30-10-2011

Assad's forces fracturing as revolt enters seventh month, main due to the constant interfering of foreign intervention, Syrian run a way’s in the USA and the UK are the ones who stalling and stopping any progress in Syria to bring the demonstration to an end. Mainly because these are the very people who wants the power after Asad is removed. Without their interference an other better system could have been in place, and that is something the Syrians in the USA and the UK, bankrolled by those government on condition that the next government of Syria will be an USA controlled one, and of course that all wealth in the form of oil and other useful wealth will be handed over to the Americans.

The Americans did the same deal with Iraq's Saddam, with Egypt’s Mubarrak, and since 2006 with Gaddafi, with Saaskivili in Georgia, etc .etc. So long the renegade of Syria promise to do what the Americans want they get the support they want. However, one misstep as by Saddam thinking that he was indeed in control of Iraq and he was death, Gaddafi to want the revenue of Libya for Libya was his mistake. The Talibans promise to build the pipeline they could not do was their mistake. The Syrian renegades should remember that they not only handing their country as a massive prison to America, but also giving large parts of the country away to Turkey and Israel.

The Western controlled Media with the, "We make it up as we go a long" Al Jazeera media in front are making up the stories as they indeed going along. Deaths of the many police in Syria are counted as being demonstrators. Soldiers are offered money (bribes) by the ones who want a continuation of the demonstrations, which never where demonstrations but organised rebellion by the very people who did the same in Libya. Qatar delivered the means and the money and weapons were delivered to the Der’a via Jordan. It was in that corner the so-called demonstration started. The first people killed were not innocent demonstrators as Al Jazeera said a story enlarged brought by Al Jazeera's Western Allie in the Media. However, the first people killed were policeman guarding the Mosque. 40 people were killed on 29/10/11, by Masyaf between Hom and Hama. Stomach turning, till we learned that 30 of them by the Syrian terrorists as that is what the so-called demonstrators are were in fact members of the security services trying to protect people from those armed terrorist.

Hom and Hama are on the coastal strip of land what is wanted by Turkey but also by the USA because of in the seabed found oil in the front of the coast. Man can wonder why large quantities of Turkey's man are entering Syria by Aleppo and then disappearing in the country. This infiltration which prolongs the so called demonstrations is accentuated by Turkey who wants an military intervention in Syria now a NO FLY zone is not possible because the UNSC cannot reach an solution over proposals either from Russia to solve the situation or the USA who wants his killing program in place. Turkey is a member of the now well known for their ruthlessness and their violent arrogance NATO, and it seems to be that NATO has found the back door to carry out their killing program by letting accidental an war starting between them (Turkey) and Syria. It means that if Turkey would have been a member of the EU, the EU countries would have been at war with Syria and the whole of the Middle East except the renegade countries such as Bahrain, Saudi, Qatar and the UAE.

Remember Turkey is the very country that saw his citizen slaughtered by Israel in the well known High sea piracy act and whereby Israel kidnapped a Turkey vessel. What did Turkey do in return, well actual absolute nothing then some cosmetic actions to keep the Turkey population happy but what in reality did entails to nothing. As a thank you for killing Turkey citizen Turkey is prepared to intervene in Syria so that they can give Israel the Golan Heights as a thank you for kidnapping our vessel and killing our citizen. It shows the mentality of the Turkey government and their slogan to the Americans; "We obey".
Under heading we obey we found the weirdest of situations of which the Turkey war intent is only one.

Take this one laughable but certainly not a laugh: Egypt saves face in swap of alleged Israeli spy Ilan Grapel. Egypt: Alleged Israeli "spy" released in new prisoner exchange. This BBC report says the exchange shows that "Egypt is still capable of dealing with Israel on business-like terms. This spy situation was a situation that never was, and for that reason the BBC comment was foolish and laughable. It was used them as leverage to set up a disproportionate prisoner exchange...

Take this one; the so-called Obama's con on 'no lobbyist money' pledge. This is nothing else then shameless covering of the truth. However, if you do not want your positions challenged or criticized, make up a new phobia shout it long out long enough and most people will take it over and belief it, and will use it. And it will put money under a different name in well filled pockets of many financially rewarded and follow the money people.

Or this one; There was a time when Palestinian leaders sought to conceal their goal of overrunning the Jewish state in misleading commentary for Western audiences that implied a willingness to accept coexistence with a sovereign Israel. Now, evidently, times have changed and blunt statements are deemed safe to make. The world is well aware of the Arab intentions in the old British mandate Area, and concealing is most certainly not one of them!

Obeying not your topic? well take this one, albeit without the awful toll of American blood this time, but a much larger treasure for America, the US under President Obama's triumphal leadership as he calls it being himself a man of peace, has extended the delusive utopian policy of his Republican predecessor G W Bush "Protecting the World for the Sharia law's?" to Libya. Obeying? The first thing PM Jalil the butcher did was, yes guessed right, installing the Sharia. Belief it or not but the e salient feature of Libya's new draft constitution is Part 1, Article 1: Islam is the Religion of the State, and the principal source of legislation is Islamic Jurisprudence (Sharia). There can not be a objection against Sharia laws under the Muslim population, but if dictators such as the kings of Bahrain and Saudi, or the Emir of Qatar, the butcher of Libya are saying such thing than it is used solely for the tied control of the population.

