is the good friend of Cameron of Britain, so we will see the wealth of Cameron and his cronies swelling fast.
There is no legal UN mandate for the destruction of Libya by mainly British fighter planes. Although if you hear William Hague then all what the fighter planes are doing is stopping Libyan forces from using airspace. The total destruction of Misrata and the centers of villages and the city of Tripoli is disregarded as accidental. That they estimated by independent sources killed at least 3600 civilians does not the matter, as every civilian on the Libyan side is automatic a evil soldier even if it is just born, that in parallel with Afghanistan where they do the same and their general then declares that all those children all those babies where in fact terrorist ready to kill Americans.
It will be the US and the UK who will set the new constitution and appoint the new leaders, raised and educated in the States. The will of the people of Libya if any is left after the US/UK terrorist attacks are finished in years to come, does not the matter, like the people in other conquered states in world the people are there to obey the US or be killed, as Davies so excellent showed in Pakistan.
Britain, France and the United States will not rest until the United Nations Security Council resolutions have been implemented and the Libyan people can obey their new masters who are deciding their future.
Kharkov.
I. Grunkowski
===================================================================
20-04-2011
Wishful thinking.
Many in the Western world dominated by the military might and ruthlessness of the Americans, for whom a dollar is worth fighting for but a human life is disposable for nothing, hope that one day the USA will dominate the whole world. Done in the old days by conquering countries and made them pay a contribution to the conquering warlord, now being done by conquering and killing most of the people under the classification of "terrorists".
The USA has the advantage that they made a country for them selves by killing of all the original inhabitants, over 100 million of them, so that they do not have the problem as what the European and Asian countries have, tribes that suddenly want to be an country of their own. It is this method that is used by the USA to create all over the world dissatisfaction and rebellions which they feed and supply with funding to take on the governments that could be a threat to the USA.
They did this very successful with Eastern Europe, they try to do it with Russia by supporting the Caucasus rebels with funding and training, The Finnish government with their actions against Russia, and have attempted several times to do the same with the Ukraine and Belarus. They do the same in the Middle East by setting up the Sunni and Shiite Muslims against each other, and inciting rebellion against a legal government as they do in Libya and Syria. While protection rough and dictatorial leaders such as in Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe.
Julius Caesar said it 2000 years ago, DIVIDE AND RULE! And that is what the USA is doing. However not only they do this to what they see as a threat to them, they do it also to their friends and allies, on this moment they try to split Europe in different parties as the EU power is getting to much of an real dominant power. They do it also in China where they attempting to stir trouble by funding and instigation dissatisfaction with the China Government. This while in the USA demonstrations are ruthless suppressed and arrests for unknown reason are a common occurrence.
Many of the terrorist attacks in Russia are USA funded, a fact acknowledge by the Caucasus terrorist themselves. However that alone does not make it possible to alter the direction of a country. The other way is to infiltrate the peoples mind, just as Hitler did with the German population. The USA uses many different kinds of science to create such illusion. Take the Berlin Institute for Population and Development which has published a large-scale analysis of demographic processes in CIS countries. The CIS countries in this case being: Belarus, Moldova, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Russia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kirgizia. A large section of this study addresses the problem of fertility and mortality in Russia, which shows that the target was Russia but to hide this it was pronounced as an investigation in the demographic processes of the CIS countries. It was prepared by the Berlin Institute for Population and Development on population trends in Russia and other former Soviet countries. The main conclusion of scientists actually formulated in the title of the report, which translated and published also in Russian.
In some regions of this enormous territory, particularly in the three Slavic republics and the Baltic countries at present have the same demographic problems as in Germany and other Western European countries. This is a low birth rate that is insufficient for population replacement. That those countries either stabilize or growing is due to the influx of immigrants what can be special seen in countries such as the Netherlands Germany and Great Britain. In those countries the actual original population is going down sharp, but the total of the population goes up sharp, this is special to see in the Netherlands and Germany. All these countries have experienced since the end of World War II a "baby boom". In the 1970's this boom started to face out and slowly is now fading away. That generation is now either passed away or are in their eighties now while the children of the baby boom are in those years are now starting to retire, while their children kept the birth rate down and therefore were not as numerous.
Results of the study at a press conference in Berlin, presented the director of the Berlin Institute for Population and Development, Professor Rainer Klingholts (Reiner Klingholz). He pointed to the worsening situation in the western republics of the former Soviet Union and Soviet bloc countries at the beginning of turning the 1990's. In Russia, by the end of the USSR, one woman gave birth to an average of 1.89 children in the middle as the 1990's - only 1.16. If in 1990 the RSFSR were born two million babies in Russia 10 years later - only 1.2 million. In all the countries of Eastern and Central Europe after the radical reforms the standard of living has risen, and with it, and its duration. In Russia, according to Professor Klingholtsa, and decreased fertility rates and life expectancy - due to worsening financial situation of the population. However, in the Caucasus the birth rate did not fall to the Western countries level instead they still have the baby boom as there was in the Western countries just after WW2. This means that the worsening of the financial situation of the population cannot be the main reason for the restriction in child birth, the level of income in the North Caucasus is lower then in the West.
The partly by the USA introduced reforms have had in Russia, devastating consequences not only for economic but also the mental state of people: drug and alcohol abuse affected their health. AIDS has become a serious problem, and the spread of tuberculosis has reached unprecedented proportions. In Russia, life expectancy for men dropped to 57 years - the lowest figure of the postwar period. "
In all industrialized countries, since 1950 the last century, life expectancy has grown steadily in the mid-1960's has been in Russia is not much lower than in France, Germany, Britain or the United States. But if in these four countries and on every ten years life span has increased by about three years in Russia, it began to decrease. Exception - a short burst in the mid-80's, probably associated with the anti-alcohol campaign by Mikhail Gorbachev. Then the curve of life expectancy in Russia went back down and began slowly to rise only in the middle of the last decade.
Russians now live to an average of 67 years,(73) REAL FIGURE IN BRACKETS, as in 1960. This is lower than in Bangladesh, compared Klingholts, but Same level in reality. In this case, Russian women live on average 13 years longer than men. Analyst at the Berlin Institute for Population and Development, Stefan Sievert (Stephan Sievert) drew attention to one more Russian demographic characteristics - extreme regional differences in birth rates and life expectancy, which is not present in other industrialized countries. This should have been rather obvious by Klingholts as no other industrialised country has so many different demographic possibilities as Russia has. It is therefore a study based on the expectation that the USA successfully will make the Caucasus countries independed of Russia this means that the study was set up to please or in order of, the USA. The publication was done in Berlin to get the attention away from the obvious conclusion that it was in effect an USA report study. It also means that although the women give birth to children in the Leningrad region is only 1.2 (the average in Russia now - 1,5), and the most in Chechnya - 3,4. This is the same as in Tajikistan or North African countries.
The average birth is actual higher then some European countries, immigration not included.
Longer than 70 years, people in post-Soviet area on average, where living only in the Baltic\u2019s, where the standard of living above, as well as North and South Caucasus, where there is less drinking and better climate. In the northern regions as many still do not survive even 60 years. However in reality this has nothing to do with drinking but all with the extreme climate of those parts. The probability of being killed in Russia is 20 times higher than in the EU, mainly due to the terrorist attacks from the Caucasus who receive funding from the USA and the EU plus from voluntary groups and the extreme weather.
Russia is opposed by Germany in the statistics on life expectancy, not only in the fact that the Germans are much longer, but that in Russia, many are killed working-age adults. The researchers analysed rates in EU countries and in Russia and came to the conclusion that as a cause of premature death comparable only infections and cancers, although of them in Russia die more often, but not significantly.
Moreover, the researchers claim most of these deaths crucial role played by alcohol, in particular, 72 percent of murders and 42 percent of suicides. However, the same is not concluded by similar situations in the Western countries of Europe and the United States, therefore again the study points to an USA stipulated work to split the Russians in opposite parties. The normal action by the USA to get control. Recently proved physicians, and often dangerous cardiovascular causes is excessive alcohol consumption. However, that does not explains the hight of the cardiovascular level in Great Britain, as that cannot be related to the excessive alcohol consumption. They try to show the the life expectancy in Russia is so much lower then in other states. Although it is lower, it does not take into account the extreme weather conditions in Russia.
Most of those figures are of course wishful thinking with no scientific background but mainly supplied to cause instability.
The coincidence of several negative demographic factors - the retirement of numerous post-war generation, the achievement of the working-age generation of small-numbered 1990 and a high mortality rate - will, as predicted by the German demographers, the fact that until 2020 the working-age population in Russia each year will decline by about 1 million people, and by 2030 will decrease by 20 percent compared with 2010. This is based on the western Russia parts not included the high birth rate in the south and the North Caucasus.
Again it is wishful thinking, the same is happening in Western European and the United States. The population there is also declining but is compensated by the enormous influx of immigrants who are taken over the cheap labour jobs.
This is already calculated by the West as being by 2020 the Caucasus will not be longer part of Russia and in the hands of the United States via their installed rulers. However, this distort the case of the German investigation as the borders of Russia will be considerable smaller and therefore will not lead to the to disastrous consequences for the economy, as this will be stabilized by its security as the borders will be considerable smaller. The wish of the West could be severely backfire instead of threatening its security.
The report of the wishful thinkers state that in 2008, Russia had about a million young men of military age. The Real figure 2,412,000. The report goes on: but by 2017 this number decreased to 630,000. (real figure 1,300,000) Not everyone can be drafted into the army: some after school will receive a higher education, others will be found unfit for military service. However the report forgot to add that fit for military service are another 46,800,00. The report that is available as there is where we obtained it although the maker of the report said you could not buy it in Russia while he also added that Russia will have no recruits as they will be in short supply, forgetting to mention the fact that in 2010 just 1,600,000 were called up for recruitment. The whole of the report what forget to mention the rest of Russia but only concentrated on the western part of Russia, this is no doubt in the hope that by 2030 only the small western part of Russia will be still known as Russia.
Discounting the enormous East and the south borders. However wishing that it will fall in USA hands and ruled as in Georgia by an USA educated president, even if it is an ruthless dictatorial leader with genocide tendencies, so long they obey the West.
Obvious the report was made to aid the terrorist and to distort the real figures and created under the USA wishful thinking that they are be able to create rebellions in Russia where ever they can. After that they will do the same with China who has similar problems as Russia has now. Then split up Europe, and Indonesia and they control all. Wishful thinking and maybe possible, Russia and China has been already several times out manoeuvred by the USA and their vassals. See how well the US and the UK out played the Russians and the Chinese in the forcing for a no-fly zone over Libya. They should by now have realised that the USA and Britain never keep a promise and never honour a promise.
The present Russian president made an enormous mistake by letting himself palmed in by the US handouts and promises. For Continental Europe and Russia a promise and a agreement will be honoured, but this does not count for the USA or Britain. For them an agreement, an promise, is made to be broken, profit before honour is their slogan followed by if you first not succeed, Cheat! The continental States do understand that, Putin when President understood this, but the present president of Russia does not understand this, he sees smiles and thinks all is well, however if not swift something is done the bottom will fall out of the Russian politic and they are ending up with nothing.
Vassals of the USA, the laughing stock of the world.
=====================================================================
22-04-2011
Science has yet to figure out how life before the ending of the Dinosaur was established. The many theories launched concerning this have all one thing in common they still do not know how it ended and why. The theory they have enough, many of them with details which are changing all the time. This would have been occurring in such a way that the earth\u2019s orbit could have been altered, the earth could have been filled with dangerous volcanic gasses, which could have created dangerous alterations and climatologically changes. It could have created an alteration in the earth\u2019s magnetic field and the chemical contents of air and earth. The list is endless.
The Pangaea would have created a solid and large enough land mass to complete change the climate of earth, the tectonic pressure would have been enormous. That tectonic pressure may have created massive volcanic activities and if so, it could have blocked out the sunlight for many years by the release of debris and ash in the air. This on it self could have triggered a chemical alteration of air and earth. Fact is that in that time earth had one of his longest and largest ice age period known. A supplying theory is that an enormous million cubic miles of lava spread out over what is now Siberia an 250 million years ago approx.
This combination on the Pangaea created almost the complete extinction of flora and fauna, and it was after this that the first Dinosaurs appeared on earth with a still unknown metabolism, or how they came into existence. The rise and fall of the Dinosaur is therefore one of the most puzzling problems for the scientist. Again there are many suggestions, many possibilities, but in reality at the moment if we leave out the suggestions and possible possibilities then we are still nowhere. As a result of so many theories and possibilities but without any solid evidence to progress it is no wonder that only a very view scientist are involved in the origin research of originality of natural evolution.
Science is progressing fast as a result of more available data and new equipment for data storage and calculations, to up date the search and the research. However it will remain to be seen of it will be possible to create the possible theoretical grounds for evaluation and proceeding to create the similar fields of creation as were on Pangaea and on which the Dinosaurs could live. It also remains to be seen of it will be possible to recreate the fields of creation at the time the Dinosaurs sudden ending, would that be possible we would have an considerable better insight about the start of the natural evolution. Although sciences still have to figure out how those life-forming chemicals were formed and destroyed. They cannot proceed unless they know what really altered the chemical situation of air and earth, if there was such an alteration. Both are fundamental to sustain life in whatever form.
Extreme heat, sudden cold, changes in the magnetic field the speeding or slowing of earth\u2019s orbit can have an effect on natural evolution, which is a fact. Theory is however, is the fact that science does not know what the changes were.
So long as that scientific data is not available, or data that is available is open for speculation, no search or research to the situation on Pangaea the beginning or at the end of the Dinosaurs is possible. Again here the scientist have solved the problem by suggesting that the possible clue must be in the fact that......they do not know it yet. Does this means that we simple have to give up, forget about it. We should not nor is there any intention to do so the field is too interesting in details and possibilities.
Science have to work with less then desirable data, however that was always the case in science. We know that fanatics who have adopted a static view on how it all began disagree with science, although they know that science regarding the natural evolution only just have started. Although the search and research in earnest is already near two hundred years going, in the frame it is just the beginning. In fact, they are not even out of the starter\u2019s blocks. However, those fanatic\u2019s wants instant explanations and they want it now. They do not deliver an alternative themselves, they do not deliver proof about there own point of view, although some point to the bible as the only source what is correct. Those fanatic\u2019s in disagreement are almost as fanatic in their pursue of the natural evolutionist of which they insist have to proof their point without delivering any themselves. They wants us to believe that what is in the bible is correct, is right is to the point and must be seen as a fact.
However, at the same time that they say, the bible is correct and right they reject the epic of Gilgamesh and the Enuma Elis, although both say the same and parts are even mentioned in the bible. They reject the Code of Ur-Nammu although parts of the Hebrew laws are based on it; they reject Shamash as God, because only the God of the Jews is right. However, Shamash was the original God of the Semitics, the Jews only changed his name. The Jews it self are a part of that Semitic tribe, and Shamash was the God in Ur, and Haran when the Jews were living there. There is no historical proof that in Ur or Haran the Jews had a different God as the others living in Ur or Haran. The God of the Jews is also the God of the Christians, therefore Christians are still believing in Shamash although they call them now God. The point is that those fanatics who believe in stories unproven want the evolutionist to proof his case, although knowing that this science is only just started. It makes the fact that the Christian Church special in the US is the biggest obstruction of science into natural evolution.
This behaviour is ad odds with the normal curiosity of human kind, you may expect that special the Christian Church would do all to proof the bible right. What can be more profitable then if science in natural evolution fails to find any reasonable evidence, not only know but also 100 or 200 years from now. Natural evolution scientist should be given time to come at least out of the starting blocks. They will be able to re-create via search and research the right circumstances in which he can create the right situation. Being the magnetic and chemical alteration of air and earth as was in the time of Pangaea and at the life time and the end of the dinosaurs.
This search will launch science in a higher orbit as a matter of speaking. They can let go of the restrictions to science as they have now and search new pathways never walked before. With those axioms removed all things are possible theoretical. The opponents will say scientist who not longer belief in the axioms of natural evolution are in fact creationist as they creating new possibilities and theories. It will be obvious that they are not they are scientist who progress were Christianity stands still fails and retract.
Some call intelligent design, a view based on an observation, without explaining the reason of how and why? They call it creation science. However, how can they call it a science as no research is involved by scientist? Intellectual design is simple the assertion that certain features of earth, universe and life is best explained by an intelligent cause. This a modern form of the traditional theological argument to prove God existence. It found its origin in the US by creationist to avoid Court rulings, in an attempt to try to promote the creation as a science, although it is in fact a pseudo science and does not have a science background. The more disrespectful call it a junk science.
It is an anti-evolution belief, also called origin science based on a singular unobserved events happened in a remote past of which there is no acceptable proof available.
There is a natural intelligent design theory which is indeed a not a science and which statements are not proven. It is normal if there is a claim, for science to investigate the evidence to examine the fact and to draw a conclusion, temporary or permanent. This is in intelligent design not possible therefore the predicate of science is void; there is no evidence to examine. Some say that intelligent design is not a religion as it does not require faith that however, is a cheap way out as intelligent design cannot be in existence without faith; it is the only backing this theory has.
Others say intelligent design is a framework of logical thinking based on observation; logical thinking however, dispels every thing that is not observational to science.
Intellectual design does not have a science based observational base. The base of natural intelligent, does not even attempts to find an reasonable claim for their point of view. What they do is simple criticising all the work what evolutionist are doing. If the Evolutionist makes an discovering then the Intelligent design believers are there to make sure that they find point on which they can criticise the discovering, rightly or wrongly. If they find that an discovering of the evolutionist has an fact in it that is open for discussion than that point is used to create many sheets of paper comments to disprove the evolutionist findings. They do not at any time offer an checkable alternative or any checkable proof.
Natural evolution or intelligent design is fully proven they say,the people who pretend they know and who making a rather nice living out of it at the same time. However, note that concerning intelligent design nothing is proven, there is only the belief and the faith. This based on the singular point that all is perfect therefore, there has to be an intelligent design and an intellectual designer, the problem here is that all is not perfect. Natural evolutionists can prove some and have a possibility of theories for others, but this is science and it is only just started and need in the coming generations an increased philosophical thinking and further development of scientific materials. The realisation is there that although not proven yet, in time with further development of scientific tools altered chemical structures to investigate the air and earth chemical structures 250 and 65 million of years ago together with a simulation of an altered earth orbit and magnetic field to prove the natural evolution. This time is still not there as equipment to simulate the altered orbit and magnetic field in combination with the alteration of air and earth chemical structure is not available yet, and have a further problem that the right air and earth chemical structure need to be found before such an project of simulation can be started.
The proof of the natural evolution or the failure to do so is still a long way off unless there are sudden scientific discoveries, which will make the speeding up possible. None of the scientific laws as defined to day are suitable for a research into the field of natural evolution. As so long the data needed is not available and not possible to create yet, to enable scientist to proof one way or another that their theory is possible.
What we expect now and what theoretical possibilities we can prove, is in the future to reveal.
It does mean that the dependence on axioms will be void. Relying on RNA will be void as that applies to science situations, as we know to day which can be abandoned in the future as other possibilities and theories are taking over. We only can present a full-scale evolution progress if we are able to produce a simulation process data as were available at the beginning of Pangaea and the ending of the dinosaurs.
Intelligent design, the creation is what it always was, History.
====================================================================
24-04-2011
his is an story from our only North Korean supporter in training for voluntary work in North Korea.
This story we have allowed to run although there were some severe doubts, however question asked from the SGI were not answered therefore we have allowed for the time being that this story should run.
Mario Marras.
Buddhism is an universal way of thinking and believing in your self and others to do what is good for all on Earth including animals, plants and anything else that lives. The Soka Gakkai a Nicheren line of Buddhist thinking was in principle a semi political stream in Japan. When that was found out the Soka Gakkai International was established. Although they use a form of Buddhism to ensnare people into their organisation, the main direction is to brain wash those people in thinking that follow the leader is their most important duty. The prime example is the way the German people followed the leader since 1919 to 1945 called Hitler. The admiration is the same and the slogans and enthusiasm is the same.
The connection to the SGI is tied and escaping is almost if not possible in an ordinary way, Soka Gakkai speciality "units of harassment" situations would be mobilized and the faulting member would be hailed back into the fault. (citation) If that does not work then stalking alone or in groups is the next step. It is not oncoming that former members suddenly lost their job, their home and lively hood, only to be returned in mystery after they returned to the SGI. On the other site well behaving members who are willing to spent their time on recruiting new members and buy the many rather expensive SGI items for sale could almost get all they wanted. Moving home to a richer and better place was suddenly possible, after being refused year after year. Here in Korea it is difficult enough without the "Harass troops" of the SGI. The journal of Korean executives and their friends can not be used in the usual palliative measures as interference will only lead to nothing but also could endanger life. The government does not take easy the defection into Buddhism and out of the State control, and being betrayed by the SGI to the government would indeed possible cost them their head.
Those defected SGI former members are exposed as criminals face-to-face as of it was a crime to leave the SGI. This accusation is to reflect on the religious guru, under the name of Ikeda. Both who's parents lived in Japan before the Koreans war in South Jeolla Province, one theory was born in Japan, Daisaku Ikeda is not himself, as is said to be first-generation. Father's name, last name of his mother and the Department of Narita, and linking it to the point to be Ikeda. Some believe that they illegally obtained Japanese nationality. Daisaku Ikeda's "bilateral" relationship awareness, and apart from the general Japanese about the "anti" in a "very Korean" theory seems to be feeling. It is unsurprising given that the birth.(However, even this article, as well as other work of Ikeda, in the Japan Society of executives would amazing.
Country Love \u25cf, country of beauty, the country of the sentence. People that have peace, "after dozens of generations seems to have forgotten (Wasu) enchanting" and anger (squid), time to bone and fall times (smug). Chanting to reach to far above world of peace and happiness seems to be forgotten under the increasing assaults (bladder) and murder (Satsuriku). Let us see further that night only, the roof of the guest house roof Blue, silver crescent (Mon solder) of the moon was illuminating. In light of this beautiful country (Fu), peoples is arrogance is visible, Nijitta (Gouman) to rage (Funnu), but also has a chest thrust.
Japan,and Korea in Buddha must make this more and more important. Grown up and been told. Live in peace. The (Korea-Japan friendship vows Seikyo newspaper November 04, 1998, "Soka alumni gathering"). If there are truly religious groups in Japan, the Korea-Japan friendship would never say no. This except the fact that the Soka Gakkai in Japan wants to be in total control and the proof is in control. Two-thirds of the executive and vice chairman of Soka Gakkai, is in Japan. Ikeda points out that from its common point of view Nichiren Buddhism has been scientific, that both religion and science base their beliefs on the assumption that everything happens in accordance with the laws of causality and that both religion and science aspire to multiply the well-being of humankind. Ikeda then offers examples of how real life applications of various scientific theories of physics and chemistry have improved our lives and makes an analogy to Nichiren Buddism\u2019s explanation of how we can also apply the Statistical Law of Causality to our daily choices of actions to create desired results which can also improve our lives.
Ikeda more specifically delves into the following related accounts of compatibility between Nichiren thought and modern Theoretical Physics: Nichiren Buddhism\u2019s \u201cUniversal Law of Cause and Effect\u201d and physics Statistical Law of Causation and Nichiren Buddhism\u2019s \u201cShiki-Shin-Funi\u201d (oneness of matter and mind) and \u201cKu\u201d (latent potentiality and interconnectedness of all) and physics Quantum Field Theory and Theory of Relativity. After each comparison the author of the article inserts his own critique of the SGI\u2019s arguments for similarity and compatibility, some supportive and some oppositional. However the facts remain that under that presumption talk of Ikeda the threat to the members who want to leave is there and dangerous. The members knowingly or subconscious know that and therefore there is not many who leave, but the ones who do and who are not independent in any form of their way of live will find that forces are turned against them. They suddenly will get high tax demands, investigations in their way of dealings and obstructions in certain new business. On the other hand be good to Ikeda's SGI will give the homeless suddenly good homes, good income lots of friends, SGI friends.
