18-11-2011

Many people are still in the stages of wanting to have proof before they bind themselves to an opinion. That is except where it concern a religion, this is so for the Hebrew, the Christian and the Muslim. In those cases they believe simple without any proof, they believe what they are told. They believe what they are told by their parent, by their teachers by their friends. Proof is never supplied and never wanted; the simplicity is the Book is enough. Never mind that this book was created only a 2500 years ago from here say and from father on son stories, taken from other religions and from other tribes stories. And above all that not one point in reality can be proven.

Let us first see how the origin of the Hebrew, Christians and Muslim was established. In about (rafly) 2500 years ago the Hebrews to keep the people interested in the Hebrew version of the Fertile Cresent religions, decided to create out of all that a solid one God religion, with rules and regulations mainly to control the population. Out of that became the turbilance what several times over destroyed the Israeli nation and what is still once more a possibility with their obvious death wish in the way the regard other people.

The Christians did come later a 500 years later (rafly). Again it was based on a possibility what could have been real of completely fantasised by a group of man who wanted instability in Israel.
This time it was a three in one God which took 400 years before someone took a realy close interest. At that time the original story was already many times altered added and parts where left out. It was used as by the Hebrews to control the people a mass. And as History has shown and still is showing us they still do.

Another 400 years later, again rafly, The Muslim did come into the equation. Their religion was just as the Christians based on the Hebrew story only before the birth of Christ. They too used it to control the people and they still do at some places under the so-called Sharia laws. Those laws are liberal to a certain extend but having a tied control on the believers.

We are well aware that those so-called bible scientists, who are in reality people who just have gone through a thick book, say that it could be proven. In which case they create proof what could if not looked at to close fitted into the empty spaces in the Book. That there still is no proof that they have made it look like proof without having proven it is not of their concern. Still they call it evidence. How many times are we not told that they had found the arc of Noah only that it turned out to be just the imagination running wild? Millions are spent on searches like that without that they have come on step further in confirming Adam and Eve.

On the other side of the coin we have the evolution scientist who also makes assumptions over what did really happen and act in many of time just as the creationist, the Book reader, to quick. The searches of the evolutionist are very creative for what concerns the evolution on the planet, but other scientists are more concerned about how it all started, for that they need evidence.
Those evidences come from such several disciplines as molecular biology to paleontology. Although the searches are not always perfect, they form the evidence to complement each other strongly at such a way that it is nearly inconceivable that evolution could not be real

So what about intelligent design? What about the Big Bang? After all, the Discovery Institute was founded on the idea. The Collider is building on the idea. Well, the simple and accurate answer is a simple “No”. There is not one piece of evidence that supports either idea. Irreducible complexity is just an argument from personal incredulity. Plus, the structures that are often pointed to as examples of irreducible complexity have had their evolutionary origins identified. Even the ideas that do not directly contradict intelligent design are neutral to the idea.

Intelligent design means magically created. Scientists laugh at it and Book readers actually believe it, then again if they believe the Book than they probably believe anything that is written logic or not. You are right if you say we don’t know where all the matter in the universe came from. However, this has no relevance on the theory of evolution. It is also a good point to remember that evolution is not a religion. There are a lot of Christians that believe in evolution. And we know that many Christians are in the front of the ones who say it is very hard to believe in something with almost no proof.

That is indeed rich, Christians who find it hard to believe in evolution as the evidence is not always proved. At the same time they believe in a Book of what nothing is proven. Not even a full sentence, it is all made up, names in the Book are taken from existing villages and cities to be given as names of the children born in the book. The believers in the Book want to believe that the children did have the names first and that the villages had taken over those children names.
That is just as obvious as Cain who was the eldest son of Adam who was sent away and found himself almost instantly a wife and family, although the Book tells us that Adam had only two sons. A writer’s mistake or just wishful thinking. However Christians will insist that they do not believe in evolution they believe in a divine creation that took 7 days to complete.

Then they waggling on that there is plenty of proof of Christianity. For example how could sea fossils come on a mountain slope and how did that arc come on to a mountain. An intelligent person would know the movements of the continental plates and the ice age, they would know that the Arc never existed and that most certainly never any proof is found. And the so called flood never existed. That flood must have been earth covering of up to 8 mile high, where did that water come from, even with all the water possibilities it would take years to reach that level not 40 days. There are even deluded people who have set up whole websites what they say proof that the Flood did exist and the Arc of Noah was a fact. There is no proof, and what they present is nothing else then making something what you simple could will believe but what falls in pieces at the first hurdle.

It is better to stick to the facts, and the facts are that there is no proof that the ones who created the bible were alive 2000 years before to record what did happen. To make it more obvious they did not even had a clue on what was going on. They needed a history they needed a God to keep the Hebrews together as it was all fallen apart. The fact is that it fell apart any way. And only a small part survived the fall out. Those are the Hebrew's still around the others are taken up in the surrounding tribes changed religion and are the very people the present Israel fights against in fact their own brothers.

Fact is also that we do find skeletons of dinosaurs, and other pre-historic flora and fauna, a fact. Fact is that we have to try to follow the footsteps back in time to find how it did happen.

The Colliders in the States and Europe, besides of creating earth quakes never seen before vibrations were there almost never were any, and an change of weather which is acknowledge by scientist are not caused by Global warming. Are maybe able to supply a basic answer an 9 Billion answer in fact.

Even so if they manage to find the Big Bang theory possible it does not confirms that it did happen that way only that in theory it would be possible. Let us hope that scientist will have a change to find to origin of the species before the colliders blow up earth altogether. They say that cannot happen, but then again it is a theory nothing is proven, we simple have to wait and hope we will never see it.