14-12-2011

After having said NO to the rest of Europe and now standing isolated on the side to watch how the rest of Europe will develop, Cameron the PM from the United Kingdom in Europe directed his attention inland. We know what the readers will say,” not again that Britain". However they are the headline makers even for all the wrong reasons. We know we are sitting thousands of Kilometres from that Britain but even we here in Poland feeling just as other countries in the EU of being targeted by a country that once was big but now is small and in the middle section of the worlds countries, but with a mouth and violence many times larger then any other country except the USA and Israel. So Maria Portas made a statement as that High streets should be more developed as for example the Brixton (London) market. Not that this market is doing fine but it still exist and old traders leaving and new one coming in on a still faster way.

However how well the idea may be seen from the outside, it misses to important ingredient a High street needs if it wants to lure people away from Super markets and Shopping centres. First of all the business rate are at such a height that it is almost impossible for a starter to begin let alone to finish as a proper shop. The people can be only from near by as parking in and around High streets is almost impossible, and if possible the sky high parking charges will make it in possible to shop, rates such as eight pounds an hour and higher are normal but they put easily an other twenty pounds on top of the normal shopping. In a country where poverty is rising fast almost impossibility. Even immigrants are now leaving because of it. That will please the British as they still believe that foreigners are a inferior species, for that reason they will stand behind the PM as they do not have a clue what that straight NO did entail. American News papers in Britain such as The Sun promoting this as it is the US interest to keep the British dim.

It will be obvious that the employers will take the governments actions as a lead for their actions which are more and more directed against the workers in full time but also in part time. Many par timers are on this moment shown the door as with one week to go they would have more rights and that is not the intention of the employers. They want workers part time so that they after eleven weeks can be fired with out any rights what so ever. Obvious there are many employers who have the decency to look after their workers even the part timers. Others are not exactly the employers which should run staff at all as they miss the basics of humanity, and are led by arrogance and greed.

Let us have a closer look at some of those on the wall side of Humanity. As an example a firm where I myself was treated for a foot problem while in London on a short visit. The treatment was fine although it did not solve the problem, but the arrogance of the man who did the treatment was astonishing. This man, Nick, as he presented himself of 132 St Lawrence Terrace London Golborne area near Portobello Road the Famous antique market, said he had a DC MChiril degree to treat a broad range of patients, with a particular interest in treating sports injuries and chronic conditions, and that I should react positive on his treatment, and it did not. This does not mean that others do not react positive either; others could well have a very positive experience from his treatment. In fact he could be maybe very good but with me it simple did not work, not at all.

He said that working in London means that he can see many patients with office based repetitive strain injuries and headaches. He found himself to be the man lucky enough to help professional and semi-professional sportsmen and women, from wrestlers, footballers, tennis players, rugby players and golfers to endurance runners. And said to work with coaching staff of sports teams teaching them ‘pre-habilitation’ a method of identifying and strengthening individual weaknesses before they become a problem. However where ever we asked nobody had ever heard his name and no one could explain what his degree of DC MChiril stood for.

When asked the HPC they shake their head and said none such degree was in their knowledge. The Society of Chiropodist did not recognise the degree but said that many working in the field for longer then 3 years could call themselves chiropodist and be recognised by the Society of Chiropodist and Podiatrist. However they added the degree for it was BSc//BSc in Chiropody or DPodM BSc Podiatry / Podiatric Medicine -BSc (Hons) Podiatry / Podiatric Medicine. As such they should be a member of the Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists, a fellow of the Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists or a fellow of the College of Podiatrists of the Society of Chiropodists. It could not be established in the short period we were there of he was such a fellow.

St Lawrence Terrace is in the www.golbornelife.co.uk area.
In the United Kingdom podiatry is simply the new name for chiropody. The name was changed to podiatry in 1993 as it's the international recognised name for a foot specialist and also as it's slightly more appropriate; 'podiatry' refers just to feet while 'chiropody' refers to both feet and hands.

What however what did stood out by this man beside that his treatment did not work on my was the arrogance and the sneering way of down talking that he did when I told him that the pain was still the same and that I would visit an Accident/emergency department in a hospital to have a look at my foot. Talking to a client waiting at a fish/chips bar around the corner where I told the story of my foot and why I was limping, I was told that the man Nick at the treatment centre in St. Lawrence Terrace was nice a enough to smile at customers with money but was very nasty and almost evil to others and to his staff of which some were fired for no reason.

The latest was a young mother who worked and looks after their home and child and therefore could work only part time although doing more then 30 hours a week. She lost her job because she dared to take off the day of her mothers funeral, which was as he said not allowed as it did not suited him. No sympathy for the fact that she just had lost her Mother, no sympathy that she did suffer, no he was interested in the missing day. It was of he had said your mother should have chosen another day to die as this day did not suit me. As we did not have the time or the information of that young mother we have to take the fish and chips client’s word for it.

This man stands on the side line of humanity not really belonging to it but only wanting the profit and the standing of his position if what we did hear is correct and we have no ground to doubt my own experience and the word of the fish and chip shop client. Seeing the prices he charged me he would be rich soon although as I explained his treatment had in my case no result at all, the stiff bandage from the hospital made it possible to walk again, an action he failed in. This was weeks ago, and I only was told about his absurd attitude to workers his total lack of understanding and his prolonged attention for greed, two days ago ad the same fish and chips bar, when they asked how mine foot was now, they did remember me from weeks ago. To add to this we actual did not find any sports people he actual did help. Then again we were only for 2 days in London so that our information did not reached further then the local Portobello green fitness centre.

However, this is typical for the business employment attitude in Britain at the moment. Fire them first and hope that the fired worker does not employ a solicitor. That last one is almost impossible as solicitors are expensive and in Britain indeed very expensive, opening a door for you cost you 200 pounds let alone if they start to speak at the rate of a 10 pounds a word. Legal help for the low paid is not available then only on paper but not in reality unless you are an illegal immigrant or a criminal. All other have to fight for themselves, which is not possible for those prices, hence the employers coming away with it where in other more civilised countries the law would step in.

If the workers or the Labour party would attempt to change the laws to make it better for the workers the par time workers then once again we would hear the NO from Cameron, as he also stand on the sideline human behaviour, he also stands just as the chiropodist Nick for Greed and lack of human feelings.

We do not want to stipulate that this is the norm in Britain and that all is well by us in Poland, but we do respect the rights of people, the rights of people taking decisions for them selves instead of forcing up to them by a self appointed PM. Hence Britain is getting poorer and poorer, while that kind of near human is getting rich over the workers bodies and health. That NO from PM Cameron will be sounding through Britain for a long time, it will reach the brains of the Britton not before the second half of February when they will see that the NO of PM Cameron has just taken all the money they had, out of there pocket. But it is to late then! In the time between he is entertaining the guest of Honour the self appointed "king" of Bahrain. The man best known as an evil dictator, and man who enjoys to do the torture himself is actual not only a slave of the USA but also protected by the dictator of Saudi. And of course man with those credentials is a friend of Cameron the British PM. No "NO" here against the dictator of Bahrain, instead he will reap the benefits for himself.