So on one hand, the SGI says that Nichiren Buddhism and science have similar views on the Statistical Law of Causation, but they also argue that Nichiren\u2019s view is broader, on the other hand they simple are brainwashing members to obey without questions ask. This creates a problem here as causality as not merely exclusive to physical phenomenon, but it expands to include mental and spiritual phenomena, and acceptance of the Law of Karma. Nichiren Buddhism understands causality as continuous- even where science denies it-on the microscopic/atomic level, where there appears to be breaks in the continuum. Science differs in that it can\u2019t apply this concept to elementary particles in motion.
Physics explanation for this apparent discontinuity lies in the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. The SGI agrees that indeed, things are more uncertain in regards to human life than they are considering non-moving objects or other life forms. Now is that not clever, the consideration that the non-moving objects such rock are easier to predict then the actions of the living on Earth. However, this is not entirely correct, the accelerators used in Swiss and the USA do make the Earth move indeed as was predicted in Austria and UK before the projects started. Ignored obvious as big money is involved, however since the full acceleration the level of Earthquakes and tsunami\u2019s has increased many times. Science will not accept this as big business is paying for it, but see the many victims in Japan/Indonesia/Philippines/Haiti and many many other places.
Mahayana views that nirvana and samsara are one and the same. However, the SGI believes that field and matter are one and compare Einstein\u2019s Theory of Relativity to Nichiren\u2019s concept of shiki-shin funi because mass and energy can transform from one to the other depending upon field conditions. Heisenberg notes that every elementary particle consists of different forms of energy. The SGI says that this was first described in the Avatamsaka Sutra as \u201cmind only\u201d, that mind and matter are impossible to separate.
The SGI thinks that the Quantum Theory and the Theory of Relativity are approaching a holistic perception analogous to ku, which is \u201clatent potentiality\u201d or the \u201cpotentiality-charged void from which everything phenomenal derives\u201d; in science language the \u201cfield\u201d or \u201cspace\u201d. Ikeda describes it as where elementary particles are produced and changed, in this concept he is wrong as spiritual thinking and and science investigations are both on a complete different planet as matter of speaking. The SGI says that Einstein \u201cdescribed matter as close composition of fields" he however then goes on with comparing Ku as a science. This however not correct. Here what the SGI tries to do is to create a field what is comparable with science. Ku is not a science it is a spiritual expression of ones thinking, an creating of the mind.
We have seen this with all faiths and religions, it is done to compensate the unprovable part of the faith and to give it some establishment it does not deserve because unlike science, ku includes only the mental and spiritual features of a person's thinking. It cannot be proven that the conception of physical things and phenomena as a transient manifestation of an underlying fundamental entity has any basic form to relate to the element of the Quantum Field Theory. It is however, a basic element of the Eastern view of the world. Nichiren Buddhism, followers describes the field as the basis of all particles and their mutual interactions.
The Nichiren Buddhists view ku and the Quantum field, as essentials in their areas of study. However, once again it is a matter being created to suit the purpose and no proof is available to establish the basics of science in KU. The SGI tries to lay a link between Buddhism and the theories of Einstein, this could be work in principle as both Buddha and Einstein contracted their visions via spiritual thinking, however there is were the link ends. The SGI and some theoretical physicists perceive the universe as an interconnected whole where all phenomenon are \u201cfluid and ever changing\u201d. However that was not the way Buddha or Nicheren saw the world, in none of his rather extensive writings is there any relation ship between science and spiritual thinking.
The SGI works here in the same way as Creation Science, they also attempt to lay a direct connection between what they expect to have happened and what did happen in reality. SGI also shows that because they attempting to go the science way they in fact have left the Buddhist way of thinking and therefore using Nichiren as an pulling power to attract new members in their society in the believe that what SGI says is indeed correct. Although Ikeda does good work in establishing an imaginary nuclear free world, he should forget about Nicheren as he has almost ignored every word Nicheren said and stood for and was willing to offer his life for. The SGI of today even as an invited UN/NGO is nothing else then an organisation that uses Nicheren Buddhism as a toll to attract members, buying members, members for life as a guaranteed solid income for the SGI. It is most certainly not a primary Buddhist organisation or a scientific organisation.
=================================================================
26-04-2011
THE WAR LORDS
We see this glorifying of money and the power with it at almost all levels of the society from the high up in Government, global institutions, national industries, and local government right down to the average person.
Beings belonging to such a group who believe in money as their salvation do maybe not all belong or believe in the money God, but to please the ones in power, they will believe. What better way to increase the power and greed possibility then to start a war. Of course they not simple start a war against anyone. They have two criteria for this, first the country must have a enormous amount of minerals and oil or gas that can be taken and secondly the country must be small and primitive in their daily existence.
To find a reason for such a job is never a problem, you simple make one up and get the supporting papers to write supporting articles to underline for the population at large your view. Any excuse, any reason, any fantasy will do, a friendly head of state can be in two weeks time being branded an terrifying tyrant which have to be brought to heel. Another head of state suddenly is accused of having weapons of mass destruction and forms a threat to the whole world. Another suddenly has decided to kill of all the civilians in a city, your press announced. That the head in that state does not have a clue where you are on about does not the matter, so long the readers of your population are bombarded with details then it will be believed, even if it is a complete lie.
They are prepared to sink to the lowest level of humanity to please their Master the money God and as such as a war lord then have to follow the money Gods lead. They step on the ones who cannot defend themselves are of no concern of them. They following the Masters orders and do so in the hope that it pleases the money God and that it will bring them riches beyond their dreams. That thousands, hundred of thousands innocent people die well who cares, you simple give them a title to create an excuse to kill. So they are terrorists, evil gangs, rapist of woman and girls, beheading of man and boys, who cares that it is just a made up story so long as the people believe it does what was intended. They assuring themselves that the smile of Him may light their path to a richer live and more power.
Sadly many of those who glorifying the money God sitting also on Sunday on the front benches of the Churches of Christianity. They pray there that Christ will punish the evil ones, the ones who kill, the ones who steal, the ones who take from their neighbours. That they are the ones who are doing the killing, stealing and robbing their neighbours is not the point Christ is not the god they are believing in, they believe the Money God that is the one who will make them rich. By sitting in front of the church every body that way can see how rich they are and how much power they have. Never mind that the bible said so clearly; He who raises himself above the people, will be humiliated before the people.
Many of those in the churches who are not rich are feeling the need to be grateful to be in the same church as those rich ones with power, in the hope that some of the shine of that riches will fall on them. They can tell friends and family that they have been in close contact in the church with those rich and powerful and hope that this fact may shine on them and those others will feel jealous not to have been there to witness this. The word of God does not count any more, yes they know God is good, however, is this they way of the word, the word was good, so God is good. How can they please two God\u2019s, one who tells them to help each other and do Good, the other to tell them to kill, steal and rob the others and get richer by doing so. What do we have to make out of the simple fact that the believers of the almighty money God also believe in the Almighty God the saviour of our souls who is simple instructions to be good to others as you expect others to be good to you.
Here we have a crucial problem as good believers we can do good to others help them support them and accompany them on the pathway to our Lord and Saviour. In return, do they receive the goodness they may have expected? Naturally, no, they are laughed at behind their back, seen as simple because of the help they give others without asking money in return. It shows that the power of the money God is more powerful then the Almighty God, the saviour of our souls. What is even worst in the eyes of the believers of the money God, is that those good Samaritans are given money away, to those who need it ever heard such a thing. You do not give money away for free, if they want it they can earn it, a kind of bonded slavery. However those good doers they actual help people, does it not make your stomach turn. It is sick that someone actual helps others without asking money for it, it is completely against their religion of the Money God. It is against all rules of the money God, you demand money from people, you don't give it that is absurd.
You can kill people if it brings you money, then that is good. See how the Bush family have been filling their pockets, they even did this in the WW2, they did it from Vietnam and they did it from Iraq. The most important lesson is you cannot give something away unless you expect to be rewarded for that deed in money several times over. You cannot help the poor, the old or the handicapped by illness or accident, no the money God requires payment at all times. The money God\u2019s instructions are clear, come down hard on those humans who defy his rules. Poor, old and handicapped by accident or by illness are a waste of space, if they do not have money there can be no profit and if there is no profit then get rid of them, fast.
If one section of the believers in the money God cannot handle that on their own, then other believers should help in and finish the job.
The Christian countries for that have an organisation called NATO. Official it is there to protect the member countries against attacks by non-members. The reality is however that they select the countries to attack under the money God principles that the countries has to be weak and rich in pickings. Remember this are Christian countries. They had to change the Christian God's rules for this. So not stealing is changed in always stealing, not robbing the neighbours is changed in always rob the neighbours, thou shall not kill is changed you always should kill and then blame it on some one else. It shows that their believe in the Christian God is fake, it is there to suck the people in. They however do not believe in it. God knows and sees all, and therefore he sees the killings the stealing and the robberies and he will remember this when those vile people are entering death, and will entering Hell. However they ignored it as they do not believe there is a God an Saviour, there is only the Money God, and that one does not have an Hell, just caves full of wealth to dwell in after death.
There to many examples in daily life to pass by, Christianity has survived for two thousand years it has grown and expanded by spreading the word to others. That corner stone is now slowly eroded, seeing that on the foundation of that corner stone is now slowly building a new one in the glory of the Money God. A God already adored and admired by the money changers in the Jewish temple in Jerusalem 2000 years ago, did not Christ called them a band of thieves, and they still exist. Punished time after time but always coming back and never have learned anything from the past as the Money God demands action now! Therefore they built a new church inside the old one with the power of money and ignorance to destroy, the poor the old and the handicapped by illness or accident.
However is it ignorance, could it be simple stupidity, after all money is won and lost almost every hour of the day, and to hope that one day you will have enough money that makes rich and the step to power, is many of times a day slashed by the loss of money. The very basic of Christianity is being good and do good.
The alternative has to be Evil and Evil is spreading faster then ever over the world, beliefs are fading away, churches are emptying from believers.
That evil is spreading fast and it is special good to see at the beginning of this century, we have the US fighting in Afghanistan to control the heroin, they fighting in Iraq to control the oil and wants to be fighting in Iran to control the oil there, They bombing Libya to get the oil that all on the flimsiest of reasons, while at other places such as Zimbabwe, people are killed on a daily base and nobody lift a finger, other then to collect the Zimbabwe diamonds, yes evil is spreading fast.
As a result, the world is a more dangerous place to live, this combined with inflation and high oil prices created by those senseless wars, which put many lives at risk but also supply the powerful with loads of money and that, will please the God of money, this is not Christianity but pure Evil. On local levels, we see the same, Governments who ignore the old, and the handicapped by accident or by illness. Property owners we have a reign of terror over their tenants all in the name of money and power they single out the old and the handicapped by illness or by accident all in the name of the money God, not Christianity in sight other then by name only.
In conclusion it can be said as a guaranteed certainty that the Abrahamic religions are slowly becoming religions of the past and in name only and that the real religion is called Money to God of almost all evil.
What buys power, Money! What buys standing, Money. What is the bases of all Evil, Money.
What buys the arms for killing people all over the world, Money. What put people down and under pressure, Money. We can go on with this almost forever but the point is made, bow your heads for the new God, Money the root of all Evil. He will expand his reign further and further setting country against country human against human religion against religion, rich against the poor, healthy against the sick and handicapped by illness or accident, the young against the old.
Nothing can stop this as that will cost money and the aim is to get money not to spent it.
The war lords are in power they craven for money craving for creed, ignorance or plain stupidity it all comes down to the same essence, money create creed, power and ignorance, and ignorance creates wars. Power corrupt we see that in daily life at any moment of the day and we can hear almost the hollow laugh of the Master of Evil the Money God.
The evil spirit who collect more and more souls who will depend on him, he will call for more wars for more evil more fighting, setting up religion against religion poor countries against the rich, till civilisation is lost in an all out war on earth of which the signs are already very much visible. The warlords don't call it wars they are too much cowards to do this, they call it war against terrorism, but they are the terrorists, the money will wins hands down and will triumph over the religions, they in name are still able to be there but in name only churches filled with the believers in power and money, that is all what counts, to the hell with every else. At the end, that is exactly where they will go and where the Master of Evil is waiting for them, HELL.
===================================================================
28-04-2011
The Papal dynasty.
The Pope is the spiritual head of the Roman catholic church. This supreme position belongs to the Pope from the first seconds he is elected. He is the successor of Saint Peter and therefore seen as the Vicar of Christ. Christ as it is written rules his church through this Vicar. Consequently, the Pope, although the servant of Christ, has Christ's authority in all matters of faith and conduct within the Roman catholic church. Not only is he seen as the supreme teacher of the true doctrine but also the supreme law-giver Judge and Chief administrator in the Roman Catholic church.
The first acknowledge Pope of the Roman catholic church was St. Peter, said to be born in Bethsaida in Galilee and said to have received the supreme pontifical power from Jesus himself, to be transmitted to his successors. That on itself seems to be very doubtful as it is unknown when or where Jesus placed that honour onto St.Peter as no mentioned is made in writings or the bible to confirm this. He is attributed to have established the recitation of the Pater Noster. He was several times arrested for disturbance of the peach and failing to follow the authorities instructions. It is said, however no proof is available, that he asked to be crucified up side down in respect for Jesus. He is said to have died in the year 67.
Peter and Paul stayed in that time in Rome at the home of Senator Pudens and his wife Claudia.
The second Pope was St. Lines said to be born in Volterra and said to be elected in 67 and died in 76. He created the first 15 Bishops and ordered that woman could only enter a place or worship with their head covered. Although he is commemorated at the 23th of September there is not much known of him, including the fact that it is not absolute certain that he actual did exist. The suggestion is that he could have been the brother of the wife of Senator Pudens, if not he was certainly in the recollection associated with St.Peter at the house of Senator Pudens. The story seems to be that it was Senator Pudens who controlled the early church as he was it also who sent the man of Jewish decent under the name of Aristobulus with a Roman legion to the British isles where it is said that he became a missioner in Wales.
Even less is known of the third Pope, St.Cletus actual name St. Anacletus, who was elected in 76 and died in 88 after being arrested. Problem here is that other sources give the year 80 as election and the year 92 as his death. The reason is unknown actual nothing is know about him. It is said that this Pope divided Rome into 25 parishes, while at the same time he ordained a number of priests. He was buries in the Basilica now called the St.Peter Basilica now the Vatican. He is said to have died a martyr. He is attributed that he made the rules of the consecration of Bishops. He is said to have made in the Vatican near St. Peters tomb an oratory, intended for the burial of martyrs. The problem is that the Vatican did not existed in that time and only was started to be build under Nicholas the third.
Patriarch St.Clement also known as St.Clement of Rome. was the fourth Pope. He official is listed as being elected between 88 and 92 and have to be executed in either 97 or 101 by Emperor Trajan after being sent to Gallipoli, where he was thrown into the sea with an anchor around his neck. An event that he did not survived. However there is still no clearity over what is what and who was who in that time. The conclusion must be that many of the facts of that time were made up later to suit the history. There is a clear lack of evidence for monarchical episcopacy in Rome so early in time. In fact there is only one letter proof between 96 and 100 to the church at Corinth. It is the oldest Christian document still in existence outside the new Testament. This letter confirms the apostolic authority of the clergy. There are many other so-called identifications of Clement but none of them can be taken as confirmed.
Pope Evaristus was the 5th Pope supposedly holding office between 99 and 108 also know as Aristus of which other sources say that he died in 105. It is suggested that he was from Jewish origin and elected when Emperor Domitian was in power. He is said to have founded the first 7 deaconaries which are supposedly the early beginning of the present college of Cardinals, he also established the solemn blessing after civil marriage for the Christians. Although their is severe doubt about both claims. In certain environments it is even seen as absurd.
The point, or the pontiff in this is that most of the early leaders of the Roman catholic church seems to have been coming from one place, the senator of Rome Pudens and his wife Claudia. Did they just heard the story and decided to develop it or was there someone in their household who told them the story, and then they decided to develop it. We will never know, however to stick with the facts we do know is that Peter is at some point clearly associated with the Pudens and was used or used the Pudens to get the story out. In later developments it seems that the only point that is for certain is that Peter and Paul managed to come to Rome, managed to come in Pudens home and were accepted as such as guests of the family.
Early reports are that Paul was in fact a Roman placed in the Palestine to infiltrate the many Jewish groups who were stirred against the Romans. Maybe Paul was a Pudens and as such his first place to go would have been the senators home. It does not seem likely that in those times 2 Jewish fellows were without any questions taken in by a Senator of Rome. Those Senators had to much to loose to take such a risk. Hence a family band can be presumed. In which case Paul was indeed a Roman spy. Of he still was as spy in Rome's service when he knocked at Pudens door is also not known. Fact is that he was not arrested, but as a Roman citizen began to write. He made the story of Jesus of Nazareth, the son of God, in fact he made most of the story while writing in Rome. It is in the Christian Church accepted that what he wrote was the truth, however was it, was it not simple a story made by a Roman citizen who had travelled the empire.
Nobody will ever known, all the stories about Saul of Tarsus, the blindness the cure, the journey to the Home of Senator Pudens, it was all his writing, their is no in-depended verification than his own writings. If we accept that as the truth do we have to accept then that the Lord of the Rings could be a true story, an happening that really did happen, just as the story of Jesus did happen in the writings of Paul? We did believe the claims of weapons of mass destruction by the Americans, they were false, could it be that the claim from Paul was also just a claim? And what did happen to Paul when he had finished his writings? Off to a new spy job for the Roman empire? Fact is that the death of Paul never is mentioned or recorded, we may presume that he probably died in action.
We will not know any of this unless Christ will come down to Earth to judge.
That is if he is not shot down by the Americans/British or Jewish as a terrorist first, on his way down.
The Papal dynasty.
The Pope is the spiritual head of the Roman catholic church. This supreme position belongs to the Pope from the first seconds he is elected. He is the successor of Saint Peter and therefore seen as the Vicar of Christ. Christ as it is written rules his church through this Vicar. Consequently, the Pope, although the servant of Christ, has Christ's authority in all matters of faith and conduct within the Roman catholic church. Not only is he seen as the supreme teacher of the true doctrine but also the supreme law-giver Judge and Chief administrator in the Roman Catholic church.
The first acknowledge Pope of the Roman catholic church was St. Peter, said to be born in Bethsaida in Galilee and said to have received the supreme pontifical power from Jesus himself, to be transmitted to his successors. That on itself seems to be very doubtful as it is unknown when or where Jesus placed that honour onto St.Peter as no mentioned is made in writings or the bible to confirm this. He is attributed to have established the recitation of the Pater Noster. He was several times arrested for disturbance of the peach and failing to follow the authorities instructions. It is said, however no proof is available, that he asked to be crucified up side down in respect for Jesus. He is said to have died in the year 67.
Peter and Paul stayed in that time in Rome at the home of Senator Pudens and his wife Claudia.
The second Pope was St. Lines said to be born in Volterra and said to be elected in 67 and died in 76. He created the first 15 Bishops and ordered that woman could only enter a place or worship with their head covered. Although he is commemorated at the 23th of September there is not much known of him, including the fact that it is not absolute certain that he actual did exist. The suggestion is that he could have been the brother of the wife of Senator Pudens, if not he was certainly in the recollection associated with St.Peter at the house of Senator Pudens. The story seems to be that it was Senator Pudens who controlled the early church as he was it also who sent the man of Jewish decent under the name of Aristobulus with a Roman legion to the British isles where it is said that he became a missioner in Wales.
Even less is known of the third Pope, St.Cletus actual name St. Anacletus, who was elected in 76 and died in 88 after being arrested. Problem here is that other sources give the year 80 as election and the year 92 as his death. The reason is unknown actual nothing is know about him. It is said that this Pope divided Rome into 25 parishes, while at the same time he ordained a number of priests. He was buries in the Basilica now called the St.Peter Basilica now the Vatican. He is said to have died a martyr. He is attributed that he made the rules of the consecration of Bishops. He is said to have made in the Vatican near St. Peters tomb an oratory, intended for the burial of martyrs. The problem is that the Vatican did not existed in that time and only was started to be build under Nicholas the third.
Patriarch St.Clement also known as St.Clement of Rome. was the fourth Pope. He official is listed as being elected between 88 and 92 and have to be executed in either 97 or 101 by Emperor Trajan after being sent to Gallipoli, where he was thrown into the sea with an anchor around his neck. An event that he did not survived. However there is still no clearity over what is what and who was who in that time. The conclusion must be that many of the facts of that time were made up later to suit the history. There is a clear lack of evidence for monarchical episcopacy in Rome so early in time. In fact there is only one letter proof between 96 and 100 to the church at Corinth. It is the oldest Christian document still in existence outside the new Testament. This letter confirms the apostolic authority of the clergy. There are many other so-called identifications of Clement but none of them can be taken as confirmed.
Pope Evaristus was the 5th Pope supposedly holding office between 99 and 108 also know as Aristus of which other sources say that he died in 105. It is suggested that he was from Jewish origin and elected when Emperor Domitian was in power. He is said to have founded the first 7 deaconaries which are supposedly the early beginning of the present college of Cardinals, he also established the solemn blessing after civil marriage for the Christians. Although their is severe doubt about both claims. In certain environments it is even seen as absurd.
The point, or the pontiff in this is that most of the early leaders of the Roman catholic church seems to have been coming from one place, the senator of Rome Pudens and his wife Claudia. Did they just heard the story and decided to develop it or was there someone in their household who told them the story, and then they decided to develop it. We will never know, however to stick with the facts we do know is that Peter is at some point clearly associated with the Pudens and was used or used the Pudens to get the story out. In later developments it seems that the only point that is for certain is that Peter and Paul managed to come to Rome, managed to come in Pudens home and were accepted as such as guests of the family.
Early reports are that Paul was in fact a Roman placed in the Palestine to infiltrate the many Jewish groups who were stirred against the Romans. Maybe Paul was a Pudens and as such his first place to go would have been the senators home. It does not seem likely that in those times 2 Jewish fellows were without any questions taken in by a Senator of Rome. Those Senators had to much to loose to take such a risk. Hence a family band can be presumed. In which case Paul was indeed a Roman spy. Of he still was as spy in Rome's service when he knocked at Pudens door is also not known. Fact is that he was not arrested, but as a Roman citizen began to write. He made the story of Jesus of Nazareth, the son of God, in fact he made most of the story while writing in Rome. It is in the Christian Church accepted that what he wrote was the truth, however was it, was it not simple a story made by a Roman citizen who had travelled the empire.
Nobody will ever known, all the stories about Saul of Tarsus, the blindness the cure, the journey to the Home of Senator Pudens, it was all his writing, their is no in-depended verification than his own writings. If we accept that as the truth do we have to accept then that the Lord of the Rings could be a true story, an happening that really did happen, just as the story of Jesus did happen in the writings of Paul? We did believe the claims of weapons of mass destruction by the Americans, they were false, could it be that the claim from Paul was also just a claim? And what did happen to Paul when he had finished his writings? Off to a new spy job for the Roman empire? Fact is that the death of Paul never is mentioned or recorded, we may presume that he probably died in action.
We will not know any of this unless Christ will come down to Earth to judge.
That is if he is not shot down by the Americans/British or Jewish as a terrorist first, on his way down.
======================================================================
30-04-2011
Soka Gakkai is the Faith in North Korea, but not only in North Korea but also in Japan and South Korea. So what is that Soka Gakkai which in Japan hooked themselves onto the Nicheren Buddhism but with a strong political link. They now pronounce themselves as an Japanese faith and call themselves the beacon of the spiritual world champion, is the most powerful thought leaders of all cultures. The grow is remarkable and create much power and powerful as this one make you arrogant, special as the backing of the Jewish are clearly in attendance. By such an increase they see Ikeda behind that great power.
The Soka Gakkai organization grew out of the the U.S. domination of postwar Japan, called Japan the" enemy "against the" enemy of my enemy is my friend "to take advantage of the classic lessons of the Korean people suffered from Japanese colonial rule. Soka Gakkai Aum Shinrikyo, Unification Church, The Sun Myung Moon (the moonies of the 60 years) are in fact the early Soka Gakkai in Korea. The Jewish via the Americans, Rockefeller\u2019s influence via funding created the organisation in Japan.
The leading Jewish elderly is in second-generation Koreans in Japan, Ikeda, who has the backing of power in the Soka Gakkai. The forced abandoning of the political link of the Soka Gakkai led to the forming of the Soka Gakkai International. It was immediatelyyy based on the style of the Moonies and many of the mind disabling activities were also taken over to be integrated into the Soka Gakkai International. To criticizeze the Soka Gakkai at this point would not be in the interest of this revelation it probably would drive in deeper in darkness if it would be proper investigated. Japan and Korea, are aware that were it Soka Gakkai International is concerned, there are various sources of information like the United States that are involved. SGI this are the three characters which end up as a Jewish keyword.
The set uppppp of the Soka Gakkai International would have involved U.S. intelligence agencies and the Soka Gakkai no doubt was instructed and been brainwashed by Israintelligence.nts. such as the Jewish Agency (JAFI: Jewish Agency for Israel). The World Zionist Organization (WZO: World Zionist Organization) U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). The Federal Security Agency (NSA: National Security Association). This is the reality it controls the people, it controls their mind and it ring fence them from other possible influence, by indoctrination. It is that part what makes it very dangerous. It is a step to gain control an way to conquer. The stepping stone was Iraq, then Afghanistan, now Libya, Syria, Algeria, Jordanian and the ultimate price Iran! All in the name of peace!
Soka Gakkai international is not a Buddhist organization it just uses the Nicheren form of Buddhism to attract lost souls. People who are at the end of their search for what ever they wanted in life. The promise from Ikeda that the chant will change your life and that sticking together to chant together attract the lonely souls. It has however nothing to do with Buddhism, but all with brainwashing and control. Put this brainwashing against the background of mind infiltration in which right is told to be wrong and wrong to be right as the victim, the SGI member does not dare to have an opposite voice against that of the ultimate leader Ikeda, who now have put himself forwards as a nomination for the Peach price. However it's the mind infiltration what is the reason for the peace price then indeed Obama got his one rightly so. It was his Time for a change that brainwashed the Americans to vote for him, but the only change was that he was now in total control. But there where others such as Hitler, who managed with the help of the Zionists to control the whole of the German nation for well over 10 years.
If we put that in conjunction with the increase of Rebellions, terrorism and serious crimes in the world than it is important to know that here again the main problem comes from the interference of the Jews by their occupation of Palestinian land. However not only there look at the Second World War, the First World War, they where pulling strings behind the Kennedy assassination and the Cold War and even the Russian Revolution. Drug cartels and organized crime organizations and a huge cult of Jehovah's Witnesses and the Unification Church and then you can see the Soka Gakkai International as a terrorist attack on the innocent mind. What do you think you?
It would be less inclined to criticize the SGI if they were honest and admit that in reality they do not follow nicheren but just using it for the attack on the mind and the following permanent control of that mind. It is not to us to continue to criticize them vigorously for calling themselves Nichiren Daishonin\u0092s Buddhism. We know and they know that they are not Nichiren Daishonin\u0092s disciples. They are disciples of the Three Presidents of the Soka Gakkai. Their beliefs and practices are alien to Nichiren Daishonin, particularly their cooperation and seeking common ground with every one who can be beneficial to the leader and the SGI. They use them and despise them at the same time. There is no common ground and no cooperation with or within the nichiren faith. They should be following Shakyamuni Buddha, and Nichiren Daishonin, join the Kempon Hokke and receive the banner of propagation, the Gohonzon for the Transmission of the Dharma.
We are as we where with the Moonies, familiar with the SGI tradition, however tradition does not suit their agenda of portraying the SGI as a potentially beneficial cult. So they began saying how the call to Buddha via chanting was the step needed to climb the ladder to a better life and therefore worry would be disappearing and they would be safe. The SGI philosophy is to control the mind, within a "controlling society" it is merely a matter of people whose lives are based on nothing till they join the Daishonin's teachings applying those teachings to their own fields of endeavour, thus influencing those around them and attempt them to join the cult.
This in politics, for instance, this means there will be people in government whose only motivation is truly the promotion of the SGI regardless of that is good for the people. It by no means entails a dictatorship of faith just the opposite, in fact, it should be the influence of Buddhism rising from the people into institutions, instead of the SGI institution dictating the behaviour of the people by means of mind control and indoctrination.
Soka Gakkai, means Value Creation Society, which was founded in the 1930s and grew rapidly during the desolation of the years immediately after World War II. It describes its goal as combining happiness of the individual with the prosperity of all society, and it initially targeted the less affluent. In lemans terms it means controlling the mind by indoctrination. A very dangerous way of dealing with individuals, as it creates a solid outside out casting society who do not accept anyone who does not 100% accept the rules of the SGI and his leader. A leader who have set himself high above the people not that he is but to enhance himself and receive the benefits of it. It is an old system done many times before and almost always ended in disaster. Mind control is such an disaster, only his victims do not know, just as mental disabled people live a life of ignorant happiness and so do the SGI members.
===========================================================
02-04-2011
Statistics are showing that in the last half year the percentage of older people under the poverty line is up drastically. The percentage of children under the poverty line is up drastically. The average spending power of the people in Britain is down by near 25%, while the top 10% earners spending power is up drastically.
Osbourne, which via an abbreviation can be brought back to Obvious Stupidity Borne, other wise there can be no explanation for his and her meaning Osbourne and Cameron's statement, "that we all are in it together" Unless it means that we are all in it together in which the 90% of the population suffers and the 10% of the population profits. Cameron and Osbourne being the once who making the profit by stealing it from the rest. We do not want to get into what they receive for getting the oil from Libya for Qatar's Al Thani's and the US Obama's. They certainly do not do this for nothing, although the people in the country have to feed their bills for hundreds of millions spent on Libya, they no doubt will be making a profit now or as Blair did later.
In the time between the population is suffering, by the lack of spending power, and they have to keep their hands on their ears to stop hearing the continues roaring laughter of the Government of Britain, while having their luxury dinners and expensive wines, where one diner cost as much as saving an pensioner from dying. Examples enough, have a look at Jaywick, a former holiday resort in Tendring DC near Clacton.
A charming place, a place loved by the people who are living there. It consists out of 4 separate parts, the worst being the Brooklands right on the sea wall. It is one of the most deprived areas of England. The why of it is an easy one to answer. The Conservative Council have tried and failed for years to get the people out of Jaywick, with bribes, expulsions and today's with creating a complete derelict area, by refusing to do the simple basics of a normal council. Rubbish is left on the streets, roads demolished by Council vehicles never repaired, deliberate discrimination against the many disbles older people who living there, as walking or having a wheelchair is like an army training ground with high obstacles and deep holes. Although the Essex CC has a duty to repair, they do not do so as they have declared the road to be not adopted. Their way, the Tory way, of saying stuff yourself we not doing it, your lot are poor old and or disabled, so there is nothing what you can do about it. In short the typical pre-Victorian slave holders mentality.
With a Council Tax that is high by any standards, and one of the highest in the country as to take an comparison between Tendring DC as a Tory council and as an example the most expensive London Borough of Tory Kensington and Chelsea, the we find that the D band of Kensington and Chelsea is less expensive then the A band in Tendring DC. And in the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea all the roads are taken care of so far as possible all the older and disabled people are taken care of. However Tendring DC still demands a near 1000 pounds minimum a year as Council tax for services not provided, even if a house is used for holiday only, even when it is 100% not occupied Council tax need to be paid in which case council tax is paid and 100% no service provided.
This stands at the root of the derelict creation by Tendring Council. Owners who not using it or only using it for holidays need to pay the council tax just as others in Tendring DC who are living there permanent. The result is that many owners do not bother anymore and simple leaving it to rot instead of keeping it up. The council with his near fascist attitude derelict creation idea, then uses the derelict properties to show that the WHOLE of Jaywick is like that. That this is a lie does not the matter they are Tories so what is a lie, if you tell it long enough people start to believe it and then the lie is not longer a lie. You can see that from the replies of the more simple souls on articles in the local newspapers.
The question is however is it really that bad? The answer must be a re-sounding NO. The problem mainly lays in the refusal of the Council to create roads. The roads are there but are not attended to for many, many years for which the council used one stupid excuse after another none of it being legal. The point being that roads that were still to be seen as roads were almost deliberate ploughed in with heavy trucks, which demolished the concrete roads completely, without that the demolishing council attempted to repair them. As a result some roads, with one in the Grasslands being the worst, are in rain periods swimming pools and not roads, this in turns means that the residents cannot leave unless they have a car to drive out and that is dangerous as because of the water the deep holes cannot be seen. The use of wheelchair is obvious impossible. In the winter the roads can be used as skating rinks. The result of this is that the road which are filled with water, further demolishing the roads it self. Tendring DC knows this, hence the reason they do not do anything. While the rich and Tory members in Tendring DC only have to snap their fingers to get anything done they want, the poor and the disabled get nothing.
The result of that action was that more and more owners simple gave up. That resulted in the houses not being done up or repaired, which resulted into the derelict state as it is now. At the same time the council does all they can to make the situation worse by refusing to act, by refusing to do their duty for which they cashing in on the council tax, refusing to clear the rundown homes, this again with the most absurd reason they could think of. At the same time they have forbidding any form of home improvement to make sure that it will be looking derelict for a long time to come. In short a normal Tory reaction against the poor the disabled and the unemployed. That they breaking many laws do not the matter as the Tories control the courts so what ever they do even outside the law and legality it is always legal in Tory eyes.
There were many changes the council had to correct the situation, but as they are controlled by an control freak a kind of local dictator for which even the local MP stays quit nothing was ever done. As we reported before a request was made with a suggestion in May 2009 in Brussels Belgium for a project in Britain that was so deprived, by the British that a large fund injection would be needed to update the situation. Therefore a person from the institution in Brussels who do select the projects, that are deliberate placed in a deprived situation, was nominated to investigate the possibilities for Jaywick the small town on the east Essex coast in Britain.
Jaywick was selected for an investigation as the village was indicated by the British Government to be third deprived area in Britain. This village as all deprived areas is under Tory control. As it turned out it would be a simple project at a much lower estimate, then was given by the Conservative Essex County Council. The project would be viable and to be realized within a short time-span.
The most difficult problem was to get information from the Highway department regarding the roads.
Britain still has the middle age system of public roads which are classified as being private but in fact belong to the Local or State Government but are kept private in order to avoid responsibility while at the same time refuse the owners on those roads to improve them.
As it turned out it was made rather obvious that even if there were millions to be spent it would never be spent on the roads in Jaywick. The only way those millions would be used is for the building of new houses, at high rental costs, so that they make a fortune in rent, then sling everyone in Jaywick on to the street, or better the prehistoric paths that Tendring DC calls roads.
In short whatever money there will be given, where ever it comes from, it will never be spent on the roads. Or as the leader of Tendring said "we will never spent money on the roads of Jaywick" That he breaks the Human rights act does not bother him all costs for action against him would be made by the citizen anyway. The conservatives want to have the area for themselves, for their own new houses like a Great Bentley or Holland on sea, for rich conservatives only. Suddenly the sea level will not rise anymore, money to be spent will be plenty, the environment agency will have no objections anymore, and the Tory Government will give the glorious go ahead.
This entails that people still have in rain periods mud paths instead of proper roads. It is obvious that the houses on those roads in all deprived areas of which Britain has the most and the most deprived of western Europe. People who living there are either retired or social near the bottom level. The run down version is artificial created for the best effect, and kept in that state by a committee, the JSLG special appointed to keep the outlook as derelict as possible and even slowly try to change it into an Industrial estate starting the Brooklands.
The only conclusion therefore that can be made is that the deprived situation of the area is a deliberate act by the Tory Councils, the Essex County Council and the Tendring district council. Even the entrance to Brookland on the roundabout Tamarisk way/Lotus way/The Brooklands it was obvious that a deliberate run down view was created. Such a view is typical for places were the local Council has already made plans to alter the area at such a way that they, the local council can make the most money.
The investigator after a half year was still not able to receive one sensible answer of either Essex County Council or Tendring District Council. The local MP Carswell simple did not react at all. The system from both councils was simple, if you asked one a question then they pointed him to the other, then the other pointed him back to the first. Even a local Representative of the JSLG what stands for Jaywick Strategic Leadership Group but with obvious no leader in sight it is a local talk group, all the same. There is no strategy no action to improve no real activities regarding the actual deprivation of the area is observed. The main strategy is persuading people to move away to other areas. They did come up with one answer which was going back to the local council and the local council answer was going back to Essex CC. In another word a dead end.
The Brookland Area would need a complete alteration, but could be recreated as a park Home area after certain alterations. It would bring extra money for the Council, in time no housing benefit to be paid or exemption of council tax, as park homes would be owner living in or privately rented out. It was never rejected flat, including the proposal for industrial development south of St.Osyth, annex Jaywick but was simple hold off and put back and forwards.
The group which entails Essex CC, Tendring DC, Homes and Communities Agency, East of England Development Agency, the Environment Agency, and for some odd reason the Primary care trust. That odd reason being that the person who pulls the string at TDC is married to her. Those two earning a small fortune out of it and by obeying the Business establishment they do not give two pennies for what the common people think or want.
The collection of this group gives the strongest indication that Essex has an alternative plan, in which there is no place for a sea side community. The clear obstruction given to the investigator by Essex CC and Tendring DC leave no other way to interpret their actions.
Years ago Jaywick had a strong plan to regenerate the area; however Essex CC made sure that this disappearing in the dustbin on the earliest opportunity.
The previous leader of Essex County Council was the person who in effect launched the line that money for the roads for the poor was a waste of money. This illustrates the negative sight that the Tories have of the poorer site of the population. It also shows that they prefer the site to be derelict as it suits their hidden plans.
Hidden because in time of this investigation it was coming obvious clear, that wall paper was used to stick over the cracks of a failed cover up of the real intentions.
The suggestion of real intention ware becoming stronger as the investigation was closing in on details. So what is the intention of the TDC couple that runs it, there are other councillors but they are just there for the money and do not have the slightest of interest to do something for the people. This has a result that the Clacton area once renowned for their sandy shores is now a dead end coastal resort. There is one road to Clacton, the dead end road to nowhere. This road should have been widened to 4 lanes many years ago. It would have made it possible for people actual to reach Clacton, but also it would have been opened up for the Industry.
Now business cars/vans/trucks are stuck forever in an endless cue special in the spring and summer when Grandma and Granddad decide to drive to Clacton at 25 miles an hour to enjoy the view, deaf for the noise from angry cars driving behind them. Obvious no sensible person would start a business unless it is a must in Clacton with their roads to nowhere. The TDC leader wants to keep Clacton small as that way it is easier to control.
So what are the plans the TDC leader has for Jaywick?
To start they have plans to create a Brookland industrial estate, their idea is to break down most of the Brookland arcades and places and to persuade Industrial entrepreneurs to make a go of the estate. There are already plans at the TDC for storage and repair facilities at the Brooklands. The reason behind it is the make the area more an run down industrial estate, and hope that more people will accept their offer to abandon their property in exchange for an rental, low rent to start and high rents to end up with at the now agreed planned housing estate at the St. John road and Little Clacton road, first rejected then installed is obvious mend to house the tenants of the Brookland Area, after which the owners will be served with an order to sell.
With this they creating a regeneration area, for more luxury homes with garages and well maintained roads, and a small Industrial estate, the new pier would be build as that plan is shelved but not withdrawn. The golf course would receive their extension for restaurant and view area. The airfield would receive a helidrome and an extension north of Alton park road. And last but not least Lion point Broome Way would be developed to a protected sea harbour for pleasure boats. It also would be the starting sign for more development after demolishing part of Road Way's buildings to update the area.
These are facts however the TDC and the JSLG will deny this and state that there are always rumors. They should remember that there is no smoke without a fire. And they should not hide behind "we did not know" while it was known to them all the time. This and the fact that they refuse to update the roads means that they have an alternative project running alongside. Lord Hanningfield before his arrest assured the adviser via a clerk that the way forward for Jaywick was to break down the non-occupied homes, however they had trouble to find the owners. This on itself is a false statement as the investigation team had within two day all owners accept two of all the derelict homes. It all indicates that the view of a rundown area would be kept and enhanced.
All but one replies from Essex CC, TDC, and JSLG plus the Dept. of Environment, said that it was no use as there would never be any money available to update the roads. And even if there was money from the outside coming in it would not be used for Jaywick. That on itself is a rather strange statement. Essex wasted 2 million last year to do up a high street done already up two years before. Their council leader was arrested for putting his hand in the till, the TDC leader was under investigation for taking bribes end last year. While the Essex CC leader is under similar investigations.
They have money plenty for themselves the small group of Tory councillors and their lackey's. In fact they are the prototype type of Tory Government, always kicking the poor the old and the disabled.
Their day of having fun is to go to a deprived area and see the poor and the old suffer, Jaywick is such prime example. Then they take the money from the poor and the old, the Council tax for the smallest burn out house if there is still a possibility to live in be 20 pounds a week, and even if they cannot live in it is still 20 pounds a week. One of the highest in Britain or 70 pence the square meter a week. Then on the weekends they say to their children after having taken the money of the poor, we are not poor we are conservatives, come let us go to the deprived area and watch those poor people, we take some food with us and then you can feed them, but be careful that they do will not bite you. They are not sitting behind a fence yet.
Take this as an example, and remind yourself that this is a Tory Government a Tory County Council and a Tory district council. We all know that TORY stands for "That's Ours, Robbing You". However, the same is actual seen by the State Government, David Cameron the man who is almost never in Britain. Free travel, free food, free drinks life is good, following foreign orders and sealed envelopes for the safe, it all cost money however, so simple kicking some old and poor to get some more in.
This Essex CC has just giving themselves a whopping 1,600,00.00 pound pay rise were others pay are frozen or downgraded. Mind you hey have to sack 250 staff to get that money together. However who cares, those people can get unemployment benefit which is not bad, so long Essex CC gets his raise.
You think that is a lot, no it is not, anyway not in the eyes of greedy Tories after all to enable them to get it they had to blow a staggering amount of over 20,000,000.00+ pounds for consultants to advice them how to save cash. It will be of no interest that those advisors all belonged to the close friends of the Essex CC.
At the same time that they want to sack 250+ workers they want to others a 2 year freeze, otherwise it would not be possible to fill their own pockets quick enough. The whole of Jaywick would be in a perfect state of up keep if those 20,000,000.00+ pounds was spent on them.
On the other hand then their friends would have been without their lavish income. Here on the continent we call that corruption, in Britain they call that care for deprived area's consultants.
Funny thing is that the three stooges of British politics, advising the public to tighten your belts, they themselves and their compatriots of Essex CC, do the opposite but this does happen on this moment all over the Conservative Councils, filling their pockets quicker then filling a bucket of water with a fireman's hose pipe.
Essex excuse is that they have to save 300 million over the next couple of years, they have to otherwise it slows down the filling of their pockets, as everyone in Essex, excluding the Councilors and their affiliated Tory friends, will has to be part of the trimming of the services system.
As real Highway robbers they take it from the poor to give it to the rich, themselves. The leader of Tendring Neil Stock, the dictator of Tendring DC a man well known in Tendring for being economical with the truth if he wants to have his way, and who is supported by his wife Sarah Candy and together they can afford a lot of candy by earning over 100,000.00 a year are also the two who most obstructing the regeneration of Jaywick. They are the controllers who want to keep Clacton small and poor, as it is easier to control.
Both are conservative which means they both are pocket fillers and robbers from the poor the old and the disabled, for whom they do not have the slightest respect. The amount the CEO of Essex receives nearly 250,000.00 pound a year excluding would be enough for at least two roads in Jawick to be updated to residential requirements or all the roads in Grass and Brooklands to Park Home requirement.
Therefore the JSLG who's officers in daily control maybe genuine in their ideas to get progress, the simple fact that Sarah Candy, via North Essex PCT, Neil Stock via TDC both representing the Conservatives with their principle all for us and nothing for others in the JSLG, and the other Conservatives who running Essex CC and Tendring DC, makes it impossible that something ever will be done for Jaywick, as the JSLG is only installed so far as we can see as an control to keep Jaywick in check.
In any case the Tory government has decided that sea defenses are not needed urgent and the money is therefore withdrawn, probably into the wine/dine and travel pot for Cameron and his friends.
It does means that they as the leaders of Tendring DC in reality do not give two pennies for Tendring and that their primary goal is power and greed and wealth. There was a time that evil people were burned on a stake maybe we should ask ourselves are those Tendring Conservative leaders that evil. Do we have enough stake's? Fact is that they the ECC and the TDC deliberate want to make the people ill. They even are proud that Jaywick has a higher death and illness rate than anywhere else in Tendring. However they made people ill, they create stress and anxiety, and they put people in a harness of rules and regulations, which indeed it makes you ill. The main project of the JSLG is to make sure that the area looks as undesirable as possible and they getting well paid for this.
One of the JSLG said that the vision of the foundation was a solid one and has visibility, then came back two days later with it cannot be done as TDC will not cooperate with any plan. At the moment we writing this in July 2010, the investigation into the possibility of a road plan is still ongoing, but the rumours are that Essex CC and the TDC try to do all they can to obstruct by withholding simple information. Fair play is what the committee who investigate the possibilities looks for. However, Tendring is Conservatives and fair play is for them something what others do not the TDC dictator. It is something that he does not understand.
He understands power, money and greed. Fair play, honesty, care no that is not available if you cannot make a profit or can show off to your friends. However if he was willing to sift through the proposals he would find that he could make profit, that he would be fair and as an almost impossibility would be honest for a change.
That is the reason that we can predict that Tendring will have successfully torpedoed once again a possibility to show a human face. Then again a conservative human? That is also not possible they are on this moment in time blaming Labour for the bankers fiddling with money the USA bankers that is. They will not take any reasonble measures to lift the country out of recession. They will increase VAT, taxes direct and indirect, launch plans against the poor the disable the unemployed.
And if that does not get result he will go to war, Thatcher did it when she could not solve the problem, Blair did it twice when he could not solve the problems and mark our words Cameron will, and any excuse will do.
And when it is finished the JSLG, then standing for Jaywick Society Luxury Genteel will chair the new luxury estates of the conservatives then standing were once Brookland was, looking out over the new pier, already designed in 2008 and ready for construction, while were once was the Tudor estate is then a heliport and harbour so that the rich Conservatives do not have to walk to far. And the people who were living there before, they are crammed in small cramped accommodation of Little Clacton way, if they were still alive, the rest was made successful made so ill by stress and anxiety that they died early.