Islamic state by the will of the people, or mainly to force the will of the people to Obey! The Dutch newspaper Trouw published a long time ago, an interview with PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said: "The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism. Although incorrect, it shows the PLO to obey the US as that was the original (1947) stand point of the USA.

Someone wrote as a Palestinian I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem they cannot and therefore the one who said it was actual and obvious a Jew who said this to accelerate the situation as to rights of the Palestinians. However this person is wrong, obeying an impulse is one thing, but distorting the facts is another one. The UN independent agreement clearly set out and was as such accepted by the Jews that Israel would contain the area south of Beersheba to Eilat. The area south of Lebanon coastal side to include Jaffa, and the area south of Lebanon west of Syria including Ijam Kinneret. The Jerusalem and surrounded area would be under UN control. The Arabs rejected it but it was accepted in the UN. The wars following and the land grabbing of Israel created the present situation. In this situation has Israel the full rights to exist. However so have the Arabs regardless under what name they go. The fact that the Western Nations obey the wishes, in search of money from Israel does not alter the facts.

Col. Richard Kemp said the following:
"Islamite fighting groups study the international laws of armed conflict carefully and they understand it well. They know that a British or Israeli commander and his men are bound by international law and the rules of engagement that flow from it. They then do their utmost to exploit what they view as one of their enemy's main weaknesses. Their very modus operandi is built on the correct assumption that Western armies will normally abide by the rules, while these insurgents employ a deliberate policy of operating consistently outside international law. “This as is shown in Libya not correct, the NATO forces and the actions of some Arab nations notable Qatar, did not obey any international law, in Qatar’s case they do not accept Int. laws they only obey the law of Greed, they use but not obey the UN either. Therefore, groups counting on this point from Western Countries to obey International law are not longer relevant as it has been proven that they use but not obey the UN or international laws.

It must be in consideration on what is obeying. The Jews obeying the version of their belief. There is no proof of the correctness of the story. There is no proof that Israel is indeed historical indisputable. It is heresy and may be. A fact is that the Jews for a short period did conquer the land and forced the original inhabitants out. They in turn were slung out and the original inhabitants took over again. Fact is that in the last 1900 years or so there was no Jewish state or an Israeli country. It brings the period including the time that Israel was conquered by other countries of less then 700 years, before and after the Arabs had it as their country. In fact there are places on Earth that have seen a longer occupation of Jews then Israel. Therefore the Jews have in principle no right to every part of their so-called historic land. That the UK and the USA obeyed the Zionists was due to financial benefits for the UK and the USA.

The Israeli do now want the whole area that was under British mandate which include parts of Iraq, Saudi, all of Jordan, parts of Syria as the mandate of Britain between 1923 and 1948 did include those area's. They view the permanent solution in the framework of State of Israel which will include most of the area of the Land of Israel as it was under the rule of the British Mandate, and alongside it a Palestinian entity which will be a home to most of the Palestinian residents living in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. We would like this to be an entity which is less than a state they said, and which will independently run the lives of the Palestinians under its authority but under our control. In fact they the Arabs would have to obey the Jews in all what they are doing. They stole the land jailed the population and want more, just because they say that someone 3000 years ago said that his God told him that this land would be his. After that he left for Egypt only to return after having swindled a fortune out of an Egypt prince.

Then we have Rabin who insist that Israel retains full security control of the borders with Egypt and Jordan, contrary to Israel’s relinquishment of the Philadelphia Corridor on the border with Egypt: “The responsibility for external security along the borders with Egypt and Jordan, as well as control over the airspace above all of the territories and Gaza Strip maritime zone, remains in our hands.”
We come, we deal and then we steal, seems to be the Jewish point of view.

Israel accused the Palestinian non-compliance; they said that the authorized number of police grew from 8,000 to 40,000. Israeli estimates early in the second intifada put the number of gunmen - police, "security services," terrorists, and armed gangs - at 85,000. Their armament reportedly included not only heavy machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades, but also anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles so Israel said there is no proof of any of the statements made and is strongly denied by people who are in the know..

The reality is that, in defiance of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, which states that it is inadmissible to occupy land by force, Palestinian territories are still under foreign military occupation." Israel have ignored almost any of the over hundred UN resolutions, as one of them said famously “it is just a piece of paper” however they insist that others obey them instantly, while they obey none of them. Resolution 242 (1967) does note "the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." It also affirms the right of every state in the area "to live in peace with secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force." Here Israel said that there were no Palestinian territories and they are right it was the British Mandate over Palestine as a whole. Israel is therefore wrong The Palestine territory was part of the British mandate and as such there was a Palestinian territory. They statement from Israel; There were no "Palestinian territories." is therefore wrong., Their excuse that they had to steal the land was to protect themselves breaches Resolution 242(1967) several times. Their action therefor is unlawful, just as their refusal to obey the UN resolutions and Human right requests.

However, the UN using the power they had and the membership of only a handful of countries did give the Jews the land that belonged to the Palestinian Arabs under the British Mandate 1923/1948 and therefore it are they who have created the dangerous situation in the world. And are doing all they can to keep that dangerous situation under threat of violence. It is therefore that they want Syria to change government as a large part of Syria was part of the British mandate 1923/1948 and that is what they want for Israel that part of Syria. For America it would solve a problem as with Turkey already is obeying the USA, and could take a part of Syria, so could Iraq and Israel and with controlling Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi, Qatar and the UAE. They would have a free path to Iran the last Middle East country they do not yet control. And all of the Middle East oil would be theirs, the American dream!