Who need a camp with barbwire and watch towers if you have the conservatives they do the same only they make you suffer longer, but they will kill you at the end.
=====================================================================
04-04-2011
We are told by our peers, that because they say so, we should believe them. The church authority also makes it quit clear that we have to believe it. And when we are young we will do so as we are told that they know best. However, when we grow up the question sooner or later will propping up, as normally do they? If they are wrong then the question has to ask why? When they are right then we still have to ask why? Wrong or right we want to know the answer, not that by all possibilities our life would change, but simple we want to know.
The question right and why is then answered with because God say so and he is the Creator of all that is on Earth and the creator of the whole of the Universe. However, that is not completely right, the bible does not mention the universe they only mention heaven and earth, with the stars at the firmament above. It is obvious that this universe is added as a replacement for heaven. However that heaven can wait as in the time that the writers wrote the story down universe was not known. They knew heaven they knew the firmament with the stars, but they did not have a clue an inclination that beyond the firmament and the heaven above was an whole system of many thousands of systems altogether making the universe as we now it till now. Universe is still changing, day by day, new discoveries are made in what is called the universe. However that is as far as it goes at the moment, what the universe really is and how far it will go and what it entails, is still not clear and will not be clear for many centuries to come. We will be able to scout a little further day by day month by month year by year, but it will be little steps compared with the gigantic universe possibility.
So we ask it again is right, right or is right wrong? This is rather interesting, because as it turns out they do not have any proof not in the slightest, not the right and not the wrong, that this is indeed correct in either case. If it is right the church will say, God is good and God is our savour and protector. If we believe that than we stepping in the same trap once more. That God is good on that one we can in principle agree at the agreement that there is indeed a God. However, the savour, the protector, in that we are not so sure. Take as an example the people who call themselves the choice people by God. The Jewish people. If God was their savour and protector, then how can it be explained that they after 2500 years still are some of the smallest populations in the world, it is estimated that there are such a 14 million of them in the world. We know that this question will be retorted with, " We could have been much larger if it was not for the persecution around the world in the last 2500 years". However that is exactly the point, it shows that there was no savour, no protector. Instead they where at war most of that 2500 years and mostly by their own doing and in 99% till this moment they always lost, to be decimated once again.
Yes it is true, they do believe as it is in their Good Book, however proof fails. However this make the word \u201c believe\u201d a rather power full word. That power full word is protected, that believe is protected, they even kill for it and that is something else as the Good Book clearly does not allow killing. So here we have the contradiction in the I am right part of this God exist it is in the Good Book so we have to believe and obey it, at the same time they say I do believe but disobey it. It make the claim of I believe at the same time a rather silly one. If my neighbour tells me he is the new President, we do not believe him, and we are thinking he is joking or mad, we ignore him or we call the man in white coats.
Then we have the wrong side, the ones who do not believe the Good Book, they believe it came all into existence by pure coincidence, at the right time under the right conditions and it developed from there. We are urged to believe that version of events as they have found evidence that cannot be ignored. However if we look very careful at the evidence then we are not a step further, as their evidence proofs only that, the earth have certain development stages over a long period of time. It does not proof that the Good Book is right or wrong. It also does not proof that they are wrong or right. Wrong wants us to believe that the earth has coming into existence due to a slow evolution, while the right wants us to believe to believe a Book that was written a 16 or 17 hundreds of years ago, made from stories of tribes in what is now the Middle East collected an 2500 years ago before it was written down completely. And that it all happened 4 to 5 thousand years ago.
We are to believe that Adam was the first man on Earth, although the Book itself disputes that. We have to believe that in the Garden of Eden suddenly a serpent, a non-human, start to talk to Eve. Which is about the same as my neighbour would tell me that he just had spoken with the serpent next door, I would believe he would mean one of his neighbours wife\u2019s, but if he would tell me it was a real serpent I would ignoring him or make a straight call the nearest Mental Health unit for assistance.
However it is in the Good Book therefore it must be right they say, and not only that they are serious believing this.
The good Adam had two sons; the one killed the other and was sent away and found a wife on other outside of the Garden of Eden. We have to believe that if you have only two sons and you are the first man on earth and your wife the first woman, and that if one son kills the other, he suddenly finds a wife and build a city. It seems to be rather useless to build an city for two people special as we are urging to believe that there were no other people then Adam Eve and the only surviving son Cain, who the suddenly found a wife. It is on this point that we have to start believing in miracles, it was not there and suddenly it is, now that is a miracle.
We also have to believe as we are told that the Garden of Eden was perfect. Then we have two questions what was that tree doing there and where did that speaking serpent coming from both are obvious not perfect. We are told that we do not have to take this too serious, however if we do not take it serious why should we take the rest serious. And if we are not longer taking it serious would that mean that the Bible is therefore just another book that can be set on one line with other books, Jane Eyer, The Lord of the Rings to mention some. The scriptures have us to believe, although that is disputed, that Adam and Eve spoke Hebrew. That means that it was the same language as what the serpent was speaking.
If that is so then they would have enough to form discussion groups forever. Then Adam was slung out of the Garden for something his wife did, this we have to believe we are told as an angel with a flaming sword stood guard to stop them from re-entering. If we believe that than this means that their God held the man responsible for the woman\u2019s mistakes. If we would believe that and were living to the rules in the Good Book, then we would not have need for woman prisons, as the man was responsible automatically. It also means that we can forget about God being good as he blames the innocents for the offence of others. We can then also forget that he is fair as it can hardly be called fair to ban someone for something someone else did. This also clearly shown in the fact that God deliberate instigated the wrongs in the garden in the hope that Adam or Eve would be trapped by it, as such we can allocate the invention and the first entrapment to God. Not fair indeed and not good either.
However, if we believe this then the next question has to be, where is the Garden of Eden and the animals therein. The trees and the plants, and above all were is the angel with his flaming sword? After the Good book tells us that Adam left, the Garden of Eden seems to have disappeared of the face of the earth as never anything is found back of it. A kind of never never land that went missing just as the ten tribes later on in the book, who also suddenly were missing and maybe are living in that missing Garden. What we try to point out is that we do not question the book, it has all it needs to be the best seller it is, but it is simple not a real happened story, maybe a real happened wishful thinking but that is as far as it goes.
The Israeli population believes that God give them the right to own that country. We have no problem with the State of Israel being there, they lived there before and were thrown out so many times that it would be time that they settled down in peace for a while. However, here we have the Good Book again, one day or night when Abram was sitting in or in front of his tent God game to him and started a conversation, it is unknown of Abram did offer Him a drink the Good Book does not mention it, but the conversation as Abram told his followers, was as follows, I do give you this land and all the land you can see for you and for your family to come, forever. Then God was gone and Abram told his followers that he had spoken with God and that this was the place they would stay. Then God sent in a draught and they had to fled to Egypt. The Good Book said so, however this is a part we do not understand. First he gives it to them to stay forever, and then he makes it impossible to stay. Now here is a contradiction. But we are told we have to believe it as it is in the Good Book. Too many times we see in the Good Book that when the main characters are under stress they do the weirdest of things, just as we see almost every day in daily life. It does not mean we have to believe it.
It is that simple, believing is a question of believing it or not. Right or wrong have no part in it. God as an Creator throws up the same problem, we have to believe. The Creator made the Universe and all what is in it, we have to believe, However the question does arise as, who created the creator? We are then told to believe that the Creator was always there, but if we have to believe this then we can extend this to: "The universe was always there" of either there is no proof. Here we have a contradiction; we should only believe what we see we are told. However, at the same time we are told we should believe what we cannot see, and what others wants us to believe, it is in the Good Book.
We are wrong we are told, we should believe, as the Creator is all around us, in all what we see and can see, He created it, there is no proof needed as it is the Good Book.
The Good Book has to be right, if we believe the supporters of the Good Book, they confirming that the whole Good Book story was drawn up at the Anshei Knesset Hagedolah around 500 to 450 BC. We think that in stead of drawn up the story it need to be seen as creating a story as they made up the story as they were going along. This is even obvious as most of the children born in that period had names of ancient cities in and around the Fertile Crescent. Some points of the Good Book are in the cuneiforms founds, and in the Enuma Elish and Gilgamesh story. It will be obvious that the Great Assembly simple collecting the many stories and brought them together as one. We have no doubt that they believed that what they did was correct and they did believe that it was the instruction of God to do so at least that is what we hope for. We also have to believe that this was more then 2500 years ago.
The question is not that we doubt what was written by the Assembly, we doubt of they had their facts right but they did the best they could do in that time, which was an achievement on his own. If we would believe that they had their fact right we also should believe the Good Book it self. However, the assemble itself later had already doubts as shows in the Pentateuch this is not a doubt on the account of the Great Assembly, after all they were human and they had to go back in thousands of years of history of which a large part never was written but just told from father to son. What makes us to have doubt of that you have to be believe, is the adding of the exclamation that it was the word of God, and the word of God is that we have to believe, however if we can believe that, then we have to accept that it was indeed the word of God.
This brings us to the other side of the coin, the evolutionist who claim that the whole story of Creator is a lot of rubbish as to them the world and the Universe did establish themselves, to put it into the popularity phrase The Big Bang.
However that is also not proven, we are asking to believe it as the scientist say so. Then we are on the same stretch as the Good Book we have to believe as the Good Book says so. The evolutionist try to proof their side, with pointers to the Millions of years of the earth development. In reality they have shown animals and plants they say are not mentioned in the Good Book, but the Good Book does not give the names of the animals and or plants. They are till this moment in time also not able to proof that the suggestion that there was an Big Bang indeed did happen as they want us to believe.
This brings us to the point of no return. The right ones as they claim they are, cannot proof the existence of God, nor can the ones who call the others wrong proof there is not a God. Here we have the absurd situation that the Creationist try to proof that it al was created which is impossible and they know it. So they instead of trying to proof God exist they are now only trying to point out possible floors in the evolutionist findings, while the evolutionist are trying their best to get clarity in what they see as an evolution process over millions of years.
If God indeed exist he must be more then being amused by the actions of the creationists, who by lack of getting ever the proof they need simple criticizing others who do real research. Those creationist are cashing in on the fear for God, because you never know. At the same time they cashing in on that fear, something real creationist supporters never would do. It points to an creation to create a money source with nothing to do with God. Although the phrase, "God we make a lot of money out of it" could be their slogan.
===================================================================
06-04-2011
How to get friends.
While Europe is slowly falling to pieces under the watchful eyes of the EU commissioners and their President, wringing their hand in anticipation of yet another country falling into their claws, and the lack of cash and funding is starting to be more then obvious. With an American President having carefully to manoeuvre to get funding which would make its outlook to a second term more possible, there is a British PM who throws money around as of it is confetti. Not his money that is obvious.
So while the Western world try to wring themselves in all kind of hoops to get money and to keep money, the British Government in the form of his PM travels the world and leaves a trail of money presents where ever he goes. We are not talking of a million here and a million there, we talking here of hundreds of millions to countries who have them selves enough and therefore spent the money they do not need but are given as a present, on buying weapons.
The poor British population is forced to pay worlds highest petrol prices which include a seventy percent tax, one of the highest tax, the highest food and clothing prices to make the hand outs to the world possible. So what is the reason that this PM an political nobody, an upstart, who wants to be somebody, spent all that money that does not belong to him. Friendship! He is buying friendship he gives the money in the hope that people will like him and accept him as an friend. And they do, until the money runs out and then that PM has to go back and handover more money that does not below to him. If an civilian would give money away that did not belong to him, he would be arrested for theft.
He follows the footsteps of a former PM Tony Blair, also a failure as a PM, but as a lawyer very good in talking all what was wrong into right. The war in Iraq and his WMD lie, is a good example, pure lies but it was the way he told the people that made them to believe him. He also did spent billions on getting friends and it did work, the result was that from a average middle class lawyer he resigned as PM being a multi millionaire. And that is the example that this PM wants to follow.
There is an saying that says there is honour under thief\u2019s, there is the same under elected politicians. They know from each other what they do and what they do wrong. That is then stored and will come around when one of them breaks the band. By obeying the rules all is possible, getting rich beyond dreams, president of the EU, secretary general of the NATO all is possible, it is this that the PM of Britain is trying to achieve. The Basis for his future riches just as Blair.
Then there are the British people who suffering one disaster after another day after day. They are given promises which are then broken again or followed by new promises which then also are broken again. Then there is the little boy blue which find of himself that he is the man Britain cannot do without Clegg. Clegg is famous for betraying his own voters so that the party is now less then the half as it was before the last election. Clegg himself does not have a clue of what he actual is doing but he tries to do this so long as possible, and if someone tells him off, and that almost the whole of the British population then he cries as the little boy blue. At the same time he is cashing in as life has to go on. Sad thing is that Clegg only is in the job not because what he knowns but because who he knows, or better who his daddy knew. If it was not for daddy he would have not got anywhere at all.
Then there is an jolly good fellow who knows it all, however till this moment he has failed to reveal that what he knows all to the British population. Osborne a man who never was able to explain what he was doing on board of a Russian Billionaires yacht in the Mediterranean. No he never did indeed, however he was double quick to question the reason why others where on that yacht, making suggestion and half accusations as coming out of an film move writers sheet. However, no he did never explained why he was there himself, he was not a close friend of the Russian Billionaire so why? Then again the man so far has never revealed that he actual does know anything. This is however the man who tells Britain that, \u201cWe are all in it together\u201d. And that is yet looking at his many freebies it is clearly another fantasy.
This government in Britain has actual the nerve to tell the people if you are ill, stop being it and get back to work, if you are disabled but can still lift a pencil you can go back to work. There is no work but still if you are not working than you are a scrounger, a thief from others people hard earned money. You cannot have things for free the PM said. Not for free? What is he getting then, while he is saying you cannot have a home for free, not for free? However, what does he pays then for his free homes in London and the country side, NOTHING at all it's free. His petrol is free, his diners are free, almost everything he does is free, how does that goes together with you cannot get things for free, we are all in it together.
This PM, the man who tell the civilians that they cannot get anything for free is a free-loader himself not an ordinary free-loader but a rich free-loader. So does he gives away his own money to make friends worldwide, friends he fly to on the purse of the British people, friends he pays from the British people purse, invite to diner out of the British people purse and gives them millions out of the British people purse. This is the man that gets millions that is not his to spent, and get richly paid for it, and then calls people who try to survive on 70 pounds a week, free loaders. 70 pounds of which 40 pounds goes to Tax, Gas, Electricity, Phone and Water, the simple basics, the 30 pounds left goes on food, drink, clothing and cleaning plus travelling. It is more then enough the PM and his co-pilot's in this disaster say, while picking up their rich pickings in wages and free goods, free travelling and services.
This PM, the only man in the Western world who know every thing better then all the world leaders together, that is if you want to believe him, as he is a good talker, it is probably all he is, decide to fire a large part of his military force, including flight and marine equipment and then start a war for no other reason than to start a war to stop Libya to nationalise the oil business, on an excuse that makes the WMD of Iraq sounds serious. It is done in second line mainly to get the British attention away from the statistically poor situation in Britain. What better way to do it then gather the population around the flag and present the new started war as the removal of an evil dictator. It would maybe have worked if he not made a pact with an Gulf dictator from Qatar.
That evil dictator in this presentation case is Gaddafi of Libya. The man that is not a dictator not even a president or an PM, but just an head of state just as the British queen and we hardly could call her an dictator, while she is head many atrocities were committed by the British army, just as that did happen with Gaddafi, does not the matter. The fact that this Libya just was praised by the UN for their outstanding human rights record in all part of the population, does not the matter. Libya that was, till that PM of Britain started the war, a member of the UN Human rights commission, does not the matter. That Libya what was just a year before a member of the UN security council, does not the matter. That Libya that was hailed by the UN as an excellent member, does not the matter. That was that Libya that had a lot of oil that was needed by the USA and Britain corporate rulers to fill their pockets and under threat of nationalising and that did does matter. It was the reason that the USA created the so-called rebellion, then gave the order to Britain and the French, where a midget on high heels was in charge to start the war.
So the upstart of Britain and the high heeled midget followed orders and started the war, that it cost millions and millions something both countries cannot afford, Britain even less then France, is not the point the civilians have to pay and to pay through their noses. The USA controlled press, such as News International was recruited, to persuade the population that what their PM was doing is trying to remove an evil dictator. That News International it self is not so straight is shown out of the facts that they are willing to pay up to 20 million in damages for phone tapping and lies. However it did work and the British population was indeed willing to believe the PM's Lie just as they believed Blair's lie of the WMD in Iraq. Now a donkey never hit themselves twice on the same stone, but the British do. It gives a clear indication about them.
While he sacked a part of the military and went to war, he at the same time launched advertising on the TV in Britain to persuade people to join the army. Now here we have an contradiction in terms. That was something that PM found out himself so he made his usual U turn, as he always does U turn after U turn so that the civilians in Britain are so confused that they do not know any more what is what after so many U turns. The budget calculators needed more time to calculate all the U turns and alteration and had to include the extra hundreds of millions for the war in Libya. At the same time they had to calculate the reduced take of petrol due to the highly increased prices. The supporting press made up the stories the good sounding stories to tell the people the big lie but on such a way that it looks like the truth. It is done in the same way as the Nazi Germans did, tell a lie long enough and people will believe it, so some column writers in the Sun and the News of the World fantasy transferred as real situations written in a way that it sound believable, however it still is a fantasy.
So what is there left of those fantastic promises that the self appointed PM made before the last election. Out of the EU, is now deep in it, all fault of the previous party in charge they say. It is not the truth but who cares, not the PM of that party that after 13 years in opposition still was not able to win the majority to rule the country, and therefore with the help of a down and out leader of another party managed just to get enough to form a government which hangs on their finger nails almost every time of the day. That is why he needed a war, but even that he could not do proper and the government he wanted to remove is still in power. Like the hands of Blair the hands of the PM now also starting to leave a trail of blood of the innocent in Afghanistan and Libya man, woman children babies under the heading they are all terrorists or murderers.
Even the help of another dictator in the Middle east, the great friend of that British PM, Al Thani of Qatar, the man who threw his own father out of the job while he was out of the country as real cowards do, simple took the power and does not allow any form of opposition, hence the population is less then a million. No parliament, no elections, not even once in since he took power. The only other in charge under this Al Thani regime are his own family. This self appointed dictator of Qatar is good friends with the self appointed leader of Britain, both are spending money that really should go to the people of the country, they both are interfering in other countries just for the profit, while of the people of those countries many die. Look at Bahrain, look at Libya.
For the British self appointed leader it means getting richer and known, for the self appointed dictator of Qatar it means a free hand in obtaining the good he wants for the cheap to sell them with a huge profit. Life's for both self appointed leaders being an PM or a dictator do not count, prestige and money that is all what counts. For both counts however that they have to obey the USA, without that submission Qatar would be taken over by the USA and Britain would be bankrupt.
For both count obvious that there no grain of interest for the well-being of the population, and in the case of that British PM he follows the orders of the USA as of he is an US governor instead of an British PM, while his deputy PM follows the orders of the EU commissioners as of Britain is a province of the EU, instead of a proud nation.
It must be for the British population if they understand of what is going on terrible to know that Britain is sold three ways, to the corporate business for profit, to the USA as part of the USA, and to the EU as part of the EU State. For all three the British population has to pay like it or not. So while the population is starving in the middle and lower classes, the wealthy, the rich and the corporate scroungers and manipulators making an fortune over the backs of the population stimulated by corporate media who distorting the real situation. And that PM he loves it, he gets what he wants, and the people, well who cares about the people, they are there only for the money and if they do not have that, well let them rot. And that is exactly the program what the evil four have in mind, Cameron, Clegg, Osborne and Duncan Smith, millionaires with not a clue of real life between them. They think they are great but in reality they are just like the French high heeled one, midgets nothing else.
====================================================================
08-04-2011
In the Israeli press there is lately a lot of talk about the San Remo conference between the four powers of that time.
The Israeli press suggest that at the San Remo conference the Jews were given the right of the land of Palestine.
This however is incorrect: It was the establishment in Palestine of a national home for Jewish people.
The San Remo conference was hastily convened. Great Britain and France both agreed to recognize the provisional independence of Syria and Mesopotamia, while "reluctantly" claiming mandates for their administration. Palestine was composed of the Ottoman administrative districts of southern Syria. Under customary international law, premature recognition of its independence would be a gross affront to the government of the newly declared parent state.
San Remo Resolution - April 25, 1920
It was agreed –
(a) To accept the terms of the Mandates Article as given below with reference to Palestine, on the understanding that there was inserted in the process-verbal an undertaking by the Mandatory Power that this would not involve the surrender of the rights hitherto enjoyed by the non-Jewish communities in Palestine; this undertaking not to refer to the question of the religious protectorate of France, which had been settled earlier in the previous afternoon by the undertaking given by the French Government that they recognized this protectorate as being at an end.
(b) That the terms of the Mandates Article should be as follows:
The High Contracting Parties agree that Syria and Mesopotamia shall, in accordance with the fourth paragraph of Article 22, Part I (Covenant of the League of Nations), be provisionally recognized as independent States, subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone. The boundaries of the said States will be determined, and the selection of the Mandatories made, by the Principal Allied Powers.
The High Contracting Parties agree to entrust, by application of the provisions of Article 22, the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory, to be selected by the said Powers. The Mandatory will be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 8, 1917, by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
La Puissance mandataire s’engage a nommer dans le plus bref delai une Commission speciale pour etudier toute question et toute reclamation concernant les differentes communautes religieuses et en etablir le reglement. Il sera tenu compte dans la composition de cette Commission des interets religieux en jeu. Le President de la Commission sera nomme par le Conseil de la Societe des Nations.
The terms of the mandates in respect of the above territories will be formulated by the Principal Allied Powers and submitted to the Council of the League of Nations for approval.
Turkey hereby undertakes, in accordance with the provisions of Article [132 of the Treaty of Sèvres] to accept any decisions which may be taken in this connection.
(c) Les mandataires choisis par les principales Puissances allies sont: la France pour la Syrie, et la Grande Bretagne pour la Mesopotamie, et la Palestine.
In reference to the above decision the Supreme Council took note of the following reservation of the Italian Delegation:
La Delegation Italienne en consideration des grands interets economiques que l’Italie en tant que puissance exclusivement mediterraneenne possede en Asie Mineure, reserve son approbation a la presente resolution, jusqu’au reglement des interets italiens en Turquie d’Asie.
During the meetings of the "Council of Four" in 1919, British Prime Minister Lloyd George stated that the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence was a treaty obligation. He also explained that the agreement with Hussein had been the basis for the Sykes-Picot Agreement. Under the terms of the Sykes-Picot Agreement, the British and French had agreed to an independent Arab state.
On 6 January 1920 Prince Faisal initialled an agreement with French Prime Minister Clemenceau which acknowledged "the right of the Syrians to unite to govern themselves as an independent nation".[6] A Pan-Syrian Congress, meeting in Damascus, had declared an independent state of Syria on 8 March 1920.[7] The new state included Syria, Palestine, Lebanon and portions of northern Mesopotamia which had been set aside under the Sykes-Picot Agreement for an independent Arab state, or confederation of states. King Faisal was declared the head of state. At the same time Prince Zeid, Faisal's brother, was declared regent of Mesopotamia.
British Mandate for Palestine
The three principles of the British Balfour Declaration regarding Palestine were adopted in the Treaty of Sèvres:
ARTICLE 95.
The High Contracting Parties agree to entrust, by application of the provisions of Article 22, the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory to be selected by the said Powers. The Mandatory will be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2, 1917, by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
The letter shows the intention of a national home for the Jewish people. The only right herein are the religion and civil rights of non-Jewish.
Foreign Office,
November 2nd, 1917.
Dear Lord Rothschild,
I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet:
"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country".
I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
Yours sincerely
Arthur James Balfour
Balfour explained:
"The contradiction between the letters of the Covenant [of the League of Nations] and the policy of the Allies is even more flagrant in the case of the ‘independent nation’ of Palestine than in that of the ‘independent nation‘of Syria. For in Palestine we do not propose to even go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country though the American [King-Crane] Commission is going through the form of asking what they are.
The Four Great Powers [Britain, France, Italy and the United States] are committed to Zionism. And Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age-long traditions, in present needs, and future hopes, of far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land. In my opinion that is right.
What I have never been able to understand is how it can be harmonized with the [Anglo-French] declaration, the Covenant, or the instruction to the [King-Crane] Commission of Enquiry.
I do not think that Zionism will hurt the Arabs, but they will never say they want it. Whatever be the future of Palestine it is not now an ‘independent nation’, nor is it yet on the way to become one. Whatever deference should be paid to the views of those living there, the Powers in their selection of a mandatory do not propose, as I understand the matter, to consult them. In short, so far as Palestine is concerned, the Powers have made no statement of fact which is not admittedly wrong, and no declaration of policy which, at least in the letter, they have not always intended to violate.
If Zionism is to influence the Jewish problem throughout the world Palestine must be made available for the largest number of Jewish immigrants. It is therefore eminently desirable that it should obtain the command of the water-power which naturally belongs to it whether by extending its borders to the north, or by treaty with the mandatory of Syria, to whom the southward flowing waters of Hamon could not in any event be of much value.
For the same reason Palestine should be extended into the lands lying east of the Jordan. It should not, however, be allowed to include the Hedjaz Railway, which is too distinctly bound up with exclusively Arab Interests..."
The Declarations conferred basic rights on all the inhabitants of the Jewish and Arab states without distinction of sex, nationality, language, race or religion and protected the rights and property of all nationals of the country who differed in race, religion, or language from the majority of the inhabitants of the country. The country concerned had to acknowledge the clauses of the treaty: as fundamental laws of State and no law, regulation or official action could conflict or interfere with their stipulations, nor could any law, regulation or official action prevail over them. The States also had to acknowledge these rights as obligations of international concern placed under the guarantee of the United Nations. Compromissory clauses were included granting the International Court jurisdiction.
Abba Eban subsequently declared that the rights stipulated in section C. Declaration, chapters 1 and 2 of UN resolution 181(II) had been constitutionally embodied as the fundamental law of the state of Israel as required by that resolution and assured the committee that Israel would not invoke Article 2, paragraph 7 of the Charter, regarding its domestic jurisdiction. The instruments that he cited during the hearings were the Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel, and various cables and letters of confirmation addressed to the Secretary General. Mr. Eban's explanations and Israel's undertakings were noted in the text of A/RES/273 (III), 11 May 1949. A similar Declaration of the State of Palestine, supplied by the Palestine National Council, was accepted as being in line with the General Assembly resolution in A/RES/43/177, 15 December 1988.
When the state of Israel was declared the population was in percentage as below.
Territory Arab and other population % Arab and other Jewish population % Jewish Total population
Arab State 725,000 99% 10,000 1% 735,000
Jewish State 407,000 45% 498,000 55% 905,000
International 105,000 51% 100,000 49% 205,000
Total 1,237,000 67% 608,000 33% 1,845,000
Data from the Report of UNSCOP — 1947
Report, A/AC.14/32, dated 11 November 1947
It should be noted that the term Beersheba Bedouin has a meaning more definite than one would expect in the case of a nomad population. These tribes, wherever they are found in Palestine, will always describe themselves as Beersheba tribes. Their attachment to the area arises from their land rights there and their historic association with it. The Bedouin population at approximately 127,000. Note: most Bedouin's are now removed in some cases forcible from their villages and tents in the Negev.
Passage of the resolution required a two-thirds majority of valid votes (i.e. not counting abstaining and absent members). Prior to the final vote, when countries indicated their voting intentions, it was evident that the required majority was not available. The vote would have been: for 30, against 16, abstaining 10 - one short of a two-thirds majority.
On 29 November 1947, the United Nations General Assembly voted 33 to 13, with 10 abstentions, in favour of the Partition Plan, while making some adjustments to the boundaries between the two states proposed by it.
The Zionist played a vile and contemptible part in the lead up to the voting, the Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru spoke with anger and contempt for the way the UN vote had been lined up. He said the Zionists had tried to bribe India with millions and at the same time his sister, Vijayalalshmi Pandit, had received daily warnings that her life was in danger unless "she voted right.
Three countries — Haiti, Liberia, the Philippines — were persuaded to change their positions, which enabled the required majority to be reached. Liberia's Ambassador to the United States complained that the US delegation threatened aid cuts to several countries and warned of dire consequences if they did not vote according to the wished of the Americans and the Zionists. In short the only reason Israel did come in existence by one vote was due to blackmail and treats.
In favour, (33 countries, 59%):
30 countries (54%) initially in favour:
Australia, Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, Belo Russian SSR, Canada, Costa Rica, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, France, Guatemala, Iceland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Sweden, South Africa, Ukrainian SSR, United States of America, Soviet Union, Uruguay, Venezuela.
An additional 3 (5%) switched to in favour:
Haiti, Liberia, Philippines.
Against, (13 countries, 23%):
Afghanistan, Cuba, Egypt, Greece, India, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, Yemen.
Abstentions, (10 countries, 18%):
Argentina, Chile, Republic of China, Colombia, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Honduras, Mexico, United Kingdom, Yugoslavia.
Absent, (1 country, 0%):
Thailand
The San Remo conference did not promise a right and only blackmail and bribery established the State of Israel.
Not exactly the right way of starting a State on someone else land given by countries who did not own it but used treats and blackmail to give away that was not theirs to give away.
There can be no doubt that Israel has the right to exist, they have however no right to make it a secular Jewish state. So long the USA protects them under pressure of the Jewish bankers to protect the trillions debt of the USA, Israel will be save. If that protection falls away what then will be happening is anyone’s guess, we would not hold our breath.
====================================================================
10-04-2011
What do you do when you are unpopular have no funds to play with and are hand and foot tied to the US, you start a war. Europe is yet again at war, this time without a war declaration just as they done with Afghanistan. A war is it in any case. They are united via the NATO a defence organisation when it was organised, now a sole attacking force world wide. It is a part of the USA defence system where as by they give the orders and the Europeans pay the costs and the USA get the spoils. The Countries in Europe are in deep trouble financial and that already for several years.
The writing was on the wall for a long time on a sliding scale, the self-delusion of the Euro as the coin for a united Europe the self-delusion as a world dominant power bloc, their self-delusion pompous idea of greatness. It was obvious that it would go wrong as the organisers who filled in the finer points where it self no responsible for anything they did or do. It was for that reason it would go wrong as they, those self appointed rulers of failed politicians did not realise that giving people a blanc check would lead to problems. It was a blanc spent spent spent card which would if it failed be bared by the ones who had behaved themselves proper. And as predicted in 2008 it did happen in 2010, the countries who did the spent spent spent expected that when they failed the other countries opened up their purses and bailed the spent spent spent ones out, and so they did.
It is a measure of European politicians that they failed to see what the rest of the world did see. It is an form of self-delusion that Angela Merkel, Germany's premier, called the Euro-zone summit on March 24th-25th a big step forwards in solving the Euro's debt crisis. What did happen was exactly nothing then telling themselves that it only gets better. Those leaders fell well short on almost every task they set themselves. They now agreed on a permanent rescue mechanism to be introduced in 2013, but could fund it properly, because Angela Merkel refused to put up money her finance minister had pledged without asking.
As an result the club in Brussels could do nothing or almost nothing to help Greece, Ireland and Portugal with Spain and Britain close following, the Euro zone troubled economies. Those countries failure to act to reduce the problems will get worst, they will blame the others instead of their own failures. The citizen of those countries are already loaded to the neck with extra costs and taxes. It does not stop countries like Spain and Britain to waster hundreds of millions more by going to war in Libya as real cowards without a war declaration.
England and Spain are both in a dangerous position as they have both rebels fighting for rights on their own country just as the rebels in Libya. What if another country decide to actively start helping those rebels in Britain or Spain. And what would those brave countries of Britain and Spain response be if that scenario would happen. They would just as Libya attempt to drive those rebels out.
The Portuguese prime minister resigned on March 23rd after failing to win support for the fourth austerity package in a year. The country's credit rating was slashed to the status level the US and UK should be near junk. In the time between the ten-year bond yields have risen above 8% as investors fear Portugal will have to turn to the European Union and the IMF for loans. The economies of both Greece and Ireland, are shrinking faster than expected, and bond yields, at almost 13% for Greece and over 10% for Ireland, remain stubbornly high. This while the status of Britain and Spain are growing desperately close to the credit low status. Even when like in Britain the population is hanging out to dry. Investors simple do not believe the measures and the rescues will work.
There was a warning in 2008 that not including a self responsibility into the Euro zone for the countries to control their budgets. They were right. These economies are on a course to destruction, to late the governments started to realise that careful budgeting without relying on others to bail them out. Greece is trying hard to free up its rigid economy. Portugal has lagged in scrapping stifling rules, but its fiscal tightening is bold. They can make all the efforts however the blame solely can put on the shoulders of those in Brussels, they made the mistakes by not putting in place guarantees needed to stop the Euro countries from relying on others to pay for them.
It is now the same people who made the original mistake who now insist that those countries slash their budget deficits regardless of the consequences on growth. However that in turn creates problems as more stringed measures will drag down their output, their enormous debt's expected to peak at 160% of GDP for Greece, 125% for Ireland and at least 100% for Portugal so bond yields will stay high. The result is a further downwards trend. The European Central Bank will raise the interest rates either in April or in May and other countries will follow. It will hopefully make for the time being the Euro looking stronger but falls to be seen of that will last as it will reduce the competitive of the EU nations.
Some politicians are still demanding higher corporate taxes but that would block the growth and the way out of the problems. Britain even lowered even just slightly the corporate tax. Most pernicious, though, is the perverse logic of the Euro zone's rescue mechanisms. Europe declines debt reduction now, but then expect that any country requiring help from 2013 may need to have its debt restructured and that new official lending will take priority over bondholders. It is an stupidity that shows that they realise that they made a mistake but not really has a clue how to come out of it. This insecurity will keeps the yields high for the time being but that in turn torpedo's the rescue plans.
The most logic measure they could take now would be to reassign the rules for the Euro, in which every country is responsible for their own debts and has to take measures to solve debts if they occur. That the Central bank could help at normal banking standards but that the burden should not be spread over the other nations. If that would be done they then could start restructuring as final phase the debts of Greece and Ireland and lent an helping hand to Portugal and Spain. Not to Britain as that is not part of the Euro zone although at this moment they have the responsibility to help to fund the other countries debts. The big obstacle is here an political will.
The ECB, remains opposed to debt restructuring it in basics find that the countries themselves need to solve their own problems a point that is now also clearly supported by Angela Merkel. Ireland is talking about forcing the senior bondholders of its banks in trouble to take a hit. Greece should start to take the measures needed to get the country on the straight and narrow again and push for restructuring either via the ECB or the IMF, however the IMF seems to be the best chance. It is time that the IMF presses the European politicians into taking the measures they should have been taken a long time ago, responsibility for the EU. It is an absurdity that a group of unelected self appointed politicians take decisions which should be taken by an elected EU minister so that they can called to explain their handling of the issue, any issue. This is something that cannot be done yet as the commissioners have so much power that they as a group can over rule any decision made.
What the markets' agenda is however, to make profits and an balancing EU is a and can be a money spinner, therefore the EU has to place clear markers as were and how far the markets are able to interfere in the EU financial stability. However of that will happen falls to be seen, to many politicians have well established interest in the markets and certainly do not want to cut of their profits special in the UK. It is for that reason that the UK with all its fiscal mess, has so far escaped the markets attention. The Euro zone should help the weak members to avoid failing but at the same time should ensure that in doing so, they avoid the hidden danger as there should be strict rules about what a country in fiscal trouble should do.
So long as there are still countries in the EU who think that the austerity measures placed on Greece are unreasonable, unjustifiable and have no way of achieving their goal of repaying the debt. Then the chance that the EU can work out an measure to stabilize is far away. A country such as Greece has enough State property to raise funding and to attract private investments if the rules of employment are adjusted. It will encourage economic growth. But this will require increased spending, reduced taxes and growing wages - quite the contrary of the austerity measures required from both the IMF and the EU (with Germany in the front line) and almost impossible to achieve so long as Germany follows the doctrine of keeping its real-wage growth below increases of productivity in order to sell its products on other markets.
However, as so long the unelected group of failed politicians using the EU for their benefit and their income earning base then there will be no restructuring of the basics of the EURO. Fact is that more countries are balancing on the level of Junk and are only saved by their servant like attitude to the US. As soon as they lose that attitude and are becoming independent countries again they will be declared Junk status and the market gamblers will step in to take all what is possible. In 2008 we warned against the EU stand of open for all attitude regarding the EURO, it was not accepted and we had a lot of negative response from well establish economical institutions, only to proof two years later that what we had warned for was happening indeed.
It is still not over more countries will fall if the EU does not get their act together and start acting as the EU with a proper council of elected government, responsible to the EU parliament. Countries who do not want to be part of the political adhesion should be allowed to get the status of trading partners, only then we would get the stability the EU need. We fear that personal politics of the EU politicians will turn to be a real block to progress.
===================================================================
12-04-2011
In this piece we presume that Muslims and Christians both worship the same God because they both believe in one God.
It is the same God; it is the God of Adam and Eve.
All, Muslims Christians and Jews belong to the Abrahamic religion.
They all have the same God, and the same history to support their religion.
The different between them is Jesus. Christians say it is the Son of God. The Muslims believe it is a prophet, while the Jews believe it was a fake messiah. Therefore, the clear different is obvious. However, God is still the same God of all three Abrahamic religions. The vision spread out of the Bible and the Koran are the same, however, again Jesus is the disturbing factor, but God is still the same and only God. The God of Adam and Eve.
Jesus himself preached the one God and claimed to be his Son, maybe so but two of the three Abrahamic religions disagree. This does not mean that God is not God, or that the God of Adam and Eve is a different God for the Muslims although being the God of Adam and Eve. Nor does it means that the Jewish God is a different one although being the God of Adam and Eve. It does mean however, that it is the same God for all three Abrahamic religions.
The studies of the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim books show that it is indeed the same and only God.
There maybe different in the way their believes are expressed, by the three Abrahamic religions, but the God they believe in is the same God. It would be a different case if Christians only believed the teachings of Jesus and not the God of Adam and Eve. However, as they have God’s Son they do believe in the same God the God of Adam and Eve. Again, this is the same God of Adam and Eve in which the Muslims believe, hence the God of the Christians and the Muslims are the same. As they have taken the history of the Jews as their lead, it is also the God of the Jews.
The Christians to their needs adapt the interpretation of the bible taken seriously by the Jews and the Muslims.
The way the Christians have changed and altered the bible over the centuries is clearly to see if only we take an example over the last 100 or 150 years.
Two examples are needed to enlighten the above statement.
Revelation 22.18/19 “I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds anything to them, God will add to him the plaques described in this book.
And if anyone takes words away from this book of prophecy, God will take away from him his share in the tree of life and in the Holy city, which are described in this book.
Bible version 1966
This book of revelation 22.18/19 has indeed added and taken away if compared with the bibles as in 1908 and 1868 versions.
An other example is Ecclesiastes 1.2 “Vanity of vanity said the preacher, vanity of vanities, it is all vanity.
Bible 1868 and 1908 version.
The 1966 version reads: Ecclesiastes 1.2 “meaningless! Meaningless!” says the teacher
utterly meaningless! Everything is meaningless.
The Christian fanatics will argue it means in principle the same, but that argument will be indeed meaningless.
Meaningless = having no meaning (no synonym available)
Vanity = excessive pride or the quality of being worthless.
However, having no meaning or being worthless are two complete different entities and in no relationship with each other, although via a twisted intent to update and alter lengthening or shortening the Bible, a phrase or words can be altered to suit the intent.
It does not mean it is right or correct, as we should not change or correct the word of God in whatever form. Revelation 22.18/19 clearly forbids altering but that is just what they did.
The point being that there is only one God in which we all believe. Regardless of we are Christians, Jewish or Muslims, the different is as pointed out earlier Jesus.
Seen as Son of God by the Christians, Prophet by the Muslims and as a fake messiah by the Jews. However, God is God and that is all there is to it.
Many Christians will say that the Muslims are different, and so they are, they have a different view as they are not hampered by the words of Jesus and therefore can live to the rules set out by God and Mohammed the Prophet, just as the Christians adhere to the words of God and the teachings of Jesus. However regardless of Jesus or Mohammed, God is still the only God, the God of Adam and Eve.
We maybe differ at interpretations but we all in the Abrahamic religions believe in the same God, regardless.
As in all religions, there are fanatics who spoil the view, nowhere this is more obvious then in the Muslim religion, but let us not forget this is a small section and the same fanatics are active in the Christian and Jewish faiths, just read the blogs. We also have to remember, to realise that Jesus teaches that all the Pentateuch’s laws had to be kept in place and to include the Ten Commandments, the social laws and the system of that therein.
The Prophet Mohammed also in the Koran confirms the Pentateuch, and to follow the God given social legislation.
The above proofs that the God of the Christians is the same God as that of the Muslims and the Jews. Suggesting the different means a lack of faith in God and God’s judgment.
====================================================================
14-04-2011
Suomen-Finland.
To update the story underneath The priest is defrocked by the terrorism supporting Church in Finland. It means that all who now attend the church in Finland are active supporting Terrorism.
Do not pay any attention to the stories of the Kazkav center which is the US intelligent center in Finland to destabilize Russia by funding to organize the many terrorist attacks in Russia. They still, the US and the Caucasus terrorist, want to break Russia up, so that the US can use the free coming oil of the Caucasus. The Finnish government completely support this terrorist Establishment. Don't be fooled by their fantasy stories only mentally unstable would believe.
----------------------
High at the North of the EU is the State of Finland or the republic of Finland or in their own words Suomen.
It was till the end of the tent century a walking through country of many tribes of which the Sami is the only one steadily consisted. It was in the eleventh century that Sweden started to develop and got some interest for that land on the other side of that water at the east of Stockholm, a basic fishing embarking village. In the twelve century it was made a province, and later a Grand Duchy of Sweden at the end of the 19th century Russia took over and as such Finland was a Grand Duchy of Russia till 1917, when Finland declared themselves in depended due to the internal problems and war in Russia. The first world war. It took till 2000 before they had a proper constitution, something that was not really important as the population was always small and it still is a mere 5 million, mostly spread over the cities with Helsinki over a million. However it still not accepts in full the ICJ jurisdiction. It is the only country in the North that has accepted the Euro as coin.
Most of this is well known and generally the Finnish are seen as a small population depending on industry to buy the food they need to live on as the countries food production available land is very small indeed. It favours the USA as leader but at the same time is a member of the EU. They are also the sole promoter of terrorist organisations operating in Russia Doku Umarov is a near hero by the Finnish government who do not want to hear a bad word about him. They even let him use their country to spread their terrorist ideology all over the world under the heading of free speech.
That is free for terrorists but not for the Finnish people. It seems to an outsider that Finland works as the money transfer for the North Caucasus terrorists to make life difficult for the Russian government. So freedom of speech and facilities for terrorists and other charged with racial hatred for describing one of the world’s most wanted Islamic terrorists as a “terrorist.” A Finnish priest is being persecuted after speaking out against Russia’s number one terrorist Doku Umarov and his internet propaganda arm. The pastor also claims he’s been receiving constant death threats from the leader of the Chechen militants.
Finland insists the priest is the real criminal. The reason being that he dared to use the free speech, to have a free speech. The Finnish government has made it crystal clear that free speech is only for the terrorists who are paid by the USA to cause death and destruction. Doku Umarov himself admitted to the funding. Police have questioned Pastor Juha Molari after he gave an interview to RT in which he discussed Doku Umarov, the man behind the Moscow metro and airport bombings. Russia’s number one outlaw Chechen terrorist Doku Umarov is also high-up on the international most-wanted list. But it seems one of Russia’s neighbours isn’t interested in helping bring him to justice as he is under USA protection. Apparently the Finnish government over a handful of citizen sees the leader of the international terrorists as a President.
The pastor has been a long-time critic of a website called the Kavkaz Center, where extremists freely express their views. The Kavzak center is forbidden in almost every country in the world and the whole of Europe except Finland. In Finland they can operate freely and with Government support who will arrest anyone who dares to have critic on the by them protected terrorist. Apart from facing being defrocked for speaking out against Doku Umarov and his internet mouthpiece Kavzak, Juha Molari is receiving threats of a different kind. The Kavzak website no doubt with Finnish government approval as they did not act when the death treats were made, warned “We advise you to stop your activity against the Kavkaz Center. If you don’t come to your senses we’ll cut off the heads of you and your family”.
So much for the standards of the United Europe, it promotes the USA double standards, it promote international terrorism, says Gennady Gudkov in a reaction on the Finnish terrorist promotion. Gennady Gudkov is the Deputy Head of Russia’s State Duma Security Committee. Gudkov also remarked it is alarming that Finland is among the countries which call Chechen terrorism a liberation movement. In which case the Continued IRA in Northern Ireland can also be seen as a liberation movement, or the Bask organisation in Spain and France can be re-named liberation movements.
“Terrorism is terrorism, no matter how it’s disguised,” says Gudkov. Terrorism is a menace to all of mankind. Double standards are the reason terrorism still exists. The promotion by the USA and the United Kingdom of terrorism in countries they want to rob of their minerals lead to increasing terrorism and rebellion. Once a country labels militants from illegal armed groups who commit terror attacks against innocent people as terrorists, for another country to proclaim them freedom fighters is just despicable. Then again the Finnish have proven in the past to be very selective in supporting freedom and terrorism. It simple confirms that they are well and truly in the claws of the USA secret service. Personal we never expected anything like this from the Finnish authorities. then again looking back on their human right records we could have expected it.
At least the Finnish population is now aware that free speech in their country is only for the terrorist and if a citizen dares to open his mouth he knows that jail is waiting. Europe does understand most of the open countries do understand that there is a clear link between terrorist action and terrorist propaganda. And that terrorist propaganda or information is a part of global terrorist action; however, the payments and treats from the US secret service will keep at such that they do not dare to speak out against the promotion of terrorism in Finland. We may expect that the Finnish Government opened a bottle of champagne when the deaths at the Russian Moscow airport were announced and their most favoured terrorist proclaimed he was the organiser.
Some people in the intelligence community say: look, we need to keep them open because by keeping them open we could scrutinize what they do, could get a global view on their acquaintance, we can see exactly with which organizations they are in touch and that helps the global counter-terrorism struggle. This is an argument that is heard many times before even before the Internet existed and nobody was never convinced. Just collecting intelligence on terrorists and doing nothing is a counter-productive policy. It actual promotes terrorism and with an increasing Muslim population it may be expected that funding from Muslim dictators to fund the terrorism is not far behind, just look at the money spending of the Emir of Qatar.
There are people in Finland who say that it is the right policy by the Finnish government. It will prevent that Finland itself will be a victim of a terrorist attack. It’s sad but even here the leftist media and the government don’t use the word TERRORIST even when they know full well that attacks were committed by TERRORIST. The right word is backhanders and cowards. What they have done in fact is handing their country to the will of the terrorist. They cannot now decline or remove as the terrorist; cowards as they are would bomb the Finnish airport and stations. In Finland it is now safer to be a terrorist/Muslim in a Christian country than a priest. The church in Finland also breaks in fast succession the laws of God. They shall not kill is now translated by the Finnish church as, they shall support the killings. Here we need to remind ourselves that the Finnish population and the Church glorified the killings of Russians when Russia wanted to take back what was theirs the Grand duchy of Russia.
Before we know, they will it find being against the law to be a Christian or a Jew because by being a Christian or a Jew could be inciting racial hatred. Not possible? For a country that supports terrorism against Christians while calling themselves a Christian nation, all id possible just a question who pays most. Finland is less then 100 years an in depended country but is now very well tied to the USA without it would be an EU no mans land. It is no wonder that the degree of depression and stress is higher then anywhere in the world, who would not be depressed with a government that promote just like Iran, terrorism and penalise Christians for pointing out the obvious. And the rest of Europe, there are to busy to invade yet another Muslim country to rob it from their oil and gas to see the danger lurking in the North.
The ones who do notice are to busy with filling their pockets with dollars. Man can really wonder of the support for Muslim terrorism is a cover to hide that they at the same time killing Muslims in other countries.
Look at the USA every time they want to shove a bad idea to the throats of the American people then used the Blacks as an excuse. That is now changed and it is now the Muslims and the Mexicans who have taken over that blame function of the blacks. That is what they are doing in Europe’s highest northern country, blame Gaddafi for the ills created by the NATO and hail as a hero the monster that killed at the stations at the schools at the airports of Russia. That way nobody can say that NATO and EU are against Muslims which they are killing in ever larger quantities, with the help of Muslim dictators as the one in Qatar, as they protect the terrorist Muslims of Russia. The principle being they can kill they can maim they can cut peoples head off but don’t call them terrorists, call them freedom fighters, that suits the USA better, according the clown Hillary Clinton. We know she talks but while she is opening her mouth we are sure that the sound comes from some where lower at the back. In the time between the Finnish governments simple ignores their population’s wishes and follows the USA advice.
The Finnish population do not want Finland involved in the NATO terrorist attacks on Libya, the Finnish government ignores it, and maybe the sound of the dollar is more interesting. 94% is against, but 50% said they want humanitarian help to Libya, so the Finnish Government refuses. They are a left minority so they only listening to the small minorities. In between the Government in Finland simple ignores their own Bank which tells them that they are running a deficit of more than 2.5% of GDP this year while government debt tops 50 per cent. In 2008, before the financial crisis and subsequent recession, Finland had debt of only 44 per cent and a surplus of 4 per cent of GDP. IN A MEETING on Tuesday morning, President Tarja Halonen and the Cabinet Committee on Foreign and Security Policy agreed on Finnish participation in EU planning for a crisis management operation. Finland’s stance on participation – even of a military nature – is positive in principle. If the issue becomes topical, it will be decided in accordance with the Act on Military Crisis Management.
This includes the protection of the terrorist properties of Doku Umarov.
In a poor man’s version of democracy, Finland goes to polls next month to elect MPs to the 200-member parliament. The real McCoy, direct democracy, has never taken root at Finnish soil. There have been, in fact, only two referendums in Finland’s history – way back in 1931 on prohibition and in 1994 on joining the EU. In contrast, there have been over 300 referendums in Europe in the last 15 years alone. Therefore as foreigners we have to admit to being confused by contradictory attitudes that occur during these intriguing times. Finnish people in our experience, spend the majority of their lives trying to avoid contact with each other. They will specifically move seats on the bus rather than sit close to another human being, and eye contact to them is something that only occurs purely coincidental. Yet, put them in a mökki with a few beers and a barbeque and they spend the entire time in a state of semi-nakedness while chatting continuously to each other throughout. We have to admit that spending half of the weekend in a room full of naked men while sweating out of control, the sauna, is not our view of paradise.
A Helsinki bus driver was so badly beaten by a group of dubious origin on board his night bus that he remained in intensive care for over a week. This latest case of violence on the buses caused bus drivers’ representatives to threaten industrial action last week unless Helsinki Regional Transport (HSL) provided details on how it will improve security. However how can security be improved as terrorist are allowed to roam the streets and cannot be held responsible for what ever they do because the government protect the terrorists. And what does the rest of Europe they close their eyes and hopes they cannot see it.
===================================================================
16-04-2011
Excerpts from an article by Anis Shivani
This is the season of demystification. What people of my generation never understood about the mass delusions of recent history--Nazism, Stalinism, holocaust, genocide, thought crimes, totalitarian spying--is all becoming crystal clear.
We who grew up since the youth and social justice movements of the 1960s used to ask ourselves: How could the intelligentsia in Germany have been so acquiescent in the 1930s? Could Germans really not have known that mass extermination of Jews was under way? Why didn't the Jews fight back? Why did they let themselves be annihilated? Why was there nobody able to pinpoint the precise nature of what was happening, until after it was over? How these things could have happened, and could they ever happen again?
Of course they couldn't happen again! There is no Great Depression now. The world is so much more interconnected, information travels so fast and wide, nothing can remain hidden for too long, there simply isn't the stomach to embark on mass repression and annihilation of entire peoples, the liberal consensus about protecting human rights is too strong, wealth is so spread out that ordinary people put portfolios before pogroms, too many institutionalised liberal barriers exist to counter a dictator making the world over in his brutal image.
This is what some of us continue to believe.
Evidence doesn't matter. What we see and read and hear and intuit as about to happen takes secondary place to what our rational faculties tell us about the nature of the modern world.
We are in mass denial, mass psychosis, and mass deceit once again...
...Is it still not clear what is happening?
Until a few weeks ago, there was little mention in the media, even in most of its alternative, progressive form, of words like "fascism," "totalitarianism," "dictatorship," "police state," "martial law," "genocide," "concentration camps," etc. So the dirty work of laying the foundations of the genocide state occurred in full sight, with open "coverage" by the media.
The entire framework for martial rule under the most extreme conditions of surveillance was allowed to come into existence; and it is happening even as we speak, with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), essentially the president's nearly 200,000 strong paramilitary, coming into being as the entity that will harbour the brown shirts of this country, and give them license to annihilate common decency.
What is Bush's sticking point with congress over DHS? That there not be civil service protections for the 170,000 workers that will fall under its jurisdiction. No whistle-blower and freedom of information protections. So if you don't fall in with whatever it is that they have planned for us, you can be fired immediately--no thirty-day notice! And replaced with any of a legion of workers with fascist sympathies more than happy to embark on the genocide.
The alarm bells are going up now, but it is too late. The dirty work has already been done. It has already been demonstrated what is possible to achieve with one orchestrated "attack." Wait till the next bio terror "attack," or anything using "weapons of mass destruction" is orchestrated, and every dissenting voice will shut up. Then the brown shirts will go into action.
Two things above all are necessary to complete the genocide state. The national ID card, which will be unlike anything anyone's ever seen or dreamed of. Eventually, every fact about your life--where you travel, who you speak with on the phone, what government aid you have received that you were or were not qualified for, what books you read, what magazines you subscribe to, what organizations you belong to, how much money you have and what bills you're behind on, what diseases you've been treated for or are susceptible to--will potentially be instantly available. So if you're stopped by the police--and the line between police and intelligence and military is being blurred to nothingness--and you've ever done anything that as a good bourgeois following the lines of responsible capitalist living you ought not to have done, you're in trouble.
This national ID card is coming. If nothing else, as soon as the second massive "attack" occurs, its execution will go into overdrive. As a side note, one of the companies eager to assimilate every known bit of data available to American corporations about the trivialities of your life--which are not so trivial anymore when the spooks are putting everything into a profile of terrorists, or dissidents, which are now one and the same thing--is Choice point, the same company that illegally purged tens of thousands of black voters in Florida under Jeb Bush and Katherine Harris's patronage.
Second, the military must be allowed to supersede civilian authority--in "emergencies" of course, except that the state of emergency, as in all dictatorships, will become permanent. The second "attack" will be the excuse to let the military take over. We've already heard that the military will monitor the 2002 and 2004 elections, that it will "quarantine" people in case of bio terrorism, that it should have, according to Tom Ridge, shoot-to-kill and arrest powers. Senator Biden agrees that the Posse Commutates Act of 1878, which forbids military involvement in civil affairs, ought to be subject to review. The idea has already been put forth. It is as good as accepted doctrine. The Northern Commander, General Ralph Eberhart, is for scrapping the Posse Commutates Act as we know it. The Northern Command, functioning with the new DHS, will take us to Stalinist Russia, Hitler Germany.
What they want to do more than anything else is an excuse to search people's homes, go door to door, ask for everyone's papers, make anyone who fits the "terrorist" or dissident profile disappear without a trace, as they already have been doing on a small, preparatory scale.
The East German style TIPS (the Terrorist Information and Prevention System) program will recruit more than a million service workers--phone, gas, mail, and delivery people--to send in tips about suspicious people or activities to the government. What is suspicious? If I read books on terrorism to write a scholarly article, I'm suspect. The librarian or bookstore owner is already being forced to turn over this information. Millions of "tips" about suspicious people will end up in a permanent database, to be used as and when necessary...
...The Bush administration fought hard to replace a liberal member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights with a hard-right ideologue. This same Peter Kirsanow now says that in the event of a second attack--which we've already been assured is inevitable--Korematsu (the Supreme Court decision of 1944 upholding the internment of Japanese Americans) would make a comeback, that there would be no civil rights for certain ethnic or religious groups.
There, he's already said what's on everyone's mind. Now do we wonder why the Jews didn't leave Germany? Why the Japanese in California professed patriotism to the end, thinking it couldn't happen to them?
Absolutely every immigrant is deportable now, even if you have never done anything to break the law. Ashcroft says that all non-citizens are to report a change of address within 10 days, or face deportation. Even if you follow this procedure, will the INS admit to having received the notification, if you're among those targeted for deportation?...
...That is all coming, and if you don't see that, then--well, maybe it will be all right in the end, and we will come away mostly unscathed.
====================================================================
18-04-2011
Statement of the jolly jokers of Evil war lords of the West.
The Christian Countries of the West have decided that the Lords law; Thou shall not kill, need to be changed into: Thou shall always kill relentless.
There for the following statement was given by the Evil Warlords of the West:
We have to bear in mind that all three are in political difficulties and could face defeat in coming elections, in fact they fighting for their political careers. They find the best way to do this is to start a war. They rob their own countries people from prosperity they waste billions on a civil war started by the US, where by he let his governors from Britain and France take the most of the costs and the intake of the hundred of thousands of Muslim fugitives into Europe. With that they creating an instability in Europe which will destroy it.
Britain will probably have less problems as that country is in facto all ready a semi Muslim state, including Sharia law's and with a near Muslim Conservative party that on this moment has the power without winning the elections out right. They rule as an dictatorship in which the population is dragged into the gutter and in to poverty, but the millionaires club what is the conservative government getting richer quick and fast. As soon as they have destroyed Libya as the have done in Iraq, once rich now poor, and now Libya ones rich and will be poor. The spoil equal divided between the dictator of Qatar and the Anti-Christ in the US. With Britain and France following as true slaves.
-----------------------------------------
Here follows the statement, please read it seriously without laughing, as the attempted murder on a country is serious.
Together with our NATO allies and coalition partners, the United States, France and Britain have been united at the UN Security Council, as well as the following Paris Conference, in building a broad-based coalition to respond to the crisis in Libya. We are equally united on what needs to happen in order to end it.
Even as we continue military operations today to protect civilians in Libya, we are determined to look to the future. We are convinced that better times lie ahead for the people of Libya, and a pathway can be forged to achieve just that.
We must never forget the reasons why the international community was obliged to act in the first place. As Libya descended into chaos with Colonel Qadhafi attacking his own people, the Arab League called for action. The Libyan opposition called for help. And the people of Libya looked to the world in their hour of need. In an historic Resolution, the United Nations Security Council authorized all necessary measures to protect the people of Libya from the attacks upon them. By responding immediately, our countries halted the advance of Qadhafi\u2019s forces. The bloodbath that he had promised to inflict upon the citizens of the besieged city of Benghazi has been prevented.
Tens of thousands of lives have been protected. But the people of Libya are suffering terrible horrors at Qadhafi's hands each and every day. His rockets and his shells rained down on defenseless civilians in Ajdabiya. The city of Misrata is enduring a mediaeval siege, as Qadhafi tries to strangle its population into submission. The evidence of disappearances and abuses grows daily.
Our duty and our mandate under UN Security Council Resolution 1973 is to protect civilians, and we are doing that. It is not to remove Qadhafi by force. But it is impossible to imagine a future for Libya with Qadhafi in power. The International Criminal Court is rightly investigating the crimes committed against civilians and the grievous violations of international law. It is unthinkable that someone who has tried to massacre his own people can play a part in their future government. The brave citizens of those towns that have held out against forces that have been mercilessly targeting them would face a fearful vengeance if the world accepted such an arrangement. It would be an unconscionable betrayal.
Furthermore, it would condemn Libya to being not only a pariah state, but a failed state too. Qadhafi has promised to carry out terrorist attacks against civilian
ships and airliners. And because he has lost the consent of his people any deal that leaves him in power would lead to further chaos and lawlessness. We know from bitter experience what that would mean. Neither Europe, the region, or the world can afford a new safe haven for extremists.
There is a pathway to peace that promises new hope for the people of Libya. A future without Qadhafi that preserves Libya\u2019s integrity and sovereignty, and restores her economy and the prosperity and security of her people. This needs to begin with a genuine end to violence, marked by deeds not words. The regime has to pull back from the cities it is besieging, including Ajdabiya, Misrata and Zintan, and their forces return to their barracks. However, so long as Qadhafi is in power, NATO and its coalition partners must maintain their operations so that civilians remain protected and the pressure on the regime builds. Then a genuine transition from dictatorship to an inclusive constitutional process can really begin, led by a new generation of leaders. In order for that transition to succeed, Colonel Qadhafi must go and go for good. At that point, the United Nations and its members should help the Libyan people as they rebuild where Qadhafi has destroyed to repair homes and hospitals, to restore basic utilities, and to assist Libyans as they develop the institutions to underpin a prosperous and open society.
This vision for the future of Libya has the support of a broad coalition of countries, including many from the Arab world. These countries came together in London on 29 March and founded a Contact Group which met this week in Doha to support a solution to the crisis that respects the will of the Libyan people.
Today, NATO and its coalition partners are acting in the name of the United Nations with an unprecedented international legal mandate. But it will be the people of Libya, not the UN, that choose their new constitution, elect their new leaders, and write the next chapter in their history.
Britain, France and the United States will not rest until the United Nations Security Council resolutions have been implemented and the Libyan people can choose their own future.
-------------------------------------------
The readers will agree that this is the greatest baloney they have ever seen, we will therefore explain the epistle.
The article starts that those evil three wants Gaddafi to go, just like the populations of the US/UK/France want OBAMA-CAMERON and SARKOZY to go permanent.
They then go on saying that they are united at the security council. Honesty was never the strongest point by the US/UK, the resolution was only passed by bribery and abstaining. Where Russia and China both were fooled with false promises. There is not a broad based coalition as the half of the NATO does not agree with the warlords of the US/UK and France.
Line three state: That the reason for action was due to the fact that Gaddafi was attacking his own people. An obvious lie, just as the WMD in Iraq. It were the US/UK lead rebels most of them not even from Libya who attacked Libya. The Arab League called for action. What they say in reality is that they made a deal with the Dictator of Qatar to share the spoils. The Western fantasy story of Gadaffi wanted to kill all the people of Benghazi can be put at the same level as the WMD in Iraq.
That the defenseless civilians of Misrata have heavy armory and even tanks, which are hidden in civilian yards and cars does not the matter, after all as those followers imitators of the NAZI's say a lie is only a lie if you tell it once, however if you tell it long enough people believe it as the truth. And if you are found out you simple make an U turn, ask Cameron he has made so many U turns that he does not know anymore which way to go.
The tonnage of the speech is the same as Hitler did to excuse his occupation of Sudetenland before the beginning of WW2, same lies same fantasies same evil intentions, man can wonder are Obama and Cameron having the Mein Kampf as bedtime reading. Their actions are most certainly the same.
And this comes from countries who between them in the last 250 years killed at least 200 million civilians in the same way as the rebels of Libya are civilians.
The rhetoric is the same as by the destruction of Iraq an middle class earners level country, due to the US/UK an low earners country on the balance of civil war.
That is what they want in Libya, also before their on attack Libya it was a middle class earners level country and now fast sliding to a low earners country if not bankrupt. In both cases it will be mainly the USA who gets the benefits of the oil for near to nothing, while the Libyan people get near to nothing in return, see the situation in Iraq. Notice that the US/UK are doing the same in Afghanistan.
The broad coalition of countries, which is in reality a small coalition and many of them only acting under US duress, while the Arab world are the Dictator Qatar and others. Qatar, where the ruler threw his father out while hi was out of the country, which makes him a real coward not facing up to his own actions. Has never wrote out elections for the people, does not accept international laws and has for the country only one law, His. All the revenue of his oil goes in his pockets, while the people are still standing on a near poverty level. This man steals the oil from Libya and sells it expensive, this is the same man who obtained the world renewed Store of Harrods of London and then breaks his staffing promise as he always breaks his promises. He is the good friend of Cameron of Britain, so we will see the wealth of Cameron and his cronies swelling fast.
There is no legal UN mandate for the destruction of Libya by mainly British fighter planes. Although if you hear William Hague then all what the fighter planes are doing is stopping Libyan forces from using airspace. The total destruction of Misrata and the centers of villages and the city of Tripoli is disregarded as accidental. That they estimated by independent sources killed at least 3600 civilians does not the matter, as every civilian on the Libyan side is automatic a evil soldier even if it is just born, that in parallel with Afghanistan where they do the same and their general then declares that all those children all those babies where in fact terrorist ready to kill Americans.
It will be the US and the UK who will set the new constitution and appoint the new leaders, raised and educated in the States. The will of the people of Libya if any is left after the US/UK terrorist attacks are finished in years to come, does not the matter, like the people in other conquered states in world the people are there to obey the US or be killed, as Davies so excellent showed in Pakistan.
Britain, France and the United States will not rest until the United Nations Security Council resolutions have been implemented and the Libyan people can obey their new masters who are deciding their future.
Kharkov.
I. Grunkowski
===================================================================
20-04-2011
Wishful thinking.
Many in the Western world dominated by the military might and ruthlessness of the Americans, for whom a dollar is worth fighting for but a human life is disposable for nothing, hope that one day the USA will dominate the whole world. Done in the old days by conquering countries and made them pay a contribution to the conquering warlord, now being done by conquering and killing most of the people under the classification of "terrorists".
The USA has the advantage that they made a country for them selves by killing of all the original inhabitants, over 100 million of them, so that they do not have the problem as what the European and Asian countries have, tribes that suddenly want to be an country of their own. It is this method that is used by the USA to create all over the world dissatisfaction and rebellions which they feed and supply with funding to take on the governments that could be a threat to the USA.
They did this very successful with Eastern Europe, they try to do it with Russia by supporting the Caucasus rebels with funding and training, The Finnish government with their actions against Russia, and have attempted several times to do the same with the Ukraine and Belarus. They do the same in the Middle East by setting up the Sunni and Shiite Muslims against each other, and inciting rebellion against a legal government as they do in Libya and Syria. While protection rough and dictatorial leaders such as in Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe.
Julius Caesar said it 2000 years ago, DIVIDE AND RULE! And that is what the USA is doing. However not only they do this to what they see as a threat to them, they do it also to their friends and allies, on this moment they try to split Europe in different parties as the EU power is getting to much of an real dominant power. They do it also in China where they attempting to stir trouble by funding and instigation dissatisfaction with the China Government. This while in the USA demonstrations are ruthless suppressed and arrests for unknown reason are a common occurrence.
Many of the terrorist attacks in Russia are USA funded, a fact acknowledge by the Caucasus terrorist themselves. However that alone does not make it possible to alter the direction of a country. The other way is to infiltrate the peoples mind, just as Hitler did with the German population. The USA uses many different kinds of science to create such illusion. Take the Berlin Institute for Population and Development which has published a large-scale analysis of demographic processes in CIS countries. The CIS countries in this case being: Belarus, Moldova, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Russia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kirgizia. A large section of this study addresses the problem of fertility and mortality in Russia, which shows that the target was Russia but to hide this it was pronounced as an investigation in the demographic processes of the CIS countries. It was prepared by the Berlin Institute for Population and Development on population trends in Russia and other former Soviet countries. The main conclusion of scientists actually formulated in the title of the report, which translated and published also in Russian.
In some regions of this enormous territory, particularly in the three Slavic republics and the Baltic countries at present have the same demographic problems as in Germany and other Western European countries. This is a low birth rate that is insufficient for population replacement. That those countries either stabilize or growing is due to the influx of immigrants what can be special seen in countries such as the Netherlands Germany and Great Britain. In those countries the actual original population is going down sharp, but the total of the population goes up sharp, this is special to see in the Netherlands and Germany. All these countries have experienced since the end of World War II a "baby boom". In the 1970's this boom started to face out and slowly is now fading away. That generation is now either passed away or are in their eighties now while the children of the baby boom are in those years are now starting to retire, while their children kept the birth rate down and therefore were not as numerous.
Results of the study at a press conference in Berlin, presented the director of the Berlin Institute for Population and Development, Professor Rainer Klingholts (Reiner Klingholz). He pointed to the worsening situation in the western republics of the former Soviet Union and Soviet bloc countries at the beginning of turning the 1990's. In Russia, by the end of the USSR, one woman gave birth to an average of 1.89 children in the middle as the 1990's - only 1.16. If in 1990 the RSFSR were born two million babies in Russia 10 years later - only 1.2 million. In all the countries of Eastern and Central Europe after the radical reforms the standard of living has risen, and with it, and its duration. In Russia, according to Professor Klingholtsa, and decreased fertility rates and life expectancy - due to worsening financial situation of the population. However, in the Caucasus the birth rate did not fall to the Western countries level instead they still have the baby boom as there was in the Western countries just after WW2. This means that the worsening of the financial situation of the population cannot be the main reason for the restriction in child birth, the level of income in the North Caucasus is lower then in the West.
The partly by the USA introduced reforms have had in Russia, devastating consequences not only for economic but also the mental state of people: drug and alcohol abuse affected their health. AIDS has become a serious problem, and the spread of tuberculosis has reached unprecedented proportions. In Russia, life expectancy for men dropped to 57 years - the lowest figure of the postwar period. "
In all industrialized countries, since 1950 the last century, life expectancy has grown steadily in the mid-1960's has been in Russia is not much lower than in France, Germany, Britain or the United States. But if in these four countries and on every ten years life span has increased by about three years in Russia, it began to decrease. Exception - a short burst in the mid-80's, probably associated with the anti-alcohol campaign by Mikhail Gorbachev. Then the curve of life expectancy in Russia went back down and began slowly to rise only in the middle of the last decade.
Russians now live to an average of 67 years,(73) REAL FIGURE IN BRACKETS, as in 1960. This is lower than in Bangladesh, compared Klingholts, but Same level in reality. In this case, Russian women live on average 13 years longer than men. Analyst at the Berlin Institute for Population and Development, Stefan Sievert (Stephan Sievert) drew attention to one more Russian demographic characteristics - extreme regional differences in birth rates and life expectancy, which is not present in other industrialized countries. This should have been rather obvious by Klingholts as no other industrialised country has so many different demographic possibilities as Russia has. It is therefore a study based on the expectation that the USA successfully will make the Caucasus countries independed of Russia this means that the study was set up to please or in order of, the USA. The publication was done in Berlin to get the attention away from the obvious conclusion that it was in effect an USA report study. It also means that although the women give birth to children in the Leningrad region is only 1.2 (the average in Russia now - 1,5), and the most in Chechnya - 3,4. This is the same as in Tajikistan or North African countries.
The average birth is actual higher then some European countries, immigration not included.
Longer than 70 years, people in post-Soviet area on average, where living only in the Baltic\u2019s, where the standard of living above, as well as North and South Caucasus, where there is less drinking and better climate. In the northern regions as many still do not survive even 60 years. However in reality this has nothing to do with drinking but all with the extreme climate of those parts. The probability of being killed in Russia is 20 times higher than in the EU, mainly due to the terrorist attacks from the Caucasus who receive funding from the USA and the EU plus from voluntary groups and the extreme weather.
Russia is opposed by Germany in the statistics on life expectancy, not only in the fact that the Germans are much longer, but that in Russia, many are killed working-age adults. The researchers analysed rates in EU countries and in Russia and came to the conclusion that as a cause of premature death comparable only infections and cancers, although of them in Russia die more often, but not significantly.
Moreover, the researchers claim most of these deaths crucial role played by alcohol, in particular, 72 percent of murders and 42 percent of suicides. However, the same is not concluded by similar situations in the Western countries of Europe and the United States, therefore again the study points to an USA stipulated work to split the Russians in opposite parties. The normal action by the USA to get control. Recently proved physicians, and often dangerous cardiovascular causes is excessive alcohol consumption. However, that does not explains the hight of the cardiovascular level in Great Britain, as that cannot be related to the excessive alcohol consumption. They try to show the the life expectancy in Russia is so much lower then in other states. Although it is lower, it does not take into account the extreme weather conditions in Russia.
Most of those figures are of course wishful thinking with no scientific background but mainly supplied to cause instability.
The coincidence of several negative demographic factors - the retirement of numerous post-war generation, the achievement of the working-age generation of small-numbered 1990 and a high mortality rate - will, as predicted by the German demographers, the fact that until 2020 the working-age population in Russia each year will decline by about 1 million people, and by 2030 will decrease by 20 percent compared with 2010. This is based on the western Russia parts not included the high birth rate in the south and the North Caucasus.
Again it is wishful thinking, the same is happening in Western European and the United States. The population there is also declining but is compensated by the enormous influx of immigrants who are taken over the cheap labour jobs.
This is already calculated by the West as being by 2020 the Caucasus will not be longer part of Russia and in the hands of the United States via their installed rulers. However, this distort the case of the German investigation as the borders of Russia will be considerable smaller and therefore will not lead to the to disastrous consequences for the economy, as this will be stabilized by its security as the borders will be considerable smaller. The wish of the West could be severely backfire instead of threatening its security.
The report of the wishful thinkers state that in 2008, Russia had about a million young men of military age. The Real figure 2,412,000. The report goes on: but by 2017 this number decreased to 630,000. (real figure 1,300,000) Not everyone can be drafted into the army: some after school will receive a higher education, others will be found unfit for military service. However the report forgot to add that fit for military service are another 46,800,00. The report that is available as there is where we obtained it although the maker of the report said you could not buy it in Russia while he also added that Russia will have no recruits as they will be in short supply, forgetting to mention the fact that in 2010 just 1,600,000 were called up for recruitment. The whole of the report what forget to mention the rest of Russia but only concentrated on the western part of Russia, this is no doubt in the hope that by 2030 only the small western part of Russia will be still known as Russia.
Discounting the enormous East and the south borders. However wishing that it will fall in USA hands and ruled as in Georgia by an USA educated president, even if it is an ruthless dictatorial leader with genocide tendencies, so long they obey the West.
Obvious the report was made to aid the terrorist and to distort the real figures and created under the USA wishful thinking that they are be able to create rebellions in Russia where ever they can. After that they will do the same with China who has similar problems as Russia has now. Then split up Europe, and Indonesia and they control all. Wishful thinking and maybe possible, Russia and China has been already several times out manoeuvred by the USA and their vassals. See how well the US and the UK out played the Russians and the Chinese in the forcing for a no-fly zone over Libya. They should by now have realised that the USA and Britain never keep a promise and never honour a promise.
The present Russian president made an enormous mistake by letting himself palmed in by the US handouts and promises. For Continental Europe and Russia a promise and a agreement will be honoured, but this does not count for the USA or Britain. For them an agreement, an promise, is made to be broken, profit before honour is their slogan followed by if you first not succeed, Cheat! The continental States do understand that, Putin when President understood this, but the present president of Russia does not understand this, he sees smiles and thinks all is well, however if not swift something is done the bottom will fall out of the Russian politic and they are ending up with nothing.
Vassals of the USA, the laughing stock of the world.
=====================================================================
22-04-2011
Science has yet to figure out how life before the ending of the Dinosaur was established. The many theories launched concerning this have all one thing in common they still do not know how it ended and why. The theory they have enough, many of them with details which are changing all the time. This would have been occurring in such a way that the earth\u2019s orbit could have been altered, the earth could have been filled with dangerous volcanic gasses, which could have created dangerous alterations and climatologically changes. It could have created an alteration in the earth\u2019s magnetic field and the chemical contents of air and earth. The list is endless.
The Pangaea would have created a solid and large enough land mass to complete change the climate of earth, the tectonic pressure would have been enormous. That tectonic pressure may have created massive volcanic activities and if so, it could have blocked out the sunlight for many years by the release of debris and ash in the air. This on it self could have triggered a chemical alteration of air and earth. Fact is that in that time earth had one of his longest and largest ice age period known. A supplying theory is that an enormous million cubic miles of lava spread out over what is now Siberia an 250 million years ago approx.
This combination on the Pangaea created almost the complete extinction of flora and fauna, and it was after this that the first Dinosaurs appeared on earth with a still unknown metabolism, or how they came into existence. The rise and fall of the Dinosaur is therefore one of the most puzzling problems for the scientist. Again there are many suggestions, many possibilities, but in reality at the moment if we leave out the suggestions and possible possibilities then we are still nowhere. As a result of so many theories and possibilities but without any solid evidence to progress it is no wonder that only a very view scientist are involved in the origin research of originality of natural evolution.
Science is progressing fast as a result of more available data and new equipment for data storage and calculations, to up date the search and the research. However it will remain to be seen of it will be possible to create the possible theoretical grounds for evaluation and proceeding to create the similar fields of creation as were on Pangaea and on which the Dinosaurs could live. It also remains to be seen of it will be possible to recreate the fields of creation at the time the Dinosaurs sudden ending, would that be possible we would have an considerable better insight about the start of the natural evolution. Although sciences still have to figure out how those life-forming chemicals were formed and destroyed. They cannot proceed unless they know what really altered the chemical situation of air and earth, if there was such an alteration. Both are fundamental to sustain life in whatever form.
Extreme heat, sudden cold, changes in the magnetic field the speeding or slowing of earth\u2019s orbit can have an effect on natural evolution, which is a fact. Theory is however, is the fact that science does not know what the changes were.
So long as that scientific data is not available, or data that is available is open for speculation, no search or research to the situation on Pangaea the beginning or at the end of the Dinosaurs is possible. Again here the scientist have solved the problem by suggesting that the possible clue must be in the fact that......they do not know it yet. Does this means that we simple have to give up, forget about it. We should not nor is there any intention to do so the field is too interesting in details and possibilities.
Science have to work with less then desirable data, however that was always the case in science. We know that fanatics who have adopted a static view on how it all began disagree with science, although they know that science regarding the natural evolution only just have started. Although the search and research in earnest is already near two hundred years going, in the frame it is just the beginning. In fact, they are not even out of the starter\u2019s blocks. However, those fanatic\u2019s wants instant explanations and they want it now. They do not deliver an alternative themselves, they do not deliver proof about there own point of view, although some point to the bible as the only source what is correct. Those fanatic\u2019s in disagreement are almost as fanatic in their pursue of the natural evolutionist of which they insist have to proof their point without delivering any themselves. They wants us to believe that what is in the bible is correct, is right is to the point and must be seen as a fact.
However, at the same time that they say, the bible is correct and right they reject the epic of Gilgamesh and the Enuma Elis, although both say the same and parts are even mentioned in the bible. They reject the Code of Ur-Nammu although parts of the Hebrew laws are based on it; they reject Shamash as God, because only the God of the Jews is right. However, Shamash was the original God of the Semitics, the Jews only changed his name. The Jews it self are a part of that Semitic tribe, and Shamash was the God in Ur, and Haran when the Jews were living there. There is no historical proof that in Ur or Haran the Jews had a different God as the others living in Ur or Haran. The God of the Jews is also the God of the Christians, therefore Christians are still believing in Shamash although they call them now God. The point is that those fanatics who believe in stories unproven want the evolutionist to proof his case, although knowing that this science is only just started. It makes the fact that the Christian Church special in the US is the biggest obstruction of science into natural evolution.
This behaviour is ad odds with the normal curiosity of human kind, you may expect that special the Christian Church would do all to proof the bible right. What can be more profitable then if science in natural evolution fails to find any reasonable evidence, not only know but also 100 or 200 years from now. Natural evolution scientist should be given time to come at least out of the starting blocks. They will be able to re-create via search and research the right circumstances in which he can create the right situation. Being the magnetic and chemical alteration of air and earth as was in the time of Pangaea and at the life time and the end of the dinosaurs.
This search will launch science in a higher orbit as a matter of speaking. They can let go of the restrictions to science as they have now and search new pathways never walked before. With those axioms removed all things are possible theoretical. The opponents will say scientist who not longer belief in the axioms of natural evolution are in fact creationist as they creating new possibilities and theories. It will be obvious that they are not they are scientist who progress were Christianity stands still fails and retract.
Some call intelligent design, a view based on an observation, without explaining the reason of how and why? They call it creation science. However, how can they call it a science as no research is involved by scientist? Intellectual design is simple the assertion that certain features of earth, universe and life is best explained by an intelligent cause. This a modern form of the traditional theological argument to prove God existence. It found its origin in the US by creationist to avoid Court rulings, in an attempt to try to promote the creation as a science, although it is in fact a pseudo science and does not have a science background. The more disrespectful call it a junk science.
It is an anti-evolution belief, also called origin science based on a singular unobserved events happened in a remote past of which there is no acceptable proof available.
There is a natural intelligent design theory which is indeed a not a science and which statements are not proven. It is normal if there is a claim, for science to investigate the evidence to examine the fact and to draw a conclusion, temporary or permanent. This is in intelligent design not possible therefore the predicate of science is void; there is no evidence to examine. Some say that intelligent design is not a religion as it does not require faith that however, is a cheap way out as intelligent design cannot be in existence without faith; it is the only backing this theory has.
Others say intelligent design is a framework of logical thinking based on observation; logical thinking however, dispels every thing that is not observational to science.
Intellectual design does not have a science based observational base. The base of natural intelligent, does not even attempts to find an reasonable claim for their point of view. What they do is simple criticising all the work what evolutionist are doing. If the Evolutionist makes an discovering then the Intelligent design believers are there to make sure that they find point on which they can criticise the discovering, rightly or wrongly. If they find that an discovering of the evolutionist has an fact in it that is open for discussion than that point is used to create many sheets of paper comments to disprove the evolutionist findings. They do not at any time offer an checkable alternative or any checkable proof.
Natural evolution or intelligent design is fully proven they say,the people who pretend they know and who making a rather nice living out of it at the same time. However, note that concerning intelligent design nothing is proven, there is only the belief and the faith. This based on the singular point that all is perfect therefore, there has to be an intelligent design and an intellectual designer, the problem here is that all is not perfect. Natural evolutionists can prove some and have a possibility of theories for others, but this is science and it is only just started and need in the coming generations an increased philosophical thinking and further development of scientific materials. The realisation is there that although not proven yet, in time with further development of scientific tools altered chemical structures to investigate the air and earth chemical structures 250 and 65 million of years ago together with a simulation of an altered earth orbit and magnetic field to prove the natural evolution. This time is still not there as equipment to simulate the altered orbit and magnetic field in combination with the alteration of air and earth chemical structure is not available yet, and have a further problem that the right air and earth chemical structure need to be found before such an project of simulation can be started.
The proof of the natural evolution or the failure to do so is still a long way off unless there are sudden scientific discoveries, which will make the speeding up possible. None of the scientific laws as defined to day are suitable for a research into the field of natural evolution. As so long the data needed is not available and not possible to create yet, to enable scientist to proof one way or another that their theory is possible.
What we expect now and what theoretical possibilities we can prove, is in the future to reveal.
It does mean that the dependence on axioms will be void. Relying on RNA will be void as that applies to science situations, as we know to day which can be abandoned in the future as other possibilities and theories are taking over. We only can present a full-scale evolution progress if we are able to produce a simulation process data as were available at the beginning of Pangaea and the ending of the dinosaurs.
Intelligent design, the creation is what it always was, History.
====================================================================
24-04-2011
his is an story from our only North Korean supporter in training for voluntary work in North Korea.
This story we have allowed to run although there were some severe doubts, however question asked from the SGI were not answered therefore we have allowed for the time being that this story should run.
Mario Marras.
Buddhism is an universal way of thinking and believing in your self and others to do what is good for all on Earth including animals, plants and anything else that lives. The Soka Gakkai a Nicheren line of Buddhist thinking was in principle a semi political stream in Japan. When that was found out the Soka Gakkai International was established. Although they use a form of Buddhism to ensnare people into their organisation, the main direction is to brain wash those people in thinking that follow the leader is their most important duty. The prime example is the way the German people followed the leader since 1919 to 1945 called Hitler. The admiration is the same and the slogans and enthusiasm is the same.
The connection to the SGI is tied and escaping is almost if not possible in an ordinary way, Soka Gakkai speciality "units of harassment" situations would be mobilized and the faulting member would be hailed back into the fault. (citation) If that does not work then stalking alone or in groups is the next step. It is not oncoming that former members suddenly lost their job, their home and lively hood, only to be returned in mystery after they returned to the SGI. On the other site well behaving members who are willing to spent their time on recruiting new members and buy the many rather expensive SGI items for sale could almost get all they wanted. Moving home to a richer and better place was suddenly possible, after being refused year after year. Here in Korea it is difficult enough without the "Harass troops" of the SGI. The journal of Korean executives and their friends can not be used in the usual palliative measures as interference will only lead to nothing but also could endanger life. The government does not take easy the defection into Buddhism and out of the State control, and being betrayed by the SGI to the government would indeed possible cost them their head.
Those defected SGI former members are exposed as criminals face-to-face as of it was a crime to leave the SGI. This accusation is to reflect on the religious guru, under the name of Ikeda. Both who's parents lived in Japan before the Koreans war in South Jeolla Province, one theory was born in Japan, Daisaku Ikeda is not himself, as is said to be first-generation. Father's name, last name of his mother and the Department of Narita, and linking it to the point to be Ikeda. Some believe that they illegally obtained Japanese nationality. Daisaku Ikeda's "bilateral" relationship awareness, and apart from the general Japanese about the "anti" in a "very Korean" theory seems to be feeling. It is unsurprising given that the birth.(However, even this article, as well as other work of Ikeda, in the Japan Society of executives would amazing.
Country Love \u25cf, country of beauty, the country of the sentence. People that have peace, "after dozens of generations seems to have forgotten (Wasu) enchanting" and anger (squid), time to bone and fall times (smug). Chanting to reach to far above world of peace and happiness seems to be forgotten under the increasing assaults (bladder) and murder (Satsuriku). Let us see further that night only, the roof of the guest house roof Blue, silver crescent (Mon solder) of the moon was illuminating. In light of this beautiful country (Fu), peoples is arrogance is visible, Nijitta (Gouman) to rage (Funnu), but also has a chest thrust.
Japan,and Korea in Buddha must make this more and more important. Grown up and been told. Live in peace. The (Korea-Japan friendship vows Seikyo newspaper November 04, 1998, "Soka alumni gathering"). If there are truly religious groups in Japan, the Korea-Japan friendship would never say no. This except the fact that the Soka Gakkai in Japan wants to be in total control and the proof is in control. Two-thirds of the executive and vice chairman of Soka Gakkai, is in Japan. Ikeda points out that from its common point of view Nichiren Buddhism has been scientific, that both religion and science base their beliefs on the assumption that everything happens in accordance with the laws of causality and that both religion and science aspire to multiply the well-being of humankind. Ikeda then offers examples of how real life applications of various scientific theories of physics and chemistry have improved our lives and makes an analogy to Nichiren Buddism\u2019s explanation of how we can also apply the Statistical Law of Causality to our daily choices of actions to create desired results which can also improve our lives.
Ikeda more specifically delves into the following related accounts of compatibility between Nichiren thought and modern Theoretical Physics: Nichiren Buddhism\u2019s \u201cUniversal Law of Cause and Effect\u201d and physics Statistical Law of Causation and Nichiren Buddhism\u2019s \u201cShiki-Shin-Funi\u201d (oneness of matter and mind) and \u201cKu\u201d (latent potentiality and interconnectedness of all) and physics Quantum Field Theory and Theory of Relativity. After each comparison the author of the article inserts his own critique of the SGI\u2019s arguments for similarity and compatibility, some supportive and some oppositional. However the facts remain that under that presumption talk of Ikeda the threat to the members who want to leave is there and dangerous. The members knowingly or subconscious know that and therefore there is not many who leave, but the ones who do and who are not independent in any form of their way of live will find that forces are turned against them. They suddenly will get high tax demands, investigations in their way of dealings and obstructions in certain new business. On the other hand be good to Ikeda's SGI will give the homeless suddenly good homes, good income lots of friends, SGI friends.
So on one hand, the SGI says that Nichiren Buddhism and science have similar views on the Statistical Law of Causation, but they also argue that Nichiren\u2019s view is broader, on the other hand they simple are brainwashing members to obey without questions ask. This creates a problem here as causality as not merely exclusive to physical phenomenon, but it expands to include mental and spiritual phenomena, and acceptance of the Law of Karma. Nichiren Buddhism understands causality as continuous- even where science denies it-on the microscopic/atomic level, where there appears to be breaks in the continuum. Science differs in that it can\u2019t apply this concept to elementary particles in motion.
Physics explanation for this apparent discontinuity lies in the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. The SGI agrees that indeed, things are more uncertain in regards to human life than they are considering non-moving objects or other life forms. Now is that not clever, the consideration that the non-moving objects such rock are easier to predict then the actions of the living on Earth. However, this is not entirely correct, the accelerators used in Swiss and the USA do make the Earth move indeed as was predicted in Austria and UK before the projects started. Ignored obvious as big money is involved, however since the full acceleration the level of Earthquakes and tsunami\u2019s has increased many times. Science will not accept this as big business is paying for it, but see the many victims in Japan/Indonesia/Philippines/Haiti and many many other places.
Mahayana views that nirvana and samsara are one and the same. However, the SGI believes that field and matter are one and compare Einstein\u2019s Theory of Relativity to Nichiren\u2019s concept of shiki-shin funi because mass and energy can transform from one to the other depending upon field conditions. Heisenberg notes that every elementary particle consists of different forms of energy. The SGI says that this was first described in the Avatamsaka Sutra as \u201cmind only\u201d, that mind and matter are impossible to separate.
The SGI thinks that the Quantum Theory and the Theory of Relativity are approaching a holistic perception analogous to ku, which is \u201clatent potentiality\u201d or the \u201cpotentiality-charged void from which everything phenomenal derives\u201d; in science language the \u201cfield\u201d or \u201cspace\u201d. Ikeda describes it as where elementary particles are produced and changed, in this concept he is wrong as spiritual thinking and and science investigations are both on a complete different planet as matter of speaking. The SGI says that Einstein \u201cdescribed matter as close composition of fields" he however then goes on with comparing Ku as a science. This however not correct. Here what the SGI tries to do is to create a field what is comparable with science. Ku is not a science it is a spiritual expression of ones thinking, an creating of the mind.
We have seen this with all faiths and religions, it is done to compensate the unprovable part of the faith and to give it some establishment it does not deserve because unlike science, ku includes only the mental and spiritual features of a person's thinking. It cannot be proven that the conception of physical things and phenomena as a transient manifestation of an underlying fundamental entity has any basic form to relate to the element of the Quantum Field Theory. It is however, a basic element of the Eastern view of the world. Nichiren Buddhism, followers describes the field as the basis of all particles and their mutual interactions.
The Nichiren Buddhists view ku and the Quantum field, as essentials in their areas of study. However, once again it is a matter being created to suit the purpose and no proof is available to establish the basics of science in KU. The SGI tries to lay a link between Buddhism and the theories of Einstein, this could be work in principle as both Buddha and Einstein contracted their visions via spiritual thinking, however there is were the link ends. The SGI and some theoretical physicists perceive the universe as an interconnected whole where all phenomenon are \u201cfluid and ever changing\u201d. However that was not the way Buddha or Nicheren saw the world, in none of his rather extensive writings is there any relation ship between science and spiritual thinking.
The SGI works here in the same way as Creation Science, they also attempt to lay a direct connection between what they expect to have happened and what did happen in reality. SGI also shows that because they attempting to go the science way they in fact have left the Buddhist way of thinking and therefore using Nichiren as an pulling power to attract new members in their society in the believe that what SGI says is indeed correct. Although Ikeda does good work in establishing an imaginary nuclear free world, he should forget about Nicheren as he has almost ignored every word Nicheren said and stood for and was willing to offer his life for. The SGI of today even as an invited UN/NGO is nothing else then an organisation that uses Nicheren Buddhism as a toll to attract members, buying members, members for life as a guaranteed solid income for the SGI. It is most certainly not a primary Buddhist organisation or a scientific organisation.
=================================================================
26-04-2011
THE WAR LORDS
We see this glorifying of money and the power with it at almost all levels of the society from the high up in Government, global institutions, national industries, and local government right down to the average person.
Beings belonging to such a group who believe in money as their salvation do maybe not all belong or believe in the money God, but to please the ones in power, they will believe. What better way to increase the power and greed possibility then to start a war. Of course they not simple start a war against anyone. They have two criteria for this, first the country must have a enormous amount of minerals and oil or gas that can be taken and secondly the country must be small and primitive in their daily existence.
To find a reason for such a job is never a problem, you simple make one up and get the supporting papers to write supporting articles to underline for the population at large your view. Any excuse, any reason, any fantasy will do, a friendly head of state can be in two weeks time being branded an terrifying tyrant which have to be brought to heel. Another head of state suddenly is accused of having weapons of mass destruction and forms a threat to the whole world. Another suddenly has decided to kill of all the civilians in a city, your press announced. That the head in that state does not have a clue where you are on about does not the matter, so long the readers of your population are bombarded with details then it will be believed, even if it is a complete lie.
They are prepared to sink to the lowest level of humanity to please their Master the money God and as such as a war lord then have to follow the money Gods lead. They step on the ones who cannot defend themselves are of no concern of them. They following the Masters orders and do so in the hope that it pleases the money God and that it will bring them riches beyond their dreams. That thousands, hundred of thousands innocent people die well who cares, you simple give them a title to create an excuse to kill. So they are terrorists, evil gangs, rapist of woman and girls, beheading of man and boys, who cares that it is just a made up story so long as the people believe it does what was intended. They assuring themselves that the smile of Him may light their path to a richer live and more power.
Sadly many of those who glorifying the money God sitting also on Sunday on the front benches of the Churches of Christianity. They pray there that Christ will punish the evil ones, the ones who kill, the ones who steal, the ones who take from their neighbours. That they are the ones who are doing the killing, stealing and robbing their neighbours is not the point Christ is not the god they are believing in, they believe the Money God that is the one who will make them rich. By sitting in front of the church every body that way can see how rich they are and how much power they have. Never mind that the bible said so clearly; He who raises himself above the people, will be humiliated before the people.
Many of those in the churches who are not rich are feeling the need to be grateful to be in the same church as those rich ones with power, in the hope that some of the shine of that riches will fall on them. They can tell friends and family that they have been in close contact in the church with those rich and powerful and hope that this fact may shine on them and those others will feel jealous not to have been there to witness this. The word of God does not count any more, yes they know God is good, however, is this they way of the word, the word was good, so God is good. How can they please two God\u2019s, one who tells them to help each other and do Good, the other to tell them to kill, steal and rob the others and get richer by doing so. What do we have to make out of the simple fact that the believers of the almighty money God also believe in the Almighty God the saviour of our souls who is simple instructions to be good to others as you expect others to be good to you.
Here we have a crucial problem as good believers we can do good to others help them support them and accompany them on the pathway to our Lord and Saviour. In return, do they receive the goodness they may have expected? Naturally, no, they are laughed at behind their back, seen as simple because of the help they give others without asking money in return. It shows that the power of the money God is more powerful then the Almighty God, the saviour of our souls. What is even worst in the eyes of the believers of the money God, is that those good Samaritans are given money away, to those who need it ever heard such a thing. You do not give money away for free, if they want it they can earn it, a kind of bonded slavery. However those good doers they actual help people, does it not make your stomach turn. It is sick that someone actual helps others without asking money for it, it is completely against their religion of the Money God. It is against all rules of the money God, you demand money from people, you don't give it that is absurd.
You can kill people if it brings you money, then that is good. See how the Bush family have been filling their pockets, they even did this in the WW2, they did it from Vietnam and they did it from Iraq. The most important lesson is you cannot give something away unless you expect to be rewarded for that deed in money several times over. You cannot help the poor, the old or the handicapped by illness or accident, no the money God requires payment at all times. The money God\u2019s instructions are clear, come down hard on those humans who defy his rules. Poor, old and handicapped by accident or by illness are a waste of space, if they do not have money there can be no profit and if there is no profit then get rid of them, fast.
If one section of the believers in the money God cannot handle that on their own, then other believers should help in and finish the job.
The Christian countries for that have an organisation called NATO. Official it is there to protect the member countries against attacks by non-members. The reality is however that they select the countries to attack under the money God principles that the countries has to be weak and rich in pickings. Remember this are Christian countries. They had to change the Christian God's rules for this. So not stealing is changed in always stealing, not robbing the neighbours is changed in always rob the neighbours, thou shall not kill is changed you always should kill and then blame it on some one else. It shows that their believe in the Christian God is fake, it is there to suck the people in. They however do not believe in it. God knows and sees all, and therefore he sees the killings the stealing and the robberies and he will remember this when those vile people are entering death, and will entering Hell. However they ignored it as they do not believe there is a God an Saviour, there is only the Money God, and that one does not have an Hell, just caves full of wealth to dwell in after death.
There to many examples in daily life to pass by, Christianity has survived for two thousand years it has grown and expanded by spreading the word to others. That corner stone is now slowly eroded, seeing that on the foundation of that corner stone is now slowly building a new one in the glory of the Money God. A God already adored and admired by the money changers in the Jewish temple in Jerusalem 2000 years ago, did not Christ called them a band of thieves, and they still exist. Punished time after time but always coming back and never have learned anything from the past as the Money God demands action now! Therefore they built a new church inside the old one with the power of money and ignorance to destroy, the poor the old and the handicapped by illness or accident.
However is it ignorance, could it be simple stupidity, after all money is won and lost almost every hour of the day, and to hope that one day you will have enough money that makes rich and the step to power, is many of times a day slashed by the loss of money. The very basic of Christianity is being good and do good.
The alternative has to be Evil and Evil is spreading faster then ever over the world, beliefs are fading away, churches are emptying from believers.
That evil is spreading fast and it is special good to see at the beginning of this century, we have the US fighting in Afghanistan to control the heroin, they fighting in Iraq to control the oil and wants to be fighting in Iran to control the oil there, They bombing Libya to get the oil that all on the flimsiest of reasons, while at other places such as Zimbabwe, people are killed on a daily base and nobody lift a finger, other then to collect the Zimbabwe diamonds, yes evil is spreading fast.
As a result, the world is a more dangerous place to live, this combined with inflation and high oil prices created by those senseless wars, which put many lives at risk but also supply the powerful with loads of money and that, will please the God of money, this is not Christianity but pure Evil. On local levels, we see the same, Governments who ignore the old, and the handicapped by accident or by illness. Property owners we have a reign of terror over their tenants all in the name of money and power they single out the old and the handicapped by illness or by accident all in the name of the money God, not Christianity in sight other then by name only.
In conclusion it can be said as a guaranteed certainty that the Abrahamic religions are slowly becoming religions of the past and in name only and that the real religion is called Money to God of almost all evil.
What buys power, Money! What buys standing, Money. What is the bases of all Evil, Money.
What buys the arms for killing people all over the world, Money. What put people down and under pressure, Money. We can go on with this almost forever but the point is made, bow your heads for the new God, Money the root of all Evil. He will expand his reign further and further setting country against country human against human religion against religion, rich against the poor, healthy against the sick and handicapped by illness or accident, the young against the old.
Nothing can stop this as that will cost money and the aim is to get money not to spent it.
The war lords are in power they craven for money craving for creed, ignorance or plain stupidity it all comes down to the same essence, money create creed, power and ignorance, and ignorance creates wars. Power corrupt we see that in daily life at any moment of the day and we can hear almost the hollow laugh of the Master of Evil the Money God.
The evil spirit who collect more and more souls who will depend on him, he will call for more wars for more evil more fighting, setting up religion against religion poor countries against the rich, till civilisation is lost in an all out war on earth of which the signs are already very much visible. The warlords don't call it wars they are too much cowards to do this, they call it war against terrorism, but they are the terrorists, the money will wins hands down and will triumph over the religions, they in name are still able to be there but in name only churches filled with the believers in power and money, that is all what counts, to the hell with every else. At the end, that is exactly where they will go and where the Master of Evil is waiting for them, HELL.
===================================================================
28-04-2011
The Papal dynasty.
The Pope is the spiritual head of the Roman catholic church. This supreme position belongs to the Pope from the first seconds he is elected. He is the successor of Saint Peter and therefore seen as the Vicar of Christ. Christ as it is written rules his church through this Vicar. Consequently, the Pope, although the servant of Christ, has Christ's authority in all matters of faith and conduct within the Roman catholic church. Not only is he seen as the supreme teacher of the true doctrine but also the supreme law-giver Judge and Chief administrator in the Roman Catholic church.
The first acknowledge Pope of the Roman catholic church was St. Peter, said to be born in Bethsaida in Galilee and said to have received the supreme pontifical power from Jesus himself, to be transmitted to his successors. That on itself seems to be very doubtful as it is unknown when or where Jesus placed that honour onto St.Peter as no mentioned is made in writings or the bible to confirm this. He is attributed to have established the recitation of the Pater Noster. He was several times arrested for disturbance of the peach and failing to follow the authorities instructions. It is said, however no proof is available, that he asked to be crucified up side down in respect for Jesus. He is said to have died in the year 67.
Peter and Paul stayed in that time in Rome at the home of Senator Pudens and his wife Claudia.
The second Pope was St. Lines said to be born in Volterra and said to be elected in 67 and died in 76. He created the first 15 Bishops and ordered that woman could only enter a place or worship with their head covered. Although he is commemorated at the 23th of September there is not much known of him, including the fact that it is not absolute certain that he actual did exist. The suggestion is that he could have been the brother of the wife of Senator Pudens, if not he was certainly in the recollection associated with St.Peter at the house of Senator Pudens. The story seems to be that it was Senator Pudens who controlled the early church as he was it also who sent the man of Jewish decent under the name of Aristobulus with a Roman legion to the British isles where it is said that he became a missioner in Wales.
Even less is known of the third Pope, St.Cletus actual name St. Anacletus, who was elected in 76 and died in 88 after being arrested. Problem here is that other sources give the year 80 as election and the year 92 as his death. The reason is unknown actual nothing is know about him. It is said that this Pope divided Rome into 25 parishes, while at the same time he ordained a number of priests. He was buries in the Basilica now called the St.Peter Basilica now the Vatican. He is said to have died a martyr. He is attributed that he made the rules of the consecration of Bishops. He is said to have made in the Vatican near St. Peters tomb an oratory, intended for the burial of martyrs. The problem is that the Vatican did not existed in that time and only was started to be build under Nicholas the third.
Patriarch St.Clement also known as St.Clement of Rome. was the fourth Pope. He official is listed as being elected between 88 and 92 and have to be executed in either 97 or 101 by Emperor Trajan after being sent to Gallipoli, where he was thrown into the sea with an anchor around his neck. An event that he did not survived. However there is still no clearity over what is what and who was who in that time. The conclusion must be that many of the facts of that time were made up later to suit the history. There is a clear lack of evidence for monarchical episcopacy in Rome so early in time. In fact there is only one letter proof between 96 and 100 to the church at Corinth. It is the oldest Christian document still in existence outside the new Testament. This letter confirms the apostolic authority of the clergy. There are many other so-called identifications of Clement but none of them can be taken as confirmed.
Pope Evaristus was the 5th Pope supposedly holding office between 99 and 108 also know as Aristus of which other sources say that he died in 105. It is suggested that he was from Jewish origin and elected when Emperor Domitian was in power. He is said to have founded the first 7 deaconaries which are supposedly the early beginning of the present college of Cardinals, he also established the solemn blessing after civil marriage for the Christians. Although their is severe doubt about both claims. In certain environments it is even seen as absurd.
The point, or the pontiff in this is that most of the early leaders of the Roman catholic church seems to have been coming from one place, the senator of Rome Pudens and his wife Claudia. Did they just heard the story and decided to develop it or was there someone in their household who told them the story, and then they decided to develop it. We will never know, however to stick with the facts we do know is that Peter is at some point clearly associated with the Pudens and was used or used the Pudens to get the story out. In later developments it seems that the only point that is for certain is that Peter and Paul managed to come to Rome, managed to come in Pudens home and were accepted as such as guests of the family.
Early reports are that Paul was in fact a Roman placed in the Palestine to infiltrate the many Jewish groups who were stirred against the Romans. Maybe Paul was a Pudens and as such his first place to go would have been the senators home. It does not seem likely that in those times 2 Jewish fellows were without any questions taken in by a Senator of Rome. Those Senators had to much to loose to take such a risk. Hence a family band can be presumed. In which case Paul was indeed a Roman spy. Of he still was as spy in Rome's service when he knocked at Pudens door is also not known. Fact is that he was not arrested, but as a Roman citizen began to write. He made the story of Jesus of Nazareth, the son of God, in fact he made most of the story while writing in Rome. It is in the Christian Church accepted that what he wrote was the truth, however was it, was it not simple a story made by a Roman citizen who had travelled the empire.
Nobody will ever known, all the stories about Saul of Tarsus, the blindness the cure, the journey to the Home of Senator Pudens, it was all his writing, their is no in-depended verification than his own writings. If we accept that as the truth do we have to accept then that the Lord of the Rings could be a true story, an happening that really did happen, just as the story of Jesus did happen in the writings of Paul? We did believe the claims of weapons of mass destruction by the Americans, they were false, could it be that the claim from Paul was also just a claim? And what did happen to Paul when he had finished his writings? Off to a new spy job for the Roman empire? Fact is that the death of Paul never is mentioned or recorded, we may presume that he probably died in action.
We will not know any of this unless Christ will come down to Earth to judge.
That is if he is not shot down by the Americans/British or Jewish as a terrorist first, on his way down.
The Papal dynasty.
The Pope is the spiritual head of the Roman catholic church. This supreme position belongs to the Pope from the first seconds he is elected. He is the successor of Saint Peter and therefore seen as the Vicar of Christ. Christ as it is written rules his church through this Vicar. Consequently, the Pope, although the servant of Christ, has Christ's authority in all matters of faith and conduct within the Roman catholic church. Not only is he seen as the supreme teacher of the true doctrine but also the supreme law-giver Judge and Chief administrator in the Roman Catholic church.
The first acknowledge Pope of the Roman catholic church was St. Peter, said to be born in Bethsaida in Galilee and said to have received the supreme pontifical power from Jesus himself, to be transmitted to his successors. That on itself seems to be very doubtful as it is unknown when or where Jesus placed that honour onto St.Peter as no mentioned is made in writings or the bible to confirm this. He is attributed to have established the recitation of the Pater Noster. He was several times arrested for disturbance of the peach and failing to follow the authorities instructions. It is said, however no proof is available, that he asked to be crucified up side down in respect for Jesus. He is said to have died in the year 67.
Peter and Paul stayed in that time in Rome at the home of Senator Pudens and his wife Claudia.
The second Pope was St. Lines said to be born in Volterra and said to be elected in 67 and died in 76. He created the first 15 Bishops and ordered that woman could only enter a place or worship with their head covered. Although he is commemorated at the 23th of September there is not much known of him, including the fact that it is not absolute certain that he actual did exist. The suggestion is that he could have been the brother of the wife of Senator Pudens, if not he was certainly in the recollection associated with St.Peter at the house of Senator Pudens. The story seems to be that it was Senator Pudens who controlled the early church as he was it also who sent the man of Jewish decent under the name of Aristobulus with a Roman legion to the British isles where it is said that he became a missioner in Wales.
Even less is known of the third Pope, St.Cletus actual name St. Anacletus, who was elected in 76 and died in 88 after being arrested. Problem here is that other sources give the year 80 as election and the year 92 as his death. The reason is unknown actual nothing is know about him. It is said that this Pope divided Rome into 25 parishes, while at the same time he ordained a number of priests. He was buries in the Basilica now called the St.Peter Basilica now the Vatican. He is said to have died a martyr. He is attributed that he made the rules of the consecration of Bishops. He is said to have made in the Vatican near St. Peters tomb an oratory, intended for the burial of martyrs. The problem is that the Vatican did not existed in that time and only was started to be build under Nicholas the third.
Patriarch St.Clement also known as St.Clement of Rome. was the fourth Pope. He official is listed as being elected between 88 and 92 and have to be executed in either 97 or 101 by Emperor Trajan after being sent to Gallipoli, where he was thrown into the sea with an anchor around his neck. An event that he did not survived. However there is still no clearity over what is what and who was who in that time. The conclusion must be that many of the facts of that time were made up later to suit the history. There is a clear lack of evidence for monarchical episcopacy in Rome so early in time. In fact there is only one letter proof between 96 and 100 to the church at Corinth. It is the oldest Christian document still in existence outside the new Testament. This letter confirms the apostolic authority of the clergy. There are many other so-called identifications of Clement but none of them can be taken as confirmed.
Pope Evaristus was the 5th Pope supposedly holding office between 99 and 108 also know as Aristus of which other sources say that he died in 105. It is suggested that he was from Jewish origin and elected when Emperor Domitian was in power. He is said to have founded the first 7 deaconaries which are supposedly the early beginning of the present college of Cardinals, he also established the solemn blessing after civil marriage for the Christians. Although their is severe doubt about both claims. In certain environments it is even seen as absurd.
The point, or the pontiff in this is that most of the early leaders of the Roman catholic church seems to have been coming from one place, the senator of Rome Pudens and his wife Claudia. Did they just heard the story and decided to develop it or was there someone in their household who told them the story, and then they decided to develop it. We will never know, however to stick with the facts we do know is that Peter is at some point clearly associated with the Pudens and was used or used the Pudens to get the story out. In later developments it seems that the only point that is for certain is that Peter and Paul managed to come to Rome, managed to come in Pudens home and were accepted as such as guests of the family.
Early reports are that Paul was in fact a Roman placed in the Palestine to infiltrate the many Jewish groups who were stirred against the Romans. Maybe Paul was a Pudens and as such his first place to go would have been the senators home. It does not seem likely that in those times 2 Jewish fellows were without any questions taken in by a Senator of Rome. Those Senators had to much to loose to take such a risk. Hence a family band can be presumed. In which case Paul was indeed a Roman spy. Of he still was as spy in Rome's service when he knocked at Pudens door is also not known. Fact is that he was not arrested, but as a Roman citizen began to write. He made the story of Jesus of Nazareth, the son of God, in fact he made most of the story while writing in Rome. It is in the Christian Church accepted that what he wrote was the truth, however was it, was it not simple a story made by a Roman citizen who had travelled the empire.
Nobody will ever known, all the stories about Saul of Tarsus, the blindness the cure, the journey to the Home of Senator Pudens, it was all his writing, their is no in-depended verification than his own writings. If we accept that as the truth do we have to accept then that the Lord of the Rings could be a true story, an happening that really did happen, just as the story of Jesus did happen in the writings of Paul? We did believe the claims of weapons of mass destruction by the Americans, they were false, could it be that the claim from Paul was also just a claim? And what did happen to Paul when he had finished his writings? Off to a new spy job for the Roman empire? Fact is that the death of Paul never is mentioned or recorded, we may presume that he probably died in action.
We will not know any of this unless Christ will come down to Earth to judge.
That is if he is not shot down by the Americans/British or Jewish as a terrorist first, on his way down.
======================================================================
30-04-2011
Soka Gakkai is the Faith in North Korea, but not only in North Korea but also in Japan and South Korea. So what is that Soka Gakkai which in Japan hooked themselves onto the Nicheren Buddhism but with a strong political link. They now pronounce themselves as an Japanese faith and call themselves the beacon of the spiritual world champion, is the most powerful thought leaders of all cultures. The grow is remarkable and create much power and powerful as this one make you arrogant, special as the backing of the Jewish are clearly in attendance. By such an increase they see Ikeda behind that great power.
The Soka Gakkai organization grew out of the the U.S. domination of postwar Japan, called Japan the" enemy "against the" enemy of my enemy is my friend "to take advantage of the classic lessons of the Korean people suffered from Japanese colonial rule. Soka Gakkai Aum Shinrikyo, Unification Church, The Sun Myung Moon (the moonies of the 60 years) are in fact the early Soka Gakkai in Korea. The Jewish via the Americans, Rockefeller\u2019s influence via funding created the organisation in Japan.
The leading Jewish elderly is in second-generation Koreans in Japan, Ikeda, who has the backing of power in the Soka Gakkai. The forced abandoning of the political link of the Soka Gakkai led to the forming of the Soka Gakkai International. It was immediatelyyy based on the style of the Moonies and many of the mind disabling activities were also taken over to be integrated into the Soka Gakkai International. To criticizeze the Soka Gakkai at this point would not be in the interest of this revelation it probably would drive in deeper in darkness if it would be proper investigated. Japan and Korea, are aware that were it Soka Gakkai International is concerned, there are various sources of information like the United States that are involved. SGI this are the three characters which end up as a Jewish keyword.
The set uppppp of the Soka Gakkai International would have involved U.S. intelligence agencies and the Soka Gakkai no doubt was instructed and been brainwashed by Israintelligence.nts. such as the Jewish Agency (JAFI: Jewish Agency for Israel). The World Zionist Organization (WZO: World Zionist Organization) U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). The Federal Security Agency (NSA: National Security Association). This is the reality it controls the people, it controls their mind and it ring fence them from other possible influence, by indoctrination. It is that part what makes it very dangerous. It is a step to gain control an way to conquer. The stepping stone was Iraq, then Afghanistan, now Libya, Syria, Algeria, Jordanian and the ultimate price Iran! All in the name of peace!
Soka Gakkai international is not a Buddhist organization it just uses the Nicheren form of Buddhism to attract lost souls. People who are at the end of their search for what ever they wanted in life. The promise from Ikeda that the chant will change your life and that sticking together to chant together attract the lonely souls. It has however nothing to do with Buddhism, but all with brainwashing and control. Put this brainwashing against the background of mind infiltration in which right is told to be wrong and wrong to be right as the victim, the SGI member does not dare to have an opposite voice against that of the ultimate leader Ikeda, who now have put himself forwards as a nomination for the Peach price. However it's the mind infiltration what is the reason for the peace price then indeed Obama got his one rightly so. It was his Time for a change that brainwashed the Americans to vote for him, but the only change was that he was now in total control. But there where others such as Hitler, who managed with the help of the Zionists to control the whole of the German nation for well over 10 years.
If we put that in conjunction with the increase of Rebellions, terrorism and serious crimes in the world than it is important to know that here again the main problem comes from the interference of the Jews by their occupation of Palestinian land. However not only there look at the Second World War, the First World War, they where pulling strings behind the Kennedy assassination and the Cold War and even the Russian Revolution. Drug cartels and organized crime organizations and a huge cult of Jehovah's Witnesses and the Unification Church and then you can see the Soka Gakkai International as a terrorist attack on the innocent mind. What do you think you?
It would be less inclined to criticize the SGI if they were honest and admit that in reality they do not follow nicheren but just using it for the attack on the mind and the following permanent control of that mind. It is not to us to continue to criticize them vigorously for calling themselves Nichiren Daishonin\u0092s Buddhism. We know and they know that they are not Nichiren Daishonin\u0092s disciples. They are disciples of the Three Presidents of the Soka Gakkai. Their beliefs and practices are alien to Nichiren Daishonin, particularly their cooperation and seeking common ground with every one who can be beneficial to the leader and the SGI. They use them and despise them at the same time. There is no common ground and no cooperation with or within the nichiren faith. They should be following Shakyamuni Buddha, and Nichiren Daishonin, join the Kempon Hokke and receive the banner of propagation, the Gohonzon for the Transmission of the Dharma.
We are as we where with the Moonies, familiar with the SGI tradition, however tradition does not suit their agenda of portraying the SGI as a potentially beneficial cult. So they began saying how the call to Buddha via chanting was the step needed to climb the ladder to a better life and therefore worry would be disappearing and they would be safe. The SGI philosophy is to control the mind, within a "controlling society" it is merely a matter of people whose lives are based on nothing till they join the Daishonin's teachings applying those teachings to their own fields of endeavour, thus influencing those around them and attempt them to join the cult.
This in politics, for instance, this means there will be people in government whose only motivation is truly the promotion of the SGI regardless of that is good for the people. It by no means entails a dictatorship of faith just the opposite, in fact, it should be the influence of Buddhism rising from the people into institutions, instead of the SGI institution dictating the behaviour of the people by means of mind control and indoctrination.
Soka Gakkai, means Value Creation Society, which was founded in the 1930s and grew rapidly during the desolation of the years immediately after World War II. It describes its goal as combining happiness of the individual with the prosperity of all society, and it initially targeted the less affluent. In lemans terms it means controlling the mind by indoctrination. A very dangerous way of dealing with individuals, as it creates a solid outside out casting society who do not accept anyone who does not 100% accept the rules of the SGI and his leader. A leader who have set himself high above the people not that he is but to enhance himself and receive the benefits of it. It is an old system done many times before and almost always ended in disaster. Mind control is such an disaster, only his victims do not know, just as mental disabled people live a life of ignorant happiness and so do the SGI members.
===========================================================
Other pages:
This is the text-only version of this page. Click here to see this page with graphics.
Edit this page |
Manage website
Make Your Own Website: 2-Minute-Website